RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment adherence (TA) in narcolepsy is a complex phenomenon influenced by various factors beyond patient-related aspects. The management of narcolepsy involves non-pharmacological and symptomatic pharmacological treatment. Factors such as chronic daytime sleepiness, cognitive deficits, psychiatric comorbidities and adverse effects of pharmacological treatment are aspects of narcolepsy that could undermine TA, impacting patients' ability or willingness to consistently follow treatment plans. The aim of this study was to identify the factors influencing TA in narcolepsy and to determine the most significant barriers to adherence. METHODS: An online survey was conducted during the pandemic, assessing demographic and clinical data, medication usage, and adverse effects of treatment. Various questionnaires, such as the Adherence Barriers Questionnaire (ABQ) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), were utilized. The ABQ identified patient-specific barriers to medication adherence, while the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) assessed depressive symptoms. RESULTS: We analyzed 243 narcolepsy patients (77 % female, mean age 35.7 ± 12.3 years) with 71 % having narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). The average ESS score was 16.4 (SD ± 3.7). Adherence barriers (AB) were identified in 89 % of patients (216/243) based on ABQ score. The most common barriers reported were "Forgetfulness" (77 %), "Depression" (57 %), and "Side effect-driven medication reduction/stopping behavior" (49 %). Approximately 72 % of patients reported side effects from their narcolepsy medication, leading to discontinuation in 78 % of cases. A moderate correlation was found between the severity of adherence barriers (ABQ score) and levels of depression (PHQ-9 score; rs = 0.412, p = 00.000), as well as ESS score (p = . 048). The results of this study may have been influenced by the pandemic situation. CONCLUSION: Adherence barriers are common (89 %) and diverse among people with narcolepsy. Many barriers are related to excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), cognitive deficits or depressive symptoms, highlighting the importance of recognizing and addressing them for optimal TA. Medication side effects, especially occurring when polypharmacology is utilized, also significantly contribute to adherence challenges. Effective communication regarding therapy adherence and improved detection and management of EDS and depression are crucial for enhancing TA in narcolepsy patients.
Asunto(s)
Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Narcolepsia , Humanos , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Narcolepsia/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: It is hypothesized that narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) develops in genetically susceptible people who encounter environmental triggers leading to immune-mediated hypocretin-1 deficiency. The pathophysiologies of narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) remain unknown. The main aim of this study was to collect all reported immunological events before onset of a central disorder of hypersomnolence. METHODS: Medical records of 290 people with NT1, and 115 with NT2 or IH were retrospectively reviewed to extract infection and influenza vaccination history. Prevalence, distribution of immunological events, and time until hypersomnolence onset were compared between NT1 and the combined group of NT2 and IH. RESULTS: Immunological events were frequently reported before hypersomnolence disorder onset across groups. Flu and H1N1 influenza vaccination were more common in NT1, and Epstein-Barr virus and other respiratory and non-respiratory infections in NT2 and IH. Distributions of events were comparable between NT2 and IH. Rapid symptom onset within one month of infection was frequent across groups, especially after flu infection in NT1. Hypersomnolence disorder progression after an immunological event was reported in ten individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a variety of immunological triggers potentially related to NT1, including H1N1 influenza infection or vaccination, infection with other flu types, and other respiratory and non-respiratory infections. Frequent reports of immunological events (other than those reported in NT1) immediately prior to the development of NT2 and IH support the specificity of triggers for NT1, and open important new research avenues into possible underlying immunological mechanisms in NT2 and IH.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Hipersomnia Idiopática , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana , Narcolepsia , Humanos , Hipersomnia Idiopática/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/epidemiología , Narcolepsia/diagnósticoRESUMEN
AIM OF THE STUDY: The primary purpose was to examine sleep difficulties and delirium in the Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit. Secondarily, factors impacting night-time sleep duration and quality, mortality, and the impact of benzodiazepine use on sleep outcomes were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study encompassed data from 323 intensive and intermediate care unit admissions collected in the Netherlands, spanning from November 2018 to May 2020. Sleep quality was measured using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. Night-time sleep duration was nurse-reported. We investigated associations of these sleep outcomes with age, sex, length-of-stay, natural daylight, disease severity, mechanical ventilation, benzodiazepine use, and delirium using Generalized Estimating Equations models. Associations with one-year post-discharge mortality were analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: Night-time sleep duration was short (median 4.5 hours) and sleep quality poor (mean score 4.9/10). Benzodiazepine use was common (24 % of included nights) and was negatively associated with night-time sleep duration and quality (B = -0.558 and -0.533, p <.001). Delirium and overnight transfers were negatively associated with sleep quality (B = -0.716 and -1.831, p <.05). The day-to-night sleep ratio was higher in the three days before delirium onset than in non-delirious individuals (p <.05). Age, disease severity and female sex were associated with increased one-year mortality. Sleep quality was negatively, but not-significantly, associated with mortality (p =.070). CONCLUSIONS: Night-time sleep in the critical care environment has a short duration and poor quality. Benzodiazepine use was not associated with improved sleep. Sleep patterns change ahead of delirium onset. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Consistent sleep monitoring should be part of routine nursing practice, using a validated instrument like the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. Given the lack of proven efficacy of benzodiazepines in promoting sleep in critical care settings, it is vital to develop more effective sleep treatments that include non-benzodiazepine medication and sleep hygiene strategies.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Delirio , Humanos , Femenino , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidados Posteriores , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Delirio/tratamiento farmacológico , Alta del Paciente , SueñoRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVES: We examined body mass index (BMI) changes associated with sodium oxybate treatment (SXB) in pediatric patients with narcolepsy with cataplexy who participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study and an open-label continuation period. METHODS: Participants were aged 7-16 years at screening. SXB-naive participants titrated to twice-nightly dosing of SXB then entered a 2-week stable-dose period; participants taking SXB at study entry entered a 3-week stable-dose period. After a 2-week randomized withdrawal period, all participants entered an open-label safety period (OLP; main study duration: ≤ 52 weeks). Participants who completed the OLP were allowed to enter the open-label continuation period (an additional 1-2 years). BMI percentile categories were defined as underweight (< 5th), normal (5th to < 85th), overweight (≥ 85th to < 95th), and obese (≥ 95th). RESULTS: Median BMI percentile decreased from baseline to OLP week 52 in SXB-naive participants who were normal weight at baseline (decreased from 77.0 to 35.0) or overweight/obese at baseline (98.0 to 86.7). Median BMI percentile decreased to a lesser extent in participants taking twice-nightly SXB at study entry who were normal weight at baseline (54.6 to 53.0) or overweight/obese at baseline (96.5 to 88.9). Shifts in BMI category from baseline to week 52 were sometimes noted. In SXB-naive participants, 9/10 (90.0%) who were overweight became normal weight, 7/25 (28.0%) who were obese became normal weight, 3/25 (12.0%) who were obese became overweight, and 1/16 (6.3%) who was normal weight became obese. In participants taking SXB at baseline, 5/8 (62.5%) who were overweight became normal weight, 3/6 (50.0%) who were obese became overweight, 1/14 (7.1%) who was normal weight became overweight, and 2/14 (14.3%) who were normal weight became underweight. Median BMI percentiles at months 6 and 12 of the open-label continuation period were similar to those at OLP end (OLP week 52). In SXB-naive participants, the evident BMI z-score decrease over time was relative to the screening values. CONCLUSIONS: Decreases in BMI percentile and z-score, and downward shifts in BMI category, were observed within 1 year of SXB treatment in pediatric participants with narcolepsy with cataplexy. BMI decreases plateaued after approximately 1 year. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: A Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Xyrem With an Open-Label Pharmacokinetic Evaluation and Safety Extension in Pediatric Subjects With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02221869; Identifier: NCT02221869. CITATION: Dauvilliers Y, Lammers GJ, Lecendreux M, et al. Effect of sodium oxybate on body mass index in pediatric patients with narcolepsy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(3):445-454.
Asunto(s)
Cataplejía , Narcolepsia , Oxibato de Sodio , Niño , Humanos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Obesidad/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Oxibato de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Delgadez , AdolescenteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, low levels of hypocretin-1 in the cerebrospinal fluid, and a strong association with the HLA DQB1*06:02 allele. There is evidence for streptococcal infections as one pathogenic factor that may lead to NT1 as part of a multifactorial pathogenesis. Elevated titers of Antistreptolysin-O antibodies and increased inflammatory activity in response to streptococci antigens have been described in patients with NT1. Sydenham chorea (SC) results from a post-streptococcal autoimmune process targeting basal ganglia neurons. Despite this common trigger, SC has been interpreted as a misdiagnosis in a few described cases of patients who were first diagnosed with SC and later with NT1. Our goal was to analyze the association between SC and NT1. PATIENTS/METHODS: We reviewed the literature and report three patients from three European sleep centers who were diagnosed with both SC and NT1 within a few months. RESULTS: We describe the cases of one male (age 10) and two female (age 22 and 10) patients. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that in those cases both diagnoses are justified, unlike reports of previous cases in which SC was considered a misdiagnosis in patients with NT1. It remains, however, unclear if the conditions occur independently or if there is an overlap disorder- an SC-like subtype of narcolepsy with a particular sequence of symptoms. Further studies need to clarify the causality of the relationship and the pathophysiology of the reported rare association.
Asunto(s)
Cataplejía , Corea , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Narcolepsia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Corea/diagnóstico , Narcolepsia/complicaciones , Cataplejía/diagnóstico , Cataplejía/complicaciones , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/complicaciones , OrexinasRESUMEN
Excessive daytime sleepiness is the core symptom of central disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH) and can directly impair driving performance. Sleepiness is reflected in relative alterations in distal and proximal skin temperature. Therefore, we examined the predictive value of skin temperature on driving performance. Distal and proximal skin temperature and their gradient (DPG) were continuously measured in 44 participants with narcolepsy type 1, narcolepsy type 2 or idiopathic hypersomnia during a standardised 1-h driving test. Driving performance was defined as the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) per 5 km segment (equivalent to 3 min of driving). Distal and proximal skin temperature and DPG measurements were averaged over each segment and changes over segments were calculated. Mixed-effect model analyses showed a strong, quadratic association between proximal skin temperature and SDLP (p < 0.001) and a linear association between DPG and SDLP (p < 0.021). Proximal skin temperature changes over 3 to 15 min were predictive for SDLP. Moreover, SDLP increased over time (0.34 cm/segment, p < 0.001) and was higher in men than in women (3.50 cm, p = 0.012). We conclude that proximal skin temperature is a promising predictor for real-time assessment of driving performance in people with CDH.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Narcolepsy type 1 is a primary sleep disorder caused by deficient hypocretin transmission leading to excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. Opioids have been suggested to increase the number of hypocretin-producing neurons. We aimed to assess opioid use and its self-reported effect on narcolepsy type 1 symptom severity through a literature review and questionnaire study. METHODS: We systematically reviewed literature on opioid use in narcolepsy. We also recruited 100 people with narcolepsy type 1 who completed an online questionnaire on opioid use in the previous three years. The main questionnaire topics were the indication for use, and the possible effects on narcolepsy symptom severity. Structured follow-up interviews were conducted when opioid use was reported. RESULTS: The systematic literature review mainly showed improvements in narcolepsy symptom severity. Recent opioid use was reported by 16/100 questionnaire respondents, who had used 20 opioids (codeine: 7/20, tramadol: 6/20, oxycodone: 6/20, fentanyl: 1/20). Narcolepsy symptom changes were reported in 11/20. Positive effects on disturbed nocturnal sleep (9/20), excessive daytime sleepiness (4/20), hypnagogic hallucinations (3/17), cataplexy (2/18), and sleep paralysis (1/13) were most pronounced for oxycodone (4/6) and codeine (4/7). CONCLUSIONS: Opioids were relatively frequently used compared to a similarly young general Dutch sample. Oxycodone and, to a lesser extent, codeine were associated with self-reported narcolepsy symptom severity improvements. Positive changes in disturbed nocturnal sleep and daytime sleepiness were most frequently reported, while cataplexy effects were less pronounced. Randomised controlled trials are now needed to verify the potential of opioids as therapeutic agents for narcolepsy.
Asunto(s)
Cataplejía , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Narcolepsia , Humanos , Cataplejía/tratamiento farmacológico , Cataplejía/diagnóstico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Orexinas , Oxicodona/uso terapéutico , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is assumed to be caused solely by a lack of hypocretin (orexin) neurotransmission. Recently, however, we found an 88% reduction in corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)-positive neurons in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). We assessed the remaining CRH neurons in NT1 to determine whether they co-express vasopressin (AVP) to reflect upregulation. We also systematically assessed other wake-systems, since current NT1 treatments target histamine, dopamine, and norepinephrine pathways. METHODS: In postmortem tissue of people with NT1 and matched controls, we immunohistochemically stained and quantified neuronal populations expressing: CRH and AVP in the PVN, and CRH in the Barrington nucleus; the key neuronal histamine-synthesizing enzyme, histidine decarboxylase (HDC) in the hypothalamic tuberomammillary nucleus (TMN); the rate-limited-synthesizing enzyme, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), for dopamine in the mid-brain and for norepinephrine in the locus coeruleus (LC). RESULTS: In NT1, there was: a 234% increase in the percentage of CRH cells co-expressing AVP, while there was an unchanged integrated optical density of CRH staining in the Barrington nucleus; a 36% increased number of histamine neurons expressing HDC, while the number of typical human TMN neuronal profiles was unchanged; a tendency toward an increased density of TH-positive neurons in the substantia nigra compacta; while the density of TH-positive LC neurons was unchanged. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest an upregulation of activity by histamine neurons and remaining CRH neurons in NT1. This may explain earlier reports of normal basal plasma cortisol levels but lower levels after dexamethasone suppression. Alternatively, CRH neurons co-expressing AVP neurons are less vulnerable. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:762-771.
Asunto(s)
Arginina Vasopresina , Narcolepsia , Humanos , Dopamina , Histamina , Hormona Liberadora de Corticotropina , Norepinefrina/metabolismo , Narcolepsia/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Evaluation of hypersomnolence disorders ideally includes an assessment of vigilance using the short Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART). We evaluated whether this task can differentiate between hypersomnolence disorders, whether it correlates with subjective and objective sleepiness, whether it is affected by the time of day, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. PATIENTS/METHODS: We analyzed diagnostic data of 306 individuals with hypersomnolence complaints diagnosed with narcolepsy type 1 (n=100), narcolepsy type 2 (n=20), idiopathic hypersomnia (n=49), obstructive sleep apnea (n=27) and other causes or without explanatory diagnosis (n=110). We included the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), polysomnography, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and SART, which were administered five times during the day (outcomes: reaction time, total, commission and omission errors). RESULTS: The SART outcomes did not differ between groups when adjusted for relevant covariates. Higher ESS scores were associated with longer reaction times and more commission errors (p<.01). The main outcome, total errors, did not differ between times of the day. Reaction times and omission errors were impacted (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The SART quantifies disturbed vigilance, an important dimension of disorders of hypersomnolence. Results do not suggest that depressive symptoms influence SART outcomes. A practice session is advised. Testing time should be taken into account when interpreting results. We conclude that the SART does not differentiate between central disorders of hypersomnolence. It may be a helpful addition to the standard diagnostic workup and monitoring of these disorders.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Narcolepsia , Humanos , Somnolencia , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/diagnóstico , Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , VigiliaRESUMEN
Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is caused by a loss of hypocretin/orexin transmission. Risk factors include pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza A infection and immunization with Pandemrix®. Here, we dissect disease mechanisms and interactions with environmental triggers in a multi-ethnic sample of 6,073 cases and 84,856 controls. We fine-mapped GWAS signals within HLA (DQ0602, DQB1*03:01 and DPB1*04:02) and discovered seven novel associations (CD207, NAB1, IKZF4-ERBB3, CTSC, DENND1B, SIRPG, PRF1). Significant signals at TRA and DQB1*06:02 loci were found in 245 vaccination-related cases, who also shared polygenic risk. T cell receptor associations in NT1 modulated TRAJ*24, TRAJ*28 and TRBV*4-2 chain-usage. Partitioned heritability and immune cell enrichment analyses found genetic signals to be driven by dendritic and helper T cells. Lastly comorbidity analysis using data from FinnGen, suggests shared effects between NT1 and other autoimmune diseases. NT1 genetic variants shape autoimmunity and response to environmental triggers, including influenza A infection and immunization with Pandemrix®.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Narcolepsia , Humanos , Autoinmunidad/genética , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/genética , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/genética , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Narcolepsia/inducido químicamente , Narcolepsia/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Narcolepsy is a life-long disorder characterised by excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy, often arising in childhood or adolescence. Pitolisant, a selective histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist, has been approved in Europe and USA for adults with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy, with a favourable safety profile. This phase 3 study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pitolisant in children with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy. METHODS: For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multisite study, we recruited patients aged 6-17 years with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in 11 sleep centres in five countries (Italy, France, Netherlands, Russia, and Finland). Participants were required to have a Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale score of 15 or greater and to have not received psychostimulants for at least 14 days before enrolment; participants who needed anticataplectics (including sodium oxybate) were required to have been on a stable dose for at least 1 month. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with pitolisant or placebo in a 2:1 ratio at the end of screening. Randomisation was stratified by study centre and treatment was allocated using an interactive web response system. After a 4-week screening period including a 2-week baseline period, patients entered in a 4-week individual up-titration scheme from 5 mg a day to a maximum of 40 mg a day of pitolisant or placebo; treatment was administered at a stable dose for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week placebo period. For the primary analysis, we assessed pitolisant versus placebo using change in the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (UNS) total score from baseline to the end of double-blind period in the full analysis set, defined as all randomly allocated patients who received at least one dose of treatment and who had at least one baseline UNS value. A decrease in the UNS total score reflects a reduction in both excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. All adverse events were assessed in the safety population, defined as all participants who took at least one dose of study medication. An open-label follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02611687. FINDINGS: Between June 6, 2016, and April 3, 2021, we screened 115 participants and 110 were randomly assigned (mean age 12·9 [SD 3·0] years, 61 [55%] male, and 90 [82%] with cataplexy; 72 assigned to pitolisant and 38 to placebo); 107 (70 receiving pitolisant and 37 receiving placebo) completed the double-blind period. The mean adjusted difference in UNS total score from baseline to the end of the double-blind period was -6·3 (SE 1·1) in the pitolisant group and -2·6 (1·4) in the placebo group (least squares mean difference -3·7; 95% CI -6·4 to -1·0, p=0·007). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 22 (31%) of 72 patients in the pitolisant group and 13 (34%) of 38 patients in the placebo group. The most frequently reported adverse events (affecting ≥5% of patients) in either group were headache (14 [19%] in the pitolisant group and three [8%] in the placebo group) and insomnia (five [7%] in the pitolisant group and one [3%] in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION: Pitolisant treatment resulted in an improvement in narcolepsy symptoms in children, although the UNS was not validated for use in children with narcolepsy when our study began. The safety profile was similar to that reported in adults but further studies are needed to confirm long-term safety. FUNDING: Bioprojet.
Asunto(s)
Cataplejía , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Narcolepsia , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cataplejía/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Agonismo Inverso de Drogas , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess problems faced by children with type 1 narcolepsy (NT1) at school and obtain insight into potential interventions for these problems. METHODS: We recruited children and adolescents with NT1 from three Dutch sleep-wake centers. Children, parents, and teachers completed questionnaires about school functioning, interventions in the classroom, global functioning (DISABKIDS), and depressive symptoms (CDI). RESULTS: Eighteen children (7-12 years) and thirty-seven adolescents (13-19 years) with NT1 were recruited. Teachers' most frequently reported school problems were concentration problems and fatigue (reported by about 60% in both children and adolescents). The most common arrangements at school were, for children, discussing school excursions (68%) and taking a nap at school (50%) and, for adolescents, a place to nap at school (75%) and discussing school excursions (71%). Regular naps at home on the weekend (children 71% and adolescents 73%) were more common than regular naps at school (children 24% and adolescents 59%). Only a minority of individuals used other interventions. School support by specialized school workers was associated with significantly more classroom interventions (3.5 versus 1.0 in children and 5.2 versus 4.1 in adolescents) and napping at school, but not with better global functioning, lower depressive symptom levels, or napping during the weekends. CONCLUSIONS: Children with NT1 have various problems at school, even after medical treatment. Interventions to help children with NT1 within the classroom do not seem to be fully implemented. School support was associated with the higher implementation of these interventions. Longitudinal studies are warranted to examine how interventions can be better implemented within the school.
Asunto(s)
Personal Docente , Narcolepsia , Adolescente , Humanos , Niño , Narcolepsia/epidemiología , Narcolepsia/terapia , Narcolepsia/complicaciones , Instituciones Académicas , SueñoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Management of narcolepsy includes behavior strategies and symptomatic pharmacological treatment. In the general population, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common in Europe (30%), also in chronic neurological disorders (10-20%). The aim of our study was to evaluate frequency and characteristics of CAM use in German narcolepsy patients. METHODS: Demographic, disease-related data frequency and impact of CAM use were assessed in an online survey. Commonly used CAM treatments were predetermined in a questionnaire based on the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine and included the domains: (1) alternative medical systems; (2) biologically based therapies; (3) energy therapies; (4) mind-body interventions, and (5) manipulative and body-based therapies. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 254 questionnaires. Fifteen percent of participants were at the time of survey administration using CAM for narcolepsy, and an additional 18% of participants reported past use. Among the 33% of CAM users, vitamins/trace elements (54%), homoeopathy (48%) and meditation (39%) were used most frequently. 54% of the users described CAM as helpful. CAM users more frequently described having side effects from their previous medication (p = 0.001), and stated more frequently not to comply with pharmacological treatment than non-CAM users (21% vs. 8%; p = 0.024). DISCUSSION: The use of CAM in narcolepsy patients is common. Our results indicate that many patients still feel the need to improve their symptoms, sleepiness and psychological well-being in particular. Frequent medication change, the experience of adverse events and low adherence to physician-recommended medication appears more frequent in CAM users. The impact of CAM however seems to be limited.
Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias , Meditación , Narcolepsia , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , EmocionesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can impair vigilance/attention. Solriamfetol, a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved to treat EDS associated with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/day) or OSA (37.5-150 mg/day). The analysis reported here explored the use of the Sleep, Activity, Fatigue, and Task Effectiveness (SAFTE) model (used in transport industries to model performance based on accumulated sleep and circadian variability) as a substitute for healthy controls using psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) data collected during clinical studies. METHODS: Data were analyzed from two phase 2 studies of solriamfetol in adults with OSA (NCT02806895, EudraCT 2015-003930-28) or narcolepsy (NCT02806908, EudraCT 2015-003931-36). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to solriamfetol 150 mg/day (3 days) followed by 300 mg/day (4 days), or placebo (7 days), then crossed over to the other treatment. Actual task effectiveness scores were calculated from average PVT inverse reaction time (pre-dose; 2 h post-dose; 6 h post-dose). Actigraphy-derived sleep intervals were used in SAFTE to determine modeled healthy control task effectiveness scores. RESULTS: In participants with OSA (N = 31) on placebo or solriamfetol, actual and modeled healthy control task effectiveness did not differ at any time point. In participants with narcolepsy (N = 20) on placebo, actual task effectiveness at 2 h post-dose was lower than modeled healthy control task effectiveness (nominal P = 0.03), a difference not present with solriamfetol. There was no main effect of solriamfetol on actual or modeled healthy control task effectiveness across time points. CONCLUSION: This study represents a novel application of the SAFTE biomathematical model to approximate healthy controls in sleep disorder research and provides valuable lessons that may optimize future research. Future studies should perform a priori power analyses for model-tested outcomes and use sleep measures that capture sleep fragmentation characteristic of sleep disorders for sleep input (e.g., total sleep time rather than time in bed). TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02806895, EudraCT 2015-003930-28: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover On-Road Driving Study Assessing the Effect of JZP-110 on Driving Performance in Subjects With Excessive Sleepiness Due to Obstructive Sleep Apnea. NCT02806908, EudraCT 2015-003931-36: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover On-Road Driving Study Assessing the Effect of JZP-110 on Driving Performance in Subjects With Excessive Sleepiness Due to Narcolepsy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of solriamfetol, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, on on-the-road driving performance in participants with narcolepsy. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, driving performance during a 1 h on-road driving test was assessed at 2 and 6 h post-dose following 7 days of treatment with solriamfetol (150 mg/day for 3 days, followed by 300 mg/day for 4 days) or placebo. The primary endpoint was standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) at 2 h post-dose. RESULTS: The study included 24 participants (54% male; mean age, 40 years); 22 had evaluable SDLP data. At 2 h post-dose, median SDLP was significantly lower (improved) with solriamfetol compared with placebo (19.08 vs. 20.46 cm [median difference, -1.9 cm], p = 0.002). Four participants on solriamfetol and 7 on placebo had incomplete driving tests. At 6 h post-dose, median SDLP was not statistically significantly different with solriamfetol compared with placebo (19.59 vs. 19.78 cm [median difference, -1.1 cm], p = 0.125). Three participants on solriamfetol and 10 on placebo had incomplete driving tests. Common adverse events (≥5%) included headache, decreased appetite, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: Solriamfetol 300 mg/day improved on-the-road driving performance, at 2 h post-administration in participants with narcolepsy.
Asunto(s)
Conducción de Automóvil , Narcolepsia , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios Cruzados , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Carbamatos/efectos adversos , Fenilalanina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This analysis characterized changes in weight in participants with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or narcolepsy treated with solriamfetol (Sunosi™) 37.5 (OSA only), 75, 150, or 300 mg/d. METHODS: In two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and one 1-year open-label extension study, changes in weight were evaluated from baseline to end of study (week 12 or week 40 of the open-label extension [after up to 52 weeks of solriamfetol treatment]) in participants with OSA or narcolepsy. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of solriamfetol treatment, median percent change in weight from baseline across all solriamfetol doses was -0.84%, compared with 0.54% for placebo, in participants with OSA; and -0.07%, compared with 3.08% for placebo, in participants with narcolepsy. After up to 52 weeks of solriamfetol treatment, overall median percent change in weight from baseline was -1.76%, which showed a dose-dependent pattern (75 mg, 0.57%; 150 mg, -1.2%; 300 mg, -2.5%). Results were similar in subgroups of participants with OSA or narcolepsy, with overall median percent changes in weight of -2.2% and -1.1%, respectively. After up to 52 weeks of solriamfetol treatment, the percentage of participants with weight loss ≥5% relative to baseline was 25.7% overall and increased in a dose-dependent manner (75 mg, 4.5%; 150 mg, 17.3%; 300 mg, 32.4%). Results were similar among subgroups of participants with OSA or narcolepsy, with 26.4% and 24.2% of participants experiencing weight loss ≥5%, respectively. No weight-related treatment-emergent adverse events were serious. CONCLUSIONS: Solriamfetol treatment was associated with decreases in body weight in a dose-related manner.
Asunto(s)
Narcolepsia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Narcolepsia/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Pérdida de Peso , Peso CorporalRESUMEN
Lifestyle adjustment, in combination with symptomatic pharmacologic treatment, allows most patients, particularly those with an inability to stay awake during the day, to live a relatively normal life. New pharmacologic substances show encouraging results in phase 2 and 3 studies to improve the current situation. More dedicated studies in IH, particularly in those who suffer from an increased need for sleep, are needed.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Narcolepsia , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Sueño , VigiliaRESUMEN
The brain activation patterns related to sleep resistance remain to be discovered in health and disease. The maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) is an objective neuropsychological assessment often used to assess an individual's ability to resist sleep. It is frequently used in narcolepsy type 1, a disorder characterized by impaired sleep-wake control and the inability to resist daytime sleep. We investigated the neural correlates of active sleep resistance in 12 drug-free people with narcolepsy type 1 and 12 healthy controls. Simultaneous fMRI-EEG measurements were recorded during five cycles of two alternating conditions of active sleep resistance and waking rest. Cleaned EEG signals were used to verify wakefulness and task adherence. Pooling both subject groups, significantly higher fMRI activation when actively resisting sleep was seen in the brainstem, superior cerebellum, bilateral thalamus and visual cortices. In controls the activation clusters were generally smaller compared to patients and no significant activation was seen in the brainstem. Formal comparison between groups only found a significantly higher left primary visual cortex activation in patients during active sleep resistance. The active sleep resistance paradigm is a feasible fMRI task to study sleep resistance and induces evident arousal- and visual-related activity. Significantly higher left primary visual cortical activation in patients could be caused by an enhanced need of visual focus to resist sleep, or reflecting a more rapid descent in their level of alertness when resting.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Narcolepsy type-1 (NT1) is a rare chronic neurological sleep disorder with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) as usual first and cataplexy as pathognomonic symptom. Shortening the NT1 diagnostic delay is the key to reduce disease burden and related low quality of life. Here we investigated the changes of diagnostic delay over the diagnostic years (1990-2018) and the factors associated with the delay in Europe. Patients and Methods: We analyzed 580 NT1 patients (male: 325, female: 255) from 12 European countries using the European Narcolepsy Network database. We combined machine learning and linear mixed-effect regression to identify factors associated with the delay. Results: The mean age at EDS onset and diagnosis of our patients was 20.9±11.8 (mean ± standard deviation) and 30.5±14.9 years old, respectively. Their mean and median diagnostic delay was 9.7±11.5 and 5.3 (interquartile range: 1.7-13.2 years) years, respectively. We did not find significant differences in the diagnostic delay over years in either the whole dataset or in individual countries, although the delay showed significant differences in various countries. The number of patients with short (≤2-year) and long (≥13-year) diagnostic delay equally increased over decades, suggesting that subgroups of NT1 patients with variable disease progression may co-exist. Younger age at cataplexy onset, longer interval between EDS and cataplexy onsets, lower cataplexy frequency, shorter duration of irresistible daytime sleep, lower daytime REM sleep propensity, and being female are associated with longer diagnostic delay. Conclusion: Our findings contrast the results of previous studies reporting shorter delay over time which is confounded by calendar year, because they characterized the changes in diagnostic delay over the symptom onset year. Our study indicates that new strategies such as increasing media attention/awareness and developing new biomarkers are needed to better detect EDS, cataplexy, and changes of nocturnal sleep in narcolepsy, in order to shorten the diagnostic interval.