Acute Kidney Injury and Renal Replacement Therapy in COVID-19 Versus Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potentially fatal complication of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Binding of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, to its viral receptor, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), results in viral entry and may cause AKI. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the frequencies of AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill COVID-19 patients and compared those frequencies with patients who were infected by respiratory viruses that bind or downregulate ACE2 (ACE2-associated viruses) and viruses that do not bind nor downregulate ACE2 (non-ACE2-associated viruses). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Observational studies on COVID-19 and other respiratory viral infections reporting AKI and RRT were included. The exclusion criteria were non-English articles, non-peer-reviewed articles, review articles, studies that included patients under the age of 18, studies including fewer than 10 patients, and studies not reporting AKI and RRT rates. PATIENTS: Adult COVID-19, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and influenza patients. MEASUREMENTS: We extracted the following data from the included studies: author, year, study location, age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, shock, vasopressor use, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU mortality, AKI, and RRT. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE for articles reporting AKI or RRT. AKI was defined by authors of included studies. Critical illness was defined by ICU admission. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates for the AKI and RRT rate within each virus group using a random intercept logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 23 655 hospitalized, critically ill COVID-19 patients, AKI frequencies were not significantly different between COVID-19 patients (51%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 44%-57%) and critically ill patients infected with ACE2-associated (56%, 95% CI: 37%-74%, P = .610) or non-ACE2-associated viruses (63%, 95% CI: 43%-79%, P = .255). Pooled RRT rates were also not significantly different between critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (20%, 95% CI: 16%-24%) and ACE2-associated viruses (18%, 95% CI: 8%-33%, P = .747). RRT rates for both COVID-19 and ACE2-associated viruses were significantly different (P < .001 for both) from non-ACE2-associated viruses (49%, 95% CI: 44%-54%). After adjusting for shock or vasopressor use, AKI and RRT rates were not significantly different between groups. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include the heterogeneity of definitions of AKI that were used across different virus studies. We could not match severity of infection or do propensity matching across studies. Most of the included studies were conducted in retrospective fashion. Last, we did not include non-English publications. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that viral ACE2 association does not significantly alter the rates of AKI and RRT among critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. However, the rate of RRT is lower in patients with COVID-19 or ACE2-associated viruses when compared with patients infected with non-ACE2-binding viruses, which might partly be due to the lower frequencies of shock and use of vasopressors in these two virus groups. Prospective studies are necessary to demonstrate whether modulation of the ACE2 axis with Renin-Angiotensin System inhibitors impacts the rates of AKI and whether they are beneficial or harmful in COVID-19 patients.

MISE EN CONTEXTE: L'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) est une complication potentiellement mortelle de la maladie à coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19). Obligatoire du Coronavirus 2 du Syndrome Respiratoire Aigu Sévère (SARS-CoV-2), le virus responsable du COVID-19, à son récepteur, l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine 2 (ACE2), entraîne une entrée virale et peut provoquer une IRA. OBJECTIFS DE L'ÉTUDE: Nous avons effectué une revue systématique et une méta-analyse des fréquences de l'IRA et de la thérapie de remplacement renal (RRT) chez les patients COVID-19 gravement malades et a comparé ces fréquences avec les patients qui ont été infectés par des voies respiratoires virus qui lient ou régulent négativement l'ACE2 (virus associés à l'ACE2) et les virus qui ne régulent pas négativement ni ne lient l'ACE2 (virus non associés à l'ACE2). CADRE ET TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Revue systématique et méta-analyse. Des études d'observation sur le COVID-19 et d'autres infections virales respiratoires signalant une AKI et une RRT ont été incluses. Les critères d'exclusion étaient des articles non anglophones, des articles non évalués par des pairs, des articles de revue, des études incluant des patients moins de 18 ans, les études incluant moins de 10 patients et les études ne rapportant pas les taux d'IRA et de RRT. PATIENTS: Adultes COVID-19, syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère (SRAS), syndrome respiratoire du Moyen-Orient (MERS) et malades de la grippe. MESURES: Nous avons extrait les données suivantes des études incluses : auteur, année, lieu de l'étude, âge, sexe, race, diabète sucré, hypertension, maladie rénale chronique, état de choc, utilisation de vasopresseurs, mortalité, admission en unité de soins intensifs (USI), Mortalité en soins intensifs, AKI et RRT. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons systématiquement recherché dans PubMed et EMBASE les articles rapportant AKI ou RRT. AKI a été défini par les auteurs des études incluses. La maladie grave a été définie par l'admission aux soins intensifs. Nous avons effectué une méta-analyse à effets aléatoires pour calculer estimations regroupées pour le taux d'IRA et de RRT au sein de chaque groupe de virus à l'aide d'un modèle de régression logistique d'interception aléatoire. RÉSULTATS: Sur 23 655 patients hospitalisés et gravement malades COVID-19, les fréquences AKI n'étaient pas significativement différentes entre patients COVID-19 (51 %, intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC] : 44 %-57 %) et patients gravement malades infectés par l'ACE2 associé (56 %, IC à 95 % : 37 % à 74 %, P = 0,610) ou des virus non associés à l'ACE2 (63 %, IC à 95 % : 43 % à 79 %, P = 0,255). Tarifs RRT groupés n'étaient pas non plus significativement différents entre les patients hospitalisés gravement malades atteints de COVID-19 (20 %, IC à 95 % : 16 % à 24 %) et virus associés à l'ACE2 (18 %, IC à 95 % : 8 % à 33 %, P = 0,747). Taux de RRT pour les virus associés au COVID-19 et à l'ACE2 étaient significativement différents (P < 0,001 pour les deux) des virus non associés à l'ACE2 (49 %, IC à 95 % : 44 % à 54 %). Après ajustement pour le choc ou l'utilisation de vasopresseurs, les taux d'IRA et de RRT n'étaient pas significativement différents entre les groupes. LIMITES DE L'ÉTUDE: Les limites de cette étude incluent l'hétérogénéité des définitions de l'IRA qui ont été utilisées pour différents virus études. Nous n'avons pas pu faire correspondre la gravité de l'infection ou faire une correspondance de propension entre les études. La plupart des études incluses ont été menées de manière rétrospective. Enfin, nous n'avons pas inclus les publications non anglophones. CONCLUSIONS: Nos résultats suggèrent que l'association virale ACE2 ne modifie pas de manière significative les taux d'IRA et de RRT parmi les patients gravement malades admis aux soins intensifs. Cependant, le taux de RRT est plus faible chez les patients atteints de COVID-19 ou associés à l'ACE2 virus par rapport aux patients infectés par des virus ne se liant pas à l'ACE2, ce qui pourrait être dû en partie à la plus faible fréquences de choc et utilisation de vasopresseurs dans ces deux groupes de virus. Des études prospectives sont nécessaires pour démontrer si la modulation de l'axe ACE2 avec les inhibiteurs du système rénine-angiotensine a un impact sur les taux d'IRA et si ells sont bénéfiques ou nocifs chez les patients COVID-19.

[Covid-19 in Côte d'Ivoire (March 2020 - April 2021) a year under the seal of the Coronavirus]. / La Covid-19 en Côte d'Ivoire (mars 2020 - avril 2021) une année sous le sceau du coronavirus.

After a year of coronavirus epidemic, Côte d'Ivoire is completing a third wave of Covid-19. Although the epidemic has been confined mainly to Greater Abidjan, thanks in particular to the isolation measures imposed on the Ivorian economic capital, the impact of the health crisis has nevertheless been marked. Like other West African countries, Côte d'Ivoire did not experience the epidemic tsunami that some predicted in March 2020, but more than 45 000 cases and nearly 300 deaths have been reported, although these figures underestimate the epidemiological reality. With the advent of vaccination, Côte d'Ivoire hopes to control the epidemic, but the possible circulation of variants, particularly South African variants, and the difficulties in obtaining vaccine doses are challenges that the Ivorian health authorities will have to overcome. The resilience of the population has been significant during this crisis, illustrating the ability of Ivorians to withstand the impact of this crisis.

Protocol adherence for continuously titrated interventions in randomized trials: an overview of the current methodology and case study.

BACKGROUND: The standard definition for protocol adherence is the proportion of all scheduled doses that are delivered. In clinical research, this definition has several limitations when evaluating protocol adherence in trials that study interventions requiring continuous titration. DISCUSSION: Building upon a specific case study, we analyzed a recent trial of a continuously titrated intervention to assess the impact of different definitions of protocol deviations on the interpretation of protocol adherence. The OVATION pilot trial was an open-label randomized controlled trial of higher (75-80 mmHg) versus lower (60-65 mmHg) mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets for vasopressor therapy in shock. In this trial, potential protocol deviations were defined as MAP values outside the targeted range for >4 consecutive hours during vasopressor therapy without synchronous and consistent adjustments of vasopressor doses. An adjudication committee reviewed each potential deviation to determine if it was clinically-justified or not. There are four reasons for this contextual measurement and reporting of protocol adherence. First, between-arm separation is a robust measure of adherence to complex protocols. Second, adherence assessed by protocol deviations varies in function of the definition of deviations and the frequency of measurements. Third, distinguishing clinically-justified vs. not clinically-justified protocol deviations acknowledges clinically sensible bedside decision-making and offers a clear terminology before the trial begins. Finally, multiple metrics exist to report protocol deviations, which provides different information but complementary information on protocol adherence. CONCLUSIONS: In trials of interventions requiring continuous titration, metrics used for defining protocol deviations have a considerable impact on the interpretation of protocol adherence. Definitions for protocol deviations should be prespecified and correlated with between-arm separation, if it can be measured.

[Evaluation of the benefit of different complementary exams in the search for a TB diagnosis algorithm for HIV patients put on ART in Niamey, Niger]. / Évaluation du bénéfice apporté par des examens complémentaires pour le diagnostic de la tuberculose chez des patients infectés par le VIH mis sous ARV à Niamey, Niger.

In Niger, the tuberculosis (TB) screening among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLHIV) is nonsystematic and the use of additional tests is very often limited. The objective of this research is to evaluate the performance and the cost-effectiveness of various paraclinical testing strategies of TB among adult patients with HIV, using available tests in routine for patients cared in Niamey. This is a multicentric prospective intervention study performed in Niamey between 2010 and 2013. TB screening has been sought in newly diagnosed PLHIV, before ART treatment, performing consistently: a sputum examination by MZN (Ziehl-Nielsen staining) and microscopy fluorescence (MIF), chest radiography (CR), and abdominal ultrasound. The performance of these different tests was calculated using sputum culture as a gold standard. The various examinations were then combined in different algorithms. The cost-effectiveness of different algorithms was assessed by calculating the money needed to prevent a patient, put on ART, dying of TB. Between November 2010 and November 2012, 509 PLHIV were included. TB was diagnosed in 78 patients (15.3%), including 35 pulmonary forms, 24 ganglion, and 19 multifocal. The sensitivity of the evaluated algorithms varied between 0.35 and 0.85. The specificity ranged from 0.85 to 0.97. The most costeffective algorithm was the one involving MIF and CR. We recommend implementing a systematic and free direct examination of sputum by MIF and a CR for the detection of TB among newly diagnosed PLHIV in Niger.

Role of safety-engineered devices in preventing needlestick injuries in 32 French hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety-engineered devices (SEDs) with respect to their effectiveness in preventing needlestick injuries (NSIs) in healthcare settings and their importance among other preventive measures. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective survey with a 1-year follow-up period during which all incident NSIs and their circumstances were reported. Data were prospectively collected during a 12-month period from April 1999 through March 2000. The procedures for which the risk of NSI was high were also reported 1 week per quarter to estimate procedure-specific NSI rates. Device types were documented. Because SEDs were not in use when a similar survey was conducted in 1990, their impact was also evaluated by comparing findings from the recent and previous surveys. SETTING: A total of 102 medical units from 32 hospitals in France. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,506 nurses in medical or intensive care units. RESULTS: A total of 110 NSIs occurring during at-risk procedures performed by nurses were documented. According to data from the 2000 survey, use of SEDs during phlebotomy procedures was associated with a 74% lower risk (P<.01). The mean NSI rate for all relevant nursing procedures was estimated to be 4.72 cases per 100,000 procedures, for a 75% decrease since 1990 (P<.01); however, the decrease in NSI rates varied considerably according to procedure type. Between 1990 and 2000, decreases in the NSI rates for each procedure were strongly correlated with increases in the frequency of SED use (r=0.88; P<.02). CONCLUSION: In this French hospital network, the use of SEDs was associated with a significantly lower NSI rate and was probably the most important preventive factor.

[Contribution of the vascular interstitial matrix to induced contraction by angiotensin II. In vitro studies on the rabbit aorta, mesenteric artery and vein]. / Contribution de la matrice interstitielle vasculaire à la contraction induite par l'angiotensine II. Etudes in vitro sur l'aorte, l'artère et la veine mésentériques du lapin.

This study examines the contribution of hyaluronan, a rich anionic glycoprotein, to angiotensin-II-induced contraction (AII: 10(-11) to 10(-8) M) of endothelium-free strips of aorta, mesenteric artery and vein obtained from normal rabbits. Tissues are treated with hyaluronidase (HYAL: 1 mg/ml) during 60 min before being mounted in organ baths superfused with normal Krebs solution for isotonic contraction. Isotonic contraction of the mesenteric artery to the four highest doses of AII is reduced by 50 to 60% following HYAL treatment, compared to the normal contraction curve (0.01 < p < 0.001). Isotonic contraction of the aorta and mesenteric vein to AII is not influenced by HYAL. Isometric contraction curves of the three tissues to AII are not modified by HYAL. In additional experiments, the Krebs solution was selectively enriched in calcium (3.8 mM/l) and in sodium (160 mEq/l) to verify if the effect of HYAL is associated with interstitial washing in the concentration of these cations, because of the hyaluronan digestion. In fact, the calcium-rich superfusion is associated with complete correction of the HYAL-induced reduction of the mesenteric artery isotonic contraction. The sodium-rich superfusion failed to normalize the depressed mesenteric artery contraction. Since HYAL only affected isotonic contraction of the resistance artery (mesenteric), it is likely that the interstitial space of this tissue contains more hyaluronan than the aortic or mesenteric vein matrix, or that HYAL only affected the smooth muscle cell population involved in the circular tonus of the resistance vessel. Correction of the abnormality by calcium enrichment of the Krebs solution suggests that a relative diminution and/or a redistribution of this important cation, obtained following the interstitial degradation of hyaluronan.