Comparative Study for Surgical Treatment of Acute Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Lesions Using the Modified Suture-Button Fixation Versus Static Syndesmotic Screw Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Several techniques to treat acute distal tibiofibular instability are described consisting in static and dynamic fixation procedures. The aim of our work is to compare the outcomes of acute syndesmotic injury fixation between the modified technique of dynamic fixation using the suture-button principle as an efficient and low-cost method and the classic static fixation. METHODS: It is a prospective study including patients presenting with acute syndesmotic injury. After fracture fixation, residual syndesmotic instability was managed using syndesmotic screw in group A and dynamic fixation with a double Ethibond suture in group B. Functional results were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS) score. Radiological evaluation was done by a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan of both ankles and plain X-rays of the ankle after surgery and at 18 months. RESULTS: Group A included 20 patients meanwhile 35 patients were in group B. The reduction was satisfactory in the 2 groups according to the postoperative CT scan measurements. The mean healing time in group A was 49.65 days and 51.49 days in group B (P = .45). We did not find any significant difference in terms of loss of reduction in the 2 groups. The return to work was faster in group B (P = .04). Patients in group B had better AOFAS score (P = .03) and ankle range of motion than those in group A. The difference was statistically significant (P = .02 for dorsal flexion and P = .001 for plantar flexion). For group A, we did not note any early complications. Meanwhile, 7 patients developed skin complications in group B (P = .03). However, no significant difference was found in terms of late complications. CONCLUSIONS: The modified dynamic suture-button fixation remains a therapeutic alternative in low-income countries that could achieve better outcomes than static fixation, with easy postoperative follow-up. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Risk factors for malunion of distal tibia fractures treated by intramedullary nailing.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of distal tibia fractures (DTF) has historically been a difficult challenge for orthopedic surgeons because of the particular characteristics of this anatomical region. Intra medullary nailing (IMN) remains the best treatment option. However, achieving and maintaining perfect reduction and stable fixation with IMN can be technically challenging due to the large medullary cavity within a short distal fragment. The aim of our study is to determine the risk factors for malunion in DTF treated with IMN. METHODS: It is a retrospective study including DTF treated surgically by IMN in the Orthopedics and Trauma Department at a tertiary hospital over a period of 7 years. The quality of reduction was evaluated by radiological assessment of the antero-posterior (AP) and lateral views of the tibia and ankle at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Our series included 90 patients with an average age of 44.8 years. Sex-ratio was 2.6. Tobacco use was reported in 35.6% of the patients. Diabetes was present in 11.1% of the patients, and 12.2% of them had open fractures. According to the OTA/AO classification, the majority of injuries were classified as type A1 (76.7%). Fibula fractures were present in 86.7% of cases. The mean follow-up was 48 months. Malunion occurred in 13 cases. Based on the univariate analysis, smoking and dynamic fixation were significantly associated with malunion. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, dynamic fixation was found to be a significant factor that increased the risk of malunion by 7.5 times. CONCLUSION: Neither patient demographics nor fracture characteristics were risk factors for malunion. Nevertheless, it should be noted that dynamic nailing must be avoided as it is associated with a higher risk of malunion. Furthermore, one to two medial to lateral distal locking screws provide sufficient stability without the need for additional fibular fixation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Comparison of the results of the synthesis of Schatzker II and III tibial plateau fractures by screwing versus plate.

PURPOSE: Lateral tibial plateau fractures with depression are the most common. Their treatment is currently surgical. Many therapeutic procedures have been described. Our aim is to evaluate the results of open surgery and to compare the two internal fixation methods used: lag screw versus plates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative study of two series of tibial plateau fractures Schatzker types II and III treated surgically over a period of ten years with two different methods: Group A: Internal fixation using screws for 86 patients. Group B: Internal fixation using plates for 71 patients. Functional and anatomical results were assessed according to Rasmussen's clinical and radiological scores. RESULTS: The patients' average age was 44 years (range from 18 to 76). The male gender was predominant (104 males and 53 females). Road traffic accidents were the most common aetiology with over two thirds of the cases. The fractures were type Schatzker II in 61% of the cases. The mean follow-up was five years. Although the clinical and radiological Rasmussen scores were better in group A (internal fixation with lag screws), those differences were statistically insignificant (p = 0.6 and p = 0.8). Group A clinical and radiological scores were 26.06 and 16.57, respectively and those of group B were 25.72 and 16.45. We noticed more sepsis and skin complications and a longer operating time (95 min versus 70 min) in group B patients with a statistically significant difference. None of the patients of our series had bone grafting. CONCLUSION: For Schatzker II and III fractures, an internal fixation with lag screws would be preferable when possible especially in the case of a pure depression fracture. It yields satisfactory results with a shorter operating time and less complication rate.