Biallelic variants in NSUN6 cause an autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorder.

PURPOSE: 5-methylcytosine RNA modifications are driven by NSUN methyltransferases. Although variants in NSUN2 and NSUN3 were associated with neurodevelopmental diseases, the physiological role of NSUN6 modifications on transfer RNAs and messenger RNAs remained elusive. METHODS: We combined exome sequencing of consanguineous families with functional characterization to identify a new neurodevelopmental disorder gene. RESULTS: We identified 3 unrelated consanguineous families with deleterious homozygous variants in NSUN6. Two of these variants are predicted to be loss-of-function. One maps to the first exon and is predicted to lead to the absence of NSUN6 via nonsense-mediated decay, whereas we showed that the other maps to the last exon and encodes a protein that does not fold correctly. Likewise, we demonstrated that the missense variant identified in the third family has lost its enzymatic activity and is unable to bind the methyl donor S-adenosyl-L-methionine. The affected individuals present with developmental delay, intellectual disability, motor delay, and behavioral anomalies. Homozygous ablation of the NSUN6 ortholog in Drosophila led to locomotion and learning impairment. CONCLUSION: Our data provide evidence that biallelic pathogenic variants in NSUN6 cause one form of autosomal recessive intellectual disability, establishing another link between RNA modification and cognition.

Exome-First Strategy in Adult Patients With CKD: A Cohort Study.

Introduction: Exome sequencing (ES) has widened the field of nephrogenomics in adult nephrology. In addition to reporting the diagnostic yield of ES in an adult cohort study, we investigated the clinical implications of molecular diagnosis and developed a clinical score to predict the probability of obtaining positive result. Methods: From September 2018 we have used ES to prospectively perform a first-tier liberal exploration of adult nephropathies of unknown origin and/or when a genetic kidney disease was clinically suggested. We also analyzed copy number variant using the same assay. Results: Molecular diagnosis was made in 127 of 538 patients sequenced (diagnostic yield: 24%), comprising 47 distinct monogenic disorders. Eight of these monogenic disorders (17% [8/47]) accounted for 52% of genetic diagnoses. In 98% (n = 125/127) of the patients, the genetic information was reported to have major clinical implications. We developed a 4-value clinical score to predict the probability of obtaining a molecular diagnosis (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC] 0.726 [95% confidence interval: 0.670-0.782]) (available at http://allogenomics.com/score). Conclusion: This study reinforces the role of ES as a first-tier exploration for adult chronic kidney disease patients in whom phenotypes are often poor and atypical. Although external validation is required, our clinical score could be a useful tool for the implementation of nephrogenomics in adults.