An analysis of analgesia and opioid prescribing for veterans after thoracic surgery.

The opioid crisis is a public health issue and has been linked to physician overprescribing. Pain management after thoracic surgery is not standardized at many centers, and we hypothesized that excessive narcotics were being dispensed on discharge. As a quality improvement initiative, we sought to understand current prescribing practices to better align the amount of opioids dispensed on discharge to actual patient needs. This was a single-center, retrospective review of patients undergoing thoracic surgery from 7/2015 to 7/2018. Demographics, operative data, perioperative pain medication use, and discharge pain medication prescriptions were analyzed. Opioids were converted to Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME). Among 124 patients, 103 (83%) received intraoperative nerve blocks and 106 (85.5%) used PCAs. Prescribed MME/day at discharge were significantly higher than MME/day received during hospitalization (Median 30 [IQR 30-45] vs. 15 [IQR 5-24], p < 0.001) and were not associated with receiving a nerve block or PCA. By procedure, prescribed MME/day were significantly higher than inpatient MME/day for wedge resections (p < 0.001), segmentectomies (p = 0.02), lobectomies (p = 0.003), and thymectomies (p = 0.02). Patients are being discharged with significantly more opioids than they are using as inpatients. Education among prescribers and a standardized approach with patient-specific dosing may reduce excessive opioid dispensing.

Nudging Emergency Care Providers to Reduce Opioid Prescribing Using Peer Norm Comparison Feedback: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and potential impact of using audit and feedback (A&F) with or without peer norm comparison on opioid prescribing by emergency medicine providers. METHODS: A convenience sample of 37 emergency medicine providers were recruited from 16 emergency departments in Western Pennsylvania for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants completed a baseline survey, were randomly allocated to A&F (N = 17) or A&F with peer norm comparison (N = 20), and were asked to complete a postintervention survey. We matched each participant 1:1 to a control who was not exposed to either intervention. RESULTS: At baseline, 57% of participants perceived that they prescribed opioids at the same frequency as their peers, whereas 32% perceived prescribing less than and 11% perceived prescribing more than their peers. Most participants rated the interventions as helpful, with no differences between conditions. For the A&F with peer norm comparison condition, from pre- to postintervention, there was a relative increase of 20% in the percentage of participants who perceived that they prescribed more opioids than their peers but no change in the A&F condition (P = 0.02). 56.8% of controls, 52.9% of A&F participants, and 75.5% of A&F with peer norm comparison participants reduced their opioid prescribing (P = 0.33). The mean reduction in opioid prescriptions (SD) was 3.3. (9.6) for controls, 3.9 (10.5) for A&F, and 7.3 (7.8) for A&F with peer norm comparison (P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Audit and feedback interventions with peer norm comparisons are helpful to providers, can alter perceptions about prescribing norms, and are a potentially effective way to alter ED providers' opioid prescribing behavior.

Do electronic health record prompts increase take-home naloxone administration for emergency department patients after an opioid overdose?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Distribution of take-home naloxone (THN) to emergency department (ED) patients who have survived an opioid overdose (OD) could reduce future opioid mortality, but is not commonly performed. We examined whether electronic health record (EHR) prompts provided to ED physicians when discharging a patient after an OD could improve THN distribution. DESIGN: Interrupted time-series analysis to compare the percentage of OD patients who received THN during the 11 months before and after implementation of an EHR prompt on 18 June 2017. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3492 adult patients with diagnoses of OD discharged from nine EDs in a single health system in Western Pennsylvania from July 2016 to April 2018. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: The EHR prompt was triggered by the presence of specific terms in the nurse's initial assessment note. The EHR displayed a pop-up window during the ED physician discharge process asking the physician to consider prescribing or providing naloxone to the patient. The comparator was 'no EHR prompt'. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements were based on standard criteria from ICD diagnostic codes and chief complaint keywords. FINDINGS: In July 2016, 16.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 14.0, 18.5] of OD patients received THN, which decreased every month through June 2017 by 1.2% (P < 0.0001, 95% CI = 0.8,1.7). For each month post-EHR prompt there was an increase of 2.8% of OD patients receiving THN (P < 0.001, 95% CI = 2.0, 3.5). No increases occurred in the ED with the highest pre-EHR prompt THN distribution. Rates of THN distribution varied by patient age and race prior to, but not after, implementation of EHR prompts. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic health record prompts are associated with increased take-home naloxone distribution for emergency department patients discharged after opioid overdoses.

How Are Real-time Opioid Prescribing Cognitions by Emergency Providers Influenced by Reviewing the State Prescription Drug Monitoring Program?

OBJECTIVE: To understand how real-time opioid prescribing cognitions by emergency medicine (EM) providers are influenced by review of the state prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP). METHODS: We collected prospective data from a convenience sample of 103 patient encounters for pain from 23 unique EM providers. After seeing the patient, before and immediately after reviewing the PDMP, EM providers answered how much they thought "the patient need[ed] an opioid to help manage their pain?", how concerned they were "about drug abuse and/or diversion?", and whether they planned to prescribe an opioid (yes/no). If they changed their decision to prescribe after querying the PDMP, they were asked to provide comments. We categorized encounters by opioid prescribing plan before/after PDMP review (e.g., O+/O- means plan changed from "yes" to "no") and examined changes in cognitions across categories. RESULTS: Ninety-two of 103 (89.3%) encounters resulted in no change in opioid prescribing plan (61/92 [66.3%] O+/O+; 31/92 [33.7%] O-/O-). For the four O+/O- encounters, perceived patient opioid need decreased 75% of the time and concern for opioid abuse and/or diversion increased 75% of time. For the seven O-/O+ encounters, providers reported increased perceived patient opioid need 28.6% of the time and decreased concern for opioid abuse and/or diversion 14.3% of time. CONCLUSIONS: PDMP data rarely alter plans to prescribe an opioid among emergency providers. When changes in opioid prescribing plan were made, this was reflected by changes in cognitions. Findings support the need for a properly powered study to identify how specific PDMP findings alter prescribing cognitions.

Estradiol shifts interactions between the infralimbic cortex and central amygdala to enhance fear extinction memory in female rats.

There is growing evidence that estradiol (E2) enhances fear extinction memory consolidation. However, it is unclear how E2 influences the nodes of the fear extinction network to enhance extinction memory. This study begins to delineate the neural circuits underlying the influence of E2 on fear extinction acquisition and consolidation in female rats. After fear conditioning (day 1), naturally cycling female rats underwent extinction learning (day 2) in a low-E2 state, receiving a systemic administration of either E2 or vehicle prior to extinction training. Extinction memory recall was then tested 24 hr later (day 3). We measured immediate early gene c-fos expression within the extinction network during fear extinction learning and extinction recall. During extinction learning, E2 treatment increased centrolateral amygdala c-fos activity and reduced lateral amygdala activity relative to vehicle. During extinction recall, E2-treated rats exhibited reduced c-fos expression in the centromedial amygdala. There were no group differences in c-fos expression within the medial prefrontal cortex or dorsal hippocampus. Examining c-fos ratios with the infralimbic cortex (IL) revealed that, despite the lack of group differences within the IL, E2 treatment induced greater IL activity relative to both prelimbic cortex and central amygdala (CeA) activity during extinction memory recall. Only the relationship between IL and CeA activity positively correlated with extinction retention. In conclusion, E2 appears to modify interactions between the IL and the CeA in females, shifting from stronger amygdalar modulation of fear during extinction learning to stronger IL control during extinction recall. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The Development of a Novel Measure to Assess Motives for Compensatory Eating in Response to Exercise: The CEMQ.

Compensatory eating in response to exercise may be an obstacle to achieving weight-loss and fitness goals. In this study we develop and conduct a preliminary examination of the psychometric properties of the Compensatory Eating Motives Questionnaire (CEMQ), a self-report questionnaire of motives for compensatory eating. Development and testing of the CEMQ was conducted in two student samples. Of respondents, 75% reported engaging in compensatory eating. Factor analysis yielded factors representing three domains of motives for compensatory eating: Eating for Reward, Eating for Recovery, and Eating for Relief. Internal consistency of the factors was adequate, and the factor structure was replicated. Correlations between the CEMQ subscales and trait questionnaires supported hypotheses for convergent and divergent validity. These results encourage further investigation of compensatory eating as a potential obstacle to weight loss, and support the continued assessment of the CEMQ as a tool to measure three conceptually distinct motives for compensatory eating.

Protocol for studying extinction of conditioned fear in naturally cycling female rats.

Extinction of conditioned fear has been extensively studied in male rodents. Recently, there have been an increasing number of studies indicating that neural mechanisms for certain behavioral tasks and response behaviors are different in females and males. Using females in research studies can represent a challenge because of the variation of gonadal hormones during their estrous cycle. This protocol describes well-established procedures that are useful in investigating the role of estrogen in fear extinction memory consolidation in female rats. Phase of the estrous cycle and exogenous estrogen administration prior to extinction training can influence extinction recall 24 hr later. The vaginal swabbing technique for estrous phase identification described here aids the examination and manipulation of naturally cycling gonadal hormones. The use of this basic rodent model may further delineate the mechanisms by which estrogen can modulate fear extinction memory in females.