Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(10): e2337557, 2023 10 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824142

RESUMEN

Importance: Emergency department (ED) triage substantially affects how long patients wait for care but triage scoring relies on few objective criteria. Prior studies suggest that Black and Hispanic patients receive unequal triage scores, paralleled by disparities in the depth of physician evaluations. Objectives: To examine whether racial disparities in triage scores and physician evaluations are present across a multicenter network of academic and community hospitals and evaluate whether patients who do not speak English face similar disparities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study examining adults presenting between February 28, 2019, and January 1, 2023, across the Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, encompassing 7 EDs: 2 urban academic hospitals and 5 community hospitals. Analysis included all patients presenting with 1 of 5 common chief symptoms. Exposures: Emergency department nurse-led triage and physician evaluation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Average Triage Emergency Severity Index [ESI] score and average visit work relative value units [wRVUs] were compared across symptoms and between individual minority racial and ethnic groups and White patients. Results: There were 249 829 visits (149 861 female [60%], American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2%, Asian 3.3%, Black 11.8%, Hispanic 18.8%, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander <0.1%, White 60.8%, and patients identifying as Other race or ethnicity 5.1%). Median age was 48 (IQR, 29-66) years. White patients had more acute ESI scores than Hispanic or Other patients across all symptoms (eg, chest pain: Hispanic, 2.68 [95% CI, 2.67-2.69]; White, 2.55 [95% CI, 2.55-2.56]; Other, 2.66 [95% CI, 2.64-2.68]; P < .001) and Black patients across most symptoms (nausea/vomiting: Black, 2.97 [95% CI, 2.96-2.99]; White: 2.90 [95% CI, 2.89-2.91]; P < .001). These differences were reversed for wRVUs (chest pain: Black, 4.32 [95% CI, 4.25-4.39]; Hispanic, 4.13 [95% CI, 4.08-4.18]; White 3.55 [95% CI, 3.52-3.58]; Other 3.96 [95% CI, 3.84-4.08]; P < .001). Similar patterns were seen for patients whose primary language was not English. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, patients who identified as Black, Hispanic, and Other race and ethnicity were assigned less acute ESI scores than their White peers despite having received more involved physician workups, suggesting some degree of mistriage. Clinical decision support systems might reduce these disparities but would require careful calibration to avoid replicating bias.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Triaje , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Dolor en el Pecho
2.
AEM Educ Train ; 7(1): e10837, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36777103

RESUMEN

Objectives: Despite decades of literature recognizing racial disparities (RDs) in emergency medicine (EM), published curricula dedicated to addressing them are sparse. We present details of our novel RD curriculum for EM clerkships and its educational outcomes. Methods: We created a 30-min interactive didactic module on the topic designed for third- and fourth-year medical students enrolled in our EM clerkships. Through a modified Delphi process, education faculty and content experts in RD developed a 10-question multiple-choice test of knowledge on RD that the students completed immediately prior to and 2 weeks following the activity. Students also completed a Likert-style learner satisfaction survey. Median pre- and posttest scores were compared using a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test and presented using medians and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Satisfaction survey responses were dichotomized into favorable and neutral/not favorable. Results: For the 36 students who completed the module, the median pretest score was 40% (95% CI 36%-50%) and the posttest score was 70% (95% CI 60%-70%) with a p-value of <0.001. Thirty-five of the 36 students improved on the posttest with a mean increase of 24.2% (95% CI 20.2-28.2). The satisfaction survey also showed a positive response, with at least 83% of participants responding favorably to all statements (overall mean favorable response 93%, 95% CI 90%-96%).ConclusionsThis EM-based module on RD led to improvement in students' knowledge on the topic and positive reception by participants. This is a feasible option for educating students in EM on the topic of RD.

4.
J Emerg Med ; 62(5): 685-689, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35400508

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted emergency medicine residents' education. Early in the pandemic, many facilities lacked adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), and intubation was considered particularly high risk for transmission to physicians, leading hospitals to limit the number of individuals present during the procedure. This posed difficulties for residents and academic faculty, as opportunities to perform endotracheal intubation during residency are limited, but patients with COVID-19 requiring intubation are unstable and have difficult airways. Case Scenario: When PPE is being rationed, who should be the one to perform an intubation on a patient with respiratory failure from severe COVID-19? DISCUSSION: We examined this case scenario using the ethical frameworks of bioethical principles and virtue ethics. Bioethical principles include justice, beneficence, nonmalfeasance, and autonomy, and virtue ethics emphasizes the provision of moral exemplars and opportunities to exercise practical wisdom. Arguments for an attending-only strategy include the role of the attending as a truly autonomous decision maker and the importance of providing residents with a moral exemplar. A resident-only strategy benefits a resident's future patients and provides opportunities for residents to exercise character. Strategies preserving the dyad of attending and resident maintain these advantages and mitigate some drawbacks, while intubation teams may provide the most parsimonious use of PPE, but may elide resident involvement. CONCLUSIONS: There exist compelling motivations for involving senior residents and attendings in high-risk intubations during the COVID-19 pandemic. A just strategy will preserve residents' role whenever possible, while maximizing supervision and providing alternative routes for intubation practice.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Medicina de Emergencia , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal
5.
AMA J Ethics ; 23(3): E229-234, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33818374

RESUMEN

Health equity is a common theme discussed in health professions schools, yet many educators are wary of addressing it. Avoidance of health equity content in health professions education leads to student frustration and missed opportunities to educate the next generation of health care professionals about sensitive yet important issues. Moreover, this gap in students' knowledge can negatively influence patients and perpetuate disparities.


Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud , Empleos en Salud , Personal de Salud , Humanos
6.
AMA J Ethics ; 23(2): E127-131, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33635192

RESUMEN

Health professions educators continuously adapt curricular content in response to new scientific knowledge but can struggle to incorporate content about current social issues that profoundly affect students and learning environments. This article offers recommendations to support innovation and action as students and faculty grapple with ongoing unrest in the United States, including racism, murders of Black people by police, and COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Educadores en Salud , Empleos en Salud/educación , Racismo/psicología , Justicia Social/psicología , Negro o Afroamericano , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Aplicación de la Ley , Estados Unidos
10.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(7): 1357-1361, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843332

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe differences in funded grants between male and female faculty in two academic emergency departments. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of grant funding at two academic emergency departments from January 2012-September 2018. We queried the grants department databases at each institution and obtained records of all funded grants for emergency medicine (EM) faculty. We extracted the following information for each award: gender of the principal investigator (PI), PI academic rank, grant mechanism (government, institutional, industry, organizational), and percent effort. Differences by gender were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon-rank sum. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty grants were awarded to EM faculty at the two institutions during the study period. Of the funded grants, 35 (27%) of recipients were female. Among grant recipients, females held lower academic ranking than males (p-value < 0.001): Instructor (49% vs 51%), Assistant Professor (36% vs 64%), Associate Professor (9% vs 91%), and Professor (0% vs 100%), respectively. Organizational grants were dispersed equally between funded faculty, but females received a fewer government, industry, and institutional grants (p-value = 0.007). Female grant recipients were awarded a higher median percent of effort compared to males (14% [IQR: 3-51] vs 8% [IQR: 1-15], respectively, p-value = 0.023). CONCLUSION: In this multicenter analysis, gender discrepancies exist among funded grants of EM faculty. Male recipients had higher academic ranking than their female counterparts. Female recipients were less likely to have government, institutional, and industry grants but received a greater percent effort on funding that was awarded.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Docentes Médicos , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Academias e Institutos , Investigación Biomédica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Centros Traumatológicos , Estados Unidos
11.
West J Emerg Med ; 20(3): 428-432, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31123541

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Opioid abuse has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. Patients often present to the emergency department (ED) with painful conditions seeking analgesic relief. While there is known variability in the prescribing behaviors of emergency physicians, it is unknown if there are differences in these behaviors based on training level or by resident specialty. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of ED visits from a single, tertiary-care academic hospital over a single academic year (2014-2015), examining the amount of opioid pain medication prescribed. We compared morphine milligram equivalents (MME) between provider specialty and level of training (emergency medicine [EM] attending physicians, EM residents in training, and non-EM residents in training). RESULTS: We reviewed 55,999 total ED visits, of which 4,431 (7.9%) resulted in discharge with a prescription opioid medication. Residents in a non-EM training program prescribed higher amounts of opioid medication (108 MME, interquartile ratio [IQR] 75-150) than EM attendings (90 MME, lQR 75-120), who prescribed more than residents in an EM training program (75 MME, IQR 60-113) (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: In an ED setting, variability exists in prescribing patterns with non-EM residents prescribing larger amounts of opioids in the acute setting. EM attendings should closely monitor for both over- and under-prescribing of analgesic medications.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Medicina de Emergencia , Internado y Residencia , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Manejo del Dolor , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación/métodos , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/clasificación , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Masculino , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
J Emerg Med ; 53(3): 391-396, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28676414

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Emergency Department is widely regarded as the epicenter of medical care for diverse and largely disparate types of patients. Physicians must be aware of the cultural diversity of their patient population to appropriately address their medical needs. A better understanding of residency preparedness in cultural competency can lead to better training opportunities and patient care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess residency and faculty exposure to formal cultural competency programs and assess future needs for diversity education. METHODS: A short survey was sent to all 168 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education program directors through the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors listserv. The survey included drop-down options in addition to open-ended input. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were used to analyze data. RESULTS: The response rate was 43.5% (73/168). Of the 68.5% (50/73) of residency programs that include cultural competency education, 90% (45/50) utilized structured didactics. Of these programs, 86.0% (43/50) included race and ethnicity education, whereas only 40.0% (20/50) included education on patients with limited English proficiency. Resident comfort with cultural competency was unmeasured by most programs (83.6%: 61/73). Of all respondents, 93.2% (68/73) were interested in a universal open-source cultural competency curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the programs in our sample have formal resident didactics on cultural competency. Some faculty members also receive cultural competency training. There are gaps, however, in types of cultural competency training, and many programs have expressed interest in a universal open-source tool to improve cultural competency for Emergency Medicine residents.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Cultural , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Internado y Residencia , Curriculum , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Reino Unido
13.
J Emerg Med ; 45(1): 100-4, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23490110

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: According to the Association of American Medical Colleges and the Institute of Medicine, promoting diversity in the health care workforce is a national priority. The under-representation of minorities in health care contributes significantly to the problem of health disparities currently facing racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States (US). Evidence shows that improved diversity among medical providers contributes to higher satisfaction for minority patients and better educational experiences for trainees. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the racial and ethnic composition of medical students, Emergency Medicine residents, and practicing Emergency Medicine Physicians as compared with other specialties and the US population. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of the most recent data available from the Association of American Medical Colleges and the US Census were used to determine the racial and ethnic distribution of the US population, medical students, residents, and practicing physicians. The Association of American Medical Colleges' definition of under-represented minorities (URMs) for the years studied included individuals of black, Latino, and Native-American race and ethnicity. Proportions with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. χ(2) analysis was used to compare groups. RESULTS: URMs comprised 30% of the total US population, yet only 6% of all practicing physicians and 9% of Emergency Physicians self-identified as URMs. By comparison, 15% of medical students, 17% of all residents, and 14% of Emergency Medicine residents were URMs (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency Medicine, like other specialties, lacks the racial and ethnic diversity seen in the US population. Efforts to improve diversity at the resident level are limited by the number of URM students in medical school, and should include steps aimed at addressing this issue.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Medicina de Emergencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Indígenas Norteamericanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/educación , Estudios Transversales , Diversidad Cultural , Hispánicos o Latinos/educación , Humanos , Indígenas Norteamericanos/educación , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...