Retained bullets: to remove or not to remove? Lessons from two clinical scenarios with intracardiac bullet embolization.

Firearm-related injuries in the USA are increasing, with over 105,000 cases annually. Gunshot wounds (GSWs), especially those involving retained bullets, present complex challenges due to bullet trajectories and embolization risks. This study reviews two cases of bullet emboli, focusing on bullet localization strategies and timing of removal. Imaging techniques such as chest X-ray, CT scan, intraoperative fluoroscopy, and transesophageal echocardiogram were employed for localization. In Case 1, a stable patient with a left-back GSW had a bullet embolism from the inferior vena cava to the right ventricle, necessitating prompt removal. In Case 2, an unstable patient with thoracoabdominal GSWs experienced a delayed embolism to the aortic root, requiring multiple surgeries. Effective management of retained bullets involves diverse imaging and timely surgical intervention, especially for stable patients, emphasizing individualized and proactive strategies to enhance outcomes in bullet embolization cases.

Lost and found: a unique foregut gastrointestinal bullet embolism.

Bullet embolism is a rare phenomenon where a bullet migrates from its original point of entry to a distant site within the body. This brief report describes a case of a bullet embolism entering the gastrointestinal (GI) tract through the posterior oropharynx. The patient initially presented with a gunshot wound to the left scapula, and the bullet was later identified in the GI tract. The patient was managed with a combination of endoscopic techniques and serial imaging, avoiding unnecessary surgical intervention. This case underscores the importance of comprehensive diagnostic strategies and tailored management in GI bullet embolism. It also emphasizes the utility of endoscopy in detecting GI tract injuries and highlights the successful use of non-operative management in specific scenarios.

Optimal Management of Traumatic Abdominal Wall Hernias Remains Unclear.

High-energy, blunt force trauma to the abdomen results in an abdominal wall injury (AWI) in up to 9% of patients. In 1% of blunt abdominal trauma, they result in a traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH). Optimal management of these injuries remains unclear. Because they are the result of a high-energy mechanism, concomitant serious abdominal organ injuries are common. This has prompted some to advocate that the presence of a TAWH on physical exam mandates exploratory laparotomy. However, delayed repairs have better outcomes and nontherapeutic celiotomy should be avoided. Similarly debated is the expanding use of minimally invasive techniques and the use of mesh for hernia repairs. Overall, the presence of a TAWH is likely not an absolute indication for emergency surgery. Rather, it is an indicator of high-energy impact and associated with a high rate of visceral injury. These patients require a close observation for clinical decline and development of typical indicators for laparotomy.