Impact of Prophylactic Cerclage Location on Femoral Fracture Propagation: A Biomechanical Study.

OBJECTIVES: Prophylactic cerclage cables are often placed intraoperatively about a fracture to prevent propagation. However, biomechanical data supporting optimal cable placement location are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of prophylactic cerclage placement location on the propagation of femoral shaft fractures. METHODS: The diaphysis of 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric femora were included. Volumetric bone mineral density in the femoral shaft was obtained from quantitative computed tomography scans. For each specimen, a 5-mm longitudinal fracture was created proximally to simulate a pre-existing fracture. After reaming of the femoral canal, a 3 degrees tapered wedge was advanced with an MTS machine at 0.2 mm/s until failure. The tests were conducted with a CoCr cable placed at varying distances (5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm, and cableless) from the distal tip of the initial fracture. A compression loadcell was used to measure the cable tension during the tests. The axial force, displacement, and cable tension were monitored for comparison between groups. RESULTS: In the cableless group, the mean force needed to propagate the fracture was 1017.8 ± 450.3 N. With the addition of a cable at 5 mm below the fracture, the failure force nearly doubled to 1970.4 ± 801.1 N (P < 0.001). This also led to significant increases in stiffness (P = 0.006) and total work (P = 0.001) when compared with the control group. By contrast, in the 15 and 20 mm groups, there were no significant changes in the failure force, stiffness, and total work as compared with the control group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Propagation of femoral shaft fracture was effectively resisted when a prophylactic cable was placed within 5 mm from the initial fracture, whereas cables placed more than 10 mm below the initial fracture were not effective in preventing fracture propagation.

Single-Strand "Short Isometric Construct" Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Restores Valgus and Rotational Stability While Isolated Deep MCL and Superficial MCL Reconstruction Do Not.

BACKGROUND: Historical MCL (medial collateral ligament) reconstruction (MCLR) techniques have focused on the superficial MCL (sMCL) to restore valgus stability while frequently ignoring the importance of the deep MCL (dMCL) in controlling tibial external rotation. The recent recognition of the medial ligament complex importance has multiple studies revisiting medial anatomy and questioning contemporary MCLR techniques. PURPOSE: To assess whether (1) an isolated sMCL reconstruction (sMCLR), (2) an isolated dMCL reconstruction (dMCLR), or (3) a novel single-strand short isometric construct (SIC) would restore translational and rotational stability to a knee with a dMCL and sMCL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Biomechanical testing was performed on 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens using a custom multiaxial knee activity simulator. The specimens were divided into 2 groups. The first group was tested in 4 states: intact, after sectioning the sMCL and dMCL, isolated sMCLR, and isolated dMCLR. The second group was tested in 3 states: intact, after sectioning the sMCL and dMCL, and after single-strand SIC reconstruction (SICR). In each state, 4 loading conditions were applied at 0°, 20°, 40°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion: 8-N·m valgus torque, 5-N·m external rotation torque, 90-N anterior drawer, and combined 90-N anterior drawer plus 5-N·m tibial external rotation torque. Anterior translation, valgus rotation, and external rotation of the knee were measured for each state and loading condition using an optical motion capture system. RESULTS: sMCL and dMCL transection resulted in increased laxity for all loading conditions at all flexion angles. Isolated dMCLR restored external rotation stability to intact levels throughout all degrees of flexion, yet valgus stability was restored only at 0° of flexion. Isolated sMCLR restored valgus and external rotation stability at 0°, 20°, and 40° of flexion but not at 60° or 90° of flexion. Single-strand SICR restored valgus and external rotation stability at all flexion angles. In the combined anterior drawer plus external rotation test, isolated dMCL and single-strand SICR restored stability to the intact level at all flexion angles, while the isolated sMCL restored stability at 20° and 40° of flexion but not at 60° or 90° of flexion. CONCLUSION: In the cadaveric model, single-strand SICR restored valgus and rotational stability throughout the range of motion. dMCLR restored rotational stability to the knee throughout the range of motion but did not restore valgus stability. Isolated sMCLR restored external rotation and valgus stability in early flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In patients with anteromedial rotatory instability in the knee, neither an sMCLR nor a dMCLR is sufficient to restore stability.

Variations in Trochlear Morphology of Contemporary and Legacy Total Knee Arthroplasty Prostheses: A Review of 22 Designs.

BACKGROUND: The morphology of the trochlear compartment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses is a major determinant of postoperative patello-femoral kinematics, particularly with unresurfaced patellae. The objective of this study was to quantify and compare the trochlear morphology of a large series of contemporary and legacy TKA designs. METHODS: The 3-dimensional surface models of 22 femoral components (13 contemporary and 9 legacy) were created using high-resolution laser scanning. The trochlear profile of each component was analyzed from proximal to distal in 15° increments around the trochlear axis. In each profile, the following variables were measured: sulcus angle, medio-lateral deviation of the sulcus, the height and width of the facets, and the trochlear groove orientation. RESULTS: In the contemporary group, the sulcus angle decreased progressively along the trochlear arc to varying degrees, except for 2 symmetrical designs, whereas the sulcus angle of the legacy designs showed considerable variability. The height of the medial facet was very strongly correlated with that of the lateral facet in the contemporary group (R2 = 0.89), whereas the correlation was weak for the legacy designs (R2 = 0.36). Moreover, the trochlear sulcus deviated laterally from distal to proximal in 10 contemporary designs and 7 legacy designs, resulting in a trochlear groove orientation of 4.2 to 11.1° and 4.3 to 10.5°, respectively. In the remaining 5 designs (3 contemporary and 2 legacy), the sulcus was vertical. CONCLUSIONS: There is more consistency in trochlear morphology of contemporary TKA designs compared to that of legacy designs, yet there are still large variations between different designs.

The Stability of Fixation of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Effect of Implantation Technique.

BACKGROUND: Due to increasing volume of total hip arthroplasties, periprosthetic femoral fractures have become a common complication with increased revision burden and perioperative morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fixation stability of Vancouver B2 fractures treated with 2 techniques. METHODS: A common B2 fracture was created by reviewing 30 type B2 cases. The fracture was then reproduced in 7 pairs of cadaveric femora. The specimens were divided into 2 groups. In Group I ("reduce-first"), the fragments were reduced first, followed by implantation of a tapered fluted stem. In Group II ("ream-first"), the stem was implanted in the distal femur first, followed by fragment reduction and fixation. Each specimen was loaded in a multiaxial testing frame with 70% of peak load during walking. A motion capture system was used to track the motion of the stem and fragments. RESULTS: The average stem diameter in Group II was 16.1 ± 0.4 mm, versus 15.4 ± 0.5 mm in Group I. The fixation stability was not significantly different in the 2 groups. After the testing, the average stem subsidence was 0.36 ± 0.31 mm and 0.19 ± 0.14 mm (P = .17) and the average rotation was 1.67 ± 1.30° and 0.91 ± 1.11° (P = .16) in Groups I and II, respectively. Compared to the stem, there was less motion of the fragments and there was no difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: When tapered fluted stems were used in combination with cerclage cables for treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, both the "reduce-first" and "ream-first" techniques showed adequate stem and fracture stability.