Are large language models valid tools for patient information on lumbar disc herniation? The spine surgeons' perspective.

Introduction: Generative AI is revolutionizing patient education in healthcare, particularly through chatbots that offer personalized, clear medical information. Reliability and accuracy are vital in AI-driven patient education. Research question: How effective are Large Language Models (LLM), such as ChatGPT and Google Bard, in delivering accurate and understandable patient education on lumbar disc herniation? Material and methods: Ten Frequently Asked Questions about lumbar disc herniation were selected from 133 questions and were submitted to three LLMs. Six experienced spine surgeons rated the responses on a scale from "excellent" to "unsatisfactory," and evaluated the answers for exhaustiveness, clarity, empathy, and length. Statistical analysis involved Fleiss Kappa, Chi-square, and Friedman tests. Results: Out of the responses, 27.2% were excellent, 43.9% satisfactory with minimal clarification, 18.3% satisfactory with moderate clarification, and 10.6% unsatisfactory. There were no significant differences in overall ratings among the LLMs (p = 0.90); however, inter-rater reliability was not achieved, and large differences among raters were detected in the distribution of answer frequencies. Overall, ratings varied among the 10 answers (p = 0.043). The average ratings for exhaustiveness, clarity, empathy, and length were above 3.5/5. Discussion and conclusion: LLMs show potential in patient education for lumbar spine surgery, with generally positive feedback from evaluators. The new EU AI Act, enforcing strict regulation on AI systems, highlights the need for rigorous oversight in medical contexts. In the current study, the variability in evaluations and occasional inaccuracies underline the need for continuous improvement. Future research should involve more advanced models to enhance patient-physician communication.

In-hospital mortality of patients with periprosthetic joint infection.

Aims: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) demonstrates the most feared complication after total joint replacement (TJR). The current work analyzes the demographic, comorbidity, and complication profiles of all patients who had in-hospital treatment due to PJI. Furthermore, it aims to evaluate the in-hospital mortality of patients with PJI and analyze possible risk factors in terms of secondary diagnosis, diagnostic procedures, and complications. Methods: In a retrospective, cross-sectional study design, we gathered all patients with PJI (International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code: T84.5) and resulting in-hospital treatment in Germany between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2022. Data were provided by the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System in Germany. Demographic data, in-hospital deaths, need for intensive care therapy, secondary diagnosis, complications, and use of diagnostic instruments were assessed. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for in-hospital mortality were calculated. Results: A total of 52,286 patients were included, of whom 1,804 (3.5%) died. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity, the most frequent comorbidities, were not associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Cardiac diseases as atrial fibrillation, cardiac pacemaker, or three-vessel coronary heart disease showed the highest risk for in-hospital mortality. Postoperative anaemia occurred in two-thirds of patients and showed an increased in-hospital mortality (OR 1.72; p < 0.001). Severe complications, such as organ failure, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), or septic shock syndrome showed by far the highest association with in-hospital mortality (OR 39.20; 95% CI 33.07 to 46.46; p < 0.001). Conclusion: These findings highlight the menace coming from PJI. It can culminate in multi-organ failure, SIRS, or septic shock syndrome, along with very high rates of in-hospital mortality, thereby highlighting the vulnerability of these patients. Particular attention should be paid to patients with cardiac comorbidities such as atrial fibrillation or three-vessel coronary heart disease. Risk factors should be optimized preoperatively, anticoagulant therapy stopped and restarted on time, and sufficient patient blood management should be emphasized.

Anterior Column Reconstruction of Destructive Vertebral Osteomyelitis at the Thoracolumbar Spine with an Expandable Vertebral Body Replacement Implant: A Retrospective, Monocentric Radiological Cohort Analysis of 24 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) often necessitates surgical intervention due to bone loss-induced spinal instability. Anterior column reconstruction, utilizing expandable vertebral body replacement (VBR) implants, is a recognized approach to restore stability and prevent neurological compromise. Despite various techniques, clinical evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of these implants in VO remains limited. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis, spanning 2000 to 2020, was conducted on 24 destructive VO cases at a Level 1 orthopedic trauma center. Diagnosis relied on clinical, radiological, and microbiological criteria. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, surgical interventions, and radiological outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The study included 24 patients (62.5% male; mean age 65.6 ± 35.0 years), with 58% having healthcare-associated infections (HAVO). The mean radiological follow-up was 137.2 ± 161.7 weeks. Surgical intervention significantly improved the bi-segmental kyphotic endplate angle (BKA) postoperatively (mean -1.4° ± 13.6°). However, a noticeable loss of correction was observed over time. The study reported a mortality rate of 1/24. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior column reconstruction using expandable VBR effectively improved local spinal alignment in destructive VO. However, the study underscores the necessity for prolonged follow-up and continuous research to refine surgical techniques and postoperative care. Addressing long-term complications and refining surgical approaches will be pivotal as the field progresses.

Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in geriatric patients aged 80 and older with axis fractures: a nationwide, cross-sectional analysis of concomitant injuries, comorbidities, and treatment strategies in 10,077 cases.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between treatment, comorbidities, concomitant injuries, and procedures with in-hospital mortality in patients aged 80 years or older with axis fractures. METHODS: Data were extracted from the German InEK (Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus) GmbH database (2019-2021) for patients aged 80 years or older with axis fractures and the in-hospital mortality rate was calculated. Differences in comorbidities and concomitant diseases and injuries were analyzed using the Chi-square test. In surgically treated patients, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to analyze potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 10,077 patients, the in-hospital mortality rate was 8.4%, with no significant difference between surgically (9.4%) and non-surgically treated patients (7.9%; p = 0.103). The most common comorbidities were essential hypertension (67.3%), atrial fibrillation (28.2%), and chronic kidney disease (23.3%), while the most common concomitant injuries were head and face wounds (25.9%), concussions (12.8%), and atlas fractures (11.6%). In surgically treated patients, spinal cord injury (OR = 4.62, 95% CI: 2.23-9.58), acute renal failure (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.26-4.53), and acute bleeding anemia (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.64-2.59) were associated with increased in-hospital mortality (all p < 0.01). Screw-rod-system fixation of one segment (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.97) and intraoperative navigation (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.16-0.71) were identified as potential protective factors (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimization of comorbidities during treatment are crucial. The indication for surgical treatment must be carefully individualized. Future studies should focus on the choice of surgical technique, perioperative blood management, and intraoperative navigation as potential protective factors.

Risk Factors for the In-Hospital Mortality in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Cross-Sectional Study on 9753 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis represents a clinical challenge associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze potential risk factors for the in-hospital mortality of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) patients. METHODS: Based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for VO ("M46.2-", "M46.3-", and "M46.4-") data for total case numbers, secondary diagnoses, and numbers of in-hospital deaths were extracted from the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK GmbH). Odds ratios (OR) for death were calculated for several secondary diseases and factors of interest. RESULTS: Despite age, certain comorbidities were found to be strongly associated with increased mortality risk: Heart failure (OR = 2.80; 95% CI 2.45 to 3.20; p < 0.01), chronic kidney disease (OR = 1.83; 95% CI 1.57 to 2.13; p < 0.01), and diabetes with complications (OR = 1.86; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.38; p < 0.01). Among the complications, acute liver failure showed the highest risk for in-hospital mortality (OR = 42.41; 95% CI 23.47 to 76.62; p < 0.01). Additionally, stage III kidney failure (OR = 9.81; 95% CI 7.96 to 12.08; p < 0.01), sepsis (OR = 5.94; 95% CI 5.02 to 7.03; p < 0.01), acute respiratory failure (OR = 5.31; 95% CI 4.61 to 6.12; p < 0.01), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (OR = 5.19; 95% CI 3.69 to 5.19; p < 0.01) were associated with in-hospital mortality. When analyzing the influence of pathogens, documented infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa had the highest risk for mortality (OR = 2.74; 95% CI 2.07 to 3.63; p < 0.01), followed by Streptococci, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus infections. CONCLUSIONS: An early assessment of individual patient risk factors may be beneficial in the care and treatment of VO to help reduce the risks of mortality. These findings emphasize the importance of closely monitoring VO patients with chronic organ diseases, early detection and treatment of sepsis, and tailored empirical antibiotic therapy. The identification of specific pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility testing should be prioritized to improve patient outcomes in this high-risk population.

The Epidemiology of Spondylodiscitis in Germany: A Descriptive Report of Incidence Rates, Pathogens, In-Hospital Mortality, and Hospital Stays between 2010 and 2020.

BACKGROUND: Spondylodiscitis can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Understanding its up-to-date epidemiological characteristics and trends is important to improve patient care. METHODS: This study analyzed trends in the incidence rate of spondylodiscitis cases in Germany between 2010 and 2020, as well as the pathogens, in-hospital mortality rate, and length of hospital stay. Data were obtained from the Federal Statistical Office and the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System database. The ICD-10 codes "M46.2-", "M46.3-" and "M46.4-" were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence rate of spondylodiscitis increased to 14.4/100,000 inhabitants, with 59.6% cases occurring in patients 70 years or older and affecting mainly the lumbar spine (56.2%). Absolute case numbers increased from 6886 by 41.6% to 9753 in 2020 (IIR = 1.39, 95% CI 0.62-3.08). Staphylococci and Escherichia coli were the most coded pathogens. The proportion of resistant pathogens was 12.9%. In-hospital mortality rates increased to a maximum of 64.7/1000 patients in 2020, intensive care unit treatment was documented in 2697 (27.7%) cases, and the length of stay per case was 22.3 days. CONCLUSION: The sharply increasing incidence and in-hospital mortality rate of spondylodiscitis highlights the need for patient-centered therapy to improve patient outcomes, especially in the geriatric, frail population, which is prone to infectious diseases.

The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in arthroplasties is currently experiencing increased usage. Therefore, single and double antibiotic-loaded bone cements are commercially available and used in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this investigation was to compare the clinical use of single compared to dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement for implant fixation after femoral neck fracture. Further infection rates were to be compared in (partial) arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture for both treatment options. METHODS: On the basis of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD), all cases of femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty (HA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) with single and dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement, were included into the data analysis. The infection risk was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: In total, 26,845 cases (HA 76.3%-THA: 23.7%) with femoral neck fracture were included. Within recent years, an increasing usage of dual antibiotic-loaded cement in Germany, with a current proportion of 7.30% in arthroplasty procedures for femoral neck fracture treatment, has been observed. In patients treated with HA, the proportion of dual antibiotic-loaded cement was 7.86%, while in those treated with THA, 5.46% of all prostheses were fixated with a two antibiotic component cement. For all arthroplasty procedures using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after six months 1.8%, after one year 1.9%, and after five years 2.3%, of the cases failed due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), while in the same time period, in cases with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement 1.5%, 1.5% and 1.5% suffered from infection (p = 0.34). A infection rate of 1.1% after HA with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement was reported, compared to a 2.1% infection rate whilst using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after five years (p = 0.098). The number required for treatment when using HA was 91. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement is increasingly used in arthroplasty procedures after femoral neck fractures. It demonstrates a reduction of PJI after HA and seems, therefore, to be a useful method for the prevention of infection, especially in patients with increased risk factors for PJI.

Increased incidence of vertebral fractures in German adults from 2009 to 2019 and the analysis of secondary diagnoses, treatment, costs, and in-hospital mortality.

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to present the nationwide rates of hospitalized patients with vertebral fractures over one decade and to comprehensively analyze the treatment characteristics and direct costs incurred in 2019. Therefore, the trends in the incidence rate were quantified based on annual ICD-10 diagnosis codes from all German medical facilities between 2009 and 2019, provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis). The ICD-10 Codes "S12.0-2; S22.0-; S32.0-, and S32.1-2" were evaluated. The relative change from 2009 through 2019 was determined. Using data from the Institute for Hospital Remuneration Systems (InEK) for 2019 the secondary diagnoses, OPS-codes, intensive care unit (ICU) treatment, in-hospital mortality, the proportion of G-DRGs and cumulative costs were evaluated. The documented number of vertebral fractures increased by 45.6% between 2009 and 2019 to an incidence of 150.7 per 100,000 inhabitants. The lumbar spine was most commonly affected with an incidence of 70.5/100,000 inhabitants in 2019 (46.8% of all vertebral fractures). The highest increases were seen in the numbers of subaxial cervical fractures (+ 121.2%) and sacral fractures (+ 306.6%). Of all vertebral fractures in 2019, 63.7% were diagnosed in women and 69.0% in patients aged 70 years or older. Osteoporosis was documented in 17.9% of cases as a concomitant diagnosis. In 10.1% of all cases, an ICU treatment was documented. The in-hospital mortality was 2.0% in 2019. I68D was the most frequently used G-DRG code, accounting for 33.3% of cases. The total direct costs for inpatient treatment in 2019 amounted to €589,205,715. The evaluation of 955,091 vertebral fractures showed a sharp increase in the nation-wide incidence rate. The presented age and sex distribution, the comorbidity profile and the in-hospital mortality rate indicate the importance of comprehensive geriatric assessment and emphasize the need for spinal care centers to be established.

Long-term patient-related quality of life outcomes and ICD-10 symptom rating (ISR) of patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: What is the psychological impact of this life-threatening disease?

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of the treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) on functional outcomes and patients' quality of life (QoL) with a special focus on psychological well-being. METHODS: A total of 156 patients with VO with a minimum clinical follow-up of 12 months were retrospectively identified and asked to participate. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated with the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and German Short-Form 36 (SF-36) outcome instruments as well as with an ICD-10 based symptom rating (ISR) and compared to normative data. Spine-specific outcomes were assessed with the Core Outcome Measure Index and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) or the Neck disability index (NDI), respectively. RESULTS: From n = 156 eligible patients, n = 129 patients could be contacted and n = 40 returned questionnaires, yielding a response rate of 31.0%. The mean time from hospital discharge to follow-up was 83.0 ± 3.8 (13-193) months. Spine-specific outcomes showed mild to moderate disability. The mean physical health component score of the SF-36 (37.1 ± 16.7), the mean mental health component score (38.2 ± 14.0) and the mean EQ-5D VAS rating (57.1 ± 21.5) were significantly lower in comparison with the scores of an age-matched reference population (all p < 0.05). The mean total score of the ISR was 0.53 ± 0.23. On average, the cohort did not cross the threshold of clinically relevant symptom burden on any subscale. CONCLUSION: Even almost seven years on average after completed treatment of VO, patients report impaired QoL. Assessment of psychological disorders should be implemented in clinical practice and future prospective studies.

Retrospective analysis of mortality and quality of life after hip disarticulation or hemipelvectomy: a report on 15 patients.

BACKGROUND: Hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy are defined as major ablative amputations of the lower limb. Due to the small number of patients, little is known about the outcome and follow-up. AIMS: We aimed to assess (1) reasons for performed major ablative surgeries such as hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy in a German center for trauma and orthopedic surgery. (2) In addition, mortality and quality of life after hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy as well as (3) patient and treatment characteristics should be investigated. METHODS: During a period of twelve years, 15 patients underwent hip disarticulation or hemipelvectomy. Mortality, EQ-5D-3L quality of life by EQ-5D-3L and time-trade-off (TTO), VAS, cause of disarticulation, length of hospital stays, revisions, comorbidities, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and ASA score were evaluated retrospective for all patients. RESULTS: The overall mortality rates were 26.7% at 30 days, 60.0% after one year and 66.7% after three years. The five surviving patients reported about moderate problems in the EQ-5D-3L. The average VAS score reached 45 (range 15-65). The mean TTO was 9.8 (range 6-12). Indications for amputation were infection (n = 7), tumor (n = 6), trauma (n = 1) and ischemia (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy are followed by a high postoperative mortality. Quality of life of the affected patients is impaired in long-term follow-up. Especially amputations performed due to infections show high mortality within one month after surgery despite average young age and low CCI. Surgeons should be aware of this devastating outcome and extraordinary vigilant for these vulnerable patient cohorts.

Incidence and treatment of intracapsular femoral neck fractures in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Intracapsular femoral neck fractures are one of the most common fractures in Germany. Nevertheless, the epidemiology and treatment modalities are not described comprehensively. For this reason, this study highlights the epidemiology of femoral neck fractures in different age groups and summarizes treatment strategies within the period from 2009 to 2019 based on nationwide data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study all cases of intracapsular femoral neck fractures (ICD-10: S72.0) between 2009 and 2019 in Germany were analyzed with regard to epidemiology, incidence and treatment. Operation and procedure classification system (OPS)- codes in combination with intracapsular femoral neck fracture as main diagnosis were taken to investigation. Data was provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis). RESULTS: A total of 807,834 intracapsular femoral neck fractures with a mean incidence of 110.0 per 100,000 inhabitants annually was detected within eleven years. In 68.8% of all fractures patients were female. Most patients were older than 70 years (82.4%), and 56.7% were older than 80 years. The overall increase of fracture numbers between 2009 and 2019 was 23.2%. Joint replacement has been most often performed (80.4%). Hemiarthroplasty (56.8%) and total hip arthroplasty (22.8%) were the most common procedures with an increase of 27.1 and 38.6%, respectively. The proportion of cemented hemiarthroplasties was 86.2% while 51.3% of all total hip arthroplasties were totally or partially cemented. Osteosyntheses were mainly conducted using dynamic compression screws (34.0%), conventional screws (31.3%) and nails (22.2%). CONCLUSION: The incidence of intracapsular femoral neck fractures in Germany has been increasing continuously within the last decade. In particular, patients over 80 years suffered predominantly from this type of fracture. The majority was treated with a joint replacement procedure, mainly cemented hemiarthroplasty.

[Antibiotic use for prophylaxis and empirical therapy of fracture-related infections in Germany : A survey of 44 hospitals]. / Antibiotikaeinsatz zu Prophylaxe und empirischer Therapie von frakturassoziierten Infektionen in Deutschland : Eine Umfrage an 44 Kliniken.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics play an important role in the prophylaxis and treatment of infections in orthopedic trauma surgery; however, there seems to be remarkable differences in the clinical antibiotic practice between hospitals, particularly for open fractures and for the empirical therapy of fracture-related infections (FRI). METHODS: Therefore, we intended to evaluate the current clinical praxis in university and workers' compensation hospitals in Germany with a questionnaire on prophylaxis and empirical treatment of FRI. The results were compared with the resistance profile of 86 FRI patients in order to analyze the hypothetical effectiveness of the empirical treatment. RESULTS: A total of 44 hospitals (62.0%) responded. A homogeneous antibiotic prophylaxis (95.5% of all hospitals) with cephalosporins was reported for perioperative prophylaxis of internal fixation of closed fractures. For open fractures, eight different monotherapy and combination treatment concepts were reported. In empirical treatment of FRI, 12 different therapeutic concepts were reported, including aminopenicillins/beta lactamase inhibitors (BLI) (31.8%), cephalosporins (31.8%), and ampicillin/sulbactam + vancomycin (9.1%). In terms of the hypothetical effectiveness of these antibiotic regimes, low sensitivity rates of 65.1% and 74.4% for cephalosporins and aminopenicillins/BLI, respectively, were found. For the combination vancomycin + meropenem, the highest hypothetical sensitivity (91.9%) was detected. DISCUSSION: Based on the existing, institution-specific pathogen spectrum, the combination therapy including meropenem and vancomycin seems to be of value but should be restricted to patients with multiple revision procedures or a septic course of infection in order to prevent the selection of highly resistant pathogens.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Primary Arthroplasty and Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Current Practice and Need for Therapy Optimization. / Antibiotikaprophylaxe und empirische Antibiotikatherapie bei Primärendoprothetik und periprothetischen Gelenkinfektionen: Aktuelle Praxis und Bedarf an Therapieoptimierung.

The aim of the present work was to survey the situation of healthcare regarding the use of prophylactic and empirical antibiotics in primary arthroplasty and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). For this purpose, a survey was conducted at German university and occupational accident hospitals. Survey data was compared to previously published data on the antimicrobial regimes of PJI (n=81) patients (n=81) treated in our department between 2017 and 2020. A homogeneous picture emerged for the prophylactic administration of antibiotics in the context of primary arthroplasty. In 93.2% (elective) and 88.6% (fracture treatment) of the hospitals, first or second generation cephalosporins were administered perioperatively for infection prophylaxis in primary hip arthroplasty. The empirical antibiotic treatment of PJIs showed a clearly inhomogeneous therapeutic picture. Monotherapy with an aminopenicillin plus a beta-lactamase inhibitor is used most frequently (38.7%); first and second generation cephalosporins are used second most frequently as monotherapy (18.2%). In light of the global problem of antibiotic multi-resistance, clinical use of antibiotics has to be reasonable and effective. The present results highlight the further need to improve awareness and following existing guidelines in the administration of empirical antibiotic therapy in PJI.

A Comprehensive Report of German Nationwide Inpatient Data on the Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Including Annual Direct Healthcare Costs.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of German nationwide data including (i) the number of hospitalized Post-COVID Syndrome (PCS) cases including in-hospital mortality rates and intensive care unit treatments, (ii) the main common concomitant diagnoses associated with PCS, (iii) the most frequently performed treatment procedures, and (iv) the annual direct healthcare costs. METHODS: The incidence was calculated based on annual ICD-10 diagnosis codes "U09.9!, Post-COVID-19 condition". Data on concomitant diagnoses, treatment procedures, treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), in-hospital mortality, the proportion of G-DRGs, and cumulative costs were assessed based on the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) data for 2019. RESULTS: A total of 29,808 PCS inpatients could be identified yielding a prevalence of 5.5%. In total, 1330 (4.5%) in-hospital deaths were recorded, and 5140 (17.2%) patients required ICU treatment. The majority of patients (18.6%) were aged 65-74 years. The most common concomitant diagnoses included pneumonia, critical illness polyneuropathy, dyspnea, chronic fatigue syndrome, and pulmonary embolisms. The most frequently performed procedures were computed tomography of the thorax with contrast medium, whole-body plethysmography, and the monitoring of respiration, heart, and circulation. The cost per case of the G-DRG codes that were analyzed ranged from € 620 ± 377 (E64D, Respiratory insufficiency, one day of occupancy) to € 113,801 ± 27,939 (A06B, Ventilation > 1799 h with complex OR procedure). Total cumulative direct healthcare costs of € 136,608,719 were calculated, resulting in mean costs of € 4583 per case. CONCLUSION: Post-COVID Syndrome is of major public health importance with substantial financial implications. The present article can support stakeholders in health care systems to foresee future needs and adapt their resource management. Consensus diagnostic criteria and rehabilitation guidelines are highly warranted.

Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Fracture-Related Infection With a Temporary Arthrodesis Made by PMMA-Coated Intramedullary Nails - Evaluation of Technique and Quality of Life in Implant-Free Interval.

Background: Antimicrobial coating of intramedullary nails with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement promises infection control and stabilization for subsequent bone healing. However, when removing the implant, bone cement can debond and remain in the medullary cavity of the long bones, representing a nidus for reinfection. This work presents a technique comprising reinforcement of PMMA-coated intramedullary nails with cerclage wire to prevent such problems in patients treated for fracture-related infection (FRI) or knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with a static spacer as temporary arthrodesis allowing weight-bearing in the implant-free interval. Outcomes of this surgical treatment were evaluated in terms of (i) associated complications and (ii) patient-reported quality of life. Methods: In this retrospective case series, 20 patients with PJI (n = 14, 70%) and FRI (n = 6, 30%) treated with PMMA-coated intramedullary nails reinforced with cerclage wire between January 2021 and July 2021 were included. Quality of life during the implant-free interval was evaluated with the EQ-5D, SF-36, and an ICD-10 based psychological symptom rating and compared with previously analyzed cohorts of successfully treated PJI and FRI patients in whom eradication of infection and stable bone consolidation was achieved. Results: Complications during the implant-free interval comprised a broken nail in one case (5.0%) and a reinfection in one case (5.0%). Coating-specific side effects and cement debonding during removal did not occur. The mean physical health component score of SF-36 was 26.1 ± 7.6, and the mean mental health component score reached a value of 47.1 ± 18.6. The mean EQ-5D index value was 0.36 ± 0.32 and the mean EQ-5D visual analogue scale rating was 47.4 ± 19.4. The scores were significantly lower than those in the successfully treated FRI cohort but not in the PJI cohort. The mean ICD-10-based symptom rating scores revealed psychological symptom burden on the depression scale and enhanced levels of anxiety in comparison with healed FRI and PJI patients. Conclusion: Reinforcement of PMMA bone cement-coated implants seems to be a reasonable treatment option to create a temporary arthrodesis, preventing detachment of the bone cement when the implant was removed.Level of Evidence: IV.

Managing periprosthetic joint infection-a qualitative analysis of nursing staffs' experiences.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection represents a major complication in orthopaedics and trauma surgery. For an ideal management approach, it is important to understand the distinct challenges for all persons involved in the treatment. Therefore, it was aimed at investigating (1) the impact of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) on the well-being of nursing staff to (2) identify challenges, which could be improved facilitating the management of PJI. METHODS: This is a qualitative interview study. In total, 20 nurses of a German university orthopedic trauma center specialized on infectious complications were recruited using a purposive sampling strategy. Content analysis was performed on transcripts of individual in-person interviews conducted between March 2021 and June 2021. RESULTS: Three major themes could be extracted including (i) feelings associated with the management of PJI and the need for emotional support, illustrating the negative emotional impact on nurses, whereby receiving collegial support was perceived as an important coping strategy, (ii) patients' psychological burden, highlighting the nurses' lack of time to address mental issues adequately and, (iii) realization of the severity of PJI and compliance problems. CONCLUSION: Identified facilitating factors for PJI management include strengthening of mental care in the treatment of PJI, providing opportunities for exchange among multidisciplinary team members and implementing compliance-enhancing strategies. The findings of this study can be beneficial for improving professionals' satisfaction, optimising the work environment, creating organizational structures which enhance opportunities for exchange and preventing mental health issues among the nursing team.

[Current practice of empiric antibiotic treatment for spondylodiscitis]. / Aktuelle Praxis der empirischen Antibiotikatherapie bei Spondylodiszitis.

BACKGROUND AND RESEARCH QUESTION: In pyogenic spondylodiscitis, infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci must be given increasing importance. Empirical antibiosis is particularly necessary in patients with severe or progressive neurological deficits or hemodynamic instability, as well as in the case of culture-negative spondylodiscitis. It is unclear whether uniform empirical antibiosis standards adapted to the resistance profiles exist in Germany. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey on the empirical antibiotic therapy for pyogenic spondylodiscitis was conducted at German university and Berufsgenossenschaft clinics, each in the departments of orthopedics and trauma surgery. The survey results were applied to the resistance profiles of pathogens in 45 spondylodiscitis patients treated in our department between 2013 and 2020. Thus, the potential susceptibility and resistance rates were calculated for the indicated antibiotic therapies. RESULTS: Of the 71 clinics queried, a total of 44 (62.0%) responded. Sixteen different antibiotic therapies were reported as standard regimes. Among these, 14 different combination therapies were reported. The most commonly reported empirical antibiotics, namely amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ampicillin/sulbactam (29.5%) and cephalosporins (18.2%) showed high potential resistance rates of 20.0% and 35.6%, respectively, in relation to the previously published resistance profile. The highest potential susceptibility rates were achieved with a combination of vancomycin + ampicillin/sulbactam (91.1% sensitive pathogens), vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam (91.1% sensitive pathogens), and ampicillin/sulbactam + teicoplanin (95.6% sensitive pathogens). One out of these combinations was reported as standard regime by three clinics (6.8%). CONCLUSION: The nationwide survey of empiric antibiotic treatment for pyogenic spondylodiscitis revealed a large heterogeneity in the standard of care. A combination of a broad-spectrum-ß-lactam antibiotic with an additional glycopeptide antibiotic may be justified.

Decision-making to stop or continue playing after football injuries - a systematic video analysis of 711 injury situations in amateur football.

Scientific injury registration via video analysis is lacking in amateur football. The purpose of this study was to analyse match injury situations with a focus on the decisions made by players and referees after sustaining a football trauma. In a retrospective cohort study, traumatic injuries sustained in any of the 305 matches of the highest amateur level (4th league) in Germany in the 2015-16 season were assessed by means of video analysis and a standardised video protocol. In total, 711 traumatic incidents at 919 different body regions had been recorded. The three most frequently injured body regions were the ankles (34.1%), the head (17.5%) and the knees (17.0%). 90% (n = 156) of head injuries were direct contact injuries, this percentage was significantly higher than that of contact injuries on ankle (68.4%; p < 0.001) or knee (52.6%; p = 0.001). Referees decided on foul play significantly more often in case of knee injuries (57.1%; p = 0.002) or ankle injuries (64.5%; p < 0.001) than in head injuries (39.8%). Only 26.1% of players with a head injury opted for substitution, which was lower than after ankle (27.8%; p = 0.78) and knee injuries (34.0%; p = 0.13). In conclusion, amateur football is associated with a considerable number of injury situations that are followed by match interruptions and the substitution of players. Players and referees decided to continue playing more often after a head injury than after an injury to other body regions. An advanced education programme on the risks and management of head injuries in football is required to prevent long-term health consequences.

Management and Mid-Term Outcome After "Real SCIWORA" in Children and Adolescents.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: The SCIWORA Syndrome (Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiographic Abnormalities) is a rare but potentially severe injury with a peak in childhood and adolescence. With a better understanding of injury patterns and advances in MRI, there is ongoing discussion regarding the "Real SCIWORA" syndrome, a clinical picture of neurologic deficits on clinical examination but absence of radiographic pathologies even on MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid-term clinical outcome and the psychological impact of the "Real SCIWORA." METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated 32 patients treated for "Real SCIWORA" between 2007-2019. Inclusion criteria were: neurologic deficit after trauma, no other cerebral or skeletal injury and a lack of pathological findings in spinal MRI. All patients were followed until complete recovery from initial symptoms. 25/32 patients were re-evaluated after 6.9 years (1-14 years) using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Frankel Score, the EQ-5D score, and the Breslau Short Screening Scale for PTSD. RESULTS: Initial neurologic presentation ranged from Frankel Grade A-D. All patients recovered neurologically during 1-13 days to a Frankel Grade E. The analysis of HR-QoL revealed no difference between the cohort of SCIWORA patients and the German population norm, Oswestry Disability Index showed only minimal disabilities. 4/25 patients showed signs of PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: The "Real SCIWORA" syndrome is a diagnosis per exclusionem requiring a full spinal MRI to ensure exclusion of structural and potentially serious reasons of the neurologic impairment. Further clinical re-evaluation, psychological support seems to be essential. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV-retrospective study.

[Fracture-related infections after intramedullary nailing : Diagnostics and treatment]. / Frakturassoziierte Infektionen nach Marknagelosteosynthese : Diagnostik und Therapie.

Intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for a large number of fractures requiring surgery. In cases of fracture-related infections (FRI) the treatment of nail infections requires special attention due to the closed situation of the osteosynthesis material in the intramedullary canal. This article gives an overview of the general principles and diagnostic criteria for FRI after nail fixation and discusses the treatment recommendations based on three case examples. In cases of acute implant infections, an implant-retaining procedure is principally possible for both periprosthetic joint infections and FRI; however, after intramedullary nailing the nail should also be exchanged in cases of acute nail infections as a sufficient debridement of the nail is impossible due to its intramedullary location. In chronic FRI after intramedullary nailing a one-stage or two-stage procedure can be followed. In cases of adequate soft tissue coverage, good fracture reduction and an expected bone healing without critical bony substance defects, a one-stage procedure with nail exchange should be preferred. If a chronic infection with soft tissue and bone defects develops after intramedullary nailing, a two-stage procedure analogous to the treatment of osteomyelitis should be considered. In this case a multidisciplinary team approach with specialists in plastic surgery, microbiology and infectious diseases is necessary. The use of local antibiotics and antimicrobial-coated implants is deemed to be advantageous.