The acid-base effect of changing citrate solution for regional anticoagulation during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.

PURPOSE: To compare the acid-base balance effects of two different citrate doses for regional citrate anticoagulant (RCA) for continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). METHODS: We used a commercial citrate fluid (citrate concentration: 11 mmol/L) from July 2003 to July 2004 (period A) in 22 patients; then changed to a new citrate fluid (citrate concentration: 14 mmol/L) from July 2004 to Feb 2005 (Period B) in 21 patients. Replacement fluid rate was fixed at 2,000 ml/h. We measured all relevant variables for acid-base analysis according to the Stewart-Figge methodology. RESULTS: After commencement of RCA-CVVH, there was a change in bicarbonate and base excess (BE) toward acidosis for both fluids. This change was significantly different between period A and B at 6 and 12 hours (pH: p<0.01, BE: p<0.05) with greater decreases with the 11 mmol/L citrate fluid. These changes were mostly secondary to an increase in the strong ion difference (SID) and occurred despite an increased strong ion gap (SIG) (+0.5 mEq/L vs. +1.5 mEq/L; p<0.01) in the higher citrate concentration fluid. Cessation of RCA-CVVH was associated with short-lived differences in bicarbonate and SIG which were similar to those seen on initiation of RCA-CVVH but in the opposite direction. CONCLUSIONS: A small increase This was partly offset by an increase in SIG, consistent with increased citratemia. Cessation of treatment showed a differential improvement in SIG also consistent with disposal of therapy-associated citrate. These observations might assist clinicians in interpreting acidbase changes during RCA-CVVH.in citrate infusion rate caused an alkalinizing increase in SID.

A comparison of two citrate anticoagulation regimens for continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.

AIMS: To assess the safety and efficacy of two different commercial citrate containing pre-filter replacement fluids during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) in patients with frequent filter clotting. SETTING: Four intensive care units. PATIENTS: Sixty-three critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: We used a commercial citrate fluid (citrate: 11 mmol/L -fluid A) as predilution replacement for CVVH. We then changed to a new commercial citrate fluid (citrate: 14 mmol/L-fluid B) as replacement fluid and performed statistical comparisons. Replacement fluid rate was fixed at 2,000 ml/hour. RESULTS: Filter life was 12.2 hour with fluid A compared with 17.1 hour with fluid B on average (p=0.0001). Mean post filter ionized calcium concentration was 0.52 mmol/L with fluid A compared with 0.40 mmol/L with fluid B (p<0.0001). Citrate intolerance led to cessation of treatment in one patient with fluid A and one patient with fluid B. Overall ionized calcium levels were higher (A: 1.18 vs B: 1.13 mmol/L; p<0.0001) and bicarbonate was lower (A: 22.4 vs B: 24.5 mmol/L; p<0.0001) during treatment with fluid A. Alkalemia was seen in 10 patients treated with fluid A and 16 patients treated with fluid B (NS). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a simple approach to regional citrate anticoagulation for CVVH using a commercial citrate-containing fluid as replacement fluid. Increasing citrate concentration from 11 to 14 mmol/L increased filter life while maintaining relative safety and simplicity.