[PLAID-Care: Research into the reduced use of coercion in France]. / PLAID-Care : une recherche sur le moindre recours à la coercition en France.

The use of coercion is a common practice in psychiatry despite its deleterious effects and insufficient evidence of benefits. It is so deeply rooted that the mention of establishments that make little use of it arouses a form of incredulity. However, the history of psychiatry and the international literature provide numerous examples of a psychiatry that is hardly coercive and numerous experiences of a reduction in the use of seclusion and/or restraint in psychiatric facilities. Today, in France, there are also less coercive establishments, which, for example, do not use mechanical restraint, have all their units open, or have reduced their use of seclusion and restraint. With regard to the stated policy objectives of reducing the use of coercion, it is surprising that most of these facilities receive little attention. PLAID-Care research aims to contribute to the visibility and analysis of these institutions and the factors involved in the reduced use of coercion. While these factors have already been identified in the international literature, the research is based on the multiplication of disciplinary perspectives (nursing, sociology, anthropology, geography) and the mobilization of a multi-level analytical framework that allows us to embrace their multiplicity and better understand their articulation. The originality of the research also lies in its historical dimension, which allows us to understand, on the scale of an institution, how a policy and practices aiming at the least recourse emerge and are consolidated. The project timeline is divided in three tasks: firstly, an inventory of "low-coercion" facilities in France; secondly, we will select and research four traditionally "low-coercion" facilities in France; thirdly we will focus on recently emerged "low-coercion" practices. PLAID-Care aims to revitalize French research on this theme which to date has been relatively lagging behind the numerous international studies. It will bring together and articulate the knowledge, tools and forms of organization and collaboration that contribute to making a policy of lesser use of coercion operational.

Clinical practice recommendations for nurse-administered intramuscular injections in mental health: A modified Delphi study.

AIM: To develop clinical practice recommendations for nurse-administered intramuscular injections in mental health. BACKGROUND: Intramuscular injection is the main route of long-acting injectable antipsychotics' administration that appear to improve the long-term prognosis of mental illness. Specific guidelines related to the nurse administration of intramuscular injections need to be updated and to explore not only the technical aspects of this procedure. DESIGN: A modified RAND/University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) appropriateness method Delphi study was conducted between October 2019 and September 2020. METHODS: A multidisciplinary steering committee conducted a literature review and developed a list of 96 recommendations. These recommendations were submitted in a two-round Delphi electronic survey to a panel of 49 experienced practicing nurses from five mental health hospitals in France. Each recommendation was rated for its appropriateness and applicability in clinical practice on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus among nurses was evaluated. The steering committee discussed the results after each round and approved the final set of recommendations. RESULTS: A final set of 79 specific recommendations were accepted for their appropriateness and applicability in clinical practice. Recommendations were classified in five domains: legal and quality assurance aspects, nurse-patient relationship, hygiene, pharmacology, and injection technique. CONCLUSION: The established recommendations placed patients at the heart of the decisions concerning the intramuscular injection and underlined the need for specific training programs. Future research should focus on the integration of these recommendations in clinical practice, by both before-and-after studies and regular assessments of professional practices with relevant indicators. IMPACT: The recommendations developed for good nursing practices explored not only the technical aspects but integrated the nurse-patient relationship. These recommendations may impact usual practices of administration of long-acting injectable antipsychotics and most of them could be applied in many countries. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Due to the study design.

[Constructing bonds to make a team]. / Construire les liens pour faire équipe.

The professional group constitutes a third party in the care relationships and situations handled by nurses. A care research study identified some of the functions which make up this activity of constructing bonds within the team and contribute to the assertion of collective skills. Working on the bond as a group favours moving from the notion of the team to the more qualitative notion of the collective.

[The invisible reality of informal nursing]. / L'invisible réalité des soins informels infirmiers.

Informal care was the subject of nursing research carried out by two psychiatric nurses. The investigation showed the importance within nursing of informal care, often confined to qualities associated with gender and the maternal function. A review of the pathway of the researchers, with a presentation of the choice of this research theme, a methodological resume and an overview of the results.

[The primary function of words in action]. / La fonction primaire de la parole en acte.

The task of characterising functions in relation to the informal aspects of psychiatric care constitutes the heart of research results. An illustration based on the function of words in action. Words in action are full, they respond to a demand for reliability. They are words which restore speech, comment and support so that we can hold on to them as a channel for the construction of a connection.