Clinical Outcomes of Protocolized Antibiotic Dosing in Critically Ill Surgical Patients With Bacteremia and Augmented Renal Clearance Compared With Critically Ill Surgical Patients Without Augmented Renal Clearance.

Background: Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a phenomenon observed in critically ill patients, leading to supraphysiologic drug clearance and concern for suboptimal antibiotic concentrations. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of our institutional protocolized antibiotic dosing regimen in critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC compared with critically ill patients without ARC. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of an institutional protocolized antibiotic dosing regimen in critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC compared with critically ill patients without ARC. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, days requiring mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, development of drug resistance to index antibiotic agent, and documented clearance of blood cultures within 72 hours. Results: There were 75 patients included in this study. Twenty percent of patients in the ARC group died in the hospital versus 31% in the non-ARC group (p = 0.26). The results for the ARC group versus the non-ARC group for the secondary outcomes of ICU mortality (20% vs. 26%; p = 0.56), ICU LOS (14.7 days vs. 7 days; p = 0.07), hospital LOS (28.3 days vs. 21.6 days; p = 0.03), days requiring mechanical ventilation (14 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.49), duration of antibiotic therapy (7.5 days vs. 9.0 days; p = 0.39), documented clearance of blood cultures within 72 hours (41% vs. 33%; p = 0.56), and the development of drug resistance to the index antibiotic agent (0% vs. 0%; p > 0.99) were also calculated. Conclusions: Among critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality compared with critically ill patients without ARC. There was a difference in hospital LOS, with a shorter duration of stay for the non-ARC group. There was no development of multi-drug-resistant organisms in either group.

A Baker's Dozen of Top Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Publications for Hospitalized Patients in 2021.

Keeping abreast of the antimicrobial stewardship-related articles published each year is challenging. The Southeastern Research Group Endeavor (SERGE-45) identified antimicrobial stewardship-related, peer-reviewed literature that detailed an "actionable" intervention among hospitalized populations during 2021. The top 13 publications were selected using a modified Delphi technique. These manuscripts were reviewed to highlight "actionable" interventions used by antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitalized populations to capture potentially effective strategies for local implementation.

Change in Antimicrobial Use During COVID-19 Pandemic in South Carolina Hospitals: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cohort study examined the impact of the pandemic on antimicrobial use (AU) in South Carolina hospitals. METHODS: Antimicrobial use in days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 days-present was evaluated in 17 hospitals in South Carolina. Matched-pairs mean difference was used to compare AU during the pandemic (March-June 2020) with that during the same months in 2019 in hospitals that did and did not admit patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: There was a 6.6% increase in overall AU in the seven hospitals that admitted patients with COVID-19 (from 530.9 to 565.8; mean difference (MD) 34.9 DOT/1000 days-present; 95% CI 4.3, 65.6; P = 0.03). There was no significant change in overall AU in the remaining 10 hospitals that did not admit patients with COVID-19 (MD 6.0 DOT/1000 days-present; 95% CI -55.5, 67.6; P = 0.83). Most of the increase in AU in the seven hospitals that admitted patients with COVID-19 was observed in broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. A 16.4% increase was observed in agents predominantly used for hospital-onset infections (from 122.3 to 142.5; MD 20.1 DOT/1000 days-present; 95% CI 11.1, 29.1; P = 0.002). There was also a 9.9% increase in the use of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) agents (from 66.7 to 73.3; MD 6.6 DOT/1000 days-present; 95% CI 2.3, 10.8; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic appears to drive overall and broad-spectrum antimicrobial use in South Carolina hospitals admitting patients with COVID-19. Additional antimicrobial stewardship resources are needed to curtail excessive antimicrobial use in hospitals to prevent subsequent increases in antimicrobial resistance and Clostridioides difficile infection rates, given the continuing nature of the pandemic.

Sulfonamide Allergies.

As one of the earliest developed antimicrobial classes, sulfonamides remain important therapeutic options for the empiric and definitive treatment of various infectious diseases. In the general population, approximately 3-8% of patients are reported to experience a sulfonamide allergy. Sulfonamide allergies can result in various physical manifestations; however, rash is reported as the most frequently observed. In patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), dermatologic reactions to sulfonamide antimicrobial agents occur 10 to 20 times more frequently compared to immunocompetent patients. This article describes the incidence, manifestations, and risk factors associated with sulfonamide allergies. The potential for cross-reactivity of allergies to sulfonamide antimicrobials with nonantimicrobial sulfonamide medications is also reviewed. Data suggest that substitutions at the N1 and N4 positions are the primary determinants of drug allergy instead of the common sulfonamide moiety. For patients with an indication for a sulfonamide antimicrobial with a listed allergy, it is important for healthcare practitioners to adequately assess the allergic reaction to determine appropriate management. Rechallenge and desensitization strategies may be appropriate for patients with delayed maculopapular eruptions, while alternative treatment options may be prudent for more severe reactions. Available data suggests a low risk of cross-allergenicity between sulfonamide antimicrobial and nonantimicrobial agents.

Targeting HER2 in breast cancer: overview of long-term experience.

The ability to probe diseases at the genomic level has improved our understanding and enhanced the treatment of breast cancer. One important finding relates to the HER2 oncogene which encodes a novel transmembrane receptor that, when overexpressed, appears to confer growth and survival advantages to breast tumor cells. This fortuitous discovery enabled researchers to develop agents which could inhibit receptor-mediated tumor cell signaling. Numerous clinical trials of such agents have demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Nonetheless, not all tumors respond to therapy targeting the receptor, while relapses occur after an initial response to treatment. This paper provides a historical and current perspective of the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.