Manejo racional de las neuropatías diabéticas: consenso multidisciplinario de expertos / Rational management of the diabetic neuropathies: a multidisciplinary expert group consensus

Resumen: La diabetes mellitus, un padecimiento crónico y progresivo, ocupó el tercer lugar en defunciones durante el período comprendido de enero a junio de 2021 en México. Su complicación crónica más frecuente es la neuropatía diabética que tiene un impacto importante en el sistema nervioso. En la Ciudad de México se reunió un grupo multidisciplinario de expertos para establecer un algoritmo de tratamiento que considere los aspectos sintomáticos y etiopatogénicos de la neuropatía diabética. Se utilizó un método Delphi en tiempo real con dos rondas de preguntas interactivas. La implementación del algoritmo propuesto permitirá abordar de manera integral al paciente diabético con neuropatía dolorosa y no dolorosa, tanto en el terreno de los síntomas como en la etiopatogenia. Este abordaje brinda la oportunidad de mejorar la calidad de vida y lograr la reinserción a la vida familiar y laboral. El panel de expertos recomienda al ácido tióctico como tratamiento etiopatogénico de primera línea en la neuropatía diabética.

Abstract: Diabetes mellitus, a chronic and progressive condition, was the third most common cause of death in Mexico between January and June 2021. Its most frequent chronic complication is diabetic neuropathy, which has a major impact on the nervous system. A multidisciplinary group of experts met in Mexico City to establish a treatment algorithm considering the symptomatic and etiopathogenic aspects of diabetic neuropathy. A real-time Delphi method with two rounds of interative questions was used. The implementation of the proposed algorithm will allow a comprehensive approach to the diabetic patient with painful and non-painful neuropathy, both in terms of symptoms and etiopathogenesis. This approach provides the opportunity to improve quality of life and achieve reintegration into family and work life. The expert panel recommends thioctic acid as the first line etiopathogenic treatment for diabetic neuropathy.

Considerations for Pain Assessments in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review of the Latin American Perspective.

Cancer incidence in Latin America is lower than in Europe or the United States but morbidity and mortality rates are disproportionately high. A barrier to adequate pain control is inadequate pain assessment, which is a relatively easy and inexpensive metric. The objective of this narrative review is to describe pain assessment for cancer patients in Latin America. Cultural factors may influence pain perception, including contextualizing pain as noble or natural suffering and aspects of what is now called "spiritual pain." Unlike other painful conditions, cancer pain may be strongly associated with existential fear, psychosocial distress, anxiety, and spiritual concerns. Pain assessment allows not just quantification of pain intensity but may elucidate pain mechanisms involved or psychosocial aspects that may color the pain. Many current pain assessment instruments capture only pain intensity, which is but one aspect of the pain experience; some have expanded to include functional assessments, mental health status evaluations, and quality of life metrics. A quality-of-life assessment may be appropriate for cancer patients since chronic pain can severely impact function, which can in turn create a vicious cycle by exacerbating pain. The incidence of cancer in Latin America is expected to increase in the ensuing years. Better pain assessment and clinician education are needed to help manage pain in this large and growing patient population.

A Latin American consensus meeting on the essentials of mixed pain.

OBJECTIVES: The term "mixed pain" has been established when a mixture of different pain components (e.g. nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic) are present. It has gained more and more acceptance amongst pain experts worldwide, but many questions around the concept of mixed pain are still unsolved. The sensation of pain is very personal. Cultural, social, personal experiences, idiomatic, and taxonomic differences should be taken into account during pain assessment. Therefore, a Latin American consensus committee was formed to further elaborate the essentials of mixed pain, focusing on the specific characteristics of the Latin American population. METHODS: The current approach was based on a systematic literature search and review carried out in Medline. Eight topics about the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of mixed pain were discussed and voted for by a Latin American consensus committee and recommendations were expressed. RESULTS: At the end of the meeting a total of 14 voting sheets were collected. The full consensus was obtained for 21 of 25 recommendations (15 strong agreement and 6 unanimous agreement) formulated for the above described 8 topics (7 of the 8 topics had for all questions at least a strong agreement - 1 topic had no agreement for all 4 questions). CONCLUSION: In a subject as complex as mixed pain, a consensus has been reached among Latin American specialists on points related to the definition and essence of this pain, its diagnosis and treatment. Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of mixed pain in Latin America were raised.

Quality of life and functional outcomes with tapentadol prolonged release in chronic musculoskeletal pain: post hoc analysis.

Aims: To investigate quality of life (QOL) and functionality changes in chronic pain during tapentadol prolonged release (PR) treatment. Patients & methods: Post hoc analysis of data from three Phase III trials in patients with osteoarthritis knee pain or low back pain. QOL and functionality changes were assessed by SF-36 scores. Results: All SF-36 subdomain scores improved progressively to week 3 of tapentadol titration and were sustained during 12-week maintenance treatment. Improvements in SF-36 scores were similar between tapentadol dose groups (e.g., 200 to <300 mg vs ≥500 mg), with no greater effect from higher doses. QOL and functionality improvements were consistently greater with tapentadol PR than oxycodone controlled release. Conclusion: Tapentadol PR provides consistent, clinically relevant improvements in QOL and functionality in chronic pain.

Consenso multidisciplinario de diagnóstico y tratamiento del dolor neuropático periférico y localizado en México.

Neuropathic pain is an entity that causes patient disability and its diagnosis and treatment is a challenge for physicians. In a significant percentage of patients with neuropathic pain, it is restricted to one dermatome or to a particular region of the body; in this case, it is referred to as localized neuropathic pain. There are no Mexican clinical guidelines proposing recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of localized neuropathic pain in our population. This article presents the recommendations of a multidisciplinary consensus of specialists from different areas involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this type of patients.

El dolor neuropático es una entidad que provoca discapacidad al paciente y su diagnóstico y tratamiento es un reto para los médicos. En un porcentaje importante de pacientes afectados, el dolor neuropático se presenta circunscrito a un dermatoma o a una región concreta del cuerpo, denominándose en ese caso dolor neuropático localizado. No existen guías clínicas mexicanas que postulen recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del dolor neuropático localizado en nuestra población. En este artículo se exponen las recomendaciones de un consenso multidisciplinario realizado con especialistas de distintas áreas implicadas en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de este tipo de pacientes.

Consenso multidisciplinario de diagnóstico y tratamiento del dolor neuropático periférico y localizado en México / Multidisciplinary consensus on diagnosis and treatment of peripheral and localized neuropathic pain in Mexico

Resumen El dolor neuropático es una entidad que provoca discapacidad al paciente y su diagnóstico y tratamiento es un reto para los médicos. En un porcentaje importante de pacientes afectados, el dolor neuropático se presenta circunscrito a un dermatoma o a una región concreta del cuerpo, denominándose en ese caso dolor neuropático localizado. No existen guías clínicas mexicanas que postulen recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del dolor neuropático localizado en nuestra población. En este artículo se exponen las recomendaciones de un consenso multidisciplinario realizado con especialistas de distintas áreas implicadas en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de este tipo de pacientes.

Abstract Neuropathic pain is an entity that causes patient disability and its diagnosis and treatment is a challenge for physicians. In a significant percentage of patients with neuropathic pain, it is restricted to one dermatome or to a particular region of the body; in this case, it is referred to as localized neuropathic pain. There are no Mexican clinical guidelines proposing recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of localized neuropathic pain in our population. This article presents the recommendations of a multidisciplinary consensus of specialists from different areas involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this type of patients.

Latin American and Caribbean consensus on noninvasive central nervous system neuromodulation for chronic pain management (LAC2-NIN-CP).

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain (CP) is highly prevalent and generally undertreated health condition. Noninvasive brain stimulation may contribute to decrease pain intensity and influence other aspects related to CP. OBJECTIVE: To provide consensus-based recommendations for the use of noninvasive brain stimulation in clinical practice. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature searching for randomized clinical trials followed by consensus panel. Recommendations also involved a cost-estimation study. RESULTS: The systematic review wielded 24 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and 22 repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) studies. The following recommendations were provided: (1) Level A for anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1) in fibromyalgia, and level B for peripheral neuropathic pain, abdominal pain, and migraine; bifrontal (F3/F4) tDCS and M1 high-definition (HD)-tDCS for fibromyalgia; Oz/Cz tDCS for migraine and for secondary benefits such as improvement in quality of life, decrease in anxiety, and increase in pressure pain threshold; (2) level A recommendation for high-frequency (HF) rTMS over M1 for fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain, and level B for myofascial or musculoskeletal pain, complex regional pain syndrome, and migraine; (3) level A recommendation against the use of anodal M1 tDCS for low back pain; and (4) level B recommendation against the use of HF rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the control of pain. CONCLUSION: Transcranial DCS and rTMS are recommended techniques to be used in the control of CP conditions, with low to moderate analgesic effects, and no severe adverse events. These recommendations are based on a systematic review of the literature and a consensus made by experts in the field. Readers should use it as part of the resources available to decision-making.

Current understanding of the mixed pain concept: a brief narrative review.

Despite having been referenced in the literature for over a decade, the term "mixed pain" has never been formally defined. The strict binary classification of pain as being either purely neuropathic or nociceptive once left a good proportion of patients unclassified; even the recent adoption of "nociplastic pain" in the IASP Terminology leaves out patients who present clinically with a substantial overlap of nociceptive and neuropathic symptoms. For these patients, the term "mixed pain" is increasingly recognized and accepted by clinicians. Thus, an independent group of international multidisciplinary clinicians convened a series of informal discussions to consolidate knowledge and articulate all that is known (or, more accurately, thought to be known) and all that is not known about mixed pain. To inform the group's discussions, a Medline search for the Medical Subject Heading "mixed pain" was performed via PubMed. The search strategy encompassed clinical trial articles and reviews from January 1990 to the present. Clinically relevant articles were selected and reviewed. This paper summarizes the group's consensus on several key aspects of the mixed pain concept, to serve as a foundation for future attempts at generating a mechanistic and/or clinical definition of mixed pain. A definition would have important implications for the development of recommendations or guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of mixed pain.

Undertreatment of pain and low use of opioids in Latin America.

Pain is highly prevalent among the adult Latin American population. However, many patients with moderate to severe pain do not have access to effective pain management with opioids due to limited access to healthcare, overuse of nonopioid analgesics, regulatory barriers and lack of appropriate information about opioids. There is scarce training on use of opioids among physicians and other healthcare providers, which leads to misconceptions, mainly related to a fear of prescribing opioids. Although opioids are safe and effective drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain, the use of opioids in Latin American nations is clearly below standards compared with developed countries.

Most Relevant Neuropathic Pain Treatment and Chronic Low Back Pain Management Guidelines: A Change Pain Latin America Advisory Panel Consensus.

Objective: Chronic pain conditions profoundly affect the daily living of a significant number of people and are a major economic and social burden, particularly in developing countries. The Change Pain Latin America (CPLA) advisory panel aimed to identify the most appropriate guidelines for the treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) for use across Latin America. Methods: Published systematic reviews or practice guidelines were identified by a systematic search of PubMed, the Guidelines Clearinghouse, and Google. Articles were screened by an independent reviewer, and potential candidate guidelines were selected for more in-depth review. A shortlist of suitable guidelines was selected and critically evaluated by the CPLA advisory panel. Results: Searches identified 674 and 604 guideline articles for NP and CLBP, respectively. Of these, 14 guidelines were shortlisted for consensus consideration, with the following final selections made: "Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain from the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group in 2015-pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.""Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society" (2007). Conclusions: The selected guidelines were endorsed by all members of the CPLA advisory board as the best fit for use across Latin America. In addition, regional considerations were discussed and recorded. We have included this expert local insight and advice to enhance the implementation of each guideline across all Latin American countries.

The role of tramadol in pain management in Latin America: a report by the Change Pain Latin America Advisory Panel.

OBJECTIVE: Change Pain Latin America (CPLA) was created to enhance chronic pain understanding and develop pain management improving strategies in this region. During its seventh meeting (August 2016), the main objective was to discuss tramadol's role in treating pain in Latin America. Furthermore, potential pain management consequences were considered, if tramadol was to become more stringently controlled. METHODS: Key topics discussed were: main indications for prescribing tramadol, its pharmacological characteristics, safety and tolerability, effects of restrictions on its availability and use, and consequent impact on pain care quality. RESULTS: The experts agreed that tramadol is used to treat a wide spectrum of non-oncological pain conditions (e.g. post-surgical, musculoskeletal, post-traumatic, neuropathic, fibromyalgia), as well as cancer pain. Its relevance when treating special patient groups (e.g. the elderly) is recognized. The main reasons for tramadol's high significance as a treatment option are: its broad efficacy, an inconspicuous safety profile and its availability, considering that access to strong analgesics - mainly controlled drugs (classical opioids) - is highly restricted in some countries. The CPLA also agreed that tramadol is well tolerated, without the safety issues associated with long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, with fewer opioid-like side effects than classical opioids and lower abuse risk. CONCLUSIONS: In Latin America, tramadol is a valuable and frequently used medication for treating moderate to severe pain. More stringent regulations would have significant impact on its availability, especially for outpatients. This could cause regression to older and frequently inadequate pain management methods, resulting in unnecessary suffering for many Latin American patients.

Latin-American guidelines for cancer pain management.

Cancer is a major public health issue. Poor pain management has devastating consequences that seriously affect quality of life, diminish functionality and place a huge emotional burden on patients and their relatives. A group of Latin American opinion leaders were invited to participate in a meeting to discuss areas associated with cancer pain. The expert panel reviewed the latest literature to draft region-specific guidelines for effective pain management. The guidelines make recommendations on tailoring treatment to the specific type of pain and provide local physicians with the state-of-the art findings in the field. Management should be with pharmacological approaches (nonopioid, adjuvant and opioid analgesics, as well as oncologic therapies and interventional procedures) and nonpharmacological approaches.

Latin-American guidelines for opioid use in chronic nononcologic pain.

AIM: Latin-American experts in the use of opioids in patients with chronic nononcologic pain (CNOP) have updated existing recommendations to current Latin-American reality. METHODS: Several key opinion leaders from Latin America participated in a face-to-face meeting in Guatemala (April 2015) to discuss the use of opioids in CNOP. Subgroups of experts worked on specific topics, reviewed the literature and shaped the final manuscript. RESULTS: The expert panel developed guidelines taking into consideration the utility of both opioid and nonopioid analgesics and factors pertaining to their efficacy, safety, adherence, administration and risks for abuse/addiction. CONCLUSION: Latin-American guidelines for the use of opioids in CNOP should improve pain relief and patients' quality of life by increasing access to these effective agents.

Use of Opioids in Latin America: The Need of an Evidence-Based Change.

OBJECTIVE: The subject of this publication has been focused on local considerations for facilitating regional best practice, including identifying and uniformly adopting the most relevant international guidelines on opioid use (OU) in chronic pain management. DESIGN AND SETTING: The Change Pain Latin America (CPLA) Advisory Panel conducted a comprehensive, robust, and critical analysis of published national and international reviews and guidelines of OU, considering those most appropriate for Latin America. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted using the terms "opioid," "chronic," and "pain" and then refined using the filters "practice guidelines" and "within the last 5 years" (2007-2012). Once the publications were identified, they were selected using five key criteria: "Evidence based," "Comprehensive," "From a well-recognized source," "Current publications," and "Based on best practice" and then critically analyzed considering 10 key criteria for determining the most relevant guidelines to be applied in Latin America. RESULTS: The initial PubMed search identified 177 reviews and guidelines, which was reduced to 16 articles using the five preliminary criteria. After a secondary analysis according to the 10 key criteria specific to OU in Latin America, 10 publications were selected for critical review and discussion. CONCLUSIONS: The CPLA advisory panel considered the "Safe and effective use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain" (published in 2010 by the NOUGG of Canada) to be valid, relevant to Latin America, practical, evidence-based, concise, unambiguous, and sufficiently educational to provide clear instruction on OU and pain management and, thus, recommended for uniform adoption across the Latin America region.

Delírium en adultos que reciben cuidados paliativos: revisión de la literatura con un enfoque sistemático / Delirium in adult patients receiving palliative care: a systematic review of the literature

El delírium en pacientes que reciben cuidados paliativos es frecuente y constituye un importante reto de diagnóstico y tratamiento. Nuestro objetivo fue realizar en 2 fases un análisis bibliométrico de la evidencia científica reciente (2007 a 2012) sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento del delírium en adultos en cuidados paliativos. En la fase 1 (estudios descriptivos y revisiones narrativas) se identificaron 133 artículos relevantes: 73 trataron el tema del delírium de forma secundaria y en 60 artículos como tema principal. Sin embargo, solo se identificaron 4 estudios observacionales prospectivos en los que el delírium fue central. De 135 artículos identificados en la fase 2 (ensayos clínicos o estudios descriptivos sobre tratamiento del delírium en pacientes paliativos), solo 3 fueron sobre prevención o tratamiento: 2 estudios retrospectivos y un ensayo clínico sobre prevención multicomponente en pacientes con cáncer. Gran parte de la literatura reciente corresponde a revisiones que hablan de estudios realizados hace más de una década en pacientes diferentes a los que reciben cuidados paliativos. En conclusión, la evidencia científica reciente sobre el delírium en cuidados paliativos es escasa y subóptima. Urgen estudios prospectivos que se enfoquen específicamente en esta población altamente vulnerable (AU)

Delirium in palliative care patients is common and its diagnosis and treatment is a major challenge. Our objective was to perform a literature analysis in two phases on the recent scientific evidence (2007-2012) on the diagnosis and treatment of delirium in adults receiving palliative care. In phase 1 (descriptive studies and narrative reviews) 133 relevant articles were identified: 73 addressed the issue of delirium secondarily, and 60 articles as the main topic. However, only 4 prospective observational studies in which delirium was central were identified. Of 135 articles analysed in phase 2 (clinical trials or descriptive studies on treatment of delirium in palliative care patients), only 3 were about prevention or treatment: 2 retrospective studies and one clinical trial on multicomponent prevention in cancer patients. Much of the recent literature is related to reviews on studies conducted more than a decade ago and on patients different to those receiving palliative care. In conclusion, recent scientific evidence on delirium in palliative care is limited and suboptimal. Prospective studies are urgently needed that focus specifically on this highly vulnerable population (AU)

Delirium in adult patients receiving palliative care: a systematic review of the literature.

Delirium in palliative care patients is common and its diagnosis and treatment is a major challenge. Our objective was to perform a literature analysis in two phases on the recent scientific evidence (2007-2012) on the diagnosis and treatment of delirium in adults receiving palliative care. In phase 1 (descriptive studies and narrative reviews) 133 relevant articles were identified: 73 addressed the issue of delirium secondarily, and 60 articles as the main topic. However, only 4 prospective observational studies in which delirium was central were identified. Of 135 articles analysed in phase 2 (clinical trials or descriptive studies on treatment of delirium in palliative care patients), only 3 were about prevention or treatment: 2 retrospective studies and one clinical trial on multicomponent prevention in cancer patients. Much of the recent literature is related to reviews on studies conducted more than a decade ago and on patients different to those receiving palliative care. In conclusion, recent scientific evidence on delirium in palliative care is limited and suboptimal. Prospective studies are urgently needed that focus specifically on this highly vulnerable population.

[Clinical pattern of patients cared for at pain clinic by first time]. / Característkicas de los enfermos que acuden a clínicas del dolor por primera vez.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies about frequency and prevalence of chronic pain in Mexico are scarce. However, it has been documented that chronic pain is a frequent complain in general population and mainly in older adults. It influences physical patient capacity and it impacts social health services with its expensive cost. Our objective was to identify the clinical pattern of patients attending at a Pain Clinic by first time. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive-retrospective study, in a five years period, with patients attending a Pain Clinic by first time. We collected demographic data and information about the cause of pain (malignant vs. non-malignant etiology), its intensity by visual analogue scale (VAS), and type (somatic, visceral, neuropathic and mixed). RESULTS: 1453 clinical records were analyzed. Women were more affected; the average age was 59 +/- 16 years; non-malignant pain and neuropathic pain were more frequent; the intensity average was 6 +/- 2, and it increases with age. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to generate epidemiological studies to fundament health policies regarding the management of these patients.

Parámetros de práctica para el manejo del dolor en cáncer: Grupo de Consenso para el Manejo del Dolor en Cáncer / Practice guidelines for cancer pain management: Task Force for Cancer Pain Management

El dolor por cáncer es un problema frecuente en nuestro medio, se presenta en 80 a 90 % de los pacientes y en aproximadamente 90 % de ellos se resuelve con medidas relativamente sencillas. No obstante, aproximadamente 40 % de los pacientes se encuentra insatisfecho con el médico o la enfermera respecto al manejo de su dolor. Por tal motivo, se convocó a un grupo de consenso con la finalidad de generar parámetros de práctica clínica fundamentados en la evidencia publicada y en la opinión de los expertos. Este grupo estuvo integrado por 31 médicos líderes de opinión es este campo, quienes con base en 599 documentos emitieron esta serie de recomendaciones, identificadas cada una según su nivel de evidencia.

Cancer pain is a frequent medical problem in our society. This syndrome affects from 80 to 90% of cancer patients and can be solved with relatively simple measures in 90% of the cases. Approximately 40% of cancer patients reported to be unsatisfied with the physician or nurse about their pain management. For these reasons, we gathered a task force in order to generate practice guidelines based on medical evidence and on the opinion of experts in this area. These guidelines were generated by a task force of 31 physicians who were leaders in this field and based on 599 papers selected by a previous literature search. This group evaluated the results of this search in three work sessions, during which a level of evidence was assigned to each recommendation.

Corroboración radiológica de catéteres peridurales instalados crónicamente en pacientes con dolor / Radiological control of epidural catheters placed in chronic pain patients

El abordaje cada vez más frecuente del espacio epidural o intratecal con fines diagnósticos, pronósticos y/o terapéuticos, ha propiciado la invasión de estas estructuras por largos períodos, lo cual obliga a precisar la ubicación y el destino de los agentes farmacológicos, que con fines analgésicos se administran en estos. Por esta razón nos propusimos a evaluar la utilidad del epidurograma como método de verificación de catéteres instalados en pacientes con dolor crónico.

Dos técnicas anestésicas en cirugía nasal. Estudio comparativo utilizando máscara laríngea más anestesia local y sedación general balanceada / Comparative study using laringeal mask airway, local anesthesia and sedation versus endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia in nasal surgery

Objetivo: Demostrar que existen alternativas en el manejo de la cirugía nasal, además de las clásicas técnicas generales inhalatorias y endovenosas, en las que se realiza intubación orotraqueal para proteger la vía aérea de secreciones, sangrado, y mantener una vía continua de suministro de oxígeno. También, probar la utilidad de un instrumento tecnológicamente innovador, la máscara laríngea, que proporciona una vía aérea controlada, predecible y a través de la cual se puede administrar oxigeno y anestésicos inhalatorios, siendo minimamente estimulante y de colocación sencilla. Material y Métodos: Se obtuvo la muestra de los pacientes programados para rinoseptumplastía de Servicio de Otorrinolaringología. Se trata de 30 sujetos en dos grupos de 15 en forma aleatoria. El grupo experimental se manejo con inducción endovenosa para colocación de la LMA, a través de la cual se suministro oxígeno. Se dio mantenimiento con infusión continua de propofol a dosis de sedación y meperidina (dosis única). El grupo control recibió una técnica general balanceada, IOT previa inducción endovenosa, empleando en el mantenimiento enfluorano y fentanyl (bolos). En algunos grupos se infiltró lidocaína con epinefrina 1:200 000 en la región nasal. Resultados: En el grupo experimental se observó reducción del sangrado quirúrgico entre un 50 y 90 por ciento, del tiempo de recuperación postanestésica en un 25 por ciento. Se registraron mayores alteraciones de la frecuencia cardíaca y mayor retención de CO2. Conclusiones: Demostramos que una técnica de sedación endovenosa aunada a infiltración adecuada de la región nasal, suministrando oxígeno a través de la máscara laríngea, brinda condiciones adecuadas para el desarrollo del transanestésico en pacientes ASA. I y II