Assessment of orthodontic treatment efficacy of Clarity Aligners using the Peer Assessment Rating index and the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: 3M Oral Care Solutions (St Paul, Minn) has recently introduced Clarity Aligners into the market. This cohort study evaluated the orthodontic treatment efficacy of this clear aligner system using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation (CR-Eval). METHODS: Pretreatment and posttreatment dental models of 87 subjects who had undergone orthodontic treatment using Clarity Aligners in both arches to align their teeth to a target setup were independently evaluated by 4 examiners using the PAR index and the American Board of Orthodontics CR-Eval. Changes in CR-Eval and PAR scores from pretreatment to posttreatment were calculated, with PAR score reductions also expressed as percentages. RESULTS: Treatment with Clarity Aligners reduced the CR-Eval scores from 39.05 ± 14.98 to 30.34 ± 8.76, resulting in a statistically significant difference of 8.76 ± 11.45 between pretreatment and posttreatment scores. Similarly, aligner treatment reduced the weighted PAR scores from 13.40 ± 9.26 to 5.80 ± 4.84, resulting in a statistically significant difference of 7.50 ± 7.56 between pretreatment and posttreatment scores. The overall median PAR reduction was 53%, with 94% of the subjects having reduced PAR scores after treatment. Seventy-eight percent of subjects had >30% PAR reduction, 57% had >50% PAR reduction, and 33% had >70% PAR reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that Clarity Aligners may be an effective treatment modality in mild to moderate malocclusions.

Three-dimensional cone-beam computed technology evaluation of skeletal and dental changes in growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to 3-dimensionally quantify and compare the outcomes of growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance in combination with full fixed orthodontic appliances. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 22 patients with Class II malocclusion with the following inclusion criteria: ANB >4.75°, Class II molar relationship, and SN-GoGn <37°. The mean age of patients was 12.5 ± 1.1 years at baseline. The average treatment time was 27.7 ± 7.3 months. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were superimposed in the cranial base, maxillary regional, and mandibular regional to evaluate growth, treatment displacements, and bone remodeling. RESULTS: Relevant statistically and clinically significant skeletal changes included average decreases in ANB (2.1 ± 1.1°) and SNA (1.8 ± 1.1°); posterior (1.3 ± 1.4 mm) and inferior (4.6 ± 2.2 mm) displacement of A-point; inferior displacements of B-point (5.4 ± 2.8 mm) and Pogonion (5.8 ± 2.6 mm); superior displacement of Condylion (6.9 ± 2.4 mm); increase in mandibular length (5.4 ± 2.0 mm); and clockwise rotation of palatal plane (1.9 ± 1.9°). Significant proclination of the maxillary incisors (9.8 ± 11.1°) and nonsignificant proclination of the mandibular incisors (4.7 ± 9.6°) were also noted. CONCLUSIONS: Class II skeletal correction was primarily achieved by posterior, inferior displacement of the sagittal position of the maxilla. Change in the sagittal position of the mandible/chin (B-point, Pogonion) was not significant; rather, mandibular displacement was significant in an inferior vertical direction without backward rotation, as seen from marked condylar and ramus growth.

Orbital volume changes during growth and development in human children assessed using cone beam computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To measure growth-related changes in orbital volume from childhood to the late teenage years using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved 65 (24 male, 41 female) healthy Caucasian children (ages 6-18 years) with existing serial craniofacial CBCT scans. CBCT scans were available for 292 orbits. Each orbit was transformed into a closed space with well-defined boundaries, and orbital volume was measured using manual segmentation. A novel statistical analysis was applied to extract the maximum amount of longitudinal information from the data. Intra- and inter-operator correlation coefficients were calculated from replications performed on a random subset of 10% of the sample. RESULTS: Orbital volume increased at a rate of 1-2% annually until the late teenage years. Intra- and inter-operator agreement between repeated measurements were >90%. CONCLUSIONS: Orbital volume increases by 1-2% per year throughout childhood continuing until the late teenage years. This annual increase is large enough to be clinically relevant as it may lead to less-than-optimal long term surgical outcomes when reconstructive surgery for the pediatric anophthalmic socket is required.

Evaluation of transverse maxillary growth on cone-beam computed tomography images.

This study aimed at quantifying the annual transverse growth of the maxilla using skeletal landmarks in three different regions on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. CBCT scans taken before and after orthodontic treatment of 100 child and adolescent patients (50 male, 50 female) without maxillary transverse deficiencies were used to determine the transverse linear distances between the greater palatine foramina (GPFd), the lateral walls of the nasal cavity (NCd), and the infraorbital foramina (IOFd). We found that all distances increased significantly with growth in both genders (p < 0.001). The overall average annual change was 0.5 mm for GPFd, 0.3 mm for NCd, and 0.7 mm for IOFd. Males generally had greater annual changes than females for GPFd and IOFd, but not NCd. There were weak, statistically not significant (p > 0.05) correlations between patient age and the annual changes in GPFd, NCd, and IOFd. These results suggest that the positions of the greater palatine foramina, the lateral walls of the nasal cavity, and the infraorbital foramina change consistently with maxillary transverse growth. Clinicians can use the growth rates as population averages to more confidently estimate the amount of skeletal transverse deficiency or evaluate the long-term effects of maxillary expansion treatment.

Midpalatal suture density ratio: Assessing the predictive power of a novel predictor of skeletal response to maxillary expansion.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a common orthodontic treatment to correct maxillary transverse deficiency; however, the inability to determine the precise timing of fusion of the midpalatal suture creates difficulty for clinicians to prescribe the appropriate treatment, surgical or nonsurgical expansion. The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive power of the midpalatal suture density ratio (MPSD) for a skeletal response to RME. METHODS: Pre- and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained from 78 orthodontic patients aged from 8 to 18 years treated with RME. MPSDs were calculated from pretreatment scans, and a prediction was made for the amount of skeletal expansion obtained at the level of the palate after comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Predicted values were compared with actual outcomes as assessed from posttreatment scans, followed by regression analyses to investigate correlations between MPSD and skeletal expansion and equivalence testing to analyze the performance of the predicted measurements. RESULTS: The MPSDs were not statistically significantly (P >0.05) correlated with the amount of skeletal expansion achieved. In addition, the predicted skeletal expansion using MPSD was not statistically equivalent to the skeletal expansion achieved using an equivalence margin of ±0.05. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the MPSD obtained from pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans were not correlated well enough with the amount of skeletal expansion achieved to be an effective predictor of the amount of long-term skeletal expansion after RME.

Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class II elastics.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to quantify and qualify the 3-dimensional (3D) condylar changes using mandibular 3D regional superimposition techniques in adolescent patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with either a 2-phase or single-phase approach. METHODS: Twenty patients with Herbst appliances who met the inclusion criteria and had cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images taken before, 8 weeks after Herbst removal, and after the completion of multibracket appliance treatment constituted the Herbst group. They were compared with 11 subjects with Class II malocclusion who were treated with elastics and multibracket appliances and who had CBCT images taken before and after treatment. Three-dimensional models generated from the CBCT images were registered on the mandible using 3D voxel-based superimposition techniques and analyzed using semitransparent overlays and point-to-point measurements. RESULTS: The magnitude of lateral condylar growth during the orthodontic phase (T2-T3) was greater than that during the orthopedic phase (T1-T2) for all condylar fiducials with the exception of the superior condyle (P <0.05). Conversely, posterior condylar growth was greater during the orthopedic phase than the subsequent orthodontic phase for all condylar fiducials (P <0.05). The magnitude of vertical condylar development was similar during both the orthopedic (T1-T2) and orthodontic phases (T2-T3) across all condylar fiducials (P <0.05). Posterior condylar growth during the orthodontic phase (T2-T3) of the 2-phase approach decreased for all condylar fiducials with the exception of the posterior condylar fiducial (P <0.05) when compared with the single-phase approach. CONCLUSIONS: Two-phase treatment using a Herbst appliance accelerates condylar growth when compared with a single-phase regime with Class II elastics. Whereas the posterior condylar growth manifested primarily during the orthopedic phase, the vertical condylar gains occurred in equal magnitude throughout both phases of the 2-phase treatment regime.

Changes in maximum lip-closing force after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatments.

Objective: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the changes in the maximum lip-closing force (MLF) after orthodontic treatment with or without premolar extractions and verify the correlation of these changes with dentoskeletal changes. Methods: In total, 17 women who underwent nonextraction orthodontic treatment and 15 women who underwent orthodontic treatment with extraction of all four first premolars were included in this retrospective study. For all patients, lateral cephalograms and dental models were measured before (T0) and after (T1) treatment. In addition, MLF was measured at both time points using the Lip De Cum LDC-110R® device. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate changes in clinical variables and MLF and their correlations. Results: Both groups showed similar skeletal patterns, although the extraction group showed greater proclination of the maxillary and mandibular incisors and lip protrusion compared to the nonextraction group at T0. MLF at T0 was comparable between the two groups. The reduction in the arch width and depth and incisor retroclination from T0 to T1 were more pronounced in the extraction group than in the nonextraction group. MLF in the extraction group significantly increased during the treatment period, and this increase was significantly greater than that in the nonextraction group. The increase in MLF was found to be correlated with the increase in the interincisal angle and decrease in the intermolar width, arch depth, and incisor-mandibular plane angle. Conclusions: This study suggests that MLF increases to a greater extent during extraction orthodontic treatment than during nonextraction orthodontic treatment.

A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare bracket survival and adhesive removal time between a flash-free and a conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients had their maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars bonded with ceramic brackets using a flash-free adhesive (APC Flash-Free Adhesive, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) on one side and a conventional adhesive (APCII Adhesive, 3M Unitek) on the other side. The side allocation was randomized. Bracket failure was recorded at 4-week intervals. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was scored on debond and adhesive removal timed to the nearest second. The primary outcome was adhesive removal time per quadrant. Secondary outcomes were bracket failure rate, time to first-time failure of a bracket, and ARI score on debond. Paired t-tests were used to compare adhesive removal times and ARI scores between the adhesives with P < .05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Bracket failure rates were 4.3% for the flash-free adhesive and 1.9% for the conventional adhesive, with mean times to first-time failure of 31 weeks for the flash-free adhesive and 42 weeks for the conventional adhesive; neither failure rates nor times to first failure were significantly different. Although the flash-free adhesive left significantly more adhesive on the tooth surface after debonding, the adhesive removal times were 22.2% shorter than with the conventional adhesive. CONCLUSIONS: Bracket survival with the flash-free adhesive was equivalent to the conventional adhesive when ceramic brackets were bonded. Adhesive removal was significantly faster when using the flash-free adhesive, which may result in time savings of more than 20% compared with the conventional adhesive.

Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: A new flash-free adhesive promises to eliminate the flash removal step in bonding and to reduce bonding time by as much as 40% per bracket, with a bond failure rate of less than 2%. The aim of this trial was to compare bonding time and bracket failure rate over a 1-year period between the flash-free adhesive and a conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients had their maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars bonded with ceramic brackets (Clarity Advanced; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) using a flash-free adhesive (APC Flash-Free Adhesive Appliance System; 3M Unitek) on 1 side and a conventional adhesive (APCII Adhesive Appliance System; 3M Unitek) on the other side. The side allocation was randomized. Bonding was timed to the nearest second. Bond failure was recorded at standardized intervals of 4 weeks. The primary outcome was bonding time (average per tooth for each patient and per quadrant). Secondary outcomes were bracket failure rate within 1 year, time to first-time failure of a bracket, and bond failure type (adhesive remnant index score). Bonding times and adhesive remnant index scores upon bond failure were compared using paired t tests, with P <0.05 considered statistically significant. The adhesives were considered equivalent if the confidence interval for the difference between bracket failure rates fell within a margin of equivalence of ±5%. RESULTS: The bonding times were significantly shorter with the flash-free adhesive than with the conventional adhesive, both per tooth (P <0.001) and per quadrant (P <0.001). Compared with the conventional adhesive, the average bonding times per tooth and per quadrant with the flash-free adhesive were 37.3% and 32.9% shorter, respectively. The bracket failure rates at 1 year were 3.7% for the flash-free adhesive and 0.9% for the conventional adhesive. This was statistically equivalent. The average times to first-time failure of a bracket were 25 weeks for the flash-free adhesive and 11 weeks for the conventional adhesive. Although there were no significant differences in the adhesive remnant index scores upon failure (P >0.05), the flash-free adhesive tended to fail more often at the enamel-adhesive interface than did the conventional adhesive. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the flash-free adhesive may result in bonding time savings of approximately one third compared with the conventional adhesive. With regard to bracket survival, a statistically significant difference was not found between the 2 adhesives when ceramic brackets were bonded. REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on December 3, 2013 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02030002). PROTOCOL: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.

Alternative cone-beam computed tomography method for the analysis of bone density around impacted maxillary canines.

INTRODUCTION: Genetic and environmental etiologic factors have been described for maxillary canine impaction, except for the trabecular bone characteristics in the impacted area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface area and fractal dimension of the alveolar bone on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with maxillary impacted canines. METHODS: The sample comprised preorthodontic treatment CBCT images of 49 participants with maxillary impacted canines (31 unilateral and 18 bilateral). CBCT images were acquired in portrait mode (17 × 23 cm high field of view) at 120 kV, 5 mA, 8.9-seconds exposure time, and 0.3-mm voxel size. Coronal slices (0.3 mm) were obtained from the right and left alveolar processes between the first and second maxillary premolars. We collected 64 × 64-pixel regions of interest between the premolars to assess maxillary bone area and fractal dimension using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md). Comparisons were made using paired t tests and linear regression. Repeated measurements were obtained randomly from about 20% of the sample. RESULTS: In subjects with unilateral impactions, the maxillary bone area (P = 0.0227) was higher in the impacted side, with a mean difference of 245.5 pixels (SD, 569.2), but the fractal dimension (P = 0.9822) was not, -0.0003 pixels (SD, 0.082). Comparisons of unilateral and bilateral subjects using a general linear mixed model test confirmed the increased bone area in the impacted side (P = 0.1062). The repeated measurements showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The maxillary alveolar bone area is increased in the impacted side compared with the nonimpacted side.

How accurate is Invisalign in nonextraction cases? Are predicted tooth positions achieved?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of Invisalign technology in achieving predicted tooth positions with respect to tooth type and direction of tooth movement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The posttreatment models of 30 patients who had nonextraction Invisalign treatment were digitally superimposed on their corresponding virtual treatment plan models using best-fit surface-based registration. The differences between actual treatment outcome and predicted outcome were computed and tested for statistical significance for each tooth type in mesial-distal, facial-lingual, and occlusal-gingival directions, as well as for tip, torque, and rotation. Differences larger than 0.5 mm for linear measurements and 2° for angular measurements were considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (P < .05) between predicted and achieved tooth positions were found for all teeth except maxillary lateral incisors, canines, and first premolars. In general, anterior teeth were positioned more occlusally than predicted, rotation of rounded teeth was incomplete, and movement of posterior teeth in all dimensions was not fully achieved. However, except for excess posttreatment facial crown torque of maxillary second molars, these differences were not large enough to be clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Although Invisalign is generally able to achieve predicted tooth positions with high accuracy in nonextraction cases, some of the actual outcomes may differ from the predicted outcomes. Knowledge of dimensions in which the final tooth position is less consistent with the predicted position enables clinicians to build necessary compensations into the virtual treatment plan.

Midpalatal suture density ratio: A novel predictor of skeletal response to rapid maxillary expansion.

INTRODUCTION: During adolescence, increasing interdigitation of the midpalatal suture increases resistance to rapid maxillary expansion (RME); this decreases its skeletal effect. In this study, we aimed at determining whether a novel measure of midpalatal suture maturity, the midpalatal suture density ratio, can be used as a valid predictor of the skeletal response to RME. METHODS: The midpalatal suture density ratio, chronologic age, cervical vertebral maturation, and the stage of midpalatal suture maturation were assessed before treatment for 30 patients (ages, 12.9 ± 2.1 years) who underwent RME as part of comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Measurements on cone-beam computed tomography scans were used to determine the proportions of prescribed expansion achieved at the greater palatine foramina, the nasal cavity, and the infraorbital foramina. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the midpalatal suture density ratio and both the greater palatine foramina and the infraorbital foramina (r = -0.7877 and -0.3647, respectively; P <0.05). In contrast, chronologic age, cervical vertebral maturation, and stage of midpalatal suture maturation were not significantly correlated to any of the assessed measures of skeletal expansion (r range, -0.2209 to 0.0831; P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The midpalatal suture density ratio has the potential to become a useful clinical predictor of the skeletal response to RME. Conversely, chronologic age, cervical vertebral maturation, and stage of midpalatal suture maturation cannot be considered useful parameters to predict the skeletal effects of RME.

Comparative evaluation of the sliding plate technique for fixation of a sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the stress distribution of the sliding plate (SP) and conventional miniplate (CM) fixation techniques of a sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) using 3-dimensional (3-D) finite element analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Four 3-D finite element models according to the number and shape of screw holes in the plate were simulated, and the von Mises stress was analyzed: SP with 2 round and 2 oval holes (SP-2 R2 O), SP with 2 round and 1 oval holes (SP-2 R1 O), CM with 4 round holes (CM-4 R), and CM with 3 round holes (CM-3 R). RESULTS: The fixation technique with CM-4 R showed a better stress distribution than CM-3 R, which in turn showed better results compared to the 2 different SPs. SP-2 R2 O showed the worst stress distribution in the bone and fixation components. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the SP-2 R2 O technique increases the stress distribution of the plate and screws, which may reduce the stability of fixation after SSRO.

Comparing Stability of Mandibular Setback Versus 2-Jaw Surgery in Class III Patients With Minimal Presurgical Orthodontics.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare treatment time and skeletal stability between mandibular setback surgery (MS) and 2-jaw surgery (2J) with minimal presurgical orthodontics (MPO) in patients with skeletal Class III. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-five patients who underwent orthognathic surgery were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients were selected based on standardized inclusion criteria: Class III malocclusion with mandibular prognathism, surgery type, and presurgical orthodontics with non-extraction for less than 6 months (MPO). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery (T0), 1 month after surgery (T1), and at debonding (T2). To evaluate surgical changes (T0 to T1) and postsurgical changes (T1 to T2) in skeletodental tissue, linear, angular, and dental measurements were analyzed using paired t test and independent t test. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were allocated to the MS-MPO group (n = 16) and the 2J-MPO group (n = 15). The 2J-MPO group showed a shorter duration of postsurgical orthodontic and total surgical and orthodontic treatment than the MS-MPO group. Although the 2J-MPO group exhibited advancement and superior impaction of the maxilla from T0 to T1, posterior movement with clockwise rotation of the mandible between the 2 groups did not show a statistical difference. In addition, from T1 to T2, the MS-MPO and 2J-MPO groups presented forward and upward movement and counterclockwise rotation of the mandible, but no intergroup difference was found. CONCLUSIONS: The MS-MPO and 2J-MPO groups showed similar horizontal and vertical mandibular stability. However, the 2J-MPO group presented a shorter surgical and orthodontic treatment time than the MS-MPO group.

The effect of root and bone visualization on perceptions of the quality of orthodontic treatment simulations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of root and bone visibility on orthodontists' perceptions of the quality of treatment simulations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was used to present orthodontists with setups generated for 10 patients in two different types of view: with and without bone and roots as modeled from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. The orthodontists were asked to rate the quality of the setups from poor to ideal on a 100-point visual analog scale and, if applicable, to identify features of concern that led them to giving a setup a less-than-ideal rating. RESULTS: The quality ratings were significantly lower when roots and bone were visible in the setups (P < .0001). Buccolingual inclination and periodontal concerns were selected significantly more often as reasons for a less-than-ideal rating when roots and bone were shown, whereas occlusal relationship, overjet, occlusal contacts, and arch form were selected significantly more often as reasons for a less-than-ideal rating when roots and bone were not shown. The odds of selecting periodontal concerns as a reason for a less-than-ideal setup rating were 331 times greater when roots and bones were visible than when they were not. CONCLUSIONS: Additional diagnostic information derived from CBCT scans affects orthodontists' perceptions of the overall case quality, which may influence their treatment-planning decisions.

Conservative interdisciplinary treatment of a case with multiple facial and condyle fractures.

The purpose of this case report is to describe an interdisciplinary approach for a 51-year-old male who underwent multiple facial fractures including bilateral condyle fractures. The patient underwent emergency surgery, which included open reduction of the maxilla and mandibular symphysis and closed reduction of the bilateral condyle fractures. Although the patient recovered a comfortable range of mouth opening and alleviation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) symptoms after surgery, he suffered from a large anterior-posterior discrepancy due to less stability on the condyle-fossa relationships and from open bite with contacts only on both second molars and right second premolars. In this case, first, to increase the occlusal contact, comprehensive orthodontic treatment was completed. Second, occlusal equilibration was selectively performed to relieve the interferences and establish a stable range of mandibular movement without any changes in the vertical dimension. Third, both the upper central incisors and left lateral incisor were minimally restored with splinted and single zirconia crowns, which had modified lingual contours to provide adequate anterior guidance permitting the anterior-posterior discrepancy of the posterior teeth during protrusion. This conservative interdisciplinary treatment, including open and closed reduction, orthodontic treatment, occlusal adjustment, and minimal prosthetic restorations, resulted in a stable mandibular position and recovery of mastication function.

Comparison of the Stability After Mandibular Setback With Minimal Orthodontics of Class III Patients With Different Facial Types.

PURPOSE: Most studies on the surgery-first approach focused on skeletal relapse compared with conventional surgery. The objective of this study was to compare the stability of skeletal Class III patients with 2 different vertical facial types after mandibular setback surgery (MS) with minimal orthodontic preparation (MO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, the patients were recruited from a population that had undergone MS. Consecutive patients were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular prognathism, MO without extraction for less than 6 months, and sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The vertical facial types of the patients were classified based on the Frankfort mandibular-plane angle (FMA). Lateral cephalograms were taken at the presurgical stage, at 1 month after surgery (T1), and at the debonding stage (T2). To evaluate surgical changes (T1 - presurgical stage) and relapse (T2 - T1), the linear, angular, and dental measurements were analyzed using a paired t test and an independent t test. RESULTS: The 26 patients were divided into 2 groups: normal-angle group (n = 14; mean FMA, 23.58°) and high-angle (HA) group (n = 12; mean FMA, 30.26°). From T1 to T2, the normal-angle and HA groups showed significant forward and counterclockwise rotation of the mandible (distance between pogonion and perpendicular line to Frankfort horizontal plane from sella, 1.71 mm and 1.51 mm, respectively; distance between menton and perpendicular line to Frankfort horizontal plane from sella, 1.91 mm and 1.60 mm, respectively; angle between articulare-menton line and Frankfort horizontal plane, -0.55° and -0.89°, respectively). The HA group showed a significant upward movement of the mandible (distance from Frankfort horizontal plane to pogonion, -1.13 mm; distance from Frankfort horizontal plane to menton, -0.78 mm). However, there was no significant difference in the skeletal-dental changes between the 2 groups from T1 to T2. CONCLUSIONS: The vertical facial types of Class III patients with similar prognathic mandible and dental patterns may not cause any differences in the relapse pattern after MS-MO.