When Treatment of Pulmonary Emphysema with Endobronchial Valves Did Not Work: Evaluation of Quantitative CT Analysis and Pulmonary Function Tests Before and After Valve Explantation.

Purpose: To investigate changes in quantitative CT analysis (QCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFT) in pulmonary emphysema patients who required premature removal of endobronchial valves (EBV). Patients and Methods: Our hospital's medical records listed 274 patients with high-grade COPD (GOLD stages 3 and 4) and pulmonary emphysema who were treated with EBV to reduce lung volume. Prior to intervention, a complete evaluation was performed that included quantitative computed tomography analysis (QCT) of scans acquired at full inspiration and full expiration, pulmonary function tests (PFT), and paraclinical findings (6-minute walking distance test (6MWDT) and quality of life questionnaires). In 41 of these 274 patients, EBV treatment was unsuccessful and the valves had to be removed for various reasons. A total of 10 of these 41 patients ventured a second attempt at EBV therapy and underwent complete reevaluation. In our retrospective study, results from three time points were compared: Before EBV implantation (BL), after EBV implantation (TP2), and after EBV explantation (TP3). QCT parameters included lung volume, total emphysema score (TES, ie, the emphysema index) and the 15th percentile of lung attenuation (P15) for the whole lung and each lobe separately. Differences in these parameters between inspiration and expiration were calculated (Vol. Diff (%), TES Diff (%), P15 Diff (%)). The results of PFT and further clinical tests were taken from the patient's records. Results: We found persistent therapy effect in the target lobe even after valve explantation together with a compensatory hyperinflation of the rest of the lung. As a result of these two divergent effects, the volume of the total lung remained rather constant. Furthermore, there was a slight deterioration of the emphysema score for the whole lung, whereas the TES of the target lobe persistently improved. Conclusion: Interestingly, we found evidence that, contrary to our expectations, unsuccessful EBV therapy can have a persistent positive effect on target lobe QCT scores.

Quantitative CT Analysis in Patients with Pulmonary Emphysema: Do Calculated Differences Between Full Inspiration and Expiration Correlate with Lung Function?

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate correlations between parameters of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) analysis, especially the 15th percentile of lung attenuation (P15), and parameters of clinical tests in a large group of patients with pulmonary emphysema. Patients and Methods: One hundred and seventy-two patients with pulmonary emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) stage 3 or 4 were assessed by nonenhanced thin-section CT scans in full inspiratory and expiratory breath-hold, pulmonary function test (PFT), a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and quality of life questionnaires (SGRQ and CAT). QCT parameters included total lung volume (TLV), total emphysema score (TES), and P15, all measured at inspiration (IN) and expiration (EX). Differences between inspiration and expiration were calculated for TLV (TLVDiff), TES (TESDiff), and P15 (P15Diff). Spearman correlation analysis was performed. Results: CT-measured lung volume in inspiration (TLVIN) correlated strongly with spirometry-measured total lung capacity (TLC) (r=0.81, p<0.001) and moderately to strongly with residual volume (RV), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/FVC (r=0.60, 0.56, and -0.49, each p<0.001). Lung volume in expiration (TLVEX) correlated moderately to strongly with TLC, RV and FEV1/FVC ratio (r=0.75, 0.66, and -0.43, each p<0.001). TES and P15 showed stronger correlations with the carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO%) (r= -0.42, 0.44, both p<0.001), when measured during expiration. P15Diff correlated moderately with KCO% and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO%) (r= 0.41, 0.40, both p<0.001). The 6MWT and most QCT parameters showed significant differences between COPD GOLD 3 and 4 groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that QCT can help predict the severity of lung function decrease in patients with pulmonary emphysema and COPD GOLD 3 or 4. Some QCT parameters, including P15EX and P15Diff, correlated moderately to strongly with parameters of pulmonary function tests.