Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Adv Rheumatol ; 64(1): 38, 2024 05 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720354

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study examines the association of standard-of-care systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) medications with key outcomes such as low disease activity attainment, flares, damage accrual, and steroid-sparing, for which there is current paucity of data. METHODS: The Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) prospectively collects data across numerous sites regarding demographic and disease characteristics, medication use, and lupus outcomes. Using propensity score methods and panel logistic regression models, we determined the association between lupus medications and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1707 patients followed over 12,689 visits for a median of 2.19 years, 1332 (78.03%) patients achieved the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), 976 (57.18%) experienced flares, and on most visits patients were taking an anti-malarial (69.86%) or immunosuppressive drug (76.37%). Prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine and azathioprine were utilised with similar frequency across all organ domains; methotrexate for musculoskeletal activity. There were differences in medication utilisation between countries, with hydroxychloroquine less frequently, and calcineurin inhibitors more frequently, used in Japan. More patients taking leflunomide, methotrexate, chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid were taking ≤ 7.5 mg/day of prednisolone (compared to > 7.5 mg/day) suggesting a steroid-sparing effect. Patients taking tacrolimus were more likely (Odds Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] 13.58 [2.23-82.78], p = 0.005) to attain LLDAS. Patients taking azathioprine (OR 0.67 [0.53-0.86], p = 0.001) and methotrexate (OR 0.68 [0.47-0.98], p = 0.038) were less likely to attain LLDAS. Patients taking mycophenolate mofetil were less likely to experience a flare (OR 0.79 [0.64-0.97], p = 0.025). None of the drugs was associated with a reduction in damage accrual. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a steroid-sparing benefit for most commonly used standard of care immunosuppressants used in SLE treatment, some of which were associated with an increased likelihood of attaining LLDAS, or reduced incidence of flares. It also highlights the unmet need for effective treatments in lupus.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Azatioprina , Glucocorticoides , Hidroxicloroquina , Inmunosupresores , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Metotrexato , Prednisolona , Nivel de Atención , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Leflunamida/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Modelos Logísticos , Puntaje de Propensión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Brote de los Síntomas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico
2.
Mod Rheumatol ; 34(4): 655-669, 2024 Jul 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531074

RESUMEN

Lupus remains a disease with a low prioritisation in the national agendas of many countries in Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific, where there is a dearth of rheumatologists and limited access to new or even standard lupus treatments. There is thus an important need for education, advocacy, and outreach to prioritise lupus in these regions to ensure that patients receive the care they need. This article reviews some of the specific challenges facing the care and management of people with lupus in these regions and suggests strategies for improving patient outcomes. Specifically, we review and discuss (with a focus on the aforementioned regions) the epidemiology of lupus; economic costs, disease burden, and effects on quality of life; barriers to care related to disease assessment; barriers to effective treatment, including limitations of standard treatments, high glucocorticoid use, inadequate access to new treatments, and low adherence to medications; and strategies to improve lupus management and patient outcomes. We hope that this represents a call to action to come together and act now for the lupus community, policymakers, health authorities, and healthcare professionals to improve lupus management and patient outcomes in Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/terapia , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Asia/epidemiología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Costo de Enfermedad , Manejo de la Enfermedad
3.
Clin Rheumatol ; 40(3): 867-875, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740672

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence rate (IR) of tuberculosis (TB) and viral hepatitis B and C (HBV/HCV) during certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment, worldwide and in Asia-Pacific countries, across clinical trials and post-marketing reports (non-interventional studies and real-world practice). METHOD: CZP safety data were pooled across 49 clinical trials from 1998 to June 2017. Post-marketing reports were from initial commercialization until March 2015 (TB)/February 2017 (HBV/HCV). All suspected TB and HBV/HCV cases underwent centralized retrospective review by external experts. Incidence rates (IRs) were calculated per 100 patient-years (PY) of CZP exposure. RESULTS: Among 11,317 clinical trial patients (21,695 PY), 62 TB cases were confirmed (IR 0.29/100 PY) including 2 in Japan (0.10/100 PY) and 3 in other Asia-Pacific countries (0.58/100 PY). From > 238,000 PY estimated post-marketing CZP exposure, there were 31 confirmed TB cases (0.01/100 PY): 5 in Japan (0.05/100 PY), 1 in other Asia-Pacific countries (0.03/100 PY). Reported regional TB IRs were highest in eastern Europe (0.17/100 PY), central Europe (0.09/100 PY), and Mexico (0.16/100 PY). Across clinical trials, there was 1 confirmed HBV reactivation and no HCV cases. From > 420,000 PY estimated post-marketing CZP exposure, 5 HBV/HCV cases were confirmed (0.001/100 PY): 2 HCV reactivations; 1 new HCV; plus 2 HBV reactivations in Japan (0.008/100 PY). CONCLUSIONS: CZP TB risk is aligned with nationwide TB rates, being slightly higher in Asia-Pacific countries excluding Japan. Overall, TB and HBV/HCV risk with CZP treatment is currently relatively low, as risk can be minimized with patient/physician education, screening, and vigilant treatment, according to international guidelines. KEY POINTS: • TB rates were highest in eastern/central Europe, Mexico, and Asia-Pacific regions. • With the implementation of stricter TB screening and risk evaluations in 2007, especially in high TB incidence countries, there was a notable reduction TB occurrence. • Safety profile of biologics in real-world settings complements controlled studies. • TB and hepatitis (HBV/HCV) risk with certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment is low.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Hepatitis Viral Humana , Tuberculosis , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Asia/epidemiología , Certolizumab Pegol/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Europa Oriental , Hepatitis Viral Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Japón , México , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA