RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate mid- and long-term outcomes after arthroscopically-assisted transosseous reattachment of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and to analyze the association of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability with the clinical outcome. METHODS: Patients treated with an arthroscopically-assisted transosseous reattachment of the deep layer of the TFCC between 2000 and 2009 and a minimum follow-up of 12 months at mid-term and 4 years at long-term follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; pain visual analogue scale (VAS); grip strength and stability of the DRUJ were assessed at 2 follow-up clinical examinations. At the last follow-up, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score was additionally recorded. RESULTS: Thirty patients with a mean age of 29 (±13) years were included. Most of the patients were female (70%, n = 21). The mid-term evaluation took place at a median of 30 months (range, 12-83 months). The assessed scores showed statistically significant clinical improvement (MMWS, P < .001; DASH score P < .001; VAS P < .001). Stability assessment showed a stable DRUJ in 23 (76.7%) patients. At a median of 106 months (range 52-215 months), the long-term clinical assessment was performed. The evaluated scores demonstrated persisting significant improvement (MMWS P < .001; DASH score P < .001; VAS P < .001). Stability assessment showed a stable DRUJ in 19 patients (63.3%). DRUJ instability did not correlate with clinical outcome. No permanent surgery-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopically-assisted transosseous reattachment of the deep fibers of radioulnar ligaments leads to excellent and good clinical results in mid- and long-term follow-up. In 95.5% of the analyzed patients, the measured improvement in the DASH score exceeded the in literature reported minimal clinically important difference of 13.5. Loss of DRUJ stability during follow-up was not associated with deterioration of clinical parameters and patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.