Ethical issues in dementia guidelines for people with dementia and informal caregivers in Denmark: A qualitative thematic synthesis.

Numerous dementia-specific guidelines are offered to support people with dementia and their informal caregivers in dealing with dementia. However, the extent to which such guidelines address ethical issues and provide guidance for dealing with the issues has not yet been assessed. This study investigates the extent to which ethical issues are addressedin those guidelines, which ethical themes are considered and whatrecommendations are offered. We analysed Danish collected via onlinesearch engines and manual contact with relevant governmental, municipal and patient organisations from November 2020 to January 2021. To assess the scope of ethical issues in such guidelines, we devised an analytical framework using Beauchamp and Childress's four principles of biomedical ethics and a data-processing method inspired by systematic reviews. We collected a total 653 dementia guidelines and screened them using formal inclusion criteria, such as publication year, target group and public availability. The guidelines that satisfied these criteria were screened for content related to ethical issues and recommendations. The guidelines that addressed ethical issues were then coded in NVivo 12 and analysed using thematic text analysis. In total, 59 guidelines satisfied the formal inclusion criteria. Among these guidelines, 15 addressed ethical issues, which fell into four transversal themes: (1) being open about the disease, (2) accepting help, (3) the line between dignified behaviour and overstepping boundaries and (4) decision-making and autonomy. The ethical issues addressed in Danish dementia-specific guidelines were diverse. However, the addressed issues did not represent a comprehensive spectrum of ethical issues as identified in relevant literature, and only a few guidelines contained substantial ethical content. In conclusion, this study indicates that the need for guidance on ethical issues is not being met by dementia-specific guidelines and that further research is required to provide additional ethical guidance that benefits people with dementia and their informal caregivers.

Does meaning protect against loneliness? Exploring empirical studies and theory.

Research indicates that meaning in life is a protective factor for physical and mental health. Although loneliness is increasingly recognized as an important public health concern, no studies have investigated the potential of meaning in life to protect against loneliness. Based on an explorative interdisciplinary research strategy that comprises data from a cohort study, a strategic review of empirical literature and a conceptual analysis of the concept of meaning in life we explore the support for potential links between meaning in life and the protection against loneliness. We propose three different explanatory mechanisms; (i) that meaning in life promotes a positive orientation toward others, (ii) that meaning in life enhances interpersonal appeal and (iii) that meaning in life promotes a better ability to cope with loneliness. Theoretically, we explore the idea that the value of meaning in life ultimately concerns a social need to contribute to the realization of value that, at least in principle, can be shared and recognized by others. When people realize the value of meaning in life, they partake in a community of shared values, which links them to a social world in a way that may protect against the feeling of loneliness. Jointly the analyses point to the need for prospective studies on the role of meaning in life as a protective factor against loneliness and a potential novel focus for loneliness interventions.

Implementing internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for common mental health disorders: A comparative case study of implementation challenges perceived by therapists and managers in five European internet services.

OBJECTIVE: Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy programs have been developed and evaluated in randomized controlled trials during the past two decades to alleviate the rising demand for effective treatment of common mental health disorders such as anxiety and depression. While most of the research on internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) has focused on efficacy and effectiveness only little attention has been devoted to the implementation of iCBT. The aim of this study was to identify the main implementation challenges perceived by therapists and managers involved in the practical operation of iCBT services in routine care settings in five European countries. METHOD: The study was designed as a multiple comparative case study to explore differences and similarities between five different iCBT services in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, The Netherlands and Scotland. Field visits were carried out to each of the five services including interviews with the management of the service (n = 9), focus group interviews with key staff (n = 15) and demonstration of online programs. The data material was processed through thematic, comparative analysis. RESULTS: The analysis generated four transversal themes: 1) integration in the mental health care system; 2) recruitment of patients; 3) working practice of therapists; and 4) long-term sustainability of service. The main results concerned the need to address the informal integration in the health care systems related to the perceived skepticism towards iCBT from GPs and face-to-face therapists, the role of referral models and communication strategies for the stable recruitment of patients, the need for knowledge, standards and material for the training of therapists in the provision of online feedback, the need to improve the possibilities to tailor programs to individual patients, and the need for considerate long-term sustainability planning of the transitions from local projects to permanent regional or national services. CONCLUSION: The present study gives an overview of the main implementation challenges regarding the practical operation of iCBT services perceived by the therapists and managers of the iCBT services. Future studies into specific details of each challenge will be important to strengthen the evidence base of iCBT and to improve uptake and implementation of iCBT in routine care.