Clinical outcomes of pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorder and other neurodevelopmental disorders and intracranial germ cell tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Intracranial germ cell tumors (IGCTs) are rare tumors of the central nervous system with peak incidence around puberty. Given the developmental origins of IGCTs, we investigated the prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in patients with IGCTs and characterized outcomes for patients with NDD and IGCTs. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for 111 patients diagnosed with IGCTs between 1998 and 2018 and evaluated at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used for survival analyses. Cox regression analyses were performed for parameters associated with progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Median age at IGCT diagnosis was 12.8 years (range: 4.3-21.7) and median follow-up was 6.5 years (range: 0.2-20.5). Eighteen patients were diagnosed with NDDs prior to IGCT diagnosis, including five patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Of the 67 patients with pure germinomas, four (6.0 %) had prior ASD diagnoses. Patients with NDD had significantly inferior PFS in the nongerminomatous germ cell tumor (NGGCT) cohort. On univariate and multivariable analyses, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) was significantly associated with improved PFS in the NGGCT cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found an ASD prevalence in the pure germinoma cohort more than threefold greater than the national prevalence, suggesting an association between ASD and pure germinomas. Furthermore, patients with NDD and NGGCT had worse PFS, possibly due to fewer patients with NDD receiving CSI. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to examine associations between NDDs and IGCTs, and further characterize outcomes for patients with NDDs and IGCTs.

Long-term toxic effects of proton radiotherapy for paediatric medulloblastoma: a phase 2 single-arm study.

BACKGROUND: Compared with traditional photon radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy irradiates less normal tissue and might improve health outcomes associated with photon radiotherapy by reducing toxic effects to normal tissue. We did a trial to assess late complications, acute side-effects, and survival associated with proton radiotherapy in children with medulloblastoma. METHODS: In this non-randomised, open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients aged 3-21 years who had medulloblastoma. Patients had craniospinal irradiation of 18-36 Gy radiobiological equivalents (GyRBE) delivered at 1·8 GyRBE per fraction followed by a boost dose. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of ototoxicity at 3 years, graded with the Pediatric Oncology Group ototoxicity scale (0-4), in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes were neuroendocrine toxic effects and neurocognitive toxic effects, assessed by intention-to-treat. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00105560. FINDINGS: We enrolled 59 patients from May 20, 2003, to Dec 10, 2009: 39 with standard-risk disease, six with intermediate-risk disease, and 14 with high-risk disease. 59 patients received chemotherapy. Median follow-up of survivors was 7·0 years (IQR 5·2-8·6). All patients received the intended doses of proton radiotherapy. The median craniospinal irradiation dose was 23·4 GyRBE (IQR 23·4-27·0) and median boost dose was 54·0 GyRBE (IQR 54·0-54·0). Four (9%) of 45 evaluable patients had grade 3-4 ototoxicity according to Pediatric Oncology Group ototoxicity scale in both ears at follow-up, and three (7%) of 45 patients developed grade 3-4 ototoxicity in one ear, although one later reverted to grade 2. The cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 hearing loss at 3 years was 12% (95% CI 4-25). At 5 years, it was 16% (95% CI 6-29). Pediatric Oncology Group hearing ototoxicity score at a follow-up of 5·0 years (IQR 2·9-6·4) was the same as at baseline or improved by 1 point in 34 (35%) of 98 ears, worsened by 1 point in 21 (21%), worsened by 2 points in 35 (36%), worsened by 3 points in six (6%), and worsened by 4 points in two (2%). Full Scale Intelligence Quotient decreased by 1·5 points (95% CI 0·9-2·1) per year after median follow-up up of 5·2 years (IQR 2·6-6·4), driven by decrements in processing speed and verbal comprehension index. Perceptual reasoning index and working memory did not change significantly. Cumulative incidence of any neuroendocrine deficit at 5 years was 55% (95% CI 41-67), with growth hormone deficit being most common. We recorded no cardiac, pulmonary, or gastrointestinal late toxic effects. 3-year progression-free survival was 83% (95% CI 71-90) for all patients. In post-hoc analyses, 5-year progression-free survival was 80% (95% CI 67-88) and 5-year overall survival was 83% (95% CI 70-90). INTERPRETATION: Proton radiotherapy resulted in acceptable toxicity and had similar survival outcomes to those noted with conventional radiotherapy, suggesting that the use of the treatment may be an alternative to photon-based treatments. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital.

Proton radiotherapy for pediatric central nervous system ependymoma: clinical outcomes for 70 patients.

BACKGROUND: Ependymoma is treated with maximal surgical resection and localized radiotherapy. Minimizing unnecessary exposure to radiation is of paramount importance for young children. Proton radiotherapy (PRT) spares healthy tissues outside the target region, but reports of clinical outcomes are scarce. We report outcomes for 70 patients treated with PRT for intracranial ependymoma. METHODS: Seventy patients with localized ependymoma treated with involved-field PRT at the Massachusetts General Hospital between October 2000 and February 2011 were included. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 38 months (range, 3 mo-20 y). Nineteen (27%) patients had supratentorial ependymoma and 51(73%) had infratentorial ependymoma. Forty-six (66%) had gross total resection (GTR), and 24 (34%) had subtotal resection (STR). At a median follow-up of 46 months, 3-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 83%, 76%, and 95%, respectively. STR was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival (54% vs 88%, P = .001) and overall survival (90% vs 97% for GTR, P = .001). In a subset of patients (n = 14), mean intelligence was 108.5 at baseline and 111.3 after mean 2.05 years of follow-up. In a larger group of patients (n = 28), overall adaptive skills were 100.1 at baseline and 100.8 after 2.21 years of follow-up. Few patients developed evidence of growth hormone deficiency, hypothyroidism, or hearing loss. CONCLUSION: Outcomes for children treated with PRT compare favorably with the literature. STR correlated with inferior outcome. The young age at diagnosis and the proximity of critical structures in patients with ependymoma make PRT an ideal radiation modality.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for localized low-grade gliomas in children: final results of a prospective trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for small, localized, pediatric brain tumors and to determine the patterns of failure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 81 patients were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective Dana-Farber Cancer Institute protocol between 1992 and 1998. Of the 81 patients, 50 had low-grade astrocytoma, 23 had residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma, 4 had posterior fossa ependymoma, and 4 had other histologic types. All patients underwent biopsy for diagnosis, with the exception of patients with neurofibromatosis and radiographic evidence of an optic system tumor. The neurocognitive outcome for all patients was also an endpoint of the study and will be reported separately. This report focused on the patients with low-grade gliomas only. Of the 50 patients, 26 were males and 24 females; the median age was 9 years (range, 2-26 years). The indications for treatment of patients with low-grade gliomas were progression during or after chemotherapy or progression after surgery alone. SRT was delivered using a dedicated 6-MV linear accelerator. Immobilization was accomplished with a removable head-frame. CT and MRI fusion was used for treatment planning. The target volume generally included the preoperative tumor plus a 2-mm margin for the planning target volume. The median collimator size was 47.25 mm (range, 30-60 mm). Three to nine arcs were used to deliver a mean total dose of 52.2 Gy in 1.8-Gy daily fractions. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 6.9 years (range, 0.9-10.2 years), the progression-free survival rate was 82.5% at 5 years and 65% at 8 years. The overall survival was 97.8% at 5 years and 82% at 8 years. Six patients had local progression. Two of the patients with local progression had pathologic progression to anaplastic astrocytoma 3 and 7 years after initial SRT. Five patients, all with optic system/hypothalamic primary tumors, developed central nervous system dissemination 1.0-7.4 years after SRT. One patient developed a presumed radiation-induced primitive neuroectodermal tumor 6 years after initial treatment. Six patients died, three of dissemination, two of progression to higher grade tumors, and one of a secondary radiation-induced tumor. All 6 cases of local progression were within the primary tumor bed at the time of progression and had received the full prescription dose. No marginal failures occurred. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiotherapy provides excellent local control for children with small, localized low-grade glial tumors. Marginal failures have not been observed, supporting the use of limited margins to minimize late sequelae using stereotactic immobilization and planning techniques.