RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes, total healthcare utilization, and cost savings for same-day discharge (SDD) vs inpatient robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN). METHODS: We compared 146 RAPNs and 65 RARNs consecutively performed as SDD (RAPN=21, RARN=9) vs inpatient (RAPN=125, RARN=56) from April 2015 to May 2023 at two academic medical centers. We collected baseline demographics, perioperative characteristics, and 30-day complications. We applied the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing analysis to compare total costs of RAPN and PARN throughout the cycle of care, including inpatient vs SDD. RESULTS: Baseline demographics and comorbidities were similar between patients undergoing inpatient vs SDD RAPN and RARN. One Clavien-Dindo grade II complication (3.3%) requiring readmission due to wound infection for antibiotics occurred after SDD RAPN; no complications occurred after SDD RARN. Two unscheduled office or emergency department visits (6.7%) occurred after SDD RAPN for surgical-site infection and urinary retention. SDD vs inpatient RAPN and RARN demonstrated a $3091 (18%) and $4003 (25%) overall cost reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: SDD RAPN and RARN result in cost savings of 18%-25% without a difference in complications, and thereby improves value-based care for appropriately selected patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Alta del Paciente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Nefrectomía/economía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/economía , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to implement a simplified opioid minimization (OM) protocol after robotic urologic surgery in a safety-net hospital to decrease opioid consumption without compromising patient-reported pain or satisfaction. METHODS: Robotic urologic surgery was performed in 103 consecutive patients at a safety-net hospital. An opioid control (OC) cohort was established from January to May 2021, and the OM protocol was implemented from June to October 2021. On postoperative day (POD) 2 and POD7, a validated survey was used to assess pain and satisfaction. Opioid dispensation records were queried from the Prescription Monitoring Program. Outcomes were compared by univariate methods. RESULTS: There were no demographic differences between the OM (n = 45) and OC (n = 35) cohorts. Total opioids received within 30 days of surgery decreased by 68% in the OM vs OC cohort (median [IQR] 32.5 [7.5-65] vs 100 [30-173] morphine milligram equivalents, P < .001). The median amount of opioids prescribed at discharge for the OM cohort was 0 (IQR:0-0) vs 75 morphine milligram equivalents (IQR:0-112.5) for the OC cohort (P < .001). Pain severity did not differ between cohorts on POD2 (median [IQR]: OM=3/10 [2-5], OC=3.5/10 [2-6]; P = .5) or POD7 (median [IQR]: OM=2/10 [0-3], OC=1/10 [0-3]; P = .8), and POD7 satisfaction with pain management remained high for both cohorts (P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: Our simplified OM protocol decreased total opioid use after robotic urologic surgery by 68% without compromising pain or satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Derivados de la MorfinaRESUMEN
While robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has been revolutionizing surgical procedures, it has various areas needing improvement, specifically in the visualization sector. Suboptimal vision due to lens occlusions has been a topic of concern in laparoscopic surgery but has not received much attention in robotic surgery. This study is one of the first to explore and quantify the degree of disruption encountered due to poor robotic visualization at a major academic center. In case observations across 28 RAS procedures in various specialties, any lens occlusions or "debris" events that appeared on the monitor displays and clinicians' reactions, the cause, and the location across the monitor for these events were recorded. Data were then assessed for any trends using analysis as described below. From around 44.33 h of RAS observation time, 163 debris events were recorded. 52.53% of case observation time was spent under a compromised visual field. In a subset of 15 cases, about 2.24% of the average observation time was spent cleaning the lens. Additionally, cautery was found to be the primary cause of lens occlusions and little variation was found within the spread of the debris across the monitor display. This study illustrates that in 6 (21.43%) of the cases, 90% of the observation time was spent under compromised visualization while only 2 (7.14%) of the cases had no debris or cleaning events. Additionally, we observed that cleaning the lens can be troublesome during the procedure, interrupting the operating room flow.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Quirófanos , Laparoscopía/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Historically, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is accompanied by an inpatient hospital admission. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a transition to same-day discharge robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in some centers to free up critically needed inpatient beds. This study aims to compare complications, total health care costs, and patient satisfaction for same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared 392 consecutive robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies performed as same-day discharge (n = 206) vs inpatient (n = 186) from February 2020 to November 2022 at 2 academic medical centers. We utilized propensity score analysis to assess the impact of same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy on 30-day complications (primary outcome). Time-driven activity-based costing analysis was applied to compare total costs of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy care, and we administered a validated Patient Satisfaction Outcome Questionnaire to compare satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy patients were more likely to be older, self-reported Black race or Hispanic ethnicity, and have higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Complication rates were nonsignificantly lower for same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.21; P = .8). Same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy demonstrated a $2106 (19%) overall cost reduction. Median satisfaction survey scores were similar, and a clinically significant difference can be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Same-day discharge robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is cost-effective and should be the preferred approach in appropriately selected patients.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Masculino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Alta del Paciente , Pandemias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prostatectomía , Costos de la Atención en SaludRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: While abiraterone acetate (AA) has demonstrated survival benefit in advanced prostate cancer (APC), meaningful cardiotoxicity is observed. It is unclear whether the magnitude differs based on disease indication and concurrent steroid administration. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II/III RCTs of AA in APC published as of August 11, 2020. Primary outcomes examined were all- and high-grade (grade ≥ 3) hypokalemia and fluid retention, and secondary outcomes included hypertension and cardiac events. We performed random effects meta-analysis comparing intervention (AA + steroid) and control (placebo ± steroid), stratified by treatment indication and whether patients received steroids. RESULTS: Among 2,739 abstracts, we included 6 relevant studies encompassing 5901 patients. Hypokalemia and fluid retention were observed more frequently among patients receiving AA (odds ratio [OR] 3.10 [95% CI 1.69-5.67] and 1.41 [95% CI 1.19-1.66]). This was modified by whether patients in the control received steroids: trials where control patients did not demonstrated a larger association between AA and hypokalemia (OR 6.88 [95% CI 1.48-2.36] versus OR 1.86 [95% CI 4.97-9.54], P < .0001) and hypertension (OR 2.53 [95% CI 1.91-3.36] vs. OR 1.55 [95% CI 1.17-2.04], P = .1) than those where steroids were administered. We observed heterogeneity due to indication: there were greater effects on hypokalemia (P < 0001), hypertension (P = .03), and cardiac disorders (P = .01) among patients treated for mHSPC than mCRPC. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of cardiotoxicity with AA differs based on trial design and disease indication. These data are valuable in treatment decisions and highlight utilization of appropriate data for counseling.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Hipopotasemia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Masculino , Humanos , Acetato de Abiraterona/efectos adversos , Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipopotasemia/inducido químicamente , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
This is a summary of existing systematic reviews comparing robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with open radical cystectomy (ORC). Our aim was to compare operative approaches with respect to perioperative, postoperative, oncologic, and health-related quality of life (QOL) outcomes. We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, Medline-in-Process and Medline Epubs Ahead of Print, and the Cochrane Library on 22 February 2022. We included reviews of adult patients with bladder cancer undergoing RARC or ORC for muscle invasive or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Nonrandomized studies were excluded to minimize confounding and selection bias. The GRADE approach was used to determine the confidence in estimates. We assessed the quality of identified systematic reviews using AMSTAR 2 checklist. Six well-conducted, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. RARC was consistently associated with lower estimated blood loss (EBL) and transfusion rates, and longer operative time. There was inconsistent evidence for the impact of RARC on hospital length of stay (LOS). There was no significant difference in overall complication rate or major complication rate, or oncologic outcomes between groups. Comparison of QOL outcomes between studies was limited by statistical and methodological heterogeneity. RARC is associated with improvement in EBL and transfusion risk. There does not appear to be differences in oncologic outcomes or complications between approaches. Prospective studies are needed to assess the impact of diversion type, technique, and recovery pathways on patient outcomes and to assess the impact of operative approach on cost and patient-reported QOL.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Adulto , Humanos , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biodynamic signatures (temporal patterns of microscopic motion within a 3-dimensional tumor explant) offer phenomic biomarkers that are highly predictive for therapeutic response. OBJECTIVE: By utilizing motility contrast tomography, which provides a simple, fast assessment of motion patterns in living tissue, we evaluated the predictive accuracy of a biodynamic drug response classifier in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred five consecutive bladder cancer patients suspected of having MIBC were screened in a multi-institutional prospective observational study (NCT03739177) from July 2018 to June 2020, of whom, 30 completed NAC and radical cystectomy. INTERVENTION(S): Biodynamic signatures from treatment-naïve fresh bladder tumor specimens obtained after transurethral resection were measured in living tumor fragments challenged by standard-of-care cytotoxins. Patients received gemcitabine and cisplatin or dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin per institutional guidelines and were followed through radical cystectomy. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A 4-level classifier was developed to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) vs. incomplete response utilizing a one-left-out cross-validation protocol to minimize over-fitting. Area under the curve evaluated predictive utility. RESULTS: Thirty percent (9 of 30) achieved pCR. Utilizing the 4-level classifier, biodynamically "favored" (scoring ≥ 3) and "strongly favored" (scoring 4) regimens accurately predicted pCR at rates of 66.7% (4 of 6 patients) and 100% (4 of 4 patients), respectively. Biodynamically "favored" scores predicted pCR with 88% sensitivity and 95% negative predictive value, P < 0.0001. Only 5.0% (1 of 20 patients) achieved pCR from regimens scoring 1 or 2, indicating poor to no response from NAC. Area under the receiver operating curve was 96% (95% Confidence Interval: 79%-99%, P < 0.0001). Future direction involves validating this model prospectively. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: Biodynamic scoring accurately predicts response in MIBC patients receiving NAC and holds promise to substantially improve the scope of appropriate management intervention.
Asunto(s)
Cisplatino , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Cistectomía/métodos , Músculos/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Despite major technological advancements in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS), there remain shortcomings yet to be addressed. This study assesses the prevalence of suboptimal vision in minimally invasive RAS and corresponding factors regarding related surgical conditions. 45 minimally invasive robotic surgeries, performed using Da Vinci XI, were observed across three surgical subspecialties: general, urology, and OB/GYN. Lens occlusion events were monitored and defined as the presence of a visual distortion caused by debris deposition on the scope lens. Lens occlusions and cleanings, and "active instrumentation" were recorded. Descriptive statistics summarized duration-based variables, and one-factor ANOVA compared the presence of active instrumentation. Cases averaged 127 ± 76 min. Active instrumentation ANOVA during lens occlusions demonstrated significant variation between categories (F7, 256 = 11.63, p = 2.558e-13). Post hoc Tukey HSD found electrocautery devices were active significantly more during occlusion events (37.9%) than other instruments. On average, lens cleaning occurred every 36.5 ± 39.8 min despite lens occlusion occurring every 24.5 ± 15.7 min. Of the operative time observed, 41.4% ± 28.1% was conducted with visual distortion. 1.16% ± 0.97% of time observed was spent cleaning. Although only 1.16% of operative time was spent cleaning, surgeons experienced suboptimal conditions for nearly 35× the time it would take the clear lens, potentially indicating a tendency to avoid cleaning the lens to disrupt surgery. Future research may examine the impact of occluded visualization and lens cleaning on other aspects of surgery.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Tempo OperativoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to compare patient-reported mental health outcomes for men undergoing treatment for localized prostate cancer longitudinally over 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective population-based analysis using the Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (CEASAR) study. Patient-reported depressive symptoms (Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression [CES-D]) and domains of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form survey evaluating emotional well-being and energy/fatigue were assessed through 5 years after treatment with surgery, radiotherapy (with or without androgen deprivation therapy) and active surveillance. Regression models were adjusted for outcome-specific baseline function, demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, and treatment approach. RESULTS: A total of 2,742 men (median [quartiles] age 64 [59-70]) met inclusion criteria. Baseline depressive symptoms, as measured by the CES-D, were low (median 4, quartiles 1-8) without differences between groups. We found no effect of treatment modality on depressive symptoms (p=0.78), though older age, poorer health, being unmarried and baseline CES-D score were associated with declines in mental health. There was no clinically meaningful association between treatment modality and scores for either emotional well-being (p=0.81) or energy/fatigue (p=0.054). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, population-based cohort study of men with localized prostate cancer showed no clinically important differences in mental health outcomes including depressive symptoms, emotional well-being, and energy/fatigue according to the treatment received (surgery, radiotherapy, or surveillance). However, we identified a number of characteristics associated with worse mental health outcomes including: older age, poorer health, being unmarried, and baseline CES-D score which may allow for early identification of patients most at risk of these outcomes following treatment.