Does the age of ulcerative colitis diagnosis impact outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy?

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) can be diagnosed at a variety of different ages. We evaluated if age of ulcerative colitis (UC) diagnosis impacts outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy (RP) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS: A prospectively maintained pouch database (1983-2020) was queried to identify patients undergoing an RP for UC. The cohort was stratified based on bimodal disease presentation into 2 groups: the early adulthood group (19-30 years old) and the mid/late adulthood group (40-70 years old). Patients' demographics, postoperative complications, functional (stool number, seepage), and quality of life (QoL) rates were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 628 patients with an age range of 19-30 years old (18.1 ± 2.2 at the time of diagnosis, 24.2 ± 10.5 at the time of IPAA) and 706 patients with an age range of 40-70 years old (45 ± 3.0 at time of diagnosis, 52.3 ± 9.4 at time of IPAA) were identified. Older patients had longer disease duration, higher BMI, lower biologic use, and greater one-/two-staged IPAA, with 20% hand sewn anastomosis and 16.5% of S pouch configuration compared to younger ones. No difference was observed in anastomotic separation, pelvic sepsis, fistulas, or pouch failure in follow-up. Postoperatively, older patients more frequently developed bowel obstructions, strictures, and pouchitis, in addition to higher rates of seepage (p < 0.05). QoL was comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: While IPAA retention rates are comparable between different age cohorts, older age at diagnosis and IPAA construction is associated with higher rates of pouchitis, bowel obstruction, anastomotic strictures, and worse functional outcome. Quality of life is similar in those who retain their ileal pouch on the long-term.

Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Procedure Is an Alternative to Permanent Ostomy in Patients With Complex Pelvic Fistulas.

BACKGROUND: A permanent stoma is frequently recommended in the setting of complex or recurrent rectovaginal fistulas because of the high failure rate of reconstructive procedures. The Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure is a salvage operation for motivated patients desiring to avoid permanent fecal diversion. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cure rates of complex rectovaginal fistulas after the Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure based on cause. DESIGN: After the institutional review approval board, a retrospective review of women who underwent the procedure (1993-2018) for a rectovaginal fistula was conducted. Patients' demographics, cause, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. SETTING: Colorectal surgery department at a tertiary center in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult women with a rectovaginal fistula who underwent a colonic pull-through procedure were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence after the colonic pull-through procedure. RESULTS: There were 81 patients who underwent colonic pull-through; of those, 26 patients had a rectovaginal fistula, had a median age of 51 (43-57) years, and had a mean BMI of 28 ± 3.2 kg/m 2 . A total of 4 patients (15%) had a recurrence and 85% of the patients healed. Ninety-three percent of the patients healed after the prior anastomotic leak. Patients with a Crohn's disease-related fistula had a 75% cure rate. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative incidence of recurrence of 8% (95% CI, 0%-8%) within 6 months after surgery and 12% at 12 months. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: The Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure may be the last option to preserve intestinal continuity and successfully treat rectovaginal fistulas in 85% of cases. EL PROCEDIMIENTO PULLTHROUGH DE TURNBULLCUTAIT ES UNA ALTERNATIVA A LA OSTOMA PERMANENTE EN PACIENTES CON FSTULAS PLVICAS COMPLEJAS: ANTECEDENTES:Con frecuencia se recomienda un estoma permanente en el contexto de una fístula rectovaginal compleja o recurrente debido a la alta tasa de fracaso de los procedimientos reconstructivos. El procedimiento de extracción de Turnbull-Cutait es una operación de rescate para pacientes motivados que desean evitar la desviación fecal permanente.OBJETIVO:Analizar las tasas de curación de la fístula rectovaginal compleja después del procedimiento de extracción de Turnbull-Cutait según la etiología.DISEÑO:Después de la junta de aprobación de revisión institucional, se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de mujeres que se sometieron a un procedimiento (1993-2018) por fístula rectovaginal. Se analizaron los datos demográficos, la etiología y los resultados posoperatorios de los pacientes.AJUSTE:Departamento de cirugía colorrectal en un centro terciario en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Mujeres adultas con fístula rectovaginal que se sometieron a extracción del colon.RESULTADO PRINCIPAL:recurrencia después de la extracción del colon.RESULTADOS:Hubo 81 pacientes que tenían extracción colónica, de esas 26 fístulas rectovaginales con una mediana de edad de 51 (43 - 57) años, y un índice de masa corporal promedio de 28 ± 3,2 kg/m2. Un total de 4 (15%) pacientes tuvieron una recurrencia y el 85% de los pacientes se curaron. El noventa y tres por ciento de los pacientes se curaron después de la fuga anastomótica previa. Los pacientes con fístula relacionada con EC tuvieron una tasa de curación del 75%. El análisis de Kaplan Meier mostró una incidencia acumulada de recurrencia del 8% [95% intervalo de confianza 0%-18%] dentro de los 6 meses posteriores a la cirugía y del 12% a los 12 meses.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:El procedimiento de extracción de Turnbull-Cutait puede ser la última opción que se puede ofrecer para preservar la continuidad intestinal y tratar la fístula rectovaginal con éxito en el 85% de los casos. (Traducción-Yesenia.Rojas-Khalil).

Redo Continent Ileostomy in Patients With IBD: Valuable Lessons Learned Over 25 Years.

BACKGROUND: Patients with IBD with continent ileostomies may require revision surgeries. There remains a paucity of data regarding outcomes after redo continent ileostomy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate patient outcomes after redo continent ileostomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a high-volume, specialized colorectal surgery department. PATIENTS: We identified patients who underwent redo continent ileostomy (defined as neo-pouch construction or major operations changing the pouch configuration) for IBD between 1994 and 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes measured were patient demographics, short- and long-term outcomes, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients met inclusion criteria; 102 (61%) were female, the mean age was 51 years (±13.1), and the mean BMI was 24.4 (±3.9). The median time between primary and redo continent ileostomy was 16.8 years. One hundred twenty-two patients (73%) who underwent redo surgery had ulcerative colitis, 36 (21%) had Crohn's disease, and 10 (6%) had indeterminate colitis. Slipped nipple valve and valve stricture were the most common indications for redo continent ileostomy (86%). After a median follow-up of 4 years, 48 patients (29%) required a subsequent reoperation and 27 (16%) had pouch failure requiring pouch excision. The pouch survival rate was 89% at 3 years, 84% at 5 years, and 79% at 10 years. On univariate analysis, a shorter interval between the primary and redo continent ileostomy was associated with long-term pouch failure ( p = 0.003). Cox regression multivariate analysis confirmed that a shorter interval between surgeries was independently associated with pouch failure ( p = 0.014). The mean Cleveland Clinic Global Quality of Life score was 0.61 (± 0.23) among the 70 patients who responded to the questionnaire. LIMITATIONS: The main limitations were that this was a retrospective, single-center study and that it had a low response rate for the Global Quality of Life questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Redo continent ileostomy surgery is associated with a long-term pouch retention rate of 79% and satisfactory quality of life. Therefore, redo surgery should be offered to patients who are motivated to keep their continent ileostomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C87 . REHACER LA ILEOSTOMA CONTINENTE EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL VALIOSAS LECCIONES APRENDIDAS DURANTE AOS: ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal con ileostomías continentes pueden requerir cirugías de revisión. Sigue habiendo escasez de datos con respecto a los resultados después de volver a realizar la ileostomía continente.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados después de rehacer la ileostomía continente.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Departamento especializado en cirugía colorrectal de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Identificamos pacientes que se sometieron a una nueva ileostomía continente (definida como construcción de una nueva bolsa u operaciones mayores que cambian la configuración de la bolsa) por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal entre 1994 y 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Datos demográficos de los pacientes, resultados a corto y largo plazo y calidad de vida.RESULTADOS:Un total de 168 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión; 102 (61%) eran mujeres, la edad media fue de 51 años (±13,1) y el IMC medio fue de 24,4 (±3,9). La mediana de tiempo entre la ileostomía primaria y la nueva ileostomía continente fue de 16,8 años. Ciento veintidós pacientes (73%) que se sometieron a una nueva cirugía tenían colitis ulcerosa, 36 (21%) tenían enfermedad de Crohn y 10 (6%) tenían colitis indeterminada. El deslizamiento de la válvula del pezón y la estenosis de la válvula fueron las indicaciones más comunes para rehacer la ileostomía continente (86%). Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 4 años, 48 (29%) pacientes requirieron una reintervención posterior y 27 (16%) tuvieron falla de la bolsa que requirió la escisión de la bolsa. La tasa de supervivencia de la bolsa fue del 89 % a los 3 años, del 84% a los 5 años y del 79% a los 10 años. En el análisis univariable, un intervalo de tiempo más corto entre la ileostomía continente primaria y la nueva se asoció con falla de la bolsa a largo plazo (p = 0,003). El análisis multivariable de regresión de Cox confirmó que el intervalo más corto entre cirugías se asoció de forma independiente con el fracaso de la bolsa (p = 0,014). La puntuación media de la Calidad de Vida Global fue de 0,61 (± 0,23) entre los 70 pacientes que respondieron al cuestionario.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro. Baja tasa de respuesta al cuestionario de Calidad de Vida.CONCLUSIÓN:La cirugía de ileostomía continente se asocia con una tasa de retención de la bolsa a largo plazo del 79% y una calidad de vida satisfactoria. Por lo tanto, se debe ofrecer una nueva cirugía a los pacientes que están motivados para mantener su ileostomía continente. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C87 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through operation: The Cleveland Clinic experience in the 21st century.

AIM: The Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure (TCO) restores intestinal continuity in the setting of chronic pelvic sepsis, colorectal anastomotic leak, complex pelvic fistulas and technical challenges related to complicated rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the TCO for salvaging complex pelvic conditions and to compare it to hand-sewn immediate coloanal anastomosis (CAA). METHODS: This is a retrospective single-institution study where we searched a prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent the TCO. Patient demographics, operative indications and outcomes were analysed. TCO success was defined as maintenance of intestinal continuity and being stoma-free. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed for stoma-free survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients with TCO and 129 patients with CAA were included. The TCO success rate was 69% at a median of 1.4 years' follow-up with 25 (31%) patients ending up with a permanent stoma compared to 22 (17%) in the CAA group with a median follow-up of 4 years (P = 0.03). The Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence of TCO success at 1, 3 and 5 years was 79%, 60% and 51%, respectively, compared to 91%, 81% and 73% after CAA. CONCLUSION: The TCO has a high success rate for patients with complex pelvic conditions who may be facing a permanent stoma as their only option.

Right colon, left colon, and rectal cancer have different oncologic and quality of life outcomes.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer patients are commonly considered a single entity in outcomes studies. This is particularly true for quality of life (QOL) studies. This study aims to compare oncologic and QOL outcomes between right colon, left colon, and rectal cancer in patients operated on in a single high-volume institution. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was queried to identify patients with pathological stages I-III colorectal adenocarcinoma electively operated on with curative intent between 2000 and 2010. Patient characteristics, perioperative and oncologic outcomes, and QOL were compared according to cancer location. RESULTS: Two-thousand sixty-five (606 right colon cancer [RCC], 366 left colon cancer [LCC], and 1093 rectal cancer [RC]) patients met the inclusion criteria. LCC had better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the non-adjusted analysis (p < 0.001) and better OS in multivariate analysis adjusted by age, gender, ASA, chemotherapy, and pathological stage (p = 0.024). Although RCC had worse OS and DFS in non-adjusted survival analysis than LCC and RC, when adjusted for the factors above, RCC had better survival outcomes than RC, but not LCC. COX regression analysis showed age (p < 0.001), gender (p = 0.016), ASA (p < 0.001), pathological stage (p < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.043), and cancer location (p = 0.024) were independently associated with OS. Age (p < 0.001), gender (p = 0.030), ASA (p = 0.004), and pathological stage (p < 0.001) were independently associated with DFS. Patients with RC reported more sexual dysfunction and work restrictions than colon cancers (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In an adjusted multivariate analysis, colon cancers demonstrated better survival outcomes when compared to rectal cancers.

Nonspecific, Acute Pouchitis in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Less Common Than We Think.

BACKGROUND: Nonspecific acute pouchitis is common in patients with ulcerative colitis who undergo IPAA, but there is disagreement about the rate at which this occurs in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to define the rate at which nonspecific acute pouchitis occurs in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. SETTING: This study was conducted at a hereditary colorectal cancer center in a large academic medical center. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study using prospectively gathered data. PATIENTS: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who have had IPAA were included. INTERVENTIONS: Symptoms, pouchoscopy and pouch radiography, and pouch biopsy were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the presence of nonspecific acute pouchitis and the alternative diagnosis of pouch dysfunction. RESULTS: There were 250 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who had undergone IPAA; 38 (15.2%) had been labeled as having "pouchitis": 23 men and 15 women. Median age was 55 years (range, 18-90 years). No patient had nonspecific, acute pouchitis as defined by our criteria. In 9 cases, the diagnosis was derived from benign ulcers common in ileal pouches. Stool frequency was the most common symptom associated with the "pouchitis" label, but actual causes for the frequency included poor pouch emptying, poor eating habits, poor bowel habits, and afferent limb syndrome. Median stool frequency was 9, ranging from 4 to 15 per day. Every patient had at least 1 pouch endoscopy, and the median number was 19 per patient (range, 1-21). Nine patients had pouch biopsies to rule out inflammation; all showed chronic active enteritis, a normal finding in ileal pouches. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: We could not confirm any case of nonspecific acute pouchitis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Those caring for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who have a pouch should seek causes for pouch-related symptoms other than "pouchitis." See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B666.POUCHITIS AGUDA INESPECÍFICA EN PACIENTES CON POLIPOSIS ADENOMATOSA FAMILIAR: MENOS COMÚN DE LO QUE PENSAMOSANTECEDENTES:La pouchitis aguda e inespecífica es común en pacientes con colitis ulcerativa, sometidos a anastomosis de bolsa ileoanal, pero no hay acuerdo sobre la frecuencia en que se presenta en pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar (PAF).OBJETIVO:Definir la frecuencia en la que se presenta pouchitis aguda inespecífica en pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro de cáncer colorrectal hereditario en un gran centro médico académico.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo utilizando datos recopilados prospectivamente.PACIENTES:Pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar sometidos a bolsa con anastomosis ileoanal.INTERVENCIONES:Síntomas, proctoscopia, radiografía y biopsia de bolsa ileoanal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Presencia de pouchitis aguda inespecífica; diagnósticos alternos de disfunción de la bolsa ileal.RESULTADOS:De 250 pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar sometidos a una anastomosis anal de la bolsa ileal; 38 (15,2%), habían sido etiquetados como "pouchitis", 23 hombres y 15 mujeres. La mediana de edad fue de 55 años (rango de 18 a 90 años). Ningún paciente tuvo pouchitis aguda inespecífica según lo definido por nuestros criterios. En 9 casos el diagnóstico se derivó de úlceras benignas frecuentes en bolsas ileales. La frecuencia de las evacuaciones fue el síntoma más común asociado con la etiqueta "pouchitis", pero las causas reales de la frecuencia, incluyeron un mal vaciado de la bolsa, malos hábitos alimenticios, malos hábitos intestinales y síndrome de asa aferente. La frecuencia media de las evacuaciones fue de 9, con un rango de 4 a 15 por día. A cada paciente se le realizó al menos una endoscopia de la bolsa: la mediana fue de 19 por paciente (rango de 1 a 21). A 9 pacientes se les realizó biopsia de bolsa para descartar inflamación: todos mostraron enteritis activa crónica, un hallazgo normal en las bolsas ileales.LIMITACIONES:Naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:No pudimos confirmar ningún caso de pouchitis aguda e inespecífica en pacientes con PAF. Aquellos que atienden a pacientes con PAF con bolsa ileal, deben buscar otras causas para los síntomas relacionados con la bolsa que no sean "pouchitis". Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B666. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).

Redo IPAA After a Failed Pouch In Patients With Crohn's Disease: Is It Worth Trying?

BACKGROUND: In selected patients with ulcerative colitis and pelvic pouch failure, redo pouch is an option. However, it is unknown whether selected patients with Crohn's disease should be offered a chance to avoid permanent diversion after failure of IPAA. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the outcomes of redo pouch for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained pouch database (1983-2017). SETTINGS: The setting was the Cleveland Clinic. PATIENTS: This study included patients who underwent redo pouch with a primary surgical specimen diagnosis of ulcerative or Crohn's colitis at the time of initial pouch. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pouch failure was defined as either pouch excision or indefinite pouch diversion. Patient characteristics, perioperative and functional outcomes, pouch survival, and quality of life were compared according to the diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 422 patients, 392 had ulcerative colitis and 30 had Crohn's disease. Age and sex were comparable. The most common indications for redo pouch included anastomotic separation and fistulas (220 (56.1%) in ulcerative colitis and 21 (70%) in Crohn's disease). The majority of redo pouches required mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis (310 (79%) in ulcerative colitis and 30 (100%) in Crohn's disease; p = 0.23). A new pouch was constructed in 160 patients (41%) with ulcerative colitis and repair of old pouch in 231 patients (59%) compared with 25 (83%) in Crohn's disease, who had creation of new pouch; only in 5 (17%) was the old pouch re-anastomosed. Stool frequency, seepage, and fecal urgency were comparable between groups. Cumulative 5-year pouch survival was longer in ulcerative colitis versus Crohn's disease (88% vs 55%; p = 0.008). Major causes of redo failure in Crohn's disease were pouch fistulas and/or strictures occurring after ileostomy closure. These were more common in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: Redo pouch can be offered to selected patients with colonic Crohn's disease diagnosed at the time of their primary pouch. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B206. REHACER LA ANASTOMOSIS ILEOANAL CON RESERVORIO DESPUéS DE UN RESERVORIO ILEAL FALLIDO EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN: ¿VALE LA PENA INTENTARLO?: En pacientes seleccionados con colitis ulcerativa y falla del reservorio pélvico, rehacer el reservorio es una opción. Sin embargo, se desconoce si en los pacientes seleccionados con enfermedad de Crohn se debería ofrecer la oportunidad de evitar la derivación permanente después de la falla de la anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio ileal.El objetivo fue comparar los resultados de reservorios re-hechos en colitis ulcerosa y la enfermedad de Crohn.El escenario fue la Cleveland Clinic.Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos de reservorios ileales mantenida prospectivamente (1983-2017).Este estudio incluyó a pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía para rehacer el reservorio ileal con un diagnóstico en el espécimen quirúrgico primario de colitis ulcerosa o de Crohn en el momento del reservorio inicial.La falla del reservorio se definió como la escisión del reservorio o la derivación indefinida del reservorio. Las características del paciente, los resultados perioperatorios y funcionales, la supervivencia del reservorio y la calidad de vida se compararon de acuerdo con el diagnóstico.De 422 pacientes, 392 tenían colitis ulcerativa y 30 tenían enfermedad de Crohn. La edad y el género fueron comparables. Las indicaciones más comunes para rehacer el reservorio incluyeron dehiscencia anastomótica y fístulas [220 (56,1%) en colitis ulcerosa y 21 (70%) en la enfermedad de Crohn]. La mayoría de los reservorios rehechos requirieron mucosectomía con anastomosis manual [310 (79%) en colitis ulcerosa y 30 (100%) en la enfermedad de Crohn, p = 0.23]. Se construyó un nuevo reservorio en 160 (41%) pacientes con colitis ulcerativa y se reparó el reservorio antiguo en 231 (59%) pacientes, en comparación con 25 (83%) en la enfermedad de Crohn, que requirieron creación de un nuevo reservorio, y solo 5 (17%) donde el reservorio antiguo se volvió a anastomosar. La frecuencia de las evacuaciones, el manchado fecal y la urgencia fecal fueron comparables entre grupos. La supervivencia acumulada del reservorio a 5 años fue mayor en la colitis ulcerativa frente a la enfermedad de Crohn (88% frente a 55%, p = 0.008). Las principales causas de falla del reservorio rehecho en la enfermedad de Crohn fueron las fístulas del reservorio y / o las estenosis que ocurrieron después del cierre de ileostomía. Estas fueron más comunes en la enfermedad de Crohn que en la colitis ulcerativa (p <0.001).Este fue un diseño retrospectivo.Rehacer el reservorio ileal se puede ofrecer a pacientes seleccionados con enfermedad de Crohn colónica diagnosticada en el momento de su reservorio primario. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B206. (Traducción-Dr Jorge Silva Velazco).

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation improves oncologic outcomes in low and mid clinical T3N0 rectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: Controversial data exists in the current literature in regard to the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) in patients with clinical T3N0 (cT3N0) rectal cancers, specifically based on location and relation to peritoneal reflection. We aimed to analyze the impact of nCRT on oncologic outcomes among cT3N0 rectal cancers, depending on the tumor height from anal verge (AV). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with cT3N0 rectal cancers was included from a query of a prospectively maintained rectal cancer database from 1980 to 2016. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the tumor height: low (1-5 cm from AV), mid (6-10 cm from AV), and upper (11-15 cm from AV). Patients were stratified by use of nCRT. MAIN OUTCOMES: 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and local recurrence (LR) using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-two patients were included. Overall, 364 (61.4%) patients received nCRT and 228 (38.6%) patients did not. There were 251 (43%) patients with low, 302 (51%) with mid, and 39 (7%) with upper rectal cancer. Patients with low and mid rectal cancers received nCRT more frequently than those with upper rectal cancers (68.5% and 61.2% vs 43.6%, p = 0.007). The 5-year OS was 78% and 63%, DFS-88% and 73%, LR-1% and 8% in nCRT followed by resection vs. surgery alone (p < 0.001). In regard to cancer location after nCRT compared with surgery alone, low and mid cancers had better OS, DFS, and CSS, compared with upper ones. CONCLUSION: nCRT prolongs survival among patients with rectal cancer below 10 cm from AV; however, it has no effect on 5-year oncologic survival of patients with upper rectal cancer located below peritoneal reflection.

Impact of preoperative duration of ulcerative colitis on long-term outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown if ulcerative colitis (UC) duration has an impact on outcomes of ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aim of the study was to compare the long-term IPAA outcomes based on preoperative UC duration. METHODS: All patients with pathologically confirmed UC who underwent IPAA were included from a prospectively maintained pouch database (1983-2017).Patient's cohort was stratified according to UC duration:< 5 years,5-10 years,10-20 years,> 20 years. UC duration was defined as time interval from date of preoperative diagnosis to colectomy date. The main outcome was Kaplan-Meier pouch survival. Secondary outcomes were pouch function and quality of life. RESULTS: Out of 4502 IPAAs (1983-2016), 2797 patients were included. Treated with biologics versus 12% with UC duration > 20 years were 41% patients with UC duration < 5 years. Treated with steroids compared to shortest (34%,p < 0.001) were 54% patients with the longest disease. A total of 65% of patients with shortest disease had IPAAs performed mostly in 3 stages. Anastomotic separation and pelvic sepsis were more prevalent among shortest compared to longest disease groups. Rates of pouch-targeted fistulas, anastomotic strictures, and pouchitis were highest in longest disease group. Pouch survival was similar between groups. Multivariate analysis did not show a significant association between UC duration and pouch failure [1.05(0.97-1.1), p = 0.23].Longer UC duration was associated with increased odds of pouchitis [1.2(1.1, 1.3), p < 0.001]. Biologics agents were shown to be protective against pouchitis. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative UC duration does not increase pouch failure risk. Longer preoperative UC duration increases the pouchitis risk. Biologic agents and three-staged IPAA are protective against pouchitis and septic complications in long-term among patients with UC.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of primary and redo IPAA for patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) patients after ileal anal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) are subject to CD recurrence, septic complications, and pouch failure. The aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of index and redo IPAA for CD. METHODS: Patients who underwent index and redo IPAA with a diagnosis of CD colitis were identified from a prospectively maintained IPAA database. Charts were reviewed to determine complications and pouch failure rates after index and redo IPAA. Long-term pouch survival and quality of life (QoL) were compared between index and redo IPAAs. RESULTS: There were 305 patients, 253 with an index IPAA and 52 having a redo IPAA. Their median ages were 33 years (index IPAA) and 32 years (redo IPAA) (p = 0.91); there were 47% and 53% men in each group, respectively (p = 0.54). Pouch salvage with redo IPAA was possible in 75% of redo pouches. Biologic agents were given in 8% of index IPAA and 34% redo IPAA patients (p < 0.01). Cumulative Kaplan Meier 5-year pouch survival was 80% vs. 60% in index and redo IPAA (p < 0.0001), at 10 years 74% vs. 38%, respectively (p < 0.0001). When queried, 78% who underwent redo pouch surgery would have it again and 86% would recommend this surgery to others. CONCLUSION: IPAA can be offered to selected patients with isolated colonic CD. Failure in this group of patients is related mainly to recurrent CD, not surgical complications. Redo IPAA is a realistic option for salvage in certain patients with failed index IPAA.

Factors Associated with Long-Term Quality of Life After Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis.

THE AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze factors associated with quality of life (QoL) after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS: Patients who underwent IPAA (1983-2015) and replied to QoL questionnaire were identified from an IRB-approved prospectively maintained IPAA-database. QoL was assessed using Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) questionnaire at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Patient cohort was divided in two groups: overall QoL score ≤ 0.7 (low) and > 0.7 (high). Demographics, perioperative morbidity, and functional results were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 4059 patients replied to the questionnaire at the most recent follow-up and were included. A total of 2889 (71%) had overall QoL > 0.7 (group 1) and 1170 (29%) patients had overall QoL ≤ 0.7 (group 2). Patients in group 1 had lower rates of early (44.6 vs. 50.4%, p = 0.003) and late (55.7 vs. 64.5%, p < 0.003) postoperative complications. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher rates of pouch failure among patients with lower QoL. Pouchitis, obstruction, fistulas, higher number of stools, and IPAA performed during the most recent decade (2005-2015) were significantly associated with lower QoL (≤ 0.7), while S-pouch configuration was associated with higher QoL (> 0.7). CONCLUSION: Patient's characteristics and minimal perioperative complications impact patient's QoL following IPAA not only in the short term, but also in the long term.

Case-Matched Comparison of Long-Term Functional and Quality of Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is associated with recovery benefits when compared with open IPAA. There is limited data on long-term quality of life and functional outcomes, which this study aimed to assess. METHODS: An IRB-approved, prospectively maintained database was queried to identify patients undergoing laparoscopic IPAA (L), case-matched with open IPAA (O) based on age ± 5 years, gender, body mass index (BMI) ± 5 kg/m2, diagnosis, date of surgery ± 3 years, stapled/handsewn anastomosis, omission of diverting loop ileostomy and length of follow-up ± 3 years. We assessed functional results, dietary, social, work, sexual restrictions and the Cleveland Clinic global quality of life score (CGQoL) at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 years postoperatively. Functional outcomes were assessed based on number of stools (day/night) and seepage protection use (day/night). Variables were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves, uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Out of 4595 IPAAs, 529 patients underwent L, of whom 404 patients were well matched 1:1 to an equivalent number of O based on all criteria. Median follow-ups were 2 (0.5-17.8) versus 2.4 (0.5-22.2) years in L versus O, respectively (p = 0.18). L was associated with significantly decreased number of stools at night and less frequent pad usage at 1 year, both during the day and at night. Functional outcomes became similar during further follow-up. L was also associated with improved overall CGQoL, and energy scores at 1 year postoperatively, and decreased social restrictions for 1-2 years. There were no significant differences in quality of health, dietary, work or sexual restrictions. Laparoscopy was not associated with increased risk of pouch failure (p = 0.07) or significantly different causes of pouch failure when compared to O. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic and open IPAA are associated with equivalent long-term functional outcomes, quality of life and pouch survival rates. Laparoscopic technique is associated with temporary benefits lasting 1 or 2 years.

The Relationship Between Clavien-Dindo Morbidity Classification and Oncologic Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: Limited data on the relationship between postoperative complications (POCs) after colorectal cancer resection and oncologic outcomes are available. We hypothesized that the increased severity of POCs is associated with progressively worse oncologic outcomes. METHODS: Patients with pathological stages I-III colorectal adenocarcinoma undergoing elective curative resection in a single institution between 2000 and 2012 were identified from a prospectively collected database. The severity of POCs was determined using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and oncologic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of 2266 patients, 669 (30%) had at least one POC. POCs were not associated with pathologic stage (p = 0.58) or use of adjuvant therapy (p = 0.19). With a mean follow-up of 5.3 years, POCs were associated with decreased 5-year overall survival (OS) (60% vs. 77%, p < 0.001), disease-free survival (DFS) (53% vs. 70%, p < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (81% vs. 87%, p < 0.001), and increased overall recurrence rates (19% vs. 15%, p = 0.008). Increasing Clavien-Dindo scores from I to IV was significantly associated with progressively decreasing OS (71, 64, 60, 22%, p < 0.001), DFS (65, 58, 51, 19%, p < 0.001), CSS (88, 77, 79, 74%, p < 0.001), and increasing recurrence rates (12, 20, 26, 18%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis confirmed POCs as an independent factor associated with decreased OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.76], DFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.76), CSS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.97), and increased recurrence rates (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02-1.80). CONCLUSIONS: POCs are associated with adverse oncologic outcomes, with increasing effect with higher Clavien-Dindo score. Efforts to reduce both the incidence and severity of complications should result in improved oncologic outcomes.

Pattern of calcium and parathyroid hormone normalization at 12-months follow-up after parathyroid operation.

BACKGROUND: At 12 months after a parathyroid operation, we expect cured patients to have biochemical profiles similar to those of healthy individuals. The aim of the current study was to compare the biochemical characteristics patients at 12 months after parathyroidectomy for primary sporadic hyperparathyroidism with those of healthy controls. METHODS: A total of 547 patients who underwent parathyroid neck operation for primary sporadic hyperparathyroidism from 2000-2014 were analyzed. A control group consisted of 74 healthy subjects. Calcium and parathyroid hormone were collected perioperatively. Graphic plots of the relationship between calcium versus parathyroid hormone (95% confidence intervals) were used to compare the biochemical profiles of patients after parathyroid operation and controls. RESULTS: Preoperatively, patients with primary sporadic hyperparathyroidism had a calcium level of 10.9 ± 0.5 mg/dL and parathyroid hormone level of 124.4 ± 68.5 pg/dL vs controls' values of 9.2 ± 0.3 mg/dL and 34.4 ± 13.4 pg/dL, respectively. Before operation, all primary sporadic hyperparathyroidism patients had calcium versus parathyroid hormone values outside the normal zone. At 12 months after operation, 335 (69%) patients showed normalization of the chemical profile; 13 (2.7%) had absolute elevation of calcium and parathyroid hormone, reflecting persistent disease; 2 (0.4%) patients had hypoparathyroidism after subtotal parathyroidectomy; and 149 (31%) had calcium and parathyroid hormone values outside the normal zone, not fitting into the above categories. There were no marked differences between patients with simple adenoma those with multiple-gland disease. CONCLUSION: Longer follow-up might be needed for patients after parathyroid operation to confirm stabilization of biochemical profiles.

Use of Calcium and Parathyroid Hormone Nomogram to Distinguish Between Atypical Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Normal Patients.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism (1°HP) has become more complex, as fewer patients present with classic phenotype of concomitant elevation of calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH). In addition, the distinction between normal versus abnormal patients is challenging, with an increasing number of patients with 1°HP, who have calcium and/or PTH values within the "reference" range. Patients with "inappropriately" elevated PTH values relative to their serum calcium are considered to have 1°HP. METHODS: The study population consisted of 1753 patients with pathologically proven 1°HP and 74 healthy control patients. Nomograms were created by plotting PTH versus calcium of the two groups. The 95 % confidence zone of calcium and PTH for normal individuals was plotted and compared to patients with 1°HP. RESULTS: The comparison of control and disease groups showed a clear demarcation zone on the plots of calcium versus PTH. In the group of 1°HP, 70 % had classic 1°HP presentation with the concomitant elevation of both calcium (≥10.5 mg/dL) and PTH (≥65 pg/dL). 21 % had "normocalcemic" HP with calcium ≤10.5 mg/dL and PTH ≥65 pg/dL. 6 % had "normohormonal" HP with calcium ≥10.5 mg/dL and PTH ≤65 pg/dL. 3 % had both calcium and PTH within the reference range. 68.5 % of patients had single adenoma, 16 % double adenoma, and 15.5 % hyperplasia. CONCLUSION: This nomogram serves as a diagnostic tool to distinguish normal patients from those with 1°HP, particularly those with atypical presentations. This recognition would permit previously observed patients to benefit from curative surgery.