Preparing Residents for Fellowship: A Novel Mock Interview Program.

OBJECTIVES: Although high-stakes interviews are critically important for residents to obtain competitive fellowships, few formalized programs targeting interviewing skills exist. Previous studies demonstrate that mock interviews increase medical students' and healthcare professionals' confidence and improve match rates, but little research has been conducted among medical residents. The objective of our study was to increase trainees' confidence entering fellowship interviews and prepare them for commonly encountered questions via a mock interview program. METHODS: Emory Internal Medicine residency leaders designed a voluntary mock interview program focused on 103 residents (64% of the overall cohort) pursuing fellowship training (median 36, range 30-37/year) from 2018 to 2020. Administrative staff scheduled eight associate program director interviewers for 75 hours of interviews for 3 years (mean 3.6 hours per interviewer per year), ensuring program feasibility. Interviewers underwent faculty development and used a standardized tool with commonly asked interview questions to conduct mock interviews. Interviewers provided feedback on verbal communication, nonverbal communication, professionalism, and, given recent shifts to virtual interviews, camera readiness. We conducted resident surveys to understand their perceptions of mock interview program experiences. RESULTS: Ninety-nine residents pursuing fellowship (96%) enrolled. Fifty (51%) completed the survey (median 20, range 14-22/year); 46 (92%) reported that the mock interviews were helpful or increased their confidence for interview season. CONCLUSIONS: Residents perceived that this high-fidelity mock interview program successfully prepared them at a critical career juncture. This program is feasible, sustainable, adaptable, and scalable, and may be adopted to benefit trainees in any graduate medical education program.

Parental Leave Policies in Residency: A National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors.

PURPOSE: To characterize the existence, accessibility, and content of parental leave policies, as well as barriers to program-level policy implementation among internal medicine (IM) program directors (PDs) and to assess the willingness of PDs to implement a national standardized policy. METHOD: In 2019, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine conducted a survey of 422 IM PDs. Along with other content, 38 questions addressed 4 primary outcomes: parental leave policy existence, accessibility, content, and barriers. The authors compared programs with and without a program-level policy and applied qualitative content analysis to open-ended questions about barriers to policy implementation and openness to a national standard. RESULTS: The response rate was 69.4% (293/422). Of responding programs, 86% (250/290) reported a written parental leave policy with 43% (97/225) of these originating at the program level. Program-level policies, compared with policies at other levels, were more likely to address scheduling during pregnancy (38%, 36/95 vs 22%, 27/124; P = .018); peer coverage (24%, 21/89 vs 15%, 16/109; P = .037), how the duration of extended training is determined (81%, 72/89 vs 44%, 48/109; P < .001), and associated pay and benefits 61%, 54/89 vs 44%, 48/109; P = .009). PDs without program-level policy reported lacking guidance to develop policy, deferring upward to institutional policies, and wishing to retain flexibility. More than half of PDs (60%, 170/282) expressed agreement that a national standard for a residency program-level parental leave policy should exist. Those not in favor cited organization equity, lack of resources, implementation challenges, loss of flexibility, and potentially disadvantaging recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: While existing program-level policies included important content, most PDs reported not having them. A national standard to guide the development of program-level parental leave policies could be embraced if it provided flexibility for programs with limited resources.

Childbearing Decisions in Residency: A Multicenter Survey of Female Residents.

PURPOSE: To characterize how female residents make decisions about childbearing, factors associated with the decision to delay childbearing, and satisfaction with these decisions. METHOD: In 2017, the authors sent a voluntary, anonymous survey to 1,537 female residents enrolled across 78 graduate medical education programs, consisting of 25 unique specialties, at 6 U.S. academic medical centers. Survey items included personal, partner, and institutional characteristics, whether the respondent was delaying childbearing during residency, and the respondent's satisfaction with this decision. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 52% (n = 804). Among the 447 (56%) respondents who were married or partnered, 274 (61%) were delaying childbearing. Residents delaying childbearing were significantly more likely to be younger (P < .001), not currently a parent (P < .001), in a specialty with an uncontrollable lifestyle (P = .001), or in a large program (P = .004). Among self-reported reasons for delaying childbearing, which were not mutually exclusive, the majority cited a busy work schedule (n = 255; 93%) and desire not to extend residency training (n = 145; 53%). Many cited lack of access to childcare (n = 126; 46%), financial concerns (n = 116; 42%), fear of burdening colleagues (n = 96; 35%), and concern for pregnancy complications (n = 74; 27%). Only 38% (n = 103) of respondents delaying childbearing were satisfied with this decision, with satisfaction decreasing with increasing age. CONCLUSIONS: Decisions to delay childbearing are more common in certain specialties, and many residents who delay childbearing are not satisfied with that decision. These findings suggest that greater attention is needed overall, and particularly in certain specialties, to promote policies and cultures that both anticipate and normalize parenthood in residency, thus minimizing the conflict between biological and professional choices for female residents.

Maternity Leave in Residency: A Multicenter Study of Determinants and Wellness Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To characterize determinants of resident maternity leave and the effect of length of leave on maternal well-being. METHOD: In 2017, the authors sent a voluntary, anonymous survey to female residents at 78 programs, in 25 unique specialties, at 6 institutions. Survey items included personal, partner, and child demographics, and logistics of leave, including whether leave was paid or vacation or sick leave was used. Outcomes were maternity leave length; duration of breastfeeding; burnout and postpartum depression screens; perceptions of support; and satisfaction with length of leave, breastfeeding, and childbearing during residency. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent (804/1,537) of residents responded. Among 16% (126) of respondents who were mothers, 50% (63) had their first child during residency. Seventy-seven maternity leaves were reported (range, 2-40 weeks), with most taking 6 weeks (32% of leaves; 25) and including vacation (81%; 62) or sick leave (64%; 49). Length of leave was associated with institution, use of sick leave or vacation, and amount of paid leave. The most frequently self-reported determinant of leave was the desire not to extend residency training (27%; 59). Training was not extended for 53% (41) of mothers; 9% (7) were unsure. Longer breastfeeding duration and perceptions of logistical support from program administration were associated with longer maternity leaves. Burnout affected approximately 50% (38) of mothers regardless of leave length. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates variability in administration of resident maternity leaves. Targets for intervention include policy clarification, improving program support, and consideration of parent wellness upon return to work.

Smoking during pregnancy and newborn neurobehavior.

OBJECTIVE: This was a prospective study of the effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on newborn neurobehavior, including dose-response relationships using self-report and a bioassay of nicotine exposure. METHODS: The sample included 27 nicotine exposed and 29 unexposed full-term newborn infants with no medical problems from comparable social class backgrounds. Mothers were excluded for using illegal drugs during pregnancy, using antidepressant medication, or if they consumed >3 alcoholic drinks per month. Nicotine exposure was determined by maternal self-report and cotinine in maternal saliva. The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) was administered by masked examiners in hospital to measure neurobehavioral function. NNNS scores were compared between nicotine-exposed and -unexposed groups including adjustment for covariates. Dose-response relationships with NNNS scores were computed for maternal salivary cotinine and maternal report of number of cigarettes per day during pregnancy. RESULTS: After adjustment for covariates, the tobacco-exposed infants were more excitable and hypertonic, required more handling and showed more stress/abstinence signs, specifically in the central nervous system (CNS), gastrointestinal, and visual areas. Dose-response relationships showed higher maternal salivary cotinine values related to more stress/abstinence signs (r =.530) including CNS (r =.532) and visual stress (r =.688) and higher excitability scores (r =.617). Cigarettes per day during pregnancy was related to more stress/abstinence signs (r =.582) including CNS (r =.561) and visual stress (r =.640). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest neurotoxic effects of prenatal tobacco exposure on newborn neurobehavior. Dose-response relationships could indicate neonatal withdrawal from nicotine. Research directed at understanding the effects of cigarette smoking during pregnancy on infants can lead to improved public health outcome.