RESUMEN
Evaluation of possible effects of underwater sound on aquatic life requires quantification of the sound field. A marine sound source and propagation modelling workshop took place in June 2022, whose objectives were to facilitate the evaluation of source and propagation models and to identify relevant metrics for environmental impact assessment. The scope of the workshop included model verification (model-model comparison) and model validation (model-measurement comparison) for multiple sources, including airguns, a low-frequency multi-beam echo sounder, and a surface vessel. Several verification scenarios were specified for the workshop; these are described herein.
RESUMEN
The acoustical output of marine-seismic airguns is determined from recordings of the sound pressure made on hydrophones suspended below a floating barge from which the airguns are also deployed. The signals from multiple types of airguns are considered and each type is operated over a range of deployment depths and chamber pressures. The acoustical output is characterized in terms of a "source waveform" with dimensions of the pressure-times-distance and in an infinite idealized medium, could be divided by the source-receiver distance to give the sound pressure at that receiver. In more realistic environments, the source waveform may be used to predict the pressure at any arbitrary receiver position simply by the application of a time-domain transfer function describing the propagation between the source and receiver. The sources are further characterized by metrics such as the peak source waveform and energy source level. These metrics are calculated in several frequency bands so that the resulting metrics can be used to characterize the acoustical output of the airguns in terms of their utility for seismic image-processing or possible effects on marine life. These characterizations provide reference data for the calibration of models that predict the airguns' acoustical output. They are validated via comparisons of the acoustic pressure measured on far-field hydrophones and predicted using the source waveforms. Comparisons are also made between empirically derived expressions relating the acoustic metrics to the chamber volume, chamber pressure, and deployment depth and similar expressions from the literature.