Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
1.
Headache ; 64(5): 494-499, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644657

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical conditions may preclude a mother from exclusively breastfeeding her infant; however, the association between migraine and the duration of exclusive breastfeeding is not well known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between migraine and the duration of exclusive breastfeeding in a representative sample of Canadian females. METHODS: We used the Canadian Community Health Survey, a cross-sectional survey, to identify females aged 20-49 years who delivered a baby in the previous 5 years. History of migraine was self-reported. Females reported if they breastfed their baby, and among those who did, they further reported the duration of exclusive breastfeeding. We evaluated the association between migraine and the rate of breastfeeding, and the duration of exclusive breastfeeding adjusting for selected covariates. RESULTS: We included 5282 females, of whom 862 (16.3%) had migraine. Compared to females without migraine, females with migraine were less likely to have high income (annual income >$80,000: 362 [42.0] vs. 2276 [51.6]), and more likely to have comorbid mood (176 [20.5] vs. 378 [8.6%]) and anxiety (196 [22.8%] vs. 406 [9.2%]) disorders. Migraine was not associated with breastfeeding (proportion of females who did not breastfeed, migraine vs. no migraine: 114/862 [13.2%] vs. 498/4420 [11.3%]; adjusted odds ratio 1.03; 0.74-1.27); however, females with migraine had lower odds (≥6 months of exclusive breastfeeding: 216/688 [31.4%] vs. 1325/3561 [37.2%]; adjusted odds ratio from ordinal shift analyses 0.84; 0.71-0.99) of longer duration of exclusive breastfeeding than females without migraine. CONCLUSION: Females with migraine exclusively breastfeed their infants for a shorter duration compared to females without migraine, suggesting the need to better support this population through education on the safety and benefits of exclusive breastfeeding and better access to safe and effective treatment of migraine in lactating females.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Canadá/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas
2.
Can J Neurol Sci ; : 1-3, 2023 Dec 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147999

RESUMEN

This study aims to gain a better understanding of the current scope of headache education received in Canadian medical schools. The Women's College Hospital Centre for Headache at the University of Toronto, Canada, distributed a questionnaire to administrators and physicians involved in medical student education at Canadian medical schools and gathered information surrounding headache education. Overall, the degree of headache education varied between schools in regard to the hours of training that occurred and year the training took place. This survey provides an initial insight into the current standards of headache-specific education in Canadian medical schools.

3.
Headache ; 63(9): 1203-1219, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37795754

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To systematically synthesize evidence from a broad range of studies on the association between air pollution and migraine. BACKGROUND: Air pollution is a ubiquitous exposure that may trigger migraine attacks. There has been no systematic review of this possible association. METHODS: We searched for empirical studies assessing outdoor air pollution and any quantified migraine outcomes. We included short- and long-term studies with quantified air pollution exposures. We excluded studies of indoor air pollution, perfume, or tobacco smoke. We assessed the risk of bias with the World Health Organization's bias assessment instrument for air quality guidelines. RESULTS: The final review included 12 studies with over 4,000,000 participants. Designs included case-crossover, case-control, time series, and non-randomized pre-post intervention. Outcomes included migraine-related diagnoses, diary records, medical visits, and prescriptions. Rather than pooling the wide variety of exposures and outcomes into a meta-analysis, we tabulated the results. Point estimates above 1.00 reflected associations of increased risk. In single-pollutant models, the percent of point estimates above 1.00 were carbon monoxide 5/5 (100%), nitrogen dioxide 10/13 (78%), ozone 7/8 (88%), PM2.5 13/15 (87%), PM10 2/2 (100%), black carbon 0/1 (0%), methane 4/6 (75%), sulfur dioxide 3/5 (60%), industrial toxic waste 1/1 (100%), and proximity to oil and gas wells 6/13 (46%). In two-pollutant models, 16/17 (94%) of associations with nitrogen dioxide were above 1.00; however, more than 75% of the confidence intervals included the null value. Most studies had low to moderate risks of bias. Where differences were observed, stronger quality articles generally reported weaker associations. CONCLUSIONS: Balancing the generally strong methodologies with the small number of studies, point estimates were mainly above 1.00 for associations of carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulate matter with migraine. These results were most consistent for nitrogen dioxide.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Contaminación del Aire , Contaminantes Ambientales , Ozono , Humanos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/análisis , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/toxicidad
4.
Headache ; 63(8): 1031-1039, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37638484

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this narrative review, we summarize relevant literature pertaining to psychosocial risk factors for headache and migraine progression, current behavioral and psychological treatments, and consider promising treatments. BACKGROUND: Headache and migraine are common and associated with significant burden and disability. Current treatments targeting psychosocial risk factors show modest outcomes and do not directly address the impact of early life adversity, including the development of maladaptive emotional processing. An intervention that could address these factors and include components of current evidence-based interventions may lead to improved outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for articles through December 2022. Search terms included headache, migraine, psychological interventions, behavioral interventions, cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness, psychiatric comorbidities, adverse childhood experiences, trauma, and emotional processing. RESULTS: Trauma and childhood adversity show a correlation with headache and migraine progression. Developmental adversity and trauma interfere with adaptive emotional processing, which may worsen headache and migraine symptoms, while adaptive ways of experiencing emotions are shown to improve symptoms. Current behavioral and psychological interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness therapies, are effective treatments for headache, but they produce small to medium effect sizes and do not directly address the impact of trauma and emotional conflicts-common factors that contribute to chronicity and disability, especially among certain subpopulations of headache patients such as those with migraine. Thus, there exists a gap in current treatment. CONCLUSION: There is a gap in headache and migraine treatment for those patients who have a history of trauma, childhood adversity, and maladaptive emotional processing. We suggest that an integrated psychological treatment that includes components of current evidence-based interventions and addresses gaps by focusing on processing trauma-related emotions may improve chronic and debilitating symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Cefalea , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Terapia Conductista , Factores de Riesgo , Emociones
5.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(1)2023 Jan 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36693705

RESUMEN

With an increasing number of patients seeking gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), the clinical impact of testosterone treatments on headache needs to be determined. Our case report looks at the potential effect of testosterone on migraine among transgender patients. We present two transmasculine patients who used masculinising hormone therapy with testosterone. Both patients described their headache as moderate-to-severe pain with features that fulfilled the criteria for chronic migraine without aura. Following GAHT, one patient improved in both frequency and intensity of headache symptoms while the other noted improvement in headache intensity alone. Our report postulates that testosterone therapy may have a positive impact on headaches in individuals participating in GAHT, highlighting the need for further research on the role of testosterone therapy on headache in transmasculine individuals.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Personas Transgénero , Humanos , Testosterona/efectos adversos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Cefalea/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 50(3): 458-461, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35403586

RESUMEN

We investigated the association between clinical rotation at a specialized headache center and headache knowledge of resident trainees. Using standardized pre- and post-questionnaires, change in self-reported knowledge of headache disorders and management in 31 participants undertaking clinical rotations were evaluated. There was a statistically significant improvement in self-reported measures of headache disorder knowledge post-rotation [mean score (SD), 3.19(0.543), p < 0.001] and significant improvement in overall knowledge measured using case-based questionnaires pre- vs. post-rotation [7.1(1.4) vs. 7.9(1.5), p = 0.003]. Rotation at a specialized headache center improved trainees' self-reported knowledge and test-based scores, suggesting that such rotation should be included in postgraduate curriculum.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Curriculum , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Autoinforme , Competencia Clínica
7.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 50(6): 918-921, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36373325

RESUMEN

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are a risk factor for progression from episodic to chronic migraine. Risk factors for medication overuse headache (MOH) are incompletely understood, but opioid overuse may carry a higher risk than overuse of other medication types. We performed a retrospective chart review investigating the frequency and impact of ACEs in patients with MOH. Of 68 included patients, 37 (54.4%) reported ACEs. There was no significant inter-group difference in baseline migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) or monthly headache days. Patients with ACEs reported more opioid overuse, and worse headache-related disability at follow-up, despite similar monthly headache days. Patients with ACEs require complex, multidisciplinary treatment.

8.
Semin Neurol ; 42(4): 503-511, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36041478

RESUMEN

Migraine significantly impacts individuals from all walks of life and from all around the globe. Chronic or high-frequency episodic migraine has similar disability and burden on the healthcare system and can be challenging to manage. The focus of this article is to provide an outline of the available pharmacological and nonpharmacological evidence-based strategies that clinicians can employ to build a "toolbox" for their patients.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control
10.
J Headache Pain ; 22(1): 124, 2021 Oct 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34645382

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Migraine has been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events among middle-aged adults. The objective of this study was to determine the risk for ischemic stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) events among older adults with versus without migraine. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from US adults ≥66 years of age with Medicare health insurance between 2008 and 2017. After stratification by history of CVD, patients with a history of migraine were matched 1:4 to those without a history of migraine, based on calendar year, age, and sex. Patients were followed through December 31, 2017 for ischemic stroke and CHD events including myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization. All analyses were done separately for patients with and without a history of CVD. RESULTS: Among patients without a history of CVD (n = 109,950 including n = 21,990 with migraine and n = 87,960 without migraine), 1789 had an ischemic stroke and 3552 had a CHD event. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) among patients with versus without migraine was 1.20 (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.07-1.35) for ischemic stroke and 1.02 (95%CI, 0.93-1.11) for CHD events. Compared to patients without migraine, those with migraine who were taking an opioid medication had a higher risk for ischemic stroke (adjusted HR 1.43 [95%CI, 1.20-1.69]), while those taking a triptan had a lower risk for CHD events (adjusted HR 0.79 [95%CI, 0.67-0.93]). Among patients with a history of CVD (n = 79,515 including n = 15,903 with migraine and n = 63,612 without migraine), 2960 had an ischemic stroke and 7981 had a CHD event. The adjusted HRs (95%CI) for ischemic stroke and CHD events associated with migraine were 1.27 (1.17-1.39) and 0.99 (0.93-1.05), respectively. Patients with migraine taking an opioid medication had a higher risk for ischemic stroke (adjusted HR 1.21 [95%CI, 1.07-1.36]), while those taking a triptan had a lower risk for CHD events (adjusted HR 0.83 [95%CI, 0.72-0.95]), each versus those without migraine. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with migraine are at increased risk for ischemic stroke. The risk for ischemic stroke among older adults with migraine may differ by migraine medication classes.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Enfermedad Coronaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Trastornos Migrañosos , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Humanos , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
11.
Headache ; 61(5): 734-739, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021595

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the patient experience of telemedicine for headache care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine has rapidly expanded and evolved since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine eliminates the physical and geographic barriers to health care, preserves personal protective equipment, and prevents the spread of COVID-19 by allowing encounters to happen in a socially distanced way. However, few studies have assessed the patient perspective of telemedicine for headache care. METHODS: The American Migraine Foundation (AMF) designed a standardized electronic questionnaire to assess the patient experience of telemedicine for headache care between March and September 2020 to help inform future quality improvement as part of its patient advocacy initiative. The date parameters were identified as the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 disease and the declaration of a national emergency in the United States. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to more than 100,000 members of the AMF community through social media platforms and the AMF email database. RESULTS: A total of 1172 patients responded to our electronic questionnaire, with 1098 complete responses. The majority, 1081/1153 (93.8%) patients, had a previous headache diagnosis prior to the telemedicine encounter. A total of 648/1127 (57.5%) patients reported that they had used telemedicine for headache care during the study period. Among those who participated in telehealth visits, 553/647 (85.5%) patients used it for follow-up visits; 94/647 (14.5%) patients used it for new patient visits. During the telemedicine encounters, 282/645 (43.7%) patients were evaluated by headache specialists, 222/645 (34.4%) patients by general neurologists, 198/645 (30.7%) patients by primary care providers, 73/645 (11.3%) patients by headache nurse practitioners, and 21/645 (3.2%) patients by headache nurses. Only 47/633 (7.4%) patients received a new headache diagnosis from telemedicine evaluation, whereas the other 586/633 (92.6%) patients did not have a change in their diagnoses. During these visits, a new treatment was prescribed for 358/636 (52.3%) patients, whereas 278/636 (43.7%) patients did not have changes made to their treatment plan. The number (%) of patients who rated the telemedicine headache care experience as "very good," "good," "fair," "poor," and "other" were 396/638 (62.1%), 132/638 (20.7%), 67/638 (10.5%), 23/638 (3.6%), and 20/638 (3.1%), respectively. Detailed reasons for "other" are listed in the manuscript. Most patients, 573/638 (89.8%), indicated that they would prefer to continue to use telemedicine for their headache care, 45/638 (7.1%) patients would not, and 20/638 (3.1%) patients were unsure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study evaluating the patient perspective demonstrated that telemedicine facilitated headache care for many patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in high patient satisfaction rates, and a desire to continue to use telemedicine for future headache care among those who completed the online survey.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19 , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fundaciones , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/diagnóstico , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
12.
JAMA Cardiol ; 6(2): 228-235, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33263716

RESUMEN

Importance: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are potentially harmful events that occur during childhood, spanning neglect, physical or sexual abuse, parental separation, or death, among others. At least 50% of the US adult population has experienced 1 or more ACEs before the age of 18 years, but in clinical practice, ACEs remain underrecognized. Adults who have experienced ACEs are at increased risk of developing health risk behaviors and, ultimately, cardiovascular disease (CVD). This review summarizes the evidence regarding the association of ACEs with CVD and the accompanying diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in the adult population. Observations: ACEs are commonly classified into 3 domains: abuse (psychological, physical, or sexual), household dysfunction (eg, substance use by household members, mental illness, parental separation), and neglect. These experiences elicit chronic activation of the stress response system, leading to autonomic, neuroendocrine, and inflammatory dysfunction. The subsequent development of traditional risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and obesity, results in the onset of CVD and premature mortality. Adults with 4 or more ACEs compared with those with none have a more than 2-fold higher risk of developing CVD and an almost 2-fold higher risk of premature mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: Identifying methods of mitigating the health consequences of ACEs may lead to better cardiovascular outcomes. Inquiry into ACE exposure during clinical encounters and subsequent referral to psychological services when appropriate may be helpful, but strategies aimed at CVD prevention via management of ACEs in adults continue to lack adequate evidence.


Asunto(s)
Adultos Sobrevivientes del Maltrato a los Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Conductas de Riesgo para la Salud , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Mortalidad Prematura , Adultos Sobrevivientes de Eventos Adversos Infantiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Humanos
13.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep ; 20(11): 53, 2020 09 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32949259

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although common, post-traumatic headache (PTH) in the pediatric population is a niche group with a paucity of published evidence on the diagnosis, most appropriate acute and preventative management, and prognosis. This article aims to review pediatric PTH, its epidemiology and pathophysiology with a focus on management and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Using MEDLINE, EMBASE, 52 articles on PTH in children and adolescents from 2016 to 2020 were identified. Over the last 4 years, our understanding of traumatic brain injury pathophysiology has grown, expanding the potential for more therapeutic targets. Despite this achievement, and recently published consensus guidelines, the review demonstrated a lack of published controlled trials to help guide management of pediatric PTH. The last 4 years have provided new insights into the potential pathophysiological mechanisms through laboratory research and advanced MR imaging; however, there continues to be a translational gap to clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Cefalea Postraumática , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Cefalea Postraumática/diagnóstico , Cefalea Postraumática/epidemiología , Cefalea Postraumática/etiología , Pronóstico
14.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep ; 20(10): 45, 2020 08 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32770368

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Migraine disease is a neurological brain disorder that has been associated with significant disability and socioeconomic burden affecting women three times more commonly than men. Menstrual migraine is a subclass of migraine disease affecting 42-61% of females living with migraine disease. Menstrual migraine is often far more disabling, of longer duration, and more resistant to treatment. It is crucial to gain a deeper understanding of the ongoing biological changes and have a current awareness of the management of this debilitating form of migraine disease to improve the quality of life of these females living with migraine disease. RECENT FINDINGS: In new treatment options such as devices and with large-scale genome-wide association studies in migraine, genes related to migraine are being identified. This article will review the current literature regarding the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and treatment of menstrual migraine.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Calidad de Vida , Femenino , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Factores de Tiempo
15.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 314, 2020 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32293444

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are common and associated with many illnesses. Most physicians do not routinely screen for ACEs. We aimed to determine if screening is related to knowledge or medical specialty, and to assess perceived barriers. METHODS: Physicians in Ontario, Canada completed an online survey in 2018-2019. Data were analyzed in 2019. RESULTS: Participants were 89 family physicians, 46 psychiatrists and 48 other specialists. Participants screened for ACEs "never or not usually" (N = 58, 31.7%), "when indicated" (N = 67, 36.6%), "routinely" (N = 50, 27.3%) or "other" (N = 5, 2.7%). Screening was strongly associated with specialty (Chi2 = 181.0, p < .001). The modal responses were: family physicians - "when indicated" (66.3%), psychiatrists - "routinely" (91.3%), and other specialists - "never or not usually" (77.1%). Screening was not related to knowledge of prevalence of ACEs, or of the link between ACEs and mental health, but was significantly associated with knowing that ACEs are associated with physical health. Knowing that ACEs are linked to stroke, ischemic heart disease, COPD, and diabetes predicted greater screening (Chi2 15.0-17.7, each p ≤ .001). The most prevalent perceived barriers to screening were lack of mental health resources (59.0%), lack of time (59.0%), concern about causing distress (49.7%) and lack of confidence (43.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing knowledge about ACEs' negative influence on physical illness may increase screening. Efforts to promote screening should address concerns that screening is time-consuming and will increase referrals to mental health resources. Education should focus on increasing confidence with screening and with managing patient distress.


Asunto(s)
Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Tamizaje Masivo , Médicos/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
Pediatr Neurol ; 103: 3-7, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843350

RESUMEN

Headache hygiene refers to self-management behaviors and practices aimed at reducing headache-related disability and improving self-efficacy. Although self-management interventions have an established place in the management of a wide range of chronic conditions, there is still not a standardized approach to this in pediatric headache. In this article, we focus on headache hygiene approaches including education, lifestyle interventions, and psychologic interventions. We also present our center's resource compilation, made available to patients by quick response code technology, as an example of a structured approach to headache hygiene. Further work should explore a standardized approach to headache hygiene and strategies to support adherence, including the use of technology as an innovative health care delivery pathway.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Psicoterapia , Autoeficacia , Automanejo , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos
17.
Neurol Clin ; 37(4): 835-845, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563235

RESUMEN

Migraine is a lifelong condition that disproportionately affects women and, if not effectively managed, can lead to significant disability. It is important for clinicians to have a good understanding of the impact of the hormonal fluctuations that occur throughout a female migraineur's life, so that appropriate, stratified therapies can be implemented. In doing so, whether it is migraine onset at menarche in an adolescent young woman, or migraine worsening in a perimenopausal female migraineur, quality of life can be ensured.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/métodos , Menopausia/efectos de los fármacos , Ciclo Menstrual/efectos de los fármacos , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Femenino , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/tendencias , Humanos , Menopausia/sangre , Ciclo Menstrual/sangre , Trastornos Migrañosos/sangre , Calidad de Vida
18.
Headache ; 59(9): 1631-1640, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31469410

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We present a case report of 2 migraine patients engaged in shift work, followed by a narrative review, to assess whether shift work influences headache-related disability and chronification of migraine. BACKGROUND: Numerous modifiable factors can lead to chronification of migraine and to higher headache-related disability. These include, among others, obesity, depression, overuse of acute medications, ineffective acute treatments, and stressful life events. Sleep disruptions and disorders are also felt to increase the risk of transitioning from episodic to chronic migraine. We hypothesize that shift work, which by definition leads to atypical or irregular sleep cycles, along with poor quality sleep, is a risk factor for chronification of migraine. METHODS: We present the case histories of 2 shift workers with migraine as per International Classification of Headache Disorders 3 criteria, seen at a large, busy academic headache center, followed by a narrative review of the literature. RESULTS: Previous literature regarding the relationship between shift work and migraine is sparse and conflicting, with more recent studies suggesting that shift work may be a risk factor for migraine-related disability. In our case series, both patients initially reported severe migraine headache-related disability and both patients had noted a worsening of their headaches after beginning night shift work. Both improved when switched back to day shifts, then worsened upon being put back on night shifts. Their headache patterns finally reverted from chronic to episodic migraine after eliminating night shifts completely and maintaining a good sleep routine. CONCLUSIONS: In the 2 cases presented, shift work appeared to be associated with chronification of migraine and higher headache-related disability despite optimal headache management and good patient adherence. A switch to only day shifts promoted transition to an episodic, less disabling pattern of migraine. It is clinically important to take a detailed sleep history in headache patients, and when appropriate, provide support for workplace accommodations. Further larger-scale, rigorous studies are needed to more clearly delineate the relationship between shift work and migraine.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/etiología , Trastornos del Sueño del Ritmo Circadiano/complicaciones , Adulto , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Personas con Discapacidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Cefalea/clasificación , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos del Sueño del Ritmo Circadiano/epidemiología
19.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep ; 19(6): 27, 2019 04 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31011857

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Headaches in pregnancy are a frequent cause of worry for both patients and healthcare providers. Physiological changes during this period increase the risk of a number of secondary headache disorders, and often also have an impact on primary headache disorders. This article reviews recent research into distinguishing worrisome vs non-worrisome headache presentations during pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research suggests that secondary causes of headache are highly prevalent during pregnancy, in between 25 and 42.4% of women seeking medical attention. Secondary causes of headache in pregnancy are most commonly homeostatic disturbances and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, vascular problems, space-occupying lesions, and infections. Migraine itself also increases the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Specific red flags for a secondary cause of headache in pregnancy include absence of any headache history, more severe pain, systemic features such as elevated blood pressure, and abnormal laboratory tests including thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis, elevated liver function tests, elevated C-reactive protein, or proteinuria, in addition to traditional red flags, such as a change in headache pattern. Secondary causes of headache are common in women seeking medical attention during pregnancy. Red flags for secondary causes of headache during pregnancy may be remembered with the mnemonic PREGNANT HA (proteinuria, rapid onset, elevated blood pressure or temperature, gestational age in third trimester, neurological signs or symptoms, altered level of consciousness, no headache history or known history of a secondary headache disorder, thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis, high liver function tests or CRP, or agonizingly severe pain). Increased education of patients and their providers may help improve selection of patients for workup of a secondary cause.


Asunto(s)
Cefaleas Secundarias/diagnóstico , Cefaleas Secundarias/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Femenino , Cefalea/etiología , Cefaleas Primarias , Humanos , Hipertensión , Trastornos Migrañosos , Embarazo
20.
Disabil Rehabil ; 41(11): 1360-1366, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29327631

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse childhood experiences are significant risk factors for physical and mental illnesses in adulthood. Traumatic brain injury/concussion is a challenging condition where pre-injury factors may affect recovery. The association between childhood adversity and traumatic brain injury/concussion has not been previously reviewed. The research question addressed is: What is known from the existing literature about the association between adverse childhood experiences and traumatic brain injury/concussion in adults? METHODS: All original studies of any type published in English since 2007 on adverse childhood experiences and traumatic brain injury/concussion outcomes were included. The literature search was conducted in multiple electronic databases. Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al.'s scoping review frameworks were used. Two reviewers independently completed screening and data abstraction. RESULTS: The review yielded six observational studies. Included studies were limited to incarcerated or homeless samples, and individuals at high-risk of or with mental illnesses. Across studies, methods for childhood adversity and traumatic brain injury/concussion assessment were heterogeneous. DISCUSSION: A positive association between adverse childhood experiences and traumatic brain injury occurrence was identified. The review highlights the importance of screening and treatment of adverse childhood experiences. Future research should extend to the general population and implications on injury recovery. Implications for rehabilitation Exposure to adverse childhood experiences is associated with increased risk of traumatic brain injury. Specific types of adverse childhood experiences associated with risk of traumatic brain injury include childhood physical abuse, psychological abuse, household member incarceration, and household member drug abuse. Clinicians and researchers should inquire about adverse childhood experiences in all people with traumatic brain injury as pre-injury health conditions can affect recovery.


Asunto(s)
Adultos Sobrevivientes de Eventos Adversos Infantiles , Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Trastornos Mentales , Adulto , Adultos Sobrevivientes de Eventos Adversos Infantiles/psicología , Adultos Sobrevivientes de Eventos Adversos Infantiles/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/psicología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/rehabilitación , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...