Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ther Drug Monit ; 46(3): 291-308, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648666

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, has revolutionized the pharmacological management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This position statement critically reviews and examines existing data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab in patients with IMIDs. It provides a practical guide on implementing TDM in current clinical practices and outlines priority areas for future research. METHODS: The endorsing TDM of Biologics and Pharmacometrics Committees of the International Association of TDM and Clinical Toxicology collaborated to create this position statement. RESULTS: Accumulating data support the evidence for TDM of infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, with limited investigation in other IMIDs. A universal approach to TDM may not fully realize the benefits of improving therapeutic outcomes. Patients at risk for increased infliximab clearance, particularly with a proactive strategy, stand to gain the most from TDM. Personalized exposure targets based on therapeutic goals, patient phenotype, and infliximab administration route are recommended. Rapid assays and home sampling strategies offer flexibility for point-of-care TDM. Ongoing studies on model-informed precision dosing in inflammatory bowel disease will help assess the additional value of precision dosing software tools. Patient education and empowerment, and electronic health record-integrated TDM solutions will facilitate routine TDM implementation. Although optimization of therapeutic effectiveness is a primary focus, the cost-reducing potential of TDM also merits consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of TDM for infliximab necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, hospital pharmacists, and (quantitative) clinical pharmacologists to ensure an efficient research trajectory.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Infliximab , Humanos , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/farmacocinética , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/farmacocinética
2.
Ther Drug Monit ; 46(3): 410-414, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38287880

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a potential candidate for concentration-guided tapering because the standard dose of tocilizumab results in a wide range of serum concentrations, usually above the presumed therapeutic window, and an exposure-response relationship has been described. However, no clinical trials have been published to date on this subject. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of the tapering of intravenous (iv) tocilizumab with the use of a pharmacokinetic model-based algorithm in RA patients. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with a double-blind design and follow-up of 24 weeks was conducted. RA patients who received the standard of tocilizumab for at least the past 24 weeks, which is 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks, were included. Patients with a tocilizumab serum concentration above 5 mg/L at trough were randomized between concentration-guided dose tapering, referred to as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), or the standard 8 mg/kg dose. In the TDM group, the tocilizumab dose was tapered with a recently published model-based algorithm to achieve a target concentration of 4-6 mg/L after 20 weeks of dose tapering. RESULTS: Twelve RA patients were included and 10 were randomized between the TDM and standard dose group. The study was feasible regarding the predefined feasibility criteria and patients had a positive attitude toward therapeutic drug monitoring. In the TDM group, the tocilizumab trough concentration within patients decreased on average by 24.5 ± 18.3 mg/L compared with a decrease of 2.8 ± 12 mg/L in the standard dose group. None of the patients in the TDM group reached the drug range of 4-6 mg/L. Instead, tocilizumab concentrations of 1.6 and 1.5 mg/L were found for the 2 patients who completed follow-up on the tapered dose. No differences in RA disease activity were observed between the 2 study groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to show that it is feasible to apply a dose-reduction algorithm based on a pharmacokinetic model in clinical practice. However, the current algorithm needs to be optimized before it can be applied on a larger scale.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Artritis Reumatoide , Monitoreo de Drogas , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/farmacocinética , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/sangre , Reducción Gradual de Medicamentos/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Anciano , Adulto
4.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 22(5): 869-873, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30767391

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the transition from reference infliximab Remicade to biosimilar Remsima in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients were informed through a letter about the transition to a biosimilar and were subsequently contacted for possible additional questions and whether they agreed upon the transition. Once agreed, Remsima was administered at the same dosage and interval as previous treatment with Remicade. Data on the transition were analyzed in January 2018. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients continuing treatment with Remsima and secondary outcome was the change in disease activity measured with the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). In addition, the reasons for discontinuation with infliximab or restarting Remicade were recorded. RESULTS: In total 47 patients were approached, 45 patients switched from Remicade to Remsima, two patients disagreed upon transition and continued Remicade. At the end of the follow-up period of 2 years, 39 patients (87%) continued with Remsima, three patients (7%) restarted Remicade due to inefficacy according to the patient (this was not objectified by the rheumatologist) 2 (4%) patients switched to another biological due to lack of effect and in one patient (2%) infliximab was stopped because of lung malignancy. Furthermore, the DAS28-ESR remained comparable before and after the switch, with a mean (SD) of 2.34 (±1.02) and 2.31 (±1.11) respectively. CONCLUSION: In our population, 87% of patients continued Remsima during the follow-up period of approximately 2 years. Three patients restarted Remicade, while retaining stable DAS28-ESR.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artritis Psoriásica/inmunología , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA