The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Overview and Summary.

The recently published WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (World Health Organization [WHO] System) is an international approach to the standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology, updating the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology (PSC System). Significant changes were made to the categorization of benign neoplasms, intraductal neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and malignant neoplasms considered low grade. Benign neoplasms, such as serous cystadenoma, categorized as Neoplastic: benign in the PSC system, are categorized as Benign/negative for malignancy in the WHO system. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, categorized as Neoplastic: other in the PSC system, are categorized as Malignant in the WHO System in accord with their classification in the 5th edition WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours (2019). The two new categories of Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm Low-risk/grade and Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm High-risk/grade are mostly limited to intraductal neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms. Low-risk/grade lesions are mucinous cysts, with or without low-grade epithelial atypia. High-risk/grade lesions contain neoplastic epithelium with high-grade epithelial atypia. Correlation with clinical, imaging, and ancillary studies remains a key tenet. The sections for each entity are written to highlight key cytopathological features and cytopathological differential diagnoses with the pathologist working in low resource setting in mind. Each section also includes the most pertinent ancillary studies useful for the differential diagnosis. Sample reports are provided for each category. Finally, the book provides a separate section with risk of malignancy and management recommendations for each category to facilitate decision-making for clinicians.

World Health Organization Reporting System for Soft Tissue Cytopathology: Risk of malignancy and reproducibility of categories among observers.

INTRODUCTION: In 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) is scheduled to publish the WHO Reporting System for Soft Tissue Cytopathology (WHORSSTC). This system establishes categories with well-defined definitions, criteria, and estimated risks of malignancy (ROMs) for soft tissue tumors. The estimates of ROM are based on a relatively small number of published studies. Interobserver reproducibility is not addressed in the reporting system even though reproducibility of a reporting system is highly important. METHODS: A manual search of one authors personal consultation files and teaching set (L.J.L.) was conducted for all cytologic specimens of soft tissue tumors accessioned between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 2022. Only cases with documented surgical pathology follow-up were included in the study. Slides from each case were evaluated independently by three cytopathologists with each case assigned to one of the WHORSSTC categories. A ROM for each of the WHORSSTC categories was calculated. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by the kappa and weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: Risk for malignancy by category were: Category 1: 0%, Category 2: 28%, Category 3: 57%, Category 4: 47%, Category 5: 63%, and Category 6: 88%. Kappa statistics for agreement between raters varied from 0.2183 to 0.3465 and weighted kappa varied from 0.3778 to 0.5217. CONCLUSIONS: The WHORSSTC showed a progression of malignancy risk from the category "benign" (28%) to the category "malignant" (88%). Interobserver agreement was only fair.

Molecular testing of cytology specimens: Issues in specimen adequacy and clinical utility.

BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing (NGS) is standard of care for workup of many neoplasms including adenocarcinomas of the lung. Molecular testing of cytology samples is used for many types of neoplasms but the value of such testing for the selection of "first"- and "second-line" treatment protocols is incompletely understood. METHODS: Fifty-six sequentially performed cytology specimens (49 fine needle aspirates and 7 fluids) submitted for molecular analysis were reviewed by a medical oncologist to determine specimen adequacy and utility of results for therapy selection. Chart review was performed to determine availability of microsatellite instability status, tumor mutational burden, and presence of driver mutations treatable with targeted therapy in a "first"- or "second-line" application. RESULTS: Forty of 56 cases were successfully sequenced and 34% (19/56) had targetable mutations detected by NGS. Ten of these 19 cases (53%) received targeted therapy for their tumor type with five of 10 patients receiving "first-line" therapy and five (50%) "second-line" therapy. Twenty-two mutations were detected where no targeted therapy for the patient's tumor type existed but targeted therapies were available for other tumor types. Of these specimens, only one patient received treatment using protocols associated with a second tumor type. Total mutation burden and microsatellite instability status results were obtained in 29 of 56 cases (52%). CONCLUSIONS: 71% (40/56) of cytologic specimens were adequate for sequencing with 34% (19/56) demonstrating a targetable mutation and 53% of these patients receiving therapy targeted to the driver mutation of their tumor type.

Grey zones in respiratory cytology: Atypical or suspicious for malignancy and neoplasms of unknown malignant potential.

The purpose of pulmonary cytology is two-fold. First, to establish whether a pulmonary nodule is benign or malignant. Second, pulmonary cytology should classify the type of pathologic process present. When a pulmonary nodule is characterized as malignant, it is of high importance to further classify the malignancy as to type, with non-small cell carcinomas being sub-divided into adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, and other types of non-small cell carcinoma. The World Health Organization Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology (WHORSLC) provides an important framework for reporting and classifying material obtained by cytologic techniques, including sputum analysis, bronchial brushings, bronchial washings, and fine-needle aspiration. The system contains five categories for specimen reporting. Clinicians prefer definitive diagnoses separating specimens into definitively benign or definitively malignant categories. The WHORSLC recognizes that it is not invariably possible for cytopathologists to separate specimens into definitively benign or definitively malignant categories. The five categories of the WHORSLC recognize the spectrum of cytologic changes running from clearly benign to clearly malignant, which cytopathologists must place into diagnostically useful and reproduceable categories. The intermediate categories of "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" provide structured categories with stringent definitions, estimated malignancy risks, and suggested management and follow-up recommendations. In this way, the categories "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" aid in maintaining the high diagnostic accuracy of the "benign" and "malignant" categories.

Preoperative Determination of Depth of Invasion in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Standard Cross-Sectional Imaging With Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Background Depth of invasion (DOI) is a known indicator of metastatic potential in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Our purpose was to investigate the accuracy of preoperative determination of DOI in oral cavity SCC by computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Methodology A retrospective study was performed using consecutive patients with histologically proven oral cavity SCC presenting to our otorhinolaryngology department between January 2014 and July 2019 who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and/or PET/CT. Pathological assessment of DOI was determined by a review of pathology reports. The degree of DOI determined by radiographic studies was correlated to pathology results. Results A total of 79 patients were screened of whom appropriate radiographic studies were available for 63 patients. The mean DOI by pathological assessment was 12.3 ± 9.1 mm. CT and PET/CT determined depth both correlated with pathological DOI (r = 0.710; p < 0.001, r = 0.798; p < 0.001). No significant correlation was seen for CT-determined depth (r = 0.136; p = 0.709) or PET-determined depth (r = 0.234; p = 0.707) with pathologically confirmed superficial tumors (<5 mm). For patients with pathological tumor depth >10 mm, CT and PET determined depth both correlated with pathological depth (r = 0.577; p = 0.002, r = 0.668; p = 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of CT and PET for the identification of deep invasion were 88.2% and 41.7% and 52.9% and 50%, respectively. Conclusions DOI measurement is feasible with routine preoperative CT and PET/CT images and is comparable to pathological measurement in patients with oral cavity SCC.

Diagnosis of salivary gland tumors: Does the triple diagnosis method have value?

BACKGROUND: Appropriate clinical management of salivary gland lesions requires a determination as to whether a salivary gland nodule is benign or malignant. Approximately three-quarters of all salivary gland nodules represent benign neoplasms. Separation of salivary gland carcinomas from benign lesions can be diagnostically challenging. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology recommends the correlation of cytologic diagnoses with imaging and clinical findings creating a diagnostic triplet. How often the "Triple Diagnosis" method is used and its accuracy in separating salivary gland nodules into benign and malignant groups are unknown. METHODS: An electronic records search of cytology files at the University of Missouri was performed for fine needle aspirates of the salivary gland obtained between September 2018 and August 2022. Chart review was performed for preoperative clinical and imaging diagnoses. Diagnostic "Triplets" constructed from cytologic, clinical, and imaging diagnoses were correlated with final surgical pathology diagnosis. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six FNAs were identified. Eighty-seven cases had preoperative imaging with 52 of these cases having clinical diagnoses. Due to the lack of a definitive clinical or imaging diagnosis for a nodule as benign or malignant, only 12 (23%) cases had definitive "Triplets." Nine (17%) "Triplets" were benign and three (6%) were malignant. Accuracy of concordant triplets was 100% for the prediction of malignancy and 89% for the prediction of a benign result as determined by final histologic diagnoses. CONCLUSION: While highly accurate in predicting the benign or malignant nature of a salivary gland nodule, concordant triplets made up only 23% of cases limiting their clinical utility.

A brief review of the WHO reporting system for lung cytopathology.

The International Academy of Cytology has joined with the International Agency for Research on Cancer to bring together a group of experts in lung cytopathology to develop a WHO Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology (WHO System). This System aims to improve and standardize the reporting of cytopathology, facilitate communication between cytopathologists and clinicians, and improve patient care. The WHO System describes 5 categories for reporting lung cytopathology: 'Insufficient/Inadequate/Nondiagnostic', 'Benign', 'Atypical', 'Suspicious for malignancy', and 'Malignant', each one with a clear descriptive term, a definition, a risk of malignancy, and a suggested management algorithm. The key diagnostic cytopathologic features of each of the lesions within each category have been established by consensus through an Expert Editorial Board, who are also the authors of this review and selected for each reporting system and chosen based on their expertise in the field and/or diversity of geographical representation. Many other co-authors from around the world also contributed. The assignment of writing and editing responsibilities used the same model as that used for the WHO Classification of Tumours (https://whobluebooks.iarc.fr/about/faq/). The WHO System provides the best practice application of ancillary testing, including immunocytochemistry and molecular pathology, and guides in sampling and processing techniques to optimize the handling and preparation of specimens. The WHO System was created by the authors to be applicable globally and is based on cytomorphology with possibilities for additional diagnostic management of the patient. The authors are aware that local medical and pathology resources would differ, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The WHO Tumour Classification for Thoracic Tumors, Fifth Edition, is directly accessible through the online WHO System.

A brief review of the WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology.

The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have developed an approach to standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. The WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHO System) revises the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology published in 2015 and replaces the 6 PSC categories with 7 categories: "Insufficient/Inadequate/Nondiagnostic"; "Benign/Negative for malignancy"; "Atypical"; "Pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, low risk/grade (PaN-low)"; "Pancreatic neoplasm, high risk/grade (PaN-High)"; "Suspicious for malignancy"; and "Malignant". In the PSC system, there is a single category for "Neoplastic" lesions that includes 2 groups, 1 for benign neoplasms and 1 named "Neoplastic-other", dominated by premalignant intraductal neoplasms primarily intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and low-grade malignant neoplasms (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN). In the WHO System, benign neoplasms with virtually no risk of malignancy are included in the "Benign" category and low-grade malignancies (PanNET and SPN) are included in the "Malignant" category, as per the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors, while the non-invasive pre-malignant lesions of the ducts are divided by the cytomorphological grade of the epithelium into PaN-low and PaN-high with distinctly different risks of malignancy. Within each category, key diagnostic cytopathologic features and the ancillary studies for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, as well as the implications of diagnosis for patient care and management, are outlined. Reporting and diagnostic management options recognize the variations in the availability of diagnostic and prognostic ancillary testing modalities in low- and middle-income countries.

A case of spontaneous pneumothorax due to paragonimiasis in North America with literature review.

The species, Paragonimus kellicotti , causes human paragonimiasis in North America. As a foodborne disease, human infection with P. kellicotti occurs after eating raw or undercooked crayfish containing metacercariae. Many risk factors have been described in the literature, including young adult age, male, alcohol consumption, outdoor activities involving rivers within Missouri, and ingesting raw or partially cooked crayfish. Here, we report a case of a 41-year-old male with a 5-year history of cough who presented with acute shortness of breath. Further workup showed mild eosinophilia and spontaneous pneumothorax. A definitive diagnosis was made with a lung biopsy, which showed P. kellicotti eggs. Further questioning revealed that the patient took a hunting and river rafting trip on a river in Missouri 5 years ago, though the history was negative for any crayfish consumption. Paragonimiasis should be considered in those with associated clinical features, including cough and eosinophilia, with a history of a river raft float trip in Missouri, even if the history is negative for crayfish ingestion or travel.

Molecular features of pancreaticobiliary neoplasms: Implications for diagnosis, prognostication, and therapy selection.

BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnostics has impacted the diagnosis, prediction of prognosis, and selection of targeted therapy for many tumor types. While pulmonary adenocarcinomas and melanomas are among the neoplasms most associated with molecular diagnostics and targeted therapy, malignancies of the pancreaticobiliary system have also been impacted by precision medicine. METHODS: We undertook an electronic search using PubMed and Embase to review the published literature to determine what forms of molecular testing, mutations and oncogenetic pathways are associated with neoplasms of the pancreaticobiliary system. Keywords utilized were pancreas, bile duct, mutations, ERCP, FNA, KRAS, SMAD4, TP53, next-generation sequencing, serous cystadenoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, cystic mucinous neoplasm, solid pseudo-papillary neoplasm. RESULTS: A search between 1999 and 2022 yielded 6874 manuscripts. Screening of these yielded 302 more focused manuscripts of which 55 were used for the study. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is associated with a progression of mutations beginning wit KRAS mutations and ending with a set of mutations in the TP53, SMAD4, and DPC4 genes. Similar mutations are found in neoplastic mucinous cysts. Specific mutations characterize serous cystadenomas, solid, and pseudo papillary neoplasms and adenocarcinomas of the bile ducts. CONCLUSIONS: Mutational analysis of cytologic specimens obtained by fine-needle aspiration, and duct brushings and washings are helpful in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary neoplasms and may supply prognostic information.

Bone and soft tissue tumors at the borderlands of malignancy.

This review examines findings of musculoskeletal neoplasms whose equivocal imaging and/or histopathologic features make it difficult to determine if they will show aggressive behavior. We include both intermediate tumors as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), and a single low-grade malignancy, low-grade central osteosarcoma, which mimics a benign lesion on imaging and histology. Intermediate tumors are a broad category and are subdivided into tumors that have risk of local recurrence only, and ones that have a risk of distant limb and pulmonary metastases. Difficult intermediate musculoskeletal lesions include atypical cartilaginous tumor/grade 1 chondrosarcoma, atypical lipomatous tumor/grade 1 liposarcoma, and solitary fibrous tumor. We review diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, and recommendations for surveillance.

The World Health Organization Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology.

The International Academy of Cytology has joined with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to bring together a group of experts in lung cytopathology to develop a WHO Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology (WHO System). This WHO System defines five categories for reporting lung cytopathology, that is, "Insufficient"/"Inadequate"/"Non-diagnostic," "Benign," "Atypical," "Suspicious for malignancy," and "Malignant," each with a clear descriptive term for the category, a definition, a risk of malignancy and a suggested management algorithm. The key diagnostic cytopathology features of each of the lesions within each category have been established by consensus and will be presented more fully in a subsequent IARC e-book and published hard cover book.The WHO System provides the best practice application of ancillary testing, including immunocytochemistry and molecular pathology, and provides a review to guide sampling and processing techniques to optimize the handling and preparation of the cytopathology sample emphasizing the cytomorphological differential diagnosis to aid low-resourced settings. The authors recognize that local medical and pathology resources will vary, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, and have developed the WHO System to make it applicable worldwide based on cytomorphology with options for further diagnostic management of the patient.The online WHO System provides a direct link to the WHO Tumour Classification for Thoracic Tumours 5th Edition. It will raise the profile and use of cytopathology by increasing awareness of its current role and its potential role in the era of personalized medicine based on molecular pathology utilizing "small biopsies." Ultimately, the System will improve patient care and outcomes.This System aims to improve and standardize the reporting of cytopathology, facilitate communication between cytopathologists and clinicians and improve patient care. The System is based on the current role of lung cytopathology and synthesizes the existing evidence while highlighting areas requiring further research and the future potential role of lung cytopathology.

The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.

The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with expert contributors from around the world, present an international approach to standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. This reporting system is one of the first in a series from various body sites that mirror the WHO Classification of Tumours series and provides an evidence-based terminology system with associated risk of malignancy and diagnostic management recommendation per diagnostic category. The WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHO system) revises the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology published in 2015 and replaces the six-tiered system with a seven-tiered system: "insufficient/inadequate/nondiagnostic"; "benign (negative for malignancy)," "atypical," "pancreaticobiliary neoplasm of low risk/low grade," "pancreatic neoplasm of high risk/high grade," "suspicious for malignancy," and "malignant." The principal differences between the WHO and the PSC systems revolve around the classification of neoplasia. In the PSC system, there was a single category for "neoplastic" lesions that includes two groups, one for "benign neoplasms" [primarily serous cystadenoma] and one named "other," dominated by premalignant intraductal neoplasms (primarily intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms) and low-grade malignant neoplasms [pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs)]. In the WHO system, benign neoplasms with virtually no risk of malignancy are included in the "benign" category and low-grade malignancies (PanNET and SPN) are included in the "malignant" category, as per the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours, thus leaving in the "neoplasm" category primarily those noninvasive premalignant lesions of the ductal system. These neoplasms are divided by the cytomorphological grade of the epithelium into low risk/low-grade and high risk/high-grade, with distinctly different risks of malignancy. As with the PSC system, the WHO system advocates close correlation with imaging and encourages incorporation of ancillary testing into the final diagnosis, such as biochemical (CEA and amylase) and molecular testing of cyst fluid and bile duct brushings. Key diagnostic cytopathological features of specific lesions or neoplasms, ancillary studies for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, and implications of diagnosis for patient care and management are discussed. In addition, the WHO system includes reporting and diagnostic management options that recognize the variations in the availability of diagnostic and prognostic ancillary testing modalities in low- and middle-income countries, where cytopathology is particularly useful and is increasingly available in the absence of histopathological services.

PD-L1 immunohistochemical testing: A review with reference to cytology specimens.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy based on disruption of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is standard of care for many high stage malignancies including melanomas, non-small cell carcinomas of the lung, triple negative breast carcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Eligibility for immunotherapy requires immunohistochemical assessment of PD-L1 expression. Currently, many high stage malignancies are diagnosed by cytology and cytologic material is the only specimen available for ancillary testing. Formal guidelines do not currently exist defining the optimal specimen type, antibody to be used or the best scoring system for cytologic material. Significant information has been published for PD-L1 testing of pulmonary specimens but much less data exists for the reproducibility, accuracy and best practices for material obtained from other body sites and types of malignancy. METHODS: We searched the PubMed data base for manuscripts relating to PD-L1 testing of cytologic specimens. The search period was between 2016 and 2022. The search terms used were PD-L1, cytology, FNA, immunotherapy, immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry, cytology-histology correlation. Cross referencing techniques were used to screen for the most relevant manuscripts. The abstracts of these were then reviewed for final data collection and analysis. RESULTS: A total of 86 studies were identified conforming to study relevancy. These were reviewed in their entirety by two authors (LJL, TZ) for extraction of data. The majority of studies involved pulmonary specimens (79) with three relating to PD-L1 testing of head and neck cytologic specimens and one each for PD-L1 testing of cytology specimens from melanomas, pancreas, pleural fluids, and triple negative breast carcinomas. While smears could be used, most studies found cell blocks optimal for testing. SUMMARY: Currently, four drugs are approved for immunotherapy based on PD-L1 status. These drugs require specific antibody clones as well as scoring systems. Scoring systems and cut points vary with the type of neoplasm being treated. Cytology specimens from the lung, head and neck and melanomas can all be used for PD-L1 testing with good agreement with corresponding histology specimens.

Core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of primary soft tissue lesions: Accuracy and diagnostic challenges.

BACKGROUND: Core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration (FNA) are currently the most common biopsy methods for investigation of soft tissue lesions. Selection of the method to be used depends on a number of factors including diagnostic accuracy, local expertise with the techniques and the need for ancillary testing. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CNB and factors influencing the selection of CNB or FNA. METHODS: An electronic search of the surgical pathology records for all core needle biopsies of soft tissue lesions with subsequent incisional biopsies or excisions between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021 was performed. Searches of the literature for publications documenting diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy and FNA were performed using the Pub Med literature data base. RESULTS: The electronic search yielded 177 CNBs with appropriate follow-up. Six cases were non-diagnostic. The remaining 171 cases showed an accuracy of 90% for separation of benign from malignant with two false-positive and 17 false-negative diagnoses. The literature search revealed 11 series of CNBs with a diagnostic accuracy of 74% to 97%. The literature search revealed 20 series of FNAs with an accuracy of 84.8% to 100% for separation of benign from malignant. CONCLUSIONS: Core needle biopsy is a highly accurate diagnostic technique with an accuracy of 90% for separation of benign from malignant lesions. The percentage of non-diagnostic cases is low (3.4%). No significant biopsy related complications were seen in this study.

A report of an intracortical chondroblastoma of the diaphysis in a skeletally mature patient.

Chondroblastomas characteristically occur in skeletally immature patients, and arise within the medullary canal of the epiphysis. We report a rare case of an intracortical chondroblastoma arising in the diaphysis, and occurring in an adult in his 3rd decade of life. Immunohistochemistry results were critical to confirmation of this rare diagnosis, with immunohistochemistry showing S100, DOG1, and H3K36me3 positivity in the neoplastic cells.

Immunocytochemistry of effusion fluids: Introduction to SCIP approach.

Due to the remarkably wide morphologic spectrum of reactive mesothelial cells, some of the effusion fluids may be difficult to interpret with objective certainty by cytomorphology alone. Cytomorphology of well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas (responsible for the bulk of malignant effusions) may overlap with floridly reactive mesothelial cells. Even mesotheliomas including diffuse malignant epithelioid mesothelioma, are usually cytomorphologically bland without unequivocal features of malignancy. The intensity of challenge depends on the interpreter's training or experience level, institutional demographics of patients (such as type of prevalent diseases, predominant sex and age group), technical support, and quality of cytopreparatory processing. In general immunocytochemistry is valuable adjunct to facilitate objective interpretation with or without other ancillary techniques as indicated. An increasing number of immunomarkers is further refining the contribution of immunohistochemistry to this field. However, application of immunohistochemistry to effusion fluids is relatively challenging because of many variables. Multiple factors such as delay after specimen collection, specimen processing related factors including fixation and storage; ambient conditions under which paraffin blocks are archived (for retrospective testing); antigen retrieval method; duration of antigen retrieval step; antibody clone and dilution; and antibody application time are identical to application of immunohistochemistry in other areas. The significant challenge related to the potential compromization of the immunoreactivity pattern due to exposure to non-formalin fixatives / reagents is also applicable to effusion fluid specimens. The immunoreactivity results would be compared and corelated with cumulative metadata based on the reported studies performed and validated on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Deviating from such protocols may lead to suboptimal results, which is not uncommon in clinical practice with potential compromization of patient care and related liability. Because of this, it is critical to perform immunocytochemistry on formalin-fixed cell-block sections only. In addition, unless the interpretation criteria for immunohistochemical evaluation of effusion fluids are not modified specifically, it may not be productive in resolving some challenging cases. However, this aspect is not well elaborated in the literature. A basic and critical challenge is finding and locating the cells of interest in cell-block sections of effusion fluids. A unique approach is to choose a fundamental immunopanel which highlight the mesothelial and inflammatory cells in reactive effusion fluids to create the basic map. This allows detection of a 'second-foreign' population which can be immunocharacterized further with the help of subtractive coordinate immunoreactivity pattern (SCIP) approach elaborated here.

Salivary gland neoplasms with basaloid features in the era of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology: Classification and interobserver agreement.

BACKGROUND: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) has been shown to have moderate to good reproducibility for categorization of salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. Less is known of its accuracy and interobserver reproducibility for categorization of the diagnostically difficult group of basaloid neoplasms. METHODS: Forty-five salivary gland specimens with a basaloid morphology (pleomorphic and monomorphic adenomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas) were independently assigned by seven cytopathologists to one of the MSRSGC categories. Interobserver agreement was assessed for average agreement, chance expected agreement and by Cohen's κ and diagnostic accuracy. Correlation of the salivary gland neoplasm of unknown malignant potential (SUMP) category with histologic diagnosis and benign or malignant designation along with interobserver reproducibility were calculated. RESULTS: Average observed agreement for assignment to the MSRSGC was 46% and Cohen's κ = 0.2%. The SUMP category did not correlate with tumor type or with the benign or malignant nature of the neoplasm. Diagnostic specificity and sensitivity were 92% and 100% for consensus diagnosis, but were 76% and 77% for individual diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The interobserver agreement in categorizing basaloid neoplasms by the MSRSGC is poorer than for salivary gland lesions overall. This reflects the difficulty in diagnosing basaloid neoplasms. Nonetheless, diagnostic accuracy appears similar to that of salivary gland neoplasms as a whole.