Prognostic assessment for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the context of the World Health Organization 2016 proposal: a multicenter study of 280 patients.

Knowledge on chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) patients from Argentina and Brazil is limited. Our series of 280 patients depicted an older age at diagnosis (median 72 years old), 26% of aberrant karyotypes, and a prevalence of myelodysplastic (60%) and CMML-0 subtypes (56%). The median overall survival (OS) was 48.2 months for patients in CMML-0 (Ref.), 24.7 months for those in CMML-1 (HR = 2.0, p = 0.001), and 8.8 months for patients in CMML-2 (HR = 4.6, p < 0.001). In the CMML-0 category, median OS were different between myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative subtypes (63.7 vs 21.2 months, p < 0.001); however, no differences were observed within CMML-1 and CMML-2 subtypes (24.7 vs 23.7 months, p = 0.540, and 9.1 vs 8.2 months, p = 0.160). The prognostic impact of 24 variables and 7 prognostic systems was adjusted to the WHO 2016 after validating their usefulness. Multivariate analysis were performed, and the final model revealed Hb ≥ 8 -< 10g/dL (HR 1.7), Hb < 8g/dL (HR 2.8), poor karyotypes (HR 2.1), WHO 2016-CMML-1 (HR 2.1), and CMML-2 (HR 3.5) as independent adverse clinical parameters in our cohort with a borderline influence of platelets count < 50 × 109/L (HR 1.4). We could validate several scoring systems, the WHO 2016 proposal and its prognostic capability, along with accessible covariates, on predicting the outcome in our series of CMML patients from Latin America.

[Preferences and limitations of hematologists to address the complexity of myelodysplastic syndromes]. / Preferencias y limitaciones de los hematólogos para afrontar la complejidad de los síndromes mielodisplásicos.

Argentina is a country characterized by a heterogeneous distribution of its population, its economic resources and, consequently, access to health services, which could affect the diagnosis and treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Based on the increasing complexity to arrive at the diagnosis, estimate the risk and indicate an adequate treatment, we have conducted a survey of twenty-three questions to evaluate patterns of clinical practice. The questionnaire was distributed among 850 hematologists registered at the XXII Argentine Congress of Hematology, and 195 (22.9%) were answered; 40.0% report that < 75% of their patients access the karyotype, bone marrow histology and flow cytometry. This access decreases significantly due to low health coverage (OR 6.3), in the adult population (OR 3.8), when the cytogenetic study is derived (OR 3.2) and outside the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires (OR 2.4). The respondents avoid oncological terminologies (77.0%) when introducing the diagnosis and use the international prediction system or its review (74.2%) to stage risk. However, they prioritize age when selecting treatment and pediatricians preferentially recommend the transplantation of hematopoietic precursors. Most of the haematologists have prescribed the recommended treatments, whose suspensions were related to lack of response (62.7%), with reduced participation in clinical trials (8.9%). Therefore, they report heterogeneity in the access to complementary diagnostic tools with differences at the time of indicating a treatment, depending on the age of their patients without apparent limitations in their prescription.

La Argentina es un país caracterizado por una distribución heterogénea de su población, de sus recursos económicos y, consiguientemente, del acceso a los servicios de salud, lo cual podría afectar el diagnóstico y tratamiento de los pacientes con síndromes mielodisplásicos. Basados en la complejidad creciente para arribar al diagnóstico, estimar el riesgo e indicar un tratamiento adecuado, hemos conducido una encuesta de veintitrés preguntas para evaluar patrones de práctica clínica. El cuestionario se distribuyó entre los 850 hematólogos argentinos inscriptos al XXII Congreso Argentino de Hematología y 195 (22.9%) fueron contestados. El 40.0% refieren que < 75% de sus pacientes acceden al cariotipo, histología de la médula ósea y citometría de flujo. Este acceso disminuye significativamente por una baja cobertura sanitaria (OR 6.3), en población adulta (OR 3.8), al derivar el estudio citogenético (OR 3.2) y fuera del área metropolitana de Buenos Aires (OR 2.4). Los encuestados evitan terminologías oncológicas (77.0%) al introducir el diagnóstico y utilizan el sistema internacional de predicción o su revisión (74.2%) para estadificar riesgo. Sin embargo, éstos priorizan la edad al seleccionar tratamiento y los pediatras indican preferentemente el trasplante de precursores hematopoyéticos. La mayoría de los hematólogos ha prescripto los tratamientos recomendados, cuyas suspensiones se relacionaron con falta de respuesta (62.7%), con participación reducida en ensayos clínicos (8.9%). Por ende, refieren heterogeneidad en el acceso a las herramientas diagnósticas complementarias con diferencias al momento de indicar un tratamiento, dependiendo de la edad de sus pacientes, sin limitaciones aparentes en su prescripción.

Preferencias y limitaciones de los hematólogos para afrontar la complejidad de los síndromes mielodisplásicos / Preferences and limitations of hematologists to address the complexity of myelodysplastic syndromes

La Argentina es un país caracterizado por una distribución heterogénea de su población, de sus recursos económicos y, consiguientemente, del acceso a los servicios de salud, lo cual podría afectar el diagnóstico y tratamiento de los pacientes con síndromes mielodisplásicos. Basados en la complejidad creciente para arribar al diagnóstico, estimar el riesgo e indicar un tratamiento adecuado, hemos conducido una encuesta de veintitrés preguntas para evaluar patrones de práctica clínica. El cuestionario se distribuyó entre los 850 hematólogos argentinos inscriptos al XXII Congreso Argentino de Hematología y 195 (22.9%) fueron contestados. El 40.0% refieren que < 75% de sus pacientes acceden al cariotipo, histología de la médula ósea y citometría de flujo. Este acceso disminuye significativamente por una baja cobertura sanitaria (OR 6.3), en población adulta (OR 3.8), al derivar el estudio citogenético (OR 3.2) y fuera del área metropolitana de Buenos Aires (OR 2.4). Los encuestados evitan terminologías oncológicas (77.0%) al introducir el diagnóstico y utilizan el sistema internacional de predicción o su revisión (74.2%) para estadificar riesgo. Sin embargo, éstos priorizan la edad al seleccionar tratamiento y los pediatras indican preferentemente el trasplante de precursores hematopoyéticos. La mayoría de los hematólogos ha prescripto los tratamientos recomendados, cuyas suspensiones se relacionaron con falta de respuesta (62.7%), con participación reducida en ensayos clínicos (8.9%). Por ende, refieren heterogeneidad en el acceso a las herramientas diagnósticas complementarias con diferencias al momento de indicar un tratamiento, dependiendo de la edad de sus pacientes, sin limitaciones aparentes en su prescripción.

Argentina is a country characterized by a heterogeneous distribution of its population, its economic resources and, consequently, access to health services, which could affect the diagnosis and treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Based on the increasing complexity to arrive at the diagnosis, estimate the risk and indicate an adequate treatment, we have conducted a survey of twenty-three questions to evaluate patterns of clinical practice. The questionnaire was distributed among 850 hematologists registered at the XXII Argentine Congress of Hematology, and 195 (22.9%) were answered; 40.0% report that < 75% of their patients access the karyotype, bone marrow histology and flow cytometry. This access decreases significantly due to low health coverage (OR 6.3), in the adult population (OR 3.8), when the cytogenetic study is derived (OR 3.2) and outside the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires (OR 2.4). The respondents avoid oncological terminologies (77.0%) when introducing the diagnosis and use the international prediction system or its review (74.2%) to stage risk. However, they prioritize age when selecting treatment and pediatricians preferentially recommend the transplantation of hematopoietic precursors. Most of the haematologists have prescribed the recommended treatments, whose suspensions were related to lack of response (62.7%), with reduced participation in clinical trials (8.9%). Therefore, they report heterogeneity in the access to complementary diagnostic tools with differences at the time of indicating a treatment, depending on the age of their patients without apparent limitations in their prescription.