RESUMEN
The treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal origin with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has a 5-year recurrence-free or cure rate of at least 16%, so it is no longer labeled as a fatal disease, and offers prolonged survival for patients with a low peritoneal carcinomatosis index. Metachronous PC of colorectal origin is so predictable that there is a model which has been used to successfully determine the individual risk of each patient. Patients at risk are clearly identified; those with the highest risk have small peritoneal nodules present in the first surgery (70% probability of developing PC), ovarian metastases (60%), perforated tumor onset or intraoperative tumor rupture (50%). Current clinical, biological and imaging techniques still lack sufficient sensitivity to diagnose PC in its initial stages, when CRS plus HIPEC has a greater impact and a higher cure rate. Second-look surgery with HIPEC or prophylactic HIPEC at the time of the first intervention have been proposed as means of preventing and/or anticipating clinical or radiological relapse in at-risk patients. Both techniques have shown a significant decrease in peritoneal relapses and should be considered essential weapons in the management of colorectal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/terapia , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Segunda Cirugía , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Carcinoma/secundario , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Aim. A multi-centred, open-labelled, phase II study containing 46 patients was conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit of gemcitabine (1,400 mg/m2) combined with 5-FU (3 g/m2) in a 48h continuous infusion (CI). Methods. Both drugs were administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of every 4 week cycle in chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced un-resectable metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Results. Clinical benefit response was the primary endpoint and this was achieved by 24.4% of the patients. Quality of life (QoL) improved in 16.6% of patients. Objective response was observed in 7% of the patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.4 weeks and the median overall survival (OS) time was 22.7 weeks. One-year survival was 25%. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (45%), mucositis (7.5%) and hyperbilirubinaemia (10.5%). Conclusions. This schedule was not superior in terms of clinical benefit, response rate, PFS and OS than standard gemcitabine treatment