Reduction of wound infections in laparoscopic-assisted colorectal resections by plastic wound ring drapes (REDWIL)?--A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are frequent complications in colorectal surgery and may lead to burst abdomen, incisional hernia, and increased perioperative costs. Plastic wound ring drapes (RD) were introduced some decades ago to protect the abdominal wound from bacteria and reduce SSIs. There have been no controlled trials examining the benefit of RD in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The Reduction of wound infections in laparoscopic assisted colorectal resections by plastic wound ring drapes (REDWIL) trial was thus designed to assess their effectiveness in preventing SSIs after elective laparoscopic colorectal resections. MATERIALS/METHODS: REDWIL is a randomized controlled monocenter trial with two parallel groups (experimental group with RD and control group without RD). Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection were included. The primary endpoint was SSIs. Secondary outcomes were colonization of the abdominal wall with bacteria, reoperations/readmissions, early/late postoperative complications, and cost of hospital stay. The duration of follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and October 2010, 109 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental or control group (with or without RD). Forty-six patients in the RD group and 47 patients in the control group completed follow-up. SSIs developed in ten patients with RD (21.7 %) and six patients without RD (12.8 %) (p = 0.28). An intraoperative swab taken from the abdominal wall was positive in 66.7 % of patients with RD and 57.5 % without RD (p = 0.46). The number of species cultured within one swab was significantly higher in those without RD (p = 0.03). The median total inpatient costs including emergency readmissions were 3,402 ± 4,038 in the RD group and 3,563 ± 1,735 in the control group (p = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: RD do not reduce the rate of SSIs in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The inpatient costs are similar with and without RD.

The dissolution of urinary catheter encrustation.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the optimum volume of acidic bladder washout solution to dissolve catheter encrustations and to compare the effectiveness of different bladder washout delivery devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urinary catheter encrustation was generated in vitro using a model of the catheterized bladder adapted from previous work. An acidic bladder washout solution (Suby G) was applied via the catheter in the model and retained for 15 min. The amount of encrusting material dissolved was measured by colorimetric analysis of the magnesium and calcium content of the solution returned after the washout procedure. The relative effectiveness of different volumes of washout solution and different washout delivery devices (Optiflow, Bard Ltd, Crawley; UroTainer, B/Braun Medical Ltd, Aylesbury; and a bladder syringe) in dissolving catheter encrustations was compared to the 'standardized' conditions commonly used in practice. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between washouts with 100 mL and washouts with 50 mL for any of the delivery devices tested. Gentle agitation with 50 mL Suby G did not significantly improve the dissolution of encrustation but the total amount of material dissolved when two washouts with 50 mL Suby G were used sequentially was significantly better than a single washout with either 100 mL or 50 mL. CONCLUSIONS: Under controlled laboratory conditions, smaller volumes of acidic bladder washout solution (50 mL) are as effective as the 100 mL commonly used in practice, but two sequential washouts with 50 mL are more effective than a single washout. The newly designed Optiflow delivery device is at least as effective as the other devices tested. This study provides new evidence which may contribute to decision-making by practitioners in relation to catheter care.