A Multicenter Study to Assess a Systematic Screening of Occupational Exposures in Lung Cancer Patients.

Occupational lung cancer cases remain largely under-reported and under-compensated worldwide. In order to improve the detection and compensation of work-related lung cancers, we implemented a systematic screening of occupational exposures, combining a validated self-administered questionnaire to assess occupational exposures and a specialized occupational cancer consultation. After a pilot study, the present prospective, open-label, scale-up study aimed to assess this systematic screening of occupational exposures in lung cancer patients in five sites in France by associating university hospitals with cancer centers. Patients with lung cancer were sent a self-administered questionnaire to collect their job history and potential exposure to lung carcinogens. The questionnaire was assessed by a physician to determine if a specialized occupational cancer consultation was required. During the consultation, a physician assessed if the lung cancer was occupation-related and, if it was, delivered a medical certificate to claim for compensation. Patients were offered help from a social worker for the administrative procedure. Over 15 months, 1251 patients received the questionnaire and 462 returned it (37%). Among them, 176 patients (38.1%) were convened to the occupational cancer consultation and 150 patients attended the consultation. An exposure to occupational lung carcinogen was identified in 133 patients and a claim for compensation was judged possible for 90 patients. A medical certificate was delivered to 88 patients and 38 patients received compensation. Our national study demonstrated that a systematic screening of occupational exposures is feasible and will bring a significant contribution to improve the detection of occupational exposures in lung cancer patients.

[Cancers induced by occupational exposure: What progress has been made?] / Les cancers induits par les expositions professionnelles : les progrès.

INTRODUCTION: In 2019, only 1,790 occupational cancers were recognized, i.e., less than 1% of estimated occupational cancers. Our study aims to expand the methodology of a French cancer center to improve the detection and compensation of occupational bronchopulmonary cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2014 and December 2020, all patients diagnosed with primary bronchopulmonary cancer (including mesothelioma) received a free questionnaire (Curriculum Laboris) aimed at retracing their professional career but also socio-demographic data. After an initial analysis of the questionnaire, a consultation can be scheduled if exposures are suspected. They will then be confirmed or not, during a consultation of around 1hour 30minutes during which the patient's precise career path is explored. RESULTS: Among the 498 patient questionnaires received, 261 patients (52%) benefited from a consultation. Of all the patients seen in consultation, 198 (or 76%) had a proposal to declare an occupational disease. Among the 151 declarations of which the fate is known, 107 (i.e., 54% of the proposed declarations or 21% of the questionnaires concerning primary lung cancer) received an agreement of recognition. CONCLUSION: The massive underreporting of occupational cancers at present in France is a real public health problem. The two major issues in the recognition of occupational diseases are, on the one hand, reparation for the damage suffered by victims or their beneficiaries and, on the other hand, the adaptation of national prevention programs considering past, present and emerging.

Acute occupational poisoning by octogen: first case report.

BACKGROUND: Octogen (HMX) is a polynitramine explosive closely related to hexogen, a known occupational toxin in military munitions plants. No acute human poisoning with octogen has ever been reported. CASE REPORT: A 28-year-old man with no history of epilepsy was admitted to the Emergency Department for seizures that had developed during the night after a full working day when he manually sieved large amounts of dry octogen. On admission, the clinical examination was normal and all other examinations could not substantiate the development of essential or secondary epilepsy. Elevated octogen concentrations were measured in his plasma, which confirmed occupational exposure to the explosive. CONCLUSION: The rarity of acute human poisonings by octogen is due to the infrequent use of this explosive and, more importantly, its very low oral bioavailability. However, acute poisoning can occur, but should be easily avoided by implementing adequate preventive measures.