Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 84
Filtrar
1.
Hernia ; 28(1): 241-247, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38123830

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The use of robotic assisted surgery is increasing but training residents in its use may be associated with increased operative time and cost. The objective of this study is to compare the operative time of robotic incisional/ventral hernia repair (RIVHR) and robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) when performed with and without a resident or fellow trainee. METHODS: A review of prospectively collected data was performed on all patients who underwent RIVHR and RIHR by a single surgeon over a 9-year period (2014-2023). Study variables included presence of trainee (resident or fellow), procedure time, console time, and recurrent hernia. Primary outcomes include procedure time and console time. RESULTS: A total of 402 surgeries were included for analysis. Residents assisted in 190 (47%) of the procedures, while fellows assisted in 97 (24%), and 115 (29%) were performed without a trainee. Median (IQR) console times in RIVHR assisted by fellows was 102 (72-145) minutes, compared to 90 (71-129) minutes among surgeries assisted by residents and 65 (52-82) minutes among surgeries performed without a trainee (p < 0.0001), a similar trend was observed for RIHR. The duration of hernia repair assisted by trainees was significantly longer than surgeries performed without a trainee. CONCLUSION: Operative time for RIVHR and RIHR is significantly lower when performed without a trainee. However, RIHR assisted by residents showed a consistent decrease in operative time over the 9-year period.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Hernia Ventral , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Cirujanos , Humanos , Factor IX , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos
2.
Talanta ; 252: 123786, 2023 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36027616

RESUMEN

In the search for a normalized procedure to replicate and compare single cell-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS) experiments, SELM-1, a certified reference material containing selenium enriched yeast cells has been used. Selenium concentrations (both, intra- and extracellular) have been measured using either sequential or simultaneous procedures. Regarding quantitative results, the sequential procedure involving cell washing followed by freeze drying of the washed material and intracellular Se quantification using SC-ICP-MS provided best results. In this case, intracellular Se accounted for 1304 ± 48 mg kg-1 (corresponding to 64% of the certified Se content). The average mass of Se per yeast cell was 41.6 fg Se with a dispersion of 1.6-279 fg Se/cell. In the isolated extracellular Se fraction, the Se concentration accounted for 412 ± 48 mg kg-1 (about 21% of the total Se). Thus, the sequential procedure provided a total Se recovery of about 85% with respect to the certified value. The direct dilution and simultaneous measurement of intra- and extracellular Se by SC-ICP-MS provided results of 1024 ± 42 mg kg-1 for intracellular and 316 ± 30 mg kg-1 for extracellular Se representing a total recovery of about 66%. In both cases, an initial thorough characterization of the cell density per solid weighed material was conducted by flow cytometry and the cell integrity ensured using confocal microscopy. These results clearly demonstrated that with appropriate sample preparation, SC-ICP-MS is a unique tool, which is capable of providing quantitative information about intracellular and extracellular Se. In addition, SELM-1 seems the ideal tool to enable data normalization at the single cell level to replicate, benchmark, and improve new SC-ICP-MS studies by using the same material for data validation.


Asunto(s)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Selenio , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/química , Selenio/análisis , Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Análisis Espectral , Técnicas de Dilución del Indicador
3.
Hernia ; 25(4): 1071-1082, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34031762

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To provide a comparative analysis of short-term outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted (RAS) ventral incisional hernia (VIH) repairs that include subject-reported pain medication usage and hernia-related quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Subjects were ≥ 18 years old and underwent elective open, laparoscopic or RAS VIH repair without myofascial release. Perioperative clinical outcomes through 30 days were analyzed as were prescription pain medication use and subject-reported responses to the HerQLes Abdominal QOL questionnaire. Observed differences in baseline characteristics were controlled using a weighted propensity score analysis to obviate potential selection bias (inverse probability of treatment weighting, IPTW). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-one subjects (RAS, n = 159; open, n = 130; laparoscopic, n = 82) were enrolled in the study across 17 medical institutions within the United States. Operative times were significantly different between the RAS and laparoscopic groups (126.2 vs 57.2, respectively; p < 0.001). Mean length of stay was comparable for RAS vs laparoscopic (1.4 ± 1.0 vs 1.4 ± 1.1, respectively; p = 0.623) and differed for the RAS vs open groups (1.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.0 ± 1.9, respectively; p < 0.001). Conversion rates differed between RAS and laparoscopic groups (0.6% vs 4.9%; p = 0.004). The number of subjects reporting the need to take prescription pain medication through the 2-4 weeks visit differed between RAS vs open (65.2% vs 79.8%; p < 0.001) and RAS vs laparoscopic (65.2% vs 78.75%; p < 0.001). For those taking prescription pain medication, the mean number of pills taken was comparable for RAS vs open (23.3 vs 20.4; p = 0.079) and RAS vs laparoscopic (23.3 vs 23.3; p = 0.786). Times to return to normal activities and to work, complication rates and HerQLes QOL scores were comparable for the RAS vs open and RAS vs laparoscopic groups. The reoperation rate within 30 days post-procedure was comparable for RAS vs laparoscopic (0.6% vs 0%; p = 0.296) and differed for RAS vs open (0.6% vs 3.1%; p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term outcomes indicate that open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted approaches are effective surgical approaches to VIH repair; however, each repair technique may demonstrate advantages in terms of clinical outcomes. Observed differences in the RAS vs laparoscopic comparison are longer operative time and lower conversion rate in the RAS group. Observed differences in the RAS vs open comparison are shorter LOS and lower reoperation rate through 30 days in the RAS group. The operative time in the RAS vs open comparison is similar. The number of subjects requiring the use of prescription pain medication favored the RAS group in both comparisons; however, among subjects reporting a need for pain medication, there was no difference in the number of prescription pain medication pills taken. While the study adds to the body of evidence evaluating the open, laparoscopic, and RAS approaches, future controlled studies are needed to better understand pain and QOL outcomes related to incisional hernia repair. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02715622.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Hernia Incisional , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Adolescente , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos
4.
Can. j. cardiol ; 36(12): 1847-1948, Dec. 1, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | BIGG - guías GRADE | ID: biblio-1146651

RESUMEN

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.


Le programme de lignes directrices de la Société canadienne de cardiologie (SCC) en matière de fibrillation auriculaire (FA) a été élaboré pour aider les cliniciens à prendre en charge ces patients complexes, ainsi que pour orienter les décideurs politiques et les systèmes de soins de santé sur des questions connexes. La dernière édition complète des lignes directrices de la SCC en matière de FA a été publiée en 2010. Depuis lors, des mises à jour périodiques ont été publiées, traitant de domaines en évolution rapide. Cependant, en 2020, un grand nombre de développements s'y étaient ajoutés, couvrant un large éventail de domaines, ce qui a motivé le comité à créer une refonte complète des lignes directrices. L'édition 2020 des lignes directrices de la SCC en matière de FA représente un renouvellement complet qui intègre, met à jour et remplace les lignes directrices, les recommandations et les conseils pratiques des dix dernières années. Elle est destinée à être utilisée par les cliniciens praticiens de toutes les disciplines qui s'occupent de patients souffrant de FA. L'approche GRADE (Gradation des Recommandations, de l'Appréciation, du Développement et des Évaluations) a été utilisée pour évaluer la pertinence des recommandations et la qualité des résultats. Les domaines d'intérêt incluent : la classification et les définitions de la FA, son épidémiologie, sa physiopathologie, l'évaluation clinique, le dépistage de la FA, la détection et la gestion des facteurs de risque modifiables, l'approche intégrée de la gestion de la FA, la prévention des accidents vasculaires cérébraux, la gestion de l'arythmie, les différences entre les sexes et la FA dans des populations particulières. Des tableaux et figures ont été largement utilisés pour synthétiser les éléments importants et présenter les concepts clés. Ce document devrait représenter une aide importante pour l'intégration des connaissances et un outil pour aider à améliorer la gestion clinique de cette arythmie importante et difficile à traiter.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/clasificación , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Grupos de Riesgo , Algoritmos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Riesgo , Vías Clínicas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
5.
World J Surg ; 44(9): 2935-2943, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32621037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, the lack of consensus on postoperative mesh-tissue adhesion scoring leads to incomparable scientific results. The aim of this study was to develop an adhesion score recognized by experts in the field of hernia surgery. METHODS: Authors of three or more previously published articles on both mesh-tissue adhesion scores and postoperative adhesions were marked as experts. They were queried on seven items using a modified Delphi method. The items concerned the utility of adhesion scoring models, the appropriateness of macroscopic and microscopic variables, the range and use of composite scores or subscores, adhesion-related complications and follow-up length. This study comprised two questionnaire-based rounds and one consensus meeting. RESULTS: The first round was completed by 23 experts (82%), the second round by 18 experts (64%). Of those 18 experts, ten were able to participate in the final consensus meeting and all approved the final proposal. From a total of 158 items, consensus was reached on 90 items. The amount of mesh surface covered with adhesions, tenacity and thickness of adhesions and organ involvement was concluded to be a minimal set of variables to be communicated separately in each future study on mesh adhesions. CONCLUSION: The MEsh Tissue Adhesion scoring system is the first consensus-based scoring system with a wide backing of renowned experts and can be used to assess mesh-related adhesions. By including this minimal set of variables in future research interstudy comparability and objectivity can be increased and eventually linked to clinically relevant outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Adherencias Tisulares/diagnóstico , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
6.
Hernia ; 24(5): 1069-1081, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32495043

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare peri-operative outcomes through 30 days, including pain and quality of life (QOL) through 3 months across three cohorts of inguinal hernia repair (IHR) patients (robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open IHR). METHODS: The Prospective Hernia Study is an ongoing, multicenter, comparative, open-label analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes from robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) versus open and RAS versus laparoscopic IHR procedures. Patient responses to the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) questionnaire provided QOL outcomes. RESULTS: 504 enrolled patients underwent unilateral or bilateral IHR (RAS, n = 159; open, n = 190; laparoscopic, n = 155) at 17 medical institutions from May 2016 through December 2018. Propensity score matching provided a balanced comparison: RAS versus open (n = 112 each) and RAS versus laparoscopic (n = 80 each). Overall, operative times were significantly different between the RAS and laparoscopic cases (83 vs. 65 min; p < 0.001). Fewer RAS patients required prescription pain medication than either open (49.5% vs. 80.0%; p < 0.001) or laparoscopic patients (45.3% vs. 65.4%; p = 0.013). Median number of prescription pain pills taken differed for RAS vs. open (0.5 vs. 15.5; p = 0.001) and were comparable for RAS vs laparoscopic (7.0 vs. 6.0; p = 0.482) among patients taking prescribed pain medication. Time to return to normal activities differed for RAS vs. open (3 vs. 4 days; p = 0.005) and were comparable for RAS vs. laparoscopic (4 vs. 4 days; p = 0.657). Median CCS scores through 3 months were comparable for the three approaches. Postoperative complication rates for the three groups also were comparable. One laparoscopic case was converted to open. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that IHR can be performed effectively with the robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, or open approaches. There was no difference in the median number of prescription pain medication pills taken between the RAS and laparoscopic groups. A difference was observed in the overall number of patients reporting the need to take prescription pain medication. Comparable operative times were observed for RAS unilateral IHR patients compared to open unilateral IHR patients; however, operative times for RAS overall and bilateral subjects were longer than for open patients. Operative times were longer overall for RAS patients compared to laparoscopic patients; however, there was no difference in conversion and complication rate in the RAS vs. laparoscopic groups or the complication rate in the RAS vs. open group. Time to return to normal activities for RAS IHR patients was comparable to that of laparoscopically repaired patients and significantly sooner compared to open IHR patients.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
Analyst ; 145(4): 1457-1465, 2020 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31867586

RESUMEN

Several organisms have demonstrated the ability of synthesising biogenic selenium-containing nanoparticles. Such particles from biological sources have attracted great attention due to several proven activities as antioxidants or antimicrobial agents. However, little is known in terms of size (distribution), shapes, chemical composition and number/amount/concentration of these particles. Therefore, in this work, we proposed the use of complementary analytical strategies that enabled the detection and characterization of selenium-containing nanoparticles in selenized yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). The first strategy to address the intracellular presence of Se within yeast cells, involves the use of single cell ICP-TQ-MS (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry). For this aim, selenium and phosphorous (as constitutive element) were measured as oxides (80Se16O+ and 31P16O+, resp.) in the triple-quadrupole mode. Then, a simple and fast cell lysis by mechanical disruption is conducted (approx. 30 min) in order to prove the presence of selenium-containing nanoparticles (SeNPs). The lysate is analysed by single particle ICP-TQ-MS and, complementarily, by liquid chromatography coupled to ICP-TQ-MS to cover a wider range of particle sizes. One of the samples revealed the presence of dispersed SeNPs with sizes between a few nm and up to 250 nm also confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in the form of elemental selenium. The analysis of the certified reference material SELM-1 showed the presence of spherical SeNPs of 4 to 7 nm diameter. These biogenic particles, at least partially, were made of elemental selenium as well. The whole study reveals the excellent capabilities of "single" event ICP-MS methodologies in combination with HPLC-based strategies for a complete characterization of nanoparticulated material in biological samples.


Asunto(s)
Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Nanopartículas/química , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/citología , Selenio/química , Selenio/metabolismo , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismo
8.
Br J Dermatol ; 183(1): 146-154, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31605618

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Skin tears are acute wounds that are frequently misdiagnosed and under-reported. A standardized and globally adopted skin tear classification system with supporting evidence for diagnostic validity and reliability is required to allow assessment and reporting in a consistent way. OBJECTIVES: To measure the validity and reliability of the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel (ISTAP) Classification System internationally. METHODS: A multicountry study was set up to validate the content of the ISTAP Classification System through expert consultation in a two-round Delphi procedure involving 17 experts from 11 countries. An online survey including 24 skin tear photographs was conducted in a convenience sample of 1601 healthcare professionals from 44 countries to measure diagnostic accuracy, agreement, inter-rater reliability and intrarater reliability of the instrument. RESULTS: A definition for the concept of a 'skin flap' in the area of skin tears was developed and added to the initial ISTAP Classification System consisting of three skin tear types. The overall agreement with the reference standard was 0·79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·79-0·80] and sensitivity ranged from 0·74 (95% CI 0·73-0·75) to 0·88 (95% CI 0·87-0·88). The inter-rater reliability was 0·57 (95% CI 0·57-0·57). The Cohen's Kappa measuring intrarater reliability was 0·74 (95% CI 0·73-0·75). CONCLUSIONS: The ISTAP Classification System is supported by evidence for validity and reliability. The ISTAP Classification System should be used for systematic assessment and reporting of skin tears in clinical practice and research globally. What's already known about this topic? Skin tears are common acute wounds that are misdiagnosed and under-reported too often. A skin tear classification system is needed to standardize documentation and description for clinical practice, audit and research. What does this study add? The International Skin Tear Advisory Panel Classification System was psychometrically tested in 1601 healthcare professionals from 44 countries. Diagnostic accuracy was high when differentiating between type 1, 2 and 3 skin tears using a set of validated photographs.


Asunto(s)
Laceraciones , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Laceraciones/diagnóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Piel/lesiones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
Cytotherapy ; 21(10): 1019-1024, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31526643

RESUMEN

The International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy (ISCT®) Mesenchymal Stromal Cell (ISCT MSC) committee offers a position statement to clarify the nomenclature of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). The ISCT MSC committee continues to support the use of the acronym "MSCs" but recommends this be (i) supplemented by tissue-source origin of the cells, which would highlight tissue-specific properties; (ii) intended as MSCs unless rigorous evidence for stemness exists that can be supported by both in vitro and in vivo data; and (iii) associated with robust matrix of functional assays to demonstrate MSC properties, which are not generically defined but informed by the intended therapeutic mode of actions.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/clasificación , Terapia Genética/clasificación , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/clasificación , Células del Estroma/clasificación , Terminología como Asunto , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula/clasificación , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula/métodos , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula/normas , Diferenciación Celular , Terapia Genética/métodos , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/citología , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Células del Estroma/citología
10.
Surg Endosc ; 33(11): 3511-3549, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31292742

RESUMEN

In 2014 the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) published the first international "Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias". Guidelines reflect the currently best available evidence in diagnostics and therapy and give recommendations to help surgeons to standardize their techniques and to improve their results. However, science is a dynamic field which is continuously developing. Therefore, guidelines require regular updates to keep pace with the evolving literature. METHODS: For the development of the original guidelines all relevant literature published up to year 2012 was analyzed using the ranking of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based-Medicine. For the present update all of the previous authors were asked to evaluate the literature published during the recent years from 2012 to 2017 and revise their statements and recommendations given in the initial guidelines accordingly. In two Consensus Conferences (October 2017 Beijing, March 2018 Cologne) the updates were presented, discussed, and confirmed. To avoid redundancy, only new statements or recommendations are included in this paper. Therefore, for full understanding both of the guidelines, the original and the current, must be read. In addition, the new developments in repair of abdominal wall hernias like surgical techniques within the abdominal wall, release operations (transversus muscle release, component separation), Botox application, and robot-assisted repair methods were included. RESULTS: Due to an increase of the number of patients and further development of surgical techniques, repair of primary and secondary abdominal wall hernias attracts increasing interests of many surgeons. Whereas up to three decades ago hernia-related publications did not exceed 20 per year, currently this number is about 10-fold higher. Recent years are characterized by the advent of new techniques-minimal invasive techniques using robotics and laparoscopy, totally extraperitoneal repairs, novel myofascial release techniques for optimal closure of large defects, and Botox for relaxing the abdominal wall. Furthermore, a concomitant rectus diastasis was recognized as a significant risk factor for recurrence. Despite still insufficient evidence with respect to these new techniques it seemed to us necessary to include them in the update to stimulate surgeons to do research in these fields. CONCLUSION: Guidelines are recommendations based on best available evidence intended to help the surgeon to improve the quality of his daily work. However, science is a continuously evolving process, and as such guidelines should be updated about every 3 years. For a comprehensive reference, however, it is suggested to read both the initially guidelines published in 2014 together with the update. Moreover, the presented update includes also techniques which were not known 3 years before.


Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/normas , Laparoscopía/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Sociedades Médicas
11.
BMC Surg ; 19(1): 93, 2019 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31311545

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study assessed clinical outcomes, including safety and recurrence, from the two-year follow-up of patients who underwent open ventral primary hernia repair with the use of the Parietex™ Composite Ventral Patch (PCO-VP). METHODS: A prospective single-arm, multicenter study of 126 patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair for umbilical and epigastric hernias with the PCO-VP was performed. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six subjects (110 with umbilical hernia and 16 with epigastric hernia) with a mean hernia diameter of 1.8 cm (0.4-4.0) were treated with PCO-VP. One hundred subjects completed the two-year study. Cumulative hernia recurrence was 3.0% (3/101; 95%CI: 0.0-6.3%) within 24 months. Median Numeric Rating Scale pain scores improved from 2 [0-10] at baseline to 0 [0-3] at 1 month (P < 0.001) and remained low at 24 months 0 [0-6] (P < 0.001). 99% (102/103) of the patients were satisfied with their repair at 24 months postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PCO-VP to repair primary umbilical and epigastric defects yielded a low recurrence rate, low postoperative and chronic pain, and high satisfaction ratings, confirming that PCO-VP is effective for small ventral hernia repair in the two-year term after implantation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered publically at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT01848184 registered May 7, 2013).


Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia
13.
Surg Endosc ; 33(10): 3069-3139, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31250243

RESUMEN

In 2014, the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) published the first international "Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias." Guidelines reflect the currently best available evidence in diagnostics and therapy and give recommendations to help surgeons to standardize their techniques and to improve their results. However, science is a dynamic field which is continuously developing. Therefore, guidelines require regular updates to keep pace with the evolving literature. METHODS: For the development of the original guidelines, all relevant literature published up to year 2012 was analyzed using the ranking of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. For the present update, all of the previous authors were asked to evaluate the literature published during the recent years from 2012 to 2017 and revise their statements and recommendations given in the initial guidelines accordingly. In two Consensus Conferences (October 2017 Beijing, March 2018 Cologne), the updates were presented, discussed, and confirmed. To avoid redundancy, only new statements or recommendations are included in this paper. Therefore, for full understanding both of the guidelines, the original and the current, must be read. In addition, the new developments in repair of abdominal wall hernias like surgical techniques within the abdominal wall, release operations (transversus muscle release, component separation), Botox application, and robot-assisted repair methods were included. RESULTS: Due to an increase of the number of patients and further development of surgical techniques, repair of primary and secondary abdominal wall hernias attracts increasing interests of many surgeons. Whereas up to three decades ago hernia-related publications did not exceed 20 per year, currently this number is about 10-fold higher. Recent years are characterized by the advent of new techniques-minimal invasive techniques using robotics and laparoscopy, totally extraperitoneal repairs, novel myofascial release techniques for optimal closure of large defects, and Botox for relaxing the abdominal wall. Furthermore, a concomitant rectus diastasis was recognized as a significant risk factor for recurrence. Despite insufficient evidence with respect to these new techniques, it seemed to us necessary to include them in the update to stimulate surgeons to do research in these fields. CONCLUSION: Guidelines are recommendations based on best available evidence intended to help the surgeon to improve the quality of his daily work. However, science is a continuously evolving process, and as such guidelines should be updated about every 3 years. For a comprehensive reference, however, it is suggested to read both the initial guidelines published in 2014 together with the update. Moreover, the presented update includes also techniques which were not known 3 years before.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Hernia Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hernia Ventral/diagnóstico por imagen , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/normas , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Obesidad/complicaciones , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Recurrencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
14.
Br J Dermatol ; 178(6): 1331-1340, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29315488

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is a specific type of irritant contact dermatitis with different severity levels. An internationally accepted instrument to assess the severity of IAD in adults, with established diagnostic accuracy, agreement and reliability, is needed to support clinical practice and research. OBJECTIVES: To design the Ghent Global IAD Categorization Tool (GLOBIAD) and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODS: The design was based on expert consultation using a three-round Delphi procedure with 34 experts from 13 countries. The instrument was tested using IAD photographs, which reflected different severity levels, in a sample of 823 healthcare professionals from 30 countries. Measures for diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity), agreement, interrater reliability (multirater Fleiss kappa) and intrarater reliability (Cohen's kappa) were assessed. RESULTS: The GLOBIAD consists of two categories based on the presence of persistent redness (category 1) and skin loss (category 2), both of which are subdivided based on the presence of clinical signs of infection. The agreement for differentiating between category 1 and category 2 was 0·86 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·86-0·87], with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 84%. The overall agreement was 0·55 (95% CI 0·55-0·56). The Fleiss kappa for differentiating between category 1 and category 2 was 0·65 (95% CI 0·65-0·65). The overall Fleiss kappa was 0·41 (95% CI 0·41-0·41). The Cohen's kappa for differentiating between category 1 and category 2 was 0·76 (95% CI 0·75-0·77). The overall Cohen's kappa was 0·61 (95% CI 0·59-0·62). CONCLUSIONS: The development of the GLOBIAD is a major step towards a better systematic assessment of IAD in clinical practice and research worldwide. However, further validation is needed.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Lenguaje , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Incontinencia Urinaria/complicaciones , Adulto , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Psicometría , Estándares de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Terminología como Asunto
15.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 13159, 2017 10 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29030634

RESUMEN

We investigated the electronic structure of Lead Oxide (PbO) - one of the most promising photoconductor materials for direct conversion x-ray imaging detectors, using soft x-ray emission and absorption spectroscopy. Two structural configurations of thin PbO layers, namely the polycrystalline and the amorphous phase, were studied, and compared to the properties of powdered α-PbO and ß-PbO samples. In addition, we performed calculations within the framework of density functional theory and found an excellent agreement between the calculated and the measured absorption and emission spectra, which indicates high accuracy of our structural models. Our work provides strong evidence that the electronic structure of PbO layers, specifically the width of the band gap and the presence of additional interband and intraband states in both conduction and valence band, depend on the deposition conditions. We tested several model structures using DFT simulations to understand what the origin of these states is. The presence of O vacancies is the most plausible explanation for these additional electronic states. Several other plausible models were ruled out including interstitial O, dislocated O and the presence of significant lattice stress in PbO.

16.
Can J Cardiol ; 32(10)oct. 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | BIGG - guías GRADE | ID: biblio-965099

RESUMEN

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Guidelines Committee provides periodic reviews of new data to produce focused updates that address clinically important advances in AF management. This 2016 Focused Update deals with: (1) the management of antithrombotic therapy for AF patients in the context of the various clinical presentations of coronary artery disease; (2) real-life data with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; (3) the use of antidotes for the reversal of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; (4) digoxin as a rate control agent; (5) perioperative anticoagulation management; and (6) AF surgical therapy including the prevention and treatment of AF after cardiac surgery. The recommendations were developed with the same methodology used for the initial 2010 guidelines and the 2012 and 2014 Focused Updates. Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) standards, individual studies and literature were reviewed for quality and bias; the literature review process and evidence tables are included in the Supplementary Material, and on the CCS Web site. The section on concomitant AF and coronary artery disease was developed in collaboration with the CCS Antiplatelet Guidelines Committee. Details of the updated recommendations are presented, along with their background and rationale. This document is linked to an updated summary of all CCS AF Guidelines recommendations, from 2010 to the present 2016 Focused Update


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Algoritmos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Cardiotónicos , Cardiotónicos/administración & dosificación , Cardiotónicos/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Digoxina , Digoxina/administración & dosificación , Digoxina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Magnesio , Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico
18.
Hernia ; 20(1): 85-99, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26143072

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia can be repaired through either an open or laparoscopic approach. A major problem following hernia repair is recurrence, and the technique used for hernia repair influences the rate of hernia recurrence. Data from individual studies show that the area of mesh overlap used during hernia repair correlates with hernia recurrence, but no meta-analyses have previously been published. The aim of this review was to perform a meta-analysis to determine if the area of mesh overlap correlates with the rate of hernia recurrence after ventral and incisional hernia repair. METHODS: Studies from 1990 to 2013 that used a mesh in open or laparoscopic procedures, and that reported both the area of mesh overlap beyond the fascial defect and the recurrence rate, were assessed for inclusion in the final analysis. A pooled estimation of combined overall risk was calculated according to a random effect model. RESULTS: A total of 95 articles, with 111 study populations, met all criteria and were included in the final analysis. For open procedures, results showed no correlation between the pooled estimation of risk for recurrence of ventral hernia and area of mesh overlap used for hernia repair (<3 cm, incidence rate 0.065; 3-5 cm, incidence rate 0.070; >5 cm, incidence rate 0.060). In laparoscopic procedures, the pooled estimation of risk for recurrence of hernia decreased with increasing area of mesh overlap (<3 cm, incidence rate 0.086; 3-5 cm, incidence rate 0.046; >5 cm, incidence rate 0.014). CONCLUSION: Risk of hernia recurrence decreases with increasing area of mesh overlap in laparoscopic, but not open, procedures for ventral hernia repair.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Recurrencia , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos
19.
J Wound Care ; 24(8): 388-92, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26562382

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate, validate and establish reliability of the International Skin Tear Classification System in Danish. METHOD: Phase 1 of the project involved the translation of the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel (ISTAP) Skin Tear Classification System into Danish, using the forward-back translation method described by the principles of good practice for the translation process for patient-reported outcomes. In Phase 2, the Danish group sought to replicate the ISTAP validation study and validate the classification system with registered nurses (RN) and social and health-care assistants (non-RN) from both primary health care and a Danish university hospital in Copenhagen. Thirty photographs, with equal representation of the three types of skin tears, were selected to test validity. The photographs chosen were those originally used for internal and external validation by the ISTAP group. The subjects were approached in their place of work and invited to participate in the study and to attend an educational session related to skin tears. RESULTS: The Danish translation of the ISTAP classification system was tested on 270 non-wound specialists. The ISTAP classification system was validated by 241 RNs, and 29 non-RN. The results indicated a moderate level of agreement on classification of skin tears by type (Fleiss' Kappa=0.460). A moderate level of agreement was demonstrated for both the RN group and the non-RN group (Fleiss' Kappa=0.464 and 0.443, respectively). CONCLUSION: The ISTAP Skin Tear Classification System was developed with the goal of establishing a global language for describing and documenting skin tears and to raise the health-care community's awareness of skin tears. The Danish translation of the ISTAP classification system supports the earlier ISTAP study and further validates the classification system. The Danish translation of the classification system is vital to the promotion of skin tears in both research and the clinical settings in Denmark.


Asunto(s)
Laceraciones/clasificación , Piel/lesiones , Dinamarca , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Fotograbar , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Traducción
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...