Association Between Daily Physical Activity and Clinical Anthropomorphic Measures in Adults With Cerebral Palsy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship between activity level and cardiovascular risk measures as well as describe general activity patterns of adults with cerebral palsy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Academic outpatient rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with cerebral palsy (N=47). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS) level was determined by validated self-report questionnaire. Activity (daily step count, walk time, sitting time, standing time, and transitional movements) over 6 days recorded using an activPAL. Weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist-to-hip ratio were measured. Bivariate relationships between anthropomorphic and activity measures were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight participants completed all measurements. Nine were excluded because of incomplete activPAL data. The median age was 28.50 years (interquartile range [IQR]=24.25-47.00), range 18-77 years. Participants' GMFCS levels were I: 13%; II: 16%; III: 21%; IV: 34%; and V: 16%. Median steps/day for GMFCS I/II participants were 5258.3 (IQR=3606.8-6634.7), and median steps/day were 1681.3 (IQR=657.2-2751.8) and 30.0 (IQR=6.8-54.2) for GMFCS level III and IV/V participants, respectively. Significantly greater steps/day were found for GMFCS I/II or III participants compared to those GMFCS IV/V (P<.001 and P=.0074, respectively). In addition, 60.5% of the subjects had a BMI in the normal range, 10.5% were obese, 23.6% were overweight, and 5.3% were underweight. For subjects with GMFCS I/II, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for time standing and waist circumference was -0.73 (0.01). GMFCS III and GMFCS IV/V participants had respective correlations of -0.16 (0.71) and -0.01 (0.98). For subjects with GMFCS I/II, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for standing time and BMI was -0.55 (P=.08). For the GMFCS III and GMFCS IV/V groups the respective correlations were -0.19 (0.67) and 0.00 (1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with GMFCS level I or II who engaged in more activity tended to have more favorable anthropometric profiles. Subjects with GMFCS level III, IV, or V did not have a similar trend. Our findings suggest factors beyond activity patterns affect anthropometrics to a greater degree in those with higher GMFCS levels.

Usefulness of Assessment of Stool Form by the Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale in Primary Care Pediatrics.

PURPOSE: Rome criteria are considered the gold standard for diagnosing functional constipation. The modified Bristol stool form scale (m-BSFS) was validated to measure stool form in children. However, neither the potential use of the m-BSFS as a tool to facilitate the diagnosis of potential constipation, nor the agreement between m-BSFS and stool consistency by Rome has been studied. Our objective is to determine if m-BSFS is a reliable tool to facilitat detection of constipation; and the agreement between stool form by m-BSFS and hard stool criteria in Rome. METHODS: A survey tool with the Rome III criteria and the m-BSFS was developed. A Likert-scale addressed frequency of each stool form on the m-BSFS. Responses to Rome III and m-BSFS were compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the m-BSFS was 79.2% and 66.0% respectively; and in children <4 years. improved to 81.2% and 75.0% respectively. There was poor agreement between hard stools by m-BSFS and the painful or hard bowel movement question of Rome Criteria. CONCLUSION: The potential utility of m-BSFS as a reasonably good tool to facilitate the diagnosis of potential constipation in children is shown. The poor agreement between painful or hard stool question in Rome III, and ratings for hard stool on the m-BSFS illustrates that one's perception may differ between a question and a picture. A useful pictorial tool to appraise stool form may, thus, be a favorable complement in the process of enquiry about bowel habits in well-child care.