The perceived impact of homelessness on health during pregnancy and the postpartum period: A qualitative study carried out in the metropolitan area of Nantes, France.

The number of homeless people has been constantly increasing in Europe over recent years, as well as the proportion of women among the homeless population. Pregnancy can increase the risk of becoming homeless and, on the other hand, homelessness has been widely connected to adverse perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to describe the overall perceived impact of homelessness on health during pregnancy and the postpartum period, using a qualitative research approach to prioritize women's perspective. One-time semi structured interviews were conducted with 10 pregnant women and 10 women in the postpartum period experiencing homelessness in the metropolitan area of Nantes, as well as with six people from their social surroundings. A thematic analysis was performed to identify major themes and sub-themes. Homelessness was perceived as having an overall negative impact on all aspects of health (physical health, mental health, and social well-being) during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Stress and anxiety, food insecurity, social isolation, physical suffering, deterioration of chronic diseases, and pregnancy complications, were the main perceived consequences of homelessness on health. On the other hand, social support, and the "welcomeness" of healthcare professionals during pregnancy and the postpartum period were identified as capable of palliating those consequences. Finally, basic needs, such as having access to suitable housing, being independent, and being in good health, were identified by participants in the study as their main priorities. The results of this study, as well as those found by previous research, allowed us to identify possible axes in tackling homelessness and its complex consequences on health during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Housing and income assistance interventions, promoting social support and employment, outreach services enhancing collaborative networks among healthcare service providers, and integrating coordinated multidisciplinary approaches in primary care have shown to provide promising solutions to this issue.

Assessing the Acceptability and Feasibility of a Web-Based Screening for Psychoactive Substance Users Among a French Sample of University Students and Workers: Mixed Methods Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Early detection in the prevention of addictive behaviors remains a complex question in practice for most first-line health care workers (HCWs). Several prevention measures have successfully included a screening stage followed by a brief intervention in case of risk-related use or referral to an addiction center for problematic use. Whereas early detection is highly recommended by the World Health Organization, it is not usually performed in practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of a web-based app, called Pulsio Santé, for health service users and first-line prevention HCW and to carry out an exhaustive process of early detection of psychoactive substance use behaviors. METHODS: A mixed methods prospective study was conducted in 2 departments: HCWs from the regional occupational health department and from the university department of preventive medicine dedicated to students were invited to participate. Participants 18 years or older who had been seen in 2017 by a HCW from one of the departments were eligible. The study procedure comprised 5 phases: (1) inclusion of the participants after a face-to-face consultation with an HCW; (2) reception of a text message by participants on their smartphone or by email; (3) self-assessment by participants regarding their substance use with the Pulsio Santé app; (4) if participants agreed, transfer of the results to the HCW; and (5) if participants declined, a message to invite them to get in touch with their general practitioner should the assessment detect a risk. Several feasibility and acceptability criteria were assessed by an analysis of a focus group with the HCW that explored 4 themes (usefulness and advantages, problems and limitations, possible improvements, and finally, integration into routine practice). RESULTS: A total of 1474 people were asked to participate, with 42 HCWs being involved. The percentage of people who agreed to receive a text message or an email, which was considered as the first level of acceptability, was 79.17% (1167/1474). The percentage of participants who clicked on the self-assessment link, considered as the second level of acceptability, was 60.24% (703/1167). The percentage of participants who completed their self-evaluation entirely, which was considered as the first level of feasibility, was 76.24% (536/703). The percentage of participants who shared the results of their evaluation with the HCWs, considered as the second level of feasibility, was 79.48% (426/536). The qualitative study showed that there were obstacles on the side of HCWs in carrying out the recommended interventions for people at risk based on their online screening, such as previous training or adaptations in accordance with specific populations. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative results showed good acceptability and feasibility of the Pulsio Santé app by users and HCWs. There is a need for further studies more directly focused on the limitations highlighted by the qualitative results.