Healthcare professionals' experiences with the use of antipsychotics in dementia.

Background: Antipsychotics are commonly administered to nursing home residents with dementia, despite the associated risk of severe adverse events. Objective: This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' experiences in caring for nursing home residents with dementia, with a focus on rationales behind the use of antipsychotics. Method: Twelve semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals' from Danish nursing homes were conducted and analyzed using the method Systematic Text Condensation. Results: Nonpharmacological interventions were reported as the primary approach to care and the first-choice treatment for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Use of antipsychotics was considered to serve as a last resort, reserved for residents with severe symptoms. However, most informants preferred a more limited use. The study identified four main barriers to reduce the use of antipsychotics: "Scarcity of resources", "Perceiving antipsychotic use to provide relieve", "Reluctance towards deprescribing" and "Limited access to medical counseling", and three potential enablers: "Updating knowledge and nonpharmacological competencies", "Management support and clear procedures" and "Regularity in interdisciplinary collaboration". Conclusion: The treatment and care were reported as primarily following guidelines in BPSD. Several barriers were perceived to challenge the healthcare professionals' preference of limited use of antipsychotics. To further reduce the use, this study highlights the importance of understanding the adverse effects caused by limited resources, enhancing employee knowledge and competencies and ensuring regular interprofessional collaboration for assessing and reassessing the need to use antipsychotics.

Protocol for DEprescribing and Care to reduce Antipsychotics in Dementia (DECADE)-A hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) should only rarely and briefly be treated with antipsychotics. Despite recommendations to the contrary, the use of antipsychotics in nursing home residents with dementia is widespread and followed by serious adverse effects. Intervention studies on methods to reduce the use of antipsychotics in persons with dementia are few and needed. The aim of this protocol is to describe the rationale and content of the intervention DEprescribing and Care to reduce Antipsychotics in DEmentia (DECADE)-a hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a protocol of a prospective hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study. The primary aim of DECADE is to reduce the use of antipsychotic drugs by 50% in 50% of nursing home residents with dementia while maintaining or improving BPSD. The intervention is implemented in six nursing homes including approximately 190 residents with dementia and consists of Academic Detailing, medication review, education of nursing home staff, and care plans. The evaluation of feasibility and potential effectiveness is an overall assessment of all clinical and process outcomes. Logistic regression analyses will be used to investigate factors characterizing situations with prescription of antipsychotics. BPSD is analysed with a before- and after design using self-controlled case series methods and the use of antipsychotics is analysed as interrupted time series. DISCUSSION: This protocol describes a study that will provide an indication of DECADE effectiveness and a model for upscaling and further evaluation in a controlled design.

Developing a pharmacist-led intervention to provide transitional pharmaceutical care for hospital discharged patients: A collaboration between hospital and community pharmacists.

Background: Patients who transfer from the hospital back to the community are at risk of experiencing problems related to their medications. Hospital pharmacists (HPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) may play an important role and provide transitional pharmaceutical care in transition of care interventions. Objective: To describe how a pharmacist-led intervention to provide transitional pharmaceutical care for hospital discharged patients was developed, utilizing already existing pharmacist interventions in the hospital and community pharmacy. Methods: A mixed-method approach to intervention development was applied. Existing evidence was identified through a literature review of effective transitional care interventions and existing services in the hospital and community pharmacy. Focus group interviews and a workshop were carried out with HPs and CPs to identify their perceived facilitators and uncertainties in relation to intervention development. The final intervention and the expected outcomes were developed in an expert group workshop. Finally, the hospital part of the intervention was tested in a small-scale feasibility study to assess what type of information the HP would transfer to the CP for follow up. Results: Five components were identified through the 209 systematic reviews: pharmacist-led medication reconciliation, pharmacist-led medication review, collaboration with general practitioners (GPs), post discharge pharmacist follow up and patient counseling or education. HPs and CPs identified uncertainties related to the relevance of the information sent from the HP to the CP, identification of patients at the community pharmacy and communication. The expected outcomes for the patients receiving the intervention were an experience of increased safety and satisfaction and less use of healthcare resources. The feasibility study led to optimization of language and structure of the pharmacist referrals that were used to transfer information from the HP to the CP. Conclusion: A patient centered intervention to provide transitional pharmaceutical care for hospital discharged patients was developed using existing evidence in transition of care, HPs and CPs, an expert group, and a small-scale feasibility study. A full-scale feasibility test of the intervention should be carried out for it to be further refined.

[Vascular diagnostics before microvascular tissue transfer on the lower extremities : An algorithm]. / Gefäßdiagnostik vor mikrovaskulärem Gewebetransfer an der unteren Extremität : Ein Algorithmus.

Microsurgical free flap transfer plays a key role in soft tissue reconstruction of the lower extremities. Through close cooperation between plastic and orthopedic surgery, great progress and success in limb salvage could be achieved over the last decades. The risk for extremity malperfusion is especially high in older patients and after trauma. To maximize the success rate for free flap transfer there is need for interdisciplinary clinical examination and diagnostics. In addition to clinical methods radiological procedures are necessary to evaluate and optimize lower extremity perfusion before surgery.Vascular ultrasound provides important information about the arterial and venous status; however, DSA, CTA and MRA are well-established and exact methods to evaluate arterial inflow. The use of less invasive methods makes it much more feasible, economic and comfortable to perform preoperative selection of patients requiring interventional procedures.In the case of intraluminal stenosis without any option for PTA, a vascular surgeon can be involved at an early stage to evaluate further surgical options. In some cases, similar surgical revascularization and free flap transfer can be performed in a single surgery. The aim of this study is to implement a standardized algorithm for preoperative examination and radiological diagnostics before reconstructive surgery of the lower extremity.

Open Carpal Tunnel Release Under WALANT - Suitable for All Ages?

Purpose: Wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) as a walk-in procedure has become a standard technique in open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) and continues to replace the long-established intravenous regional anesthesia with a tourniquet (IVRA/"bier-block") in our clinic. The aim of this study was to compare patient satisfaction with either WALANT or IVRA/"bier-block" and define subgroups that are particularly suited for either of the two procedures. We hypothesized that older patients would prefer IVRA because of a shorter period of postoperative surveillance. Methods: In this retrospective study we evaluated patient satisfaction with either WALANT or IVRA using an adjusted questionnaire on a standard Swiss grading system (from 1 = insufficient/very strong pain to 6 = excellent/no pain). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain or satisfaction with the tourniquet and quality of postoperative care. Results: For the 176 patients (WALANT, n = 109; IVRA, n = 67) included in the study, there was high patient satisfaction with both procedures (WALANT, 5.5/6; IVRA, 5.5/6). Patients aged 80 years and older had significantly less postoperative pain after WALANT (WALANT, 5.8/6 vs IVRA, 4.9/6). Conclusions: Patients aged 80 years and older had significantly less postoperative pain after WALANT than that after IVRA. Here, sarcopenia may have contributed to the prolonged discomfort after tourniquet application. Immediate postoperative discharge after WALANT did not negatively affect older patients. Clinical relevance: For OCTR, WALANT as a walk-in procedure is a safe and comfortable alternative to IVRA, which is commonly planned with short postoperative surveillance. Both anesthesia techniques are suitable for all ages and sexes but based on this study we recommend WALANT as a tourniquet-free operation in older patients.

Translation and psychometric validation of a Danish version of the medication-related quality of life scale.

Background Generic and disease specific health-related quality of life scales have been found to be non-responsive to changes in medications in polypharmacy patients. The Taiwanese medication-related quality of life (MRQoL) scale aims to measure the effect of medication use on patients' quality of life. Objective To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Danish translation of MRQoL in a population of patients with polypharmacy. Setting Polypharmacy patients waiting for services at a community pharmacy or hospital in Denmark. Method The original MRQoL included 14 items. It was forward-translated into Danish and backward-translated into Chinese according to a modified translation protocol proposed by Sousa and Rojjanasrirrat et al. The translation was pre-tested, adjusted, and administered to polypharmacy patients. The factor structure was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency reliability was evaluated, and criterion validity assessed using the beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ) and SF-12v2. Known-group validity was carried out on age, number of medicines and setting. Main outcome measure Validity of the Danish version of the MRQoL-scale. Results 164 patients completed the questionnaire. EFA of all 14 items resulted in a two-factor structure, accounting for 72.8% of the total variance. The two factors were named "Energy/Concentration" (7 items) and "Feelings/Social" (7 items). Items correlating over 0.80 were removed leaving 11 items (Model 1). This model was further reduced to 8 items (Model 2) based on Cronbach's alpha. CFA confirmed the two-factor structure of both models. Model 2 fitted data without having to define covariations between error terms. Both factors showed high internal consistency reliability (Cronbachs' alpha 0.901-0.932). Ceiling effects were detected for both factors. Criterion validity was demonstrated via its significant correlations with SF-12vs2 subscales (Spearman's rho 0.340-0.353) and BMQ Concern (Spearman's rho - 0.451 to - 0.347). There was a statistically significant difference in relation to total scores of the MRQoL for age and number of drugs taken, indicating known-group validity. Conclusion The Danish translation of the MRQoL instrument showed measurement properties indicating a well-defined two-factor structure with high internal reliability, concurrent criterion validity, and known group validity. However, challenges remain with ceiling effects and efforts should be put into further development of the instrument.

Hospital and Community Pharmacists' Views of and Perspectives on the Establishment of an Intraprofessional Collaboration in the Transition of Care for Newly Discharged Patients.

BACKGROUND: Hospital and community pharmacists are increasingly involved in patients' medication interventions related to the transition of care from the hospital to a patient's home. These interventions may enable pharmacists to collaborate across healthcare sector boundaries. However, little is known about pharmacists' views on intraprofessional collaboration across healthcare sectors and what affects the establishment of such collaboration. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to understand the views and perspectives of hospital pharmacists (HPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) on establishing an intraprofessional collaboration in relation to newly discharging patients. METHODS: Joint focus group interviews with HPs and CPs in the Zealand region of Denmark were conducted. The HPs were employed at the only hospital pharmacy in the region (Region Zealand Hospital Pharmacy). Five HPs and six CPs participated in two focus groups. The focus groups were analyzed using theoretical thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes and seven subthemes were identified. The first theme, "Context", was divided into two subthemes: "Prioritization of new tasks in the intraprofessional collaboration" and "The lack of insight into the patient's hospital stay". The second theme, "The hospital physicians and GPs as the focal points for the HPs' and CPs' work", was divided into three subthemes: "The limitation of the CPs and HPs based on current roles and organizations", "Lack of regular access to the physician gives the patients more responsibility" and "Lack of support from the GPs for the work conducted by HPs and CPs". The last theme, "Individuals", had two subthemes: "The motivation for working intraprofessionally" and "CPs' hesitancy towards the new tasks in the intraprofessional collaboration". CONCLUSION: Both HPs and CPs are highly influenced by their work context in regard to establishing a new intraprofessional collaboration. Limited resources for intraprofessional collaboration should be taken into account. Likewise, the collaboration should fit into daily routines, which may eliminate hesitancy towards new forms of collaboration and tasks shared between HPs and CPs. The physician was identified as an important key professional, since the work tasks of both HPs and CPs depend on the physician, which in turn limits the capability and success of solely intraprofessional collaboration.