RESUMEN
Immunization against COVID-19 is needed in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). However, data on long-term immunity kinetics remain scarce. This study aimed to compare the humoral and cellular response to COVID-19 in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) compared to healthy controls. We compared the humoral and cellular response to SARS-Cov-2 elicited by vaccination and/or infection in a prospective cohort of 20 IMID patients compared with a group of 21 healthcare workers (HCWs). We assessed immunity before and after the third and fourth dose of BNT162b2 or after COVID-19 infection using quantitative IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibody (anti-S-IgG), neutralization assay, and specific interferon-gamma (IFN-g) release assay (IGRA). The responses were compared with those of healthy controls. The two groups were similar in age and total exposure, becoming infected for the first time, mainly after the third dose. Neutralizing antibodies and IGRA were negative in 9.5% of IMID patients but not in any HCWs. No significant difference was found between neutralization titers to BA.1 in the IMID and the HCW groups. The study highlights the SARS-CoV-2 immunological responses in healthy controls and IMID patients, suggesting that the combined stimuli of vaccination and infection in IMID patients could promote a more profound immunological response.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with dysregulated cells in the immune system. The disease affects organs like kidneys, nervous system, joints, and skin. To manage SLE effectively, novel treatments targeting immune system components have been developed. This review investigates the therapeutic potential of existing targeted therapies and explores future innovative approaches for well tolerated, personalized treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: SLE treatment involves cytokine targets and specific immunologic pathways, with even small molecules involved. SUMMARY: The advanced therapeutic options in SLE management give clinicians more tools to control disease activity according to personalized medicine.
Asunto(s)
Citocinas , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Medicina de Precisión , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/terapia , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Citocinas/inmunología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , AnimalesRESUMEN
This is a multicentric investigation involving two Italian centers that examined the clinical course of COVID-19 in patients receiving biological therapy targeting type 2 inflammation and those not receiving biologicals. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the management of respiratory and allergic disorders and the potential impact of biological therapy in the most severe forms has been a point of uncertainty. Our multicentric investigation aimed to compare the clinical course of COVID-19 and the impact of vaccination in an Italian cohort of patients with atopic disorders caused by a type 2 inflammation, such as eosinophilic asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), atopic dermatitis (AD), and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). A questionnaire was given to patients coming to our outpatient clinic for the first evaluation or follow-up visit, asking for the clinical characteristics of the infection, the ongoing therapy during the infection, any relevant change, and the patient's vaccination status. We enrolled 132 atopic patients from two Italian centers; 62 patients were on biological therapy at the time of infection (omalizumab 31%, mepolizumab 26%, benralizumab 19%, and dupilumab 24%). The median age was 56 (IQR 22.8) for patients on biologicals and 48 (IQR 26.5) for those not on biologicals (p = 0.028). The two groups were comparable in terms of sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, and systemic oral corticosteroid use (OCS). There were no significant differences in non-biological therapy and comorbidity between the two groups. The patients not on biological therapy had a prevalence of 87% for asthma, 52% for CRSwNP, 10% for CSU, and 6% for AD. The patients on biologicals had a prevalence of 93% for asthma, 17% for CRSwNP, and 10% for CSU. In our work, we observed that mAbs targeting type 2 inflammation in patients with COVID-19 appeared to be safe, with no worsening of symptoms, prolongation of infection, or increase in hospitalizations. Between the two groups, there were no significant differences in the duration of swab positivity (p = 0.45) and duration of symptoms (p = 0.38). During COVID-19, patients on biologicals experienced a significant increase in common cold-like symptoms (p = 0.038), dyspnea (p = 0.016), and more, but not significant, asthma exacerbations, with no significant differences between the different biologicals. Regarding the vaccination status, we observed that there was an increased number of hospitalizations among unvaccinated patients in both groups, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. No patients on biologicals reported safety issues or adverse effects associated with the use of biological treatments during COVID-19. Our investigation showed that mAbs against type 2 inflammation given during Coronavirus Disease 2019 are safe and do not impact the clinical course or main outcomes. Therefore, we found no signals suggesting that anti-Th2 biological therapy should be discontinued during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Controlled studies and analysis, including data from registries and real-life studies, are required to draw firm conclusions regarding the safety or possible advantages that anti-type 2 mAbs could offer in particular clinical contexts, such as infections.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this registry study was to evaluate the progress of osteoarthrosis (OA) symptoms after the intake of a new standardized supplement combination (Pycnogenol® + Centellicum®, both Horphag Research) in a group of subjects with OA. METHODS: Supplemented subjects took daily 150 mg Pycnogenol® + 450 mg Centellicum® for 6 months. Another comparable group of subjects using only standard management (SM) was included as a reference. RESULTS: Forty-five subjects with a mean age of 42 years completed the study, 25 in the supplemented group and 20 in the SM group. There were no safety problems or tolerability issues with the supplements. The two groups, SM and SM + Pycnogenol® + Centellicum® were comparable for age and clinical characteristics at inclusion. The two main ultrasound characteristics of cartilage, its thickness and surface-irregularity were more improved with the supplements. Pain scores, C reactive protein, the level of fitness and the use of extra pain killers (as rescue medication) were all significantly improved at 6 months with the supplement combination compared to SM (P<0.05). Plasma free radicals, pain-free walking distance on treadmill and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly improved with the supplements compared to SM. CONCLUSIONS: The morphological improvement - visible with ultrasound - correlates with a decrease in clinical symptoms and with a more efficient ambulation without pain. SM along with the Pycnogenol® Centellicum® combination are useful to avoid drug treatments that may expose patients to some side effects over time.
Asunto(s)
Flavonoides , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Extractos Vegetales , Humanos , Adulto , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Cartílago , Suplementos Dietéticos , DolorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This pilot study in post-stroke patients evaluated the effects of supplementation with Pycnogenol® on alterations in cognitive functions (COFU) over a period of 6 months, starting 4 weeks after the stroke. METHODS: The effects of supplementation - possibly acting on residual brain edema, on global cognitive function, attention and on mental performance - were studied. A control group used standard management (SM) and the other group added Pycnogenol®, 150 mg daily to SM. RESULTS: 38 post-stroke patients completed the 6-month-study, 20 in the Pycnogenol® group and 18 in the control group. No side effects were observed with the supplement. The tolerability was very good. The patients included into the two groups were comparable for age, sex and clinical distribution. There were 2 dropouts in the control group, due to non-medical problems. Main COFU parameters (assessed by a cognitive questionnaire) were significantly improved (all single items) with the supplement compared to controls (P<0.05). Additional observations indicate that Pycnogenol® patients experienced significantly less mini-accidents (including falls) than controls (P<0.05). The incidences of (minor) psychotic episodes or conflicts and distress and other problems including rare occurrence of minor hallucinations, were lower with the supplementation than in controls (P<0.05). Single observations concerning daily tasks indicated a better effect of Pycnogenol® compared to controls (P<0.05). Plasma free radicals also decreased significantly with the supplement in comparison to controls (P<0.05). Globally, supplemented subjects had a better recovery than controls. CONCLUSIONS: In post-stroke subjects, Pycnogenol® supplementation resulted in better recovery outcome and faster COFU 'normalization' after the stroke in comparison with SM; it can be considered a safe, manageable post-stroke, adjuvant management possibly reducing local brain edema. Nevertheless, more patients and a longer period of evaluation are needed to confirm these results.
Asunto(s)
Edema Encefálico , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Edema Encefálico/tratamiento farmacológico , Cognición , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología , Flavonoides/farmacología , Flavonoides/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this registry study was to evaluate the efficacy of Pycnogenol® in controlling signs/symptoms and temporary impairment of cognitive function (COFU) associated with jet lag. Previous flight studies have shown a decrease in the level of jet lag symptoms with Pycnogenol®. The control of jet lag signs/symptoms appeared to be correlated with flight-related microangiopathy and peripheral edema. Pycnogenol® - a standardized extract from the bark of French maritime pine - has significant antiedema, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. METHODS: A group of subjects flying east in economy class for 10-12 hours used Pycnogenol® 150 mg/day and a similar group without supplementation served as controls. A subgroup of mild hypertensive subjects using a single ACE inhibitor was also included. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven subjects completed the study. Of the participants, 48 were aviation professionals like pilots, flight attendants or air company staff - 24 of them took Pycnogenol® and 24 served as controls. Forty-seven study participants were frequent flyers and non-staff professionals, 25 of which took Pycnogenol® and 22 served as controls. In addition, a group of 32 subjects with mild hypertension was included, 16 took Pycnogenol® and 16 served as controls. No side effects and a good tolerability were observed. The registry groups were comparable for baseline characteristics. Eastbound flights' duration was 11.22±0.4 hours in supplemented subjects and 11.14±0.32 in controls. Dropouts were due to logistical problems. Post flight Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in all Pycnogenol® groups, including hypertensives for all signs and symptoms of jet lag compared to controls, showing prevention and improvement of jet lag symptoms. The duration of any sign/symptom of jet lag with Pycnogenol® intake was significantly shorter (P<0.05) post-flight compared to controls (P<0.05). The number of nights of altered/disturbed sleep was also lower in the Pycnogenol® groups compared to controls. Leg edema was present in almost all subjects with different degrees especially in the hypertensive group. The increase in ankle circumference before and after flight was significantly lower with Pycnogenol® compared to controls (P<0.05). After the flight, average scores of the single COFU tasks were significantly higher in the Pycnogenol® groups compared to controls, showing preserved cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in this registry study Pycnogenol® was effective in preventing jet lag-related symptoms and preserving cognitive functions without tolerability problems. These observations should be tested in a larger group of subjects including complex individuals prone to edema (i.e. diabetics, hypertensive or older patients).
Asunto(s)
Flavonoides , Hipertensión , Síndrome Jet Lag , Extractos Vegetales , Humanos , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Flavonoides/uso terapéutico , Flavonoides/administración & dosificación , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Síndrome Jet Lag/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Jet Lag/prevención & control , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Disfunción Cognitiva/prevención & control , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Sistema de Registros , FitoterapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the kinetics of response against SARS-CoV-2 elicited by vaccination and/or breakthrough infection (occurred after 3 doses of BNT162b2) in a cohort CVID patients. METHODS: We measured humoral and cellular immunity using quantitative anti-spike antibody (anti-S-IgG) and neutralization assay and specific interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) before and after the third or fourth dose of BNT162b2 and/or after COVID-19. RESULTS: In CVID, 58.3% seroconverted after 2 doses that increased to 77.8% after 3 doses. Between the second and third dose, there was a decline in humoral compartment that led to titers below the cutoff of 1:10 (MNA90%) in CVID. This was paralleled by a significantly lower proportion (30%) and reduced magnitude of the residual cellular response among CVID. The third dose achieved a lower titer of anti-S and nAb against the Wuhan strain than HC and significantly decreased the rate of those showing solely a positive neutralizing activity and those with simultaneous negativity of IGRA and nAbs; the differences in IGRA were overall reduced with respect to HC. At further sampling after breakthrough SARS-COV-2 infection, mostly in the omicron era, or fourth dose, 6 months after the last event, the residual nAb titer to Wuhan strain was still significantly higher in HC, while there was no significant difference of nAbs to BA.1. The rate of IGRA responders was 65.5% in CVID and 90.5% in HC (p=0.04), while the magnitude of response was similar. None of CVID had double negativity to nAbs and IGRA at the last sampling. CONCLUSION: This data shows an increase of adaptive immunity in CVID after mRNA vaccination in parallel to boosters, accrual number of exposures and formation of hybrid immunity.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacuna BNT162 , Formación de Anticuerpos , Pandemias , Vacunación , Anticuerpos , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Anticuerpos NeutralizantesRESUMEN
This article was published in Volume 69, issue 1 of publishing year 2023, with a mistake in Table I. The correct Table I is the one included in this erratum.