Practice Patterns for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in German Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious threat for cancer patients. Guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylaxis and treatment, but it is unknown to what extent specialists adhere to these recommendations. This survey assesses the current approach to patients with cancer-associated VTE in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent out to members of the DGHO (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Onkologie), the BNHO (Berufsverband Niedergelassener Hämatologen und Onkologen) and the DGP (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phlebologie). For most questions, more than 1 answer was possible; therefore, the total sum of percentages may exceed 100%. RESULTS: 275 specialists responded. 76% of them treat acute VTE with LMWH while 22% switch to oral treatments (vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs)) during the acute phase. For the next 3-6 months, 55% of the specialists continue LMWH, while 31% switch to VKAs and 33% to NOACs. Among those who continue LMWH for 3-6 months, 37% continue at the full dose, 26% reduce to 75% of the initial dose, and 40% even to 50%. Important factors guiding treatment decisions were the need for injections and the availability of a partner/spouse (LMWH), the need for laboratory controls (VKAs), and the number of other oral medications (NOACs). CONCLUSION: This survey reveals that practice patterns often do not follow the guideline recommendations with respect to the use of LMWH for long-term treatment of VTE in cancer patients.

Treatment of venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients in Germany: a prospective non-interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious threat for all cancer patients. This study was aimed to assess the VTE treatment of cancer patients in the ambulatory care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective non-interventional study, which includes ambulatory cancer patients from office-based oncologists. A standardized case report form was used to obtain data on patient characteristics, treatment regimens, duration of treatment, and side effects. RESULTS: Specialists from 34 centers included data from 76 patients. The median patient age was 62 years (range 33-81 years). The 4 most common cancer types were breast cancer (32%), colorectal cancer (18%), lymphoma and lung cancer (each 8%). 18% of the acute VTE cases were treated as inpatients, 80% as outpatients, and 99% with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH), or fondaparinux. After the acute phase, secondary prophylaxis with LMWH/UFH/fondaparinux was planned in 61% of the patients, with oral anticoagulation in 39%. During acute-phase treatment and secondary prophylaxis, no patient had recurrent VTE. 4 patients (5%) experienced minor bleedings. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that many ambulatory cancer patients with VTE have early tumors, no metastases, and an excellent performance score. Most patients receive LMWHs for secondary prophylaxis, as recommended by the national and international guidelines. Still, a relevant percentage is switched to oral anticoagulants. © 2015 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.