Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 16: 4, 2016 Jan 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26747793

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) variability is associated with target organ damage in hypertension and diabetes. The 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24 h-ABPM) has been proposed as an evaluation for BP variability using several indexes [standard deviation (SD) of mean BP, coefficient of variation (CV), BP variation over time (time-rate index)]. METHODS: We evaluated the association between BP variability measured by 24 h-ABPM indexes and echocardiographic variables in a cross-sectional study in 305 diabetic-hypertensive patients. RESULTS: Two groups were defined by the median (0.55 mmHg/min) of time-rate systolic BP (SBP) index and classified as low or high variability. Age was 57.3 ± 6.2 years, 196 (64.3%) were female. Diabetes duration was 10.0 (5.0-16.2) years, HbA1c was 8.2 ± 1.9%. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between low (n = 148) and high (n = 157) variability groups. Office SBP and systolic 24 h-ABPM were higher in the high variability group (139.9 mmHg vs 146.0 mmHg, P = 0.006; 128.3 mmHg vs 132.9 mmHg, P = 0.019, respectively). Time-rate index, SD and CV of SBP, were higher in high variability group (P < 0.001; P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Time-rate index was not independently associated with the echocardiography's variables in multiple linear model when adjusting for age, 24 h-ABPM, diabetes duration and HbA1c. The multiple linear regression model revealed that the significant and independent determinants for septum thickness, relative wall thickness and posterior wall thickness (parameters of left ventricular hypertrophy) were: age (p = 0.025; p = 0.010; p = 0.032, respectively) and 24 h-SBP (p < 0.001 in the three parameters). CONCLUSION: BP variability estimated by 24 h-ABPM is not independently associated with echocardiographic parameters in diabetic-hypertensive patients.


Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología
2.
J Diabetes ; 6(6): 586-94, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24460859

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted among individuals with diabetes and hypertension in order to assess the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) and the association between ED and cardiovascular risk variables such as echocardiographic changes. METHODS: We evaluated 114 men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. ED was assessed by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score. Clinical and laboratory variables were evaluated, including C-reactive protein (CRP), ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), ankle brachial index (ABI) and transthoracic echocardiography. Comparisons between patients with ED (IIEF-5 < 22) and without ED (IIEF-5 ≥ 22) were performed. RESULTS: Patients were 56.8 ± 5.7 years-old, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 150.7 ± 19.5 mmHg and 85.4 ± 11.4 mmHg, respectively, and HbA1c was 8.0 ± 1.7%. The majority (74.6%) of patients had ED. Levels of CRP, ABPM values and ABI were similar between men with and without ED. Echocardiography variables related to cardiac chamber diameters, left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function were similar between groups, except there was a slight lower left ventricular ejection fraction in men with ED (64.9 ± 7.3 vs 68.1 ± 3.9%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In high cardiovascular risk hypertensive individuals with type 2 diabetes, ED is highly prevalent as expected, but its presence is associated with neither echocardiographic variables, nor other cardiovascular risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Disfunción Eréctil/epidemiología , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Presión Sanguínea , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Eréctil/complicaciones , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...