Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
1.
JVS Vasc Sci ; 4: 100116, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37496886

RESUMEN

Objective: Left subclavian artery (LSA)-branched endografts with retrograde inner branch configuration (thoracic branch endoprosthesis [TBE]) offer a complete endovascular solution when LSA preservation is required during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair. However, the hemodynamic consequences of the TBE have not been well-investigated. We compared near-wall hemodynamic parameters before and after the TBE implantation using computational fluid dynamic simulations. Methods: Eleven patients who had undergone TBE implantation were included. Three-dimensional aortic arch geometries were constructed from the pre- and post-TBE implantation computed tomography images. The resulting 22 three-dimensional aortic arch geometries were then discretized into finite element meshes for computational fluid dynamic simulations. Inflow boundary conditions were prescribed using normal physiological pulsatile circulation. Outlet boundary conditions consisted of Windkessel models with previously published values. Blood flow, modeled as Newtonian fluid, simulations were performed with rigid wall assumptions using SimVascular's incompressible Navier-Stokes solver. We compared well-established hemodynamic descriptors: pressure, flow rate, time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), the oscillatory shear index (OSI), and percent area with an OSI of >0.2. Data were presented on the stented portion of the LSA. Results: TBE implantation was associated with a small decrease in peak LSA pressure (153 mm Hg; interquartile range [IQR], 151-154 mm Hg vs 159 mm Hg; IQR, 158-160 mm Hg; P = .005). No difference was observed in peak LSA flow rates before and after implantation: 40.4 cm3/ (IQR, 39.5-41.6 cm3/s) vs 41.3 cm3/s (IQR, 37.2-44.8 cm3/s; P = .59). There was a significant postimplantation increase in TAWSS (15.2 dynes/cm2 [IQR, 12.2-17.7 dynes/cm2] vs 6.2 dynes/cm2 [IQR, 5.7-10.3 dynes/cm2]; P = .003), leading to decreases in both the OSI (0.088 [IQR, 0.063 to -0.099] vs 0.1 [IQR, 0.096-0.16]; P = .03) and percentage of area with an OSI of >0.2 (10.4 [IQR, 5.8-15.8] vs 15.7 [IQR, 10.7-31.9]; P = .13). Neither LSA side branch angulation (median, 81°, IQR, 77°-109°) nor moderate compression (16%-58%) seemed to have an impact on the pressure, flow rate, TAWSS, or percentage of area with an OSI of >0.2 in the stented LSA. Conclusions: The implantation of TBE produces modest hemodynamic disturbances that are unlikely to result in clinically relevant changes.

2.
Eur Heart J Open ; 2(2): oeac019, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35919116

RESUMEN

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor or aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods and results: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched to identify randomized trials comparing monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor versus aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with ASCVD (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or peripheral artery disease). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding. A random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) and heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the Higgins I2 value. A total of 9 eligible trials (5 with clopidogrel and 4 with ticagrelor) with 61 623 patients were included in our analyses. Monotherapy with P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of MACE by 11% (0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.95, I2 = 0%) and MI by 19% (0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92, I2 = 0%) compared with aspirin monotherapy. There was no significant difference in the risk of stroke (0.85, 95% CI 0.73-1.01), or all-cause mortality (1.01, 95% CI 0.92-1.11). There was also no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared with aspirin (0.94, 95% CI 0.72-1.22, I2 = 42.6%). Results were consistent irrespective of the P2Y12 inhibitor used. Conclusion: P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy for secondary prevention is associated with a significant reduction in atherothrombotic events compared with aspirin alone without an increased risk of major bleeding.

3.
Vasc Specialist Int ; 38: 16, 2022 Jun 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35748179

RESUMEN

Purpose: Large studies have demonstrated improved survival outcomes with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) at two and five years compared to medical therapy; however, early TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate trends and clinical predictors of hospital readmissions in patients undergoing medical management and TEVAR for acute TBADs. Materials and Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for all 30-day and 90-day index readmissions (30D-IR and 90D-IR, respectively) after a diagnosis of a TBAD from January 2012 to September 2015. Data on readmission diagnosis, patient demographics, and hospital characteristics were collected from readmitted patients and analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of readmission after TEVAR or medical medical management of TBAD. Results: We identified 53,117 patients with acute TBAD. Medical management was the initial treatment modality in 46,985 (88.4%) patients, while 6,132 (11.5%) underwent TEVAR. Factors including older patient age, lower household income, severity of comorbidities, initial hospital length of stay, and urgent procedure demonstrated an increased likelihood of experiencing 30D-IR and 90D-IR (P<0.05). The rate of unplanned readmission for patients undergoing medical management remained stable (11.3% vs. 10.0% for 30D-IR; 19.1% vs. 15.5% for 90D-IR). Reasons for unplanned readmission in the TEVAR cohort were largely related to technical complications. There was no significant difference in readmission costs between medical management and TEVAR. Conclusion: Number of unplanned readmissions in the TEVAR arm decreased significantly over time, whereas the number of readmissions for medical management remained stable.

4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 70: 171-180, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866573

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Identifying fragile aortas that are more likely to lead to adverse clinical outcomes would provide surgeons with a better sense of how to balance the risks of surgical versus medical management in patients with type B dissections. We examine the progression of a type B dissection into a type A dissection in a patient and analyze changes in the Gaussian surface curvature distribution, as well as the response of the stress distribution at the lesser curve in response to pressurization. We hypothesize that examining the Gaussian curvature will provide us with a link between aortic surface geometry and the stress distribution, which is crucial to understanding the process driving aortic dissection. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of a patient before and after the type A dissection are obtained. These are segmented in Simpleware ScanIP. Centerline curvatures are calculated on segmented models in ScanIP. Models are then pressurized in the finite element analysis software Abaqus. The Gaussian curvature is calculated by exporting segmentations into the computational program Matlab and applying a modified previously published algorithm. RESULTS: The centerlines generated in ScanIP fail to capture the change in the acuity of the lesser curve before and after the type A dissection. Instead, Gaussian curvature analysis shows that the curvature distribution before the type A dissection is much wider compared with the distribution after the type A dissection. In addition, analyzing the stress distribution in response to pressurization reveals that before the type A dissection there is a large divergence in the principal stress vectors at the lesser curve but this transitions to a more uniform hoop stress after the type A dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrates that Gaussian surface curvature analysis captures changes in aortic geometry that are otherwise silent in centerline curvature analysis. Here, we show that as the aorta develops a type A dissection it is able to more smoothly handle the hoop stress at the lesser curve compared with the stress focusing seen in the before type A geometry. We propose that the geometric focusing before type A creates a higher energy stress state, which is relaxed on retrograde dissection. Thus, Gaussian curvature analysis may provide a window to capture underlying geometric instability in type B dissections.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Imagenología Tridimensional , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/fisiopatología , Aorta Torácica/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/fisiopatología , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Modelación Específica para el Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de Casos Únicos como Asunto
5.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 55(1): 33-38, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33030116

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) created Objective Performance Goals (OPGs) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in 2009. It was previously shown that endovascular therapy for CLI was not meeting these benchmarks. The OPG for all peripheral interventions is <8% for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), <8% for major adverse limb events (MALE), and <3% for major amputation. The goal of this study is to evaluate if outcomes have improved for CLI in recent years, specifically 2015-2018. METHODS: The Targeted Vascular Module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried to identify patients who underwent endovascular intervention for critical limb ischemia from 2011-2018. Cohorts were divided into 2011-2014 and 2015-2018. Primary 30-day outcomes were MACE, MALE, and major amputation. Univariate analyses were performed using the Fisher's exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Multivariate analysis comparing groups was performed using inverse probability weights and trend over time analysis was performed using logistic regression with year of intervention as a continuous variable. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 7,168 patients underwent an endovascular intervention for CLI. 28% were classified as "OPG high anatomic risk," and 17% were classified as "OPG high clinical risk." The 2015-2018 cohort vs. the 2011-14 cohort experienced MACE in 3.3% vs. 2.7% (p = .23), MALE in 9.1% vs. 8.9% (p = 0.83), and amputation in 4.0% vs. 4.2% (p = 0.71). When only high anatomic risk patients were considered (n = 1988), MACE was experienced in 2.4% vs. 2.2% (p = 0.87), MALE by 9.5% vs. 10.6% (p = 0.47) and amputation by 5.1% vs. 6.0% (p = 0.40). When only high clinical risk patients were considered (n = 1224), MACE was experienced in 5.2% vs. 3.9% (p = 0.33), MALE by 8.0% vs. 7.4% (p = 0.74) and amputation by 3.9% vs. 3.7% (p = 0.88). Comparing 2015-2018 to the reference 2011-2014, MALE adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.99, 95% CI [0.83-1.18], MACE AOR = 1.19 95% CI [0.88-1.60], and major amputation AOR = 0.91 95% CI [0.70-1.17]. There were no decreases in the trend over time for MALE (AOR per year 0.97, CI [.94-1.02], major amputation (AOR per year: 0.97, CI [0.91-1.03], nor for MACE (AOR per year: 1.05, CI [.98-1.13]). CONCLUSION: Outcomes following endovascular interventions for CLI continue to underperform when compared to OPG benchmarks for MALE and amputations. There is no decrease over time for these target outcomes. Target MACE events remain acceptable despite the increasing clinical complexity of patients being treated.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking/normas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/normas , Isquemia/cirugía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/normas , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica/normas , Enfermedad Crítica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/mortalidad , Recuperación del Miembro/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
6.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(1): 195-202, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33340696

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The current Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines recommend carotid revascularization for asymptomatic disease in patients with at least a 3-year life expectancy and stenosis >60% when the expected perioperative stroke and death rate is <3%. Based on this recommendation, it was previously determined that asymptomatic patients who require dialysis would not meet the perioperative stroke and death thresholds nor the long-term survival benchmarks to justify carotid surgery. To determine whether carotid surgery for patients requiring dialysis is appropriate, the present study compared the perioperative outcomes after carotid revascularization for dialysis-dependent patients relative to nondialysis patients in a contemporary, national cohort. METHODS: The targeted vascular module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients who undergone carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting for asymptomatic carotid disease from 2011 to 2018. The cohort was categorized as requiring or not requiring dialysis. The primary 30-day outcomes included mortality and the composite of stroke/death and stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI). Univariate analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariable analyses were used to assess the independent associations of the estimated glomerular filtration rate and dialysis dependence with the stroke/death rate. RESULTS: A total of 17,579 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 226 (1.3%) required dialysis at revascularization. No difference was found in the degree of severe stenosis (80%-99%) demonstrated by 69% of the dialysis cohort and 72% of the nondialysis cohort (P = .9). Of the dialysis and nondialysis cohorts, 5% and 3.6% underwent carotid artery stenting (P = .3). The dialysis-dependent patients were younger (68 vs 71 years; P < .001) and were more likely to have insulin-dependent diabetes (47% vs 12%; P < .001), congestive heart failure (8.4% vs 1.4%; P < .001), and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15% vs 10%; P = .03). In the dialysis and nondialysis cohort, 2 (0.9%) and 88 (0.5%) patients died (P = .3); 4 (1.8%) and 247 (1.4%) experienced strokes (P = .6); and 3 (1.3%) and 185 (1.1%) patients experienced MI (P = .5), respectively. The composite outcomes of stroke/death and stroke/death/MI was 2.2% (n = 5) and 1.8% (n = 319; P = .6) and 3.5% (n = 8) and 2.8% (n = 479; P = .4) in the dialysis and nondialysis cohorts, respectively. After multivariable analysis, neither the estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01; P = .26) nor dialysis dependence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-1.57; P = .13) was independently associated with the composite outcome of stroke/death. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day carotid revascularization outcomes for asymptomatic disease in dialysis-dependent patients met the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines in this national cohort and might be better than previously surmised. Hence, vascular surgeons could consider carotid revascularization for select dialysis-dependent patients with the appropriate expected longevity and perioperative risk.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/mortalidad , Endarterectomía Carotidea/normas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Surg Res ; 255: 124-129, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32543377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is currently limited data assessing the long-term consequences of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in otherwise healthy aortic segments remote from the site of endograft coverage. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate aortic remodeling and long-term outcomes of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) patients treated with TEVAR. Our hypothesis is that significant changes to the aorta proximal to the graft-covered segment are suspected following TEVAR. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI at a level I trauma center from 2004 to 2018 was performed. Forty-six patients were identified and of these, 32 patients with high-resolution computed tomographic angiography imaging follow-up were included in the study. Computed tomographic angiography measurements of aortic dimensions and branch vessels proximal, distal, and adjacent to the stent grafted segment were recorded preprocedure and postprocedure and analyzed. Primary device-related outcomes such as birdbeaking, mural thrombus, stent migration, and persistent endoleak were assessed. Patient outcomes including mortality, graft-related morbidity, and need for secondary interventions were also analyzed. RESULTS: Mean follow-up of the selected patients in the study was 1.52 y (range, 0.06-8.0 y). Following TEVAR, the ascending aortic length increased significantly (mean 5.7 ± 4.6 mm, P < 0.001). The mean diameters of the ascending aorta (1.5 ± 1.5, P < 0.001 mm), the midaortic arch (1.3 ± 1.7 mm, P < 0.001), and proximal and the distal endograft landing zones (1.9 ± 2.1 mm and 2.2 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, P < 0.001) also increased significantly following TEVAR. Clinically relevant device-related outcomes occurred with the presence of endograft infolding and subsequent development of endograft mural thrombus (P < 0.001). The need for secondary intervention following TEVAR for BTAI was associated with endograft mural thrombus (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR for BTAI causes significant geometric changes in the aorta proximal to the stented grafted segment of the aorta. Direct consequences of the graft at the stented segment includes mural thrombus development within the endograft which was associated with the need for secondary intervention. Although clinical significance is yet to be determined, post-TEVAR changes in aortic architecture warrant continued aortic surveillance following BTAI.


Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica/lesiones , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Remodelación Vascular , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/patología , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents/efectos adversos , Rigidez Vascular , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/patología , Heridas no Penetrantes/patología , Adulto Joven
8.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 66: 434-441, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31923593

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the procedure of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). It has been previously reported that significant percentage of patients were being readmitted to another hospital after complications after EVAR. We aimed to evaluate trends and clinical predictors of readmission to another (secondary) hospital after index EVAR. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried for all 30-day readmissions after an index EVAR procedure from 2012 to 2014. Readmission diagnosis, patient demographics, and hospital characteristics were collected regarding those patients who were admitted to another care facility after EVAR. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors for readmission to a different hospital. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2014, 3,215 patients were readmitted to another hospital within 30 days of their index EVAR constituting 22.8% of a total 14,073 readmissions during that time period. Comorbidities of patients examined were similar between those patients readmitted to the primary hospital versus the secondary hospital except for the incidence of hypothyroidism (P < 0.001). Higher proportion of patients admitted to a different hospital had Medicare and Medicaid insurance (P < 0.047). In addition, higher proportion of patients readmitted to secondary hospitals had EVAR performed at smaller (<100 beds) hospitals (P = 0.002). Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients readmitted to another hospital were slightly older and had higher index length of stay and higher index hospital cost after EVAR (P < 0.001). In a multivariate model, index EVAR at a small hospital (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7) and the diagnosis of hypothyroidism (OR: 1.54) were independent determinants of readmission to another care facility. CONCLUSIONS: Significant proportion of patients is being readmitted elsewhere after elective EVAR adding complexity to the determination of appropriate healthcare resource allocation. In our study, index EVAR at a small hospital (<100 beds) and pre-existing medical comorbidity of hypothyroidism were significant predictors for unanticipated readmission to a different hospital.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/tendencias , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Humanos , Hipotiroidismo/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
9.
J Vasc Surg ; 70(5): 1603-1611, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147138

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the preferred method for addressing abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), with proven reduction in perioperative morbidity and mortality. There are, however limited data examining the readmissions after EVAR that are associated with increased patient morbidity and cost. As EVAR use continues its dominance in the management of AAAs, it becomes imperative to identify and mitigate risk factors associated with unplanned hospital readmissions. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried for all 30-day readmissions after an index EVAR procedure from 2012 to 2014. Preoperative patient demographics, hospital characteristics, readmission diagnosis, and costs were compared between those who were and were not readmitted within 30 days of the index operation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify potential risk factors associated with unplanned readmissions within 30 days. RESULTS: We identified 120,646 patients who underwent an EVAR from 2012 to 2014 in the United States. The overall unplanned readmission rate during this period was 11.6% (n = 14,073) within 30 days of the index EVAR procedure. The readmission rate was the highest in 2012, with a rate of 12.3% (P = .02). Multivariate regression analysis showed that EVAR readmissions were significantly higher in patients who were of younger age (18 to 49 years) compared with other age groups (odds ratio [OR], 1.9-2.17; P < .001), female sex (OR, 1.367; P < .001), had Medicare (OR, 1.39) or Medicaid (OR, 1.25) insurance, or a combination of these. Underlying patient comorbidities significantly associated with readmissions included congestive heart failure (OR, 2.4), peripheral vascular disease (OR, 1.1), chronic pulmonary disease (OR, 1.2), cancer with no metastasis (OR, 1.5), metastatic cancer (OR, 2.2), renal failure (OR, 1.8), and diabetes (OR, 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: The trend in 30-day readmission rates after EVAR has decreased slightly since 2012, but overall rates are at 11.6%, which is not insubstantial. Patient factors strongly associated with hospital readmission were younger age and patient comorbidities, including congestive heart failure, concurrent cancer diagnosis, renal failure, and diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
J Surg Oncol ; 120(3): 494-500, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31222842

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cancer is strongly associated with thrombosis. We investigated early postoperative venous thromboembolism (PVTE) mortality among patients with pancreatic surgery and compared outcomes in adenocarcinoma pancreatic cancer (ACPC) to non-adenocarcinoma pancreatic neoplasm (NACPN). METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent pancreatic cancer or neoplasm-related surgery. As NACPN is underrepresented in other studies, we selected NACPN patients and a random sample of ACPC patients. PVTE was defined as VTE occurring within 3 months of surgical intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 441 pancreatic surgery patients were included, with 331 ACPC and 110 NACPN. Median follow-up was 449 days during which 90 (20.4%) patients developed VTE. PVTE occurred in 53 (12.0%) patients, including 41 (12.4%) ACPC patients and 12 (10.9%) NACPN patients. Those with PVTE had 60% higher mortality rate. A multivariable analysis found that PVTE is an independent predictor of increased mortality (HR Adj, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2; P < .01). The mortality impact was not consistent between ACPC (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3-7.9) and NACPN groups (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.8). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative venous thromboembolism is an independent predictor of increased mortality in pancreatic surgery, specifically in adenocarcinoma pancreatic cancer surgery.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidad , Anciano , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/sangre , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/sangre , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tromboembolia Venosa/patología , Tromboembolia Venosa/fisiopatología
11.
J Surg Res ; 240: 124-129, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30928769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess cost differences between patients who underwent percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (PEVAR) and open surgical femoral exposure in elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-approved single center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent elective EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms from 2009 to 2016 was performed. One hundred patients were selected with 50 patients who underwent PEVAR and 50 patients who underwent open surgical femoral exposure. Patient demographics, procedural variables, and hospital outcomes were collected and compared. Primary outcomes assessed used in cost calculations included operating time (OR time), hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit stay (ICU LOS). Extrapolated cost differences were based on known, published cost multipliers for the primary outcomes observed. RESULTS: Patients undergoing PEVAR had significant reduction in mean OR time (113.9 min versus 144.9 min, P < 0.001), mean ICU LOS (19.7 h versus 28.9 h, P = 0.094), and overall LOS (28.3 h versus 33.1 h, P = 0.020). There was no statistically significant difference in access related complications, although there was a trend toward less complication rates with PEVAR (0% versus 5%, P = 0.056). Calculated cost of procedures based on mean ICU LOS, hospital LOS, and OR time, showed significant reduction in mean hospital costs with PEVAR ($16,628.5 versus $21,705.8, P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated an overall 23% cost reduction with PEVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Prior reports comparing PEVAR versus EVAR with open femoral exposures have shown improvement in overall patient time to ambulation and other hospital metrics such as LOS with PEVAR. There is, however, a paucity of overall cost comparison data regarding PEVAR. In this study, adoption of PEVAR was seen to significantly reduce OR times (19%) and overall hospital LOS (50%). The outcomes observed ultimately translated into significant reduction in hospital costs.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivos de Cierre Vascular/economía
12.
J Vasc Surg ; 70(1): 92-101.e1, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30611580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an accepted approach for patients presenting with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) and suitable anatomy. The effect of anesthesia modality on mortality outcomes in rAAA has not been well described. Using the Vascular Quality Initiative database, this study compares local anesthesia (LA) vs general anesthesia (GA) in EVAR for rAAA. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for patients presenting with rAAA managed with open surgical repair, EVAR under LA (rEVAR-LA), and EVAR under GA (rEVAR-GA) between 2003 and 2017. Patients were observed until the earlier end point of either death or 1-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier event rates are presented at 30 days and 1 year. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model risk of death, with adjustment for demographic and clinical factors. Additional multivariate Cox hazards analyses were used to assess effect modifiers for 1-year mortality for the different repair methods. RESULTS: A total of 3330 patients (77.4% male) met the inclusion criteria (1594 [47.9%] open surgical repair, 226 [6.8%] rEVAR-LA, and 1510 [45.3%] rEVAR-GA). Patients treated with rEVAR-LA compared with rEVAR-GA had decreased intraoperative time, number of intraoperative blood transfusions, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intensive care unit length of stay, and postoperative pulmonary complications. Mortality rates with rEVAR-LA were lower compared with rEVAR-GA at 30 days (15.5% vs 23.3%; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.99; P = .04) and at 1 year (22.5% vs 32.3%; AHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96; P = .02). Patients undergoing EVAR who were <75 years old and those without preoperative hypotension had the greatest survival benefit from LA compared with GA (both factors: AHR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.03-0.57]; single factor: AHR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.36-0.91]). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that rEVAR-LA for rAAA may be a safe alternative to rEVAR-GA for certain patients, with lower morbidity and improved mortality. Further prospective study is warranted to confirm mortality benefit in rEVAR-LA for rAAA.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Anestesia Local , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/mortalidad , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Anestesia Local/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Vasa ; 48(1): 65-71, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30326793

RESUMEN

Although management paradigms for certain arterial trauma, such as aortic injuries, have moved towards an endovascular approach, the application of endovascular techniques for the treatment of peripheral arterial injuries continues to be debated. In the realm of peripheral vascular trauma, popliteal arterial injuries remain a devastating condition with significant rates of limb loss. Expedient management is essential and surgical revascularization has been the gold standard. Initial clinical assessment of vascular injury is aided by readily available imaging techniques such as duplex ultrasonography and high resolution computed tomographic angiography. Conventional catheter based angiography, however, remain the gold standard in the determination of vascular injury. There are limited data examining the outcomes of endovascular techniques to address popliteal arterial injuries. In this review, we examine the imaging modalities and current approaches and data regarding endovascular techniques for the management popliteal arterial trauma.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Angiografía , Humanos , Arteria Poplítea , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 57: 170-173, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30500649

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Insurance coverage of vascular surgery patients may differ from patients with less chronic surgical pathologies. The goal of this study is to identify trends in insurance status of vascular surgery patients over the last 10 years at a busy academic center. METHODS: All consecutive patient visits for a vascular procedure from 2006 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected institutional database. Data points included insurance status, procedures performed, and date of admission. The insurance status was categorized as Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured. Samples were divided between 2006-2009 and 2011-2016 for comparison. Unpaired t-test, chi-squared test, and regression analysis were used to determine significant trends over the study period. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2016, 6,007 vascular surgery procedures were performed. Procedure volume increased significantly from 1,309 to 4,698 between the 2 timeframes (P < 0.05), whereas the percentage of Medicaid and Medicare patients trended upward but did not achieve significance. There was a significant decrease in the percentage of uninsured patients between the cohorts (5.65% vs. 2.96%, P < 0.05). In 2012, 10.14% of patients were uninsured compared with 2.56% in 2016 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Insurance status affects access to care and subsequent outcomes. In our busy academic center, insurance coverage for vascular surgery has significantly increased over the past decade. The number of Medicaid and Medicare patients has slowly increased, but a significant and continuing decline in uninsured patients was observed. Implementation of the Affordable Care Act during this time period may have played a role in providing coverage for patient needing vascular surgery.


Asunto(s)
Beneficios del Seguro/tendencias , Cobertura del Seguro/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Medicaid/tendencias , Pacientes no Asegurados , Medicare/tendencias , Práctica Asociada/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Beneficios del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Medicaid/economía , Medicare/economía , Práctica Asociada/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economía
15.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 29(1): e9-e11, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30395046

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS), also known as celiac artery compression syndrome, is characterized by postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss thought to be secondary to compression of the celiac artery ganglia by the median arcuate ligament (MAL). METHODS: A young female powerlifter presented with a 3-month history of postprandial epigastric pain and involuntary weight loss following the start of a vigorous weightlifting program. The diagnosis of MALS was established after excluding other possibilities and by detailed evaluation including magnetic resonance imaging and celiac plexus block. She was treated by laparoscopic MAL release. RESULTS: The patient experienced immediate and complete cessation of her pain. She has continued to be asymptomatic at 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy weightlifting may potentially lead to MALS. The laparoscopic approach to MAL release can be utilized to treat this condition with favorable results.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio/etiología , Levantamiento de Peso/lesiones , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Síndrome del Ligamento Arcuato Medio/cirugía , Periodo Posprandial , Volver al Deporte , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
16.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 4(2): 76-79, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29942887

RESUMEN

We report the case of a 44-year-old woman who developed an acute type B aortic dissection caused by an entry tear from an aneurysmal left common iliac artery that extended retrograde to the proximal descending thoracic aorta. She experienced refractory chest pain despite optimal medical management, thereby indicating repair. Endovascular aortic repair was subsequently performed. Intraoperatively, fibromuscular dysplasia was diagnosed by the characteristic appearance of her renal arteries. The patient tolerated the procedure and had resolution of her chest pain. In summary, we present a highly unusual case of type B aortic dissection resulting from a retrograde common iliac artery tear in a patient with fibromuscular dysplasia.

17.
J Surg Res ; 229: 177-185, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29936987

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence has shown that women derive less benefit from endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in large part due to more challenging aortoiliac anatomy. This study sought to examine whether sex-dependent outcomes exist following elective EVAR cases. METHODS: An institutional retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent elective EVAR procedures between 2008 and 2014. Outcome data collected included procedural and hospital morbidity, mortality, and overall EVAR durability based on the incidence of unplanned graft-related secondary interventions (SIs) (e.g., open conversion, proximal or distal extensions, and coil embolizations). RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients (150 men, 31 women) met the study inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 40.3 mo. Women had more challenging anatomy compared to men including smaller overall iliac diameters (6.8 mm versus 8.0 mm, P < 0.001) and more severe iliac angulation (77% moderate to severe versus 44%, P < 0.001). Women had increased risk of postoperative complications compared to men (41.9% versus 11.3%, P = 0.003). There was no perioperative mortality in our series of elective EVAR cases. Median 5-y survival following EVAR was 64.4% for men and 76.3% for women (P = 0.599). Late SI rates following EVAR was 10.5% with 16 (10.7%) men and 3 (9.7%) women needing interventions (P = 0.870). Overall durability of EVAR extrapolated as time to SIs was 91% at 2 y and 85% at 5 y. Factors predisposing SIs were iliac tortuosity (P = 0.046), aortic neck angle (P = 0.022), and endoleak at the follow-up (P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, immediate outcomes following EVAR were different between men and women, with women having increased rates of postoperative complications. Mortality and overall long-term durability of EVAR, however, were the same between sexes despite anatomical differences. EVAR durability was significantly dependent on the severity of iliac tortuosity, aortic neck angulation, and presence of endoleak at the follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Injerto Vascular/métodos
18.
J Vasc Surg ; 65(1): 257-261, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27743805

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2014, we published a series of articles in the Journal of Vascular Surgery that detailed the decrease in volume of open aneurysm repair (OAR) completed for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by vascular surgery trainees. At that time, only data points from 2000 through 2011 were available, and reliable predictions could only be made through 2015. Lack of data on endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using fenestrated (FEVAR) and branched (BrEVAR) endografts also affected our findings. Despite these limitations, our predictions for OAR completed by vascular trainees were accurate for 2012 to 2014. This report uses updated data points through 2014 in conjunction with data on FEVAR and BrEVAR obtained from industry to predict trends in OAR and how it will affect vascular surgery training through 2020. METHODS: An S-curve modified logistic function was used to model the effect of introducing new technologies (EVAR, FEVAR, BrEVAR) on the standard management of AAA with OAR starting in the year 2000, similar to the technique that we have previously described. Weighted samples and data from the United States Census Bureau were used in conjunction with volume estimates derived from the National Inpatient Sample, State Inpatient Databases, and industry sources to determine trends in OAR and EVAR. The number of cases completed at teaching hospitals was calculated using the National Inpatient Sample, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs were used to forecast the number of cases completed by vascular surgery trainees through 2020. Sensitivity analysis and trend analysis were completed. RESULTS: Approximately 45,000 AAA repairs are completed annually in the United States, but only 15% of these are now completed using OAR compared with >50% just a decade ago. Further, with the accelerating adoption of FEVAR and BrEVAR, and expanding indications for standard EVAR, our model predicts that <3000 OARs will be completed annually by 2020. Because only a subset of these cases are completed at teaching institutions, our model predicts that a vascular surgery trainee in a fellowship program will complete only one to two OARs, whereas trainees in a 0+5 program may complete two to three OARs. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial prediction in the 2014 report was that vascular trainees would complete approximately five OARs by 2020. After incorporating new data on BrEVAR, FEVAR, and the accelerating pace of EVAR use between 2012 and 2014, it now appears that vascular trainees will complete one to three OARs during their training.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/educación , Internado y Residencia , Cirujanos/educación , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/tendencias , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Bases de Datos Factuales , Difusión de Innovaciones , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Curva de Aprendizaje , Modelos Logísticos , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Cirujanos/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
19.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 38: 310-314, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27531085

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) are associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Advances in DVT prophylaxis over the past decade have led to a decrease in DVT-related morbidity, but gender, racial, and other demographic factors that contribute to a higher risk of DVT are incompletely characterized. This study aimed to determine the incidence of DVT over the past decade and identify factors that were associated with an increased risk of DVT. METHODS: Patients who underwent TKR or THR between 2001 and 2011 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. For patients who developed a DVT, their demographics (including age, gender, and race), comorbidities, and subsequent outcomes (including length of stay [LOS] and mortality) were determined. Differences between patients who developed a DVT and those who did not were determined using multivariate regression analysis. A Mann-Kendall analysis was done to evaluate all trends. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2011, a total of 1.1 million patients underwent TKR, and 550,000 underwent THR. The overall incidence of DVT decreased for TKR from 0.86% in 2001 to 0.45% in 2011 and decreased for THR from 0.55% to 0.24% for the same period. Patients who developed a DVT after TKR were older (67.7 vs. 66.8, P < 0.001); more likely to be African American (P < 0.001); and more likely to have significant comorbidities including congestive heart failure, peripheral artery disease, and end-stage renal disease. Findings were similar for patients who developed a DVT after THR. Mortality was significantly greater for patients who developed a DVT (0.4% for TKR and 1.7% for THR), with an almost double LOS. CONCLUSIONS: A focus on DVT prophylaxis may have decreased national rates of DVT after TKR and THR. Older patients, African Americans, and patients with more comorbidities appear to be especially at risk for DVT. Mortality is almost 4 to 8 times higher for patients with DVT, and LOS is double. A focus on DVT prophylaxis and perhaps more aggressive management of the at-risk population may further help decrease the rate of DVT.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Negro o Afroamericano , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/mortalidad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/mortalidad
20.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 39: 284.e5-284.e10, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27531091

RESUMEN

Numerous case reports have highlighted the relationship between bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy and development of systemic mycotic aneurysms but none have established a management algorithm in patients with suspected vascular dissemination of Mycobacterium bovis. Delay in diagnosis of this disease process will lead to delays in initiation of antimycobacterium treatment to prevent dissemination into other arterial beds and potentially complicate effective surgical treatment leading to aneurysmal rupture and other devastating vascular consequences. Given the increasing number of reported cases in the literature and the ongoing, standard of care utilization of BCG for bladder cancer, we believe that a systematic approach to the management of patients with suspected BCG-related mycotic aneurysms should be set in place to prevent misdiagnosis and delays in treatment. In this report, we discuss the presentation, work-up, and report our treatment algorithm of a patient who developed diffuse peripheral mycotic aneurysms following BCG therapy for bladder cancer.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Aneurisma Infectado/terapia , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Vacuna BCG/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Vías Clínicas , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Mycobacterium bovis/aislamiento & purificación , Tuberculosis Cardiovascular/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravesical , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BCG/administración & dosificación , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis Cardiovascular/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Cardiovascular/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...