Are Surgical Outcomes Different According to Baseline Balance Status in Elderly Patients with Degenerative Sagittal Imbalance?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare surgical outcomes according to baseline balance statuses in elderly patients with degenerative sagittal imbalance (DSI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Although optimal sagittal correction has been emphasized for good surgical outcomes, the effect of the state of preoperative balance on surgical outcome has been adequately described at present. METHODS: Patients aged ≥60 years with DSI who underwent ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum were included. Among them, only those who postoperatively achieved the optimal age-adjusted pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) target were included in this study. Study participants were divided into two groups according to their preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA): compensatory balance (SVA <5 cm, group CB) and decompensation (SVA ≥5 cm, group D). Comparisons between the two groups were performed using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the independent t- test or Wilcoxon rank- sum test for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients whose postoperative sagittal alignment matched the age-adjusted PI-LL target constituted the study cohort. There were 59 patients in group CB and 97 patients in group D. Mean follow-up duration was 50.0 months after surgery. Immediate postoperatively, sacral slope and SVA were significantly greater in group D than in group CB. At last follow-up, the SVA was significantly greater in group D than in group CB (43.6 vs. 22.7 mm), while no significant differences were found in other sagittal parameters. The Oswestry disability index and Scoliosis Research Society -22 scores at the last follow-up were significantly worse in group D than in group CB. CONCLUSION: The SVA tended to experience less correction postoperatively, with evidence of further deterioration during follow-up in group D than in group CB. This suboptimal correction of SVA may contribute to the inferior clinical outcomes encountered in group D relative to group CB. Therefore, we recommend correction of PI-LL as close as possible to the lower limit of the suggested PI-LL target range in patients with evidence of preoperative decompensation.

Comparison of Surgical Burden, Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes According to the Severity of Baseline Sagittal Imbalance in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical impact of the baseline sagittal imbalance severity in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion including the pelvis, for ASD with a ≥ 2-year follow-up. Using the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification system, patients were classified into 3 groups according to the severity of the preoperative sagittal imbalance: mild, moderate, and severe. Postoperative clinical and radiographic results were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients were finally included. There were 42, 62, and 155 patients in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The perioperative surgical burden was greatest in the severe group. Postoperatively, this group also showed the largest pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, suggesting a tendency towards undercorrection. No statistically significant differences were observed in proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, or rod fractures among the groups. Visual analogue scale for back pain and Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores were similar across groups. However, severe group's last follow-up Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores significantly lower than those of the severe group. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe sagittal imbalance were treated with more invasive surgical methods along with increased the perioperative surgical burden. All patients exhibited significant radiological and clinical improvements after surgery. However, regarding ODI, the severe group demonstrated slightly worse clinical outcomes than the other groups, probably due to relatively higher proportion of undercorrection. Therefore, more rigorous correction is necessary to achieve optimal sagittal alignment specifically in patients with severe baseline sagittal imbalance.

Ideal Lumbar Lordosis Correction in Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Without Adversely Impacting Pelvic Tilt and Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis: A Study of 426 Cases.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the ideal pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) range to prevent pelvic tilt (PT) undercorrection while avoiding PI-LL overcorrection following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: PI-LL and PT are the important sagittal parameters to be restored to an adequate range by surgery. Ideal PI-LL target without causing PI-LL overcorrection and PT undercorrection has not been documented. METHODS: We included patients with ASD undergoing ≥5-level fusion including the sacrum. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the lower limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PI-LL overcorrection and the upper limit of ideal PI-LL without causing PT undercorrection. The calculated ideal PI-LL was validated in terms of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure (PJK and PJF) rates and clinical outcomes. Analyses were performed according to age subgroups (<70 and ≥70 y). RESULTS: In total, 426 patients were included in the study. Female patients were predominant (85.4%), with a mean age of 69.8 years. The lower limits of PI-LL were calculated as 4.9° for all patients, 2.3° for patients aged <70 years, and 7.9° for patients aged ≥70 years. Meanwhile, the upper limits of PI-LL were calculated as 12.7° for all patients, 12.5° for patients aged <70 years, and 13.3° for patients aged ≥70 years. There were no significant differences in the PJK and PJF rates among the new three PI-LL groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in patients with the ideal PI-LL group than those in patients with overcorrection or undercorrection groups for all age groups. CONCLUSION: The ideal PI-LL correction target without adversely impacting PT and PI-LL was calculated at 2.3°-12.5° for patients aged <70 years and 7.9°-13.3° for patients aged ≥70 years. These guideline parameters may help ensure optimal clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of PJK/F.

Hook Fixation at Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra +1 Reduced Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Patients With Spinal Deformity Having Achieved Optimal Deformity Correction by Sagittal Age-Adjusted Score.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Appropriate correction relative to the age-adjusted sagittal alignment target reduces the proximal junctional failure (PJF) risk. Nonetheless, a considerable number of patients suffer from PJF despite optimal correction. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of PJF that occurs despite optimal correction relative to the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) in adult spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or older with adult spinal deformity who underwent ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum were initially screened. Among them, only patients who achieved optimal sagittal correction relative to the SAAS were included in the study. Optimal correction was defined as the SAAS point between -1 and +1. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between the PJF and no PJF groups and were further evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 127 patients. The mean age was 67 years, and there were 111 women (87.4%). A mean of total fusion length was 7.2. PJF occurred in 42 patients (33.1%), while 85 patients (66.9%) did not develop PJF. Multivariate analysis showed that a high body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.153, 95% CI = 1.027-1.295, P = .016), a higher lordosis distribution index (LDI) (OR = 1.024, 95% CI = 1.003-1.045, P = .022), and no use of hook fixation (OR = 9.708, 95% CI = 1.121-76.923, P = .032) were significant risk factors of PJF development. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff value for the LDI was calculated as 61.0% (area under the curve = 0.790, P < .001). CONCLUSION: PJF developed in a considerable portion of patients despite optimal correction relative to the age-adjusted alignment. The risk factors of PJF in this patient group were high body mass index, high LDI exceeding 61%, and no use of hook fixation. PJF could be further decreased by properly managing these risk factors along with optimal sagittal correction.

Risk factors of adjacent-segment disease after short-segment fusion in patients with de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: Short-segment fusion (SSF) is an effective surgical option for appropriately selected patients with de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DNDLS). Considering that DNDLS is frequently accompanied by multisegment degeneration and potential instability across the entire lumbar segments, it is inevitable that unhealthy segments remain after SSF, thereby increasing the potential risk of adjacent-segment disease (ASD) occurrence. Therefore, the authors aimed to identify the risk factors for ASD in patients with DNDLS who underwent SSF. METHODS: This retrospective study included 80 patients with DNDLS (Cobb angle > 10°) who underwent SSF (1 or 2 levels) between December 2010 and July 2018 with a minimum follow-up duration of 5 years. The participants were divided into two groups: ASD and non-ASD. ASD was defined as clinical ASD rather than radiographic ASD. Various patient and operative variables were compared between the groups. Global and regional radiographic parameters (preoperatively and postoperatively) were also compared between the two groups using plain radiography and MRI. Consequently, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors for ASD occurrence. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the cutoff values. RESULTS: The mean ± SD age was 67.7 ± 7.2 years at the time of SSF, and there were 62 women (77.5%) enrolled in the study. Thirty patients (37.5%) were in the ASD group and 50 patients (62.5%) were in the non-ASD group. The mean time from the surgery to ASD diagnosis was 34.9 ± 28.2 months in ASD group. Thirteen patients required revision surgery at a mean time of 8.8 ± 7.0 months after ASD occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that preoperative disc wedging angle (OR 1.806, 95% CI 1.255-2.598, p = 0.001), presence of facet tropism (defined as ≥ 10° difference between the facet joint angles of the right and left sides) (OR 5.534, 95% CI 1.528-20.040, p = 0.009), and foraminal stenosis ≥ grade 2 (OR 5.935, 95% CI 1.253-28.117, p = 0.025) were significant risk factors for ASD development. The cutoff value of the preoperative disc wedging angle was calculated to be 2.5° using the ROC curve. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative disc wedging angle ≥ 2.5°, presence of facet tropism, and foraminal stenosis ≥ grade 2 were identified as significant risk factors for ASD development after SSF in patients with DNDLS.

Predictor of Postoperative Ambulatory Recovery in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression with Delayed Surgical Timing and Progressive Paraplegia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze preoperative predictors of ambulatory recovery after surgical treatment in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients with delayed surgical timing and progressive paraplegia. METHODS: We reviewed patients with a preoperative lower-extremity motor grade of ≤3 and surgical timing ≥48 hours after the nonambulatory status. The recovery group (group R) and nonrecovery group (group NR) were classified according to ambulation assessment during follow-up. The data on patient demographics, origin of the primary tumor, pre and postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy, surgical procedures, Tokuhashi score, Karnofsky score, preoperative lower-extremity motor grade, and surgical timing were collected for analyzing predictors of postoperative ambulatory recovery. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients, 24 (43.6%) were group R and 31 patients were group NR. The preoperative motor grade of the lower extremities was the only predictive factor (P < 0.05). The mean hip flexor and knee extensor motor grades in group R were 2.0 ± 1.0 and 2.4 ± 1.1 respectively, while in group NR, they were 1.2 ± 1.0 and 1.3 ± 1.0. The odds ratios for failing to regain ambulatory ability were 12.6 in the knee extensor and 4.8 in the hip flexor when the motor grades 0-2 and 3 groups were compared. The rescue ratio of the preoperative hip flexor and knee extensor motor grade 0-2 group were 34.1% and 21.2%, grades 3 group were 71.4% and 77.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The significant predictive factor for ambulatory recovery was the preoperative lower-extremity motor grade. The preoperative knee extensor motor grade was identified as a more important factor than hip flexor motor grade in predicting ambulatory recovery.

Clinical Significance of Lordosis Orientation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Development in Long-Segment Fusion Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of lordosis orientation (LO) on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development in adult spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: This study included 152 patients who underwent low thoracic (T9-T12) to pelvis fusion and were followed up for ≥2 years. In the literature, 6 radiographic parameters representing LO were introduced, such as uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) slope, UIV inclination, UIV-femoral angle (UIVFA), thoracolumbar tilt, thoracolumbar slope, and lordosis tilt. Various clinical and radiographic factors including 6 LO parameters were investigated using logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for PJK. RESULTS: The mean age was 69.4 years, and 136 patients were females (89.5%). PJK developed in 65 patients (42.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only small postoperative pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.962, 95% confidence interval: 0.929-0.996, P = 0.030) and large UIVFA (OR = 1.089, 95% confidence interval: 1.028-1.154, P = 0.004) were significant for PJK development. UIVFA showed significantly positive correlation with pelvic tilt (CC = 0.509), thoracic kyphosis (CC = 0.384), and lordosis distribution index (CC = 0.223). UIVFA was also negatively correlated with sagittal vertical axis (CC = -0.371). However, UIVFA did not correlate with LL, PI-LL, or T1 pelvic angle. CONCLUSIONS: LO significantly increases the risk of PJK development in ASD surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that smaller postoperative PI-LL and greater UIVFA were significant risk factors for PJK. Surgeons should avoid undercorrection and overcorrection to prevent PJK development.

Proximal Junctional Failure after Corrective Surgery: Focusing on Elderly Patients with Severe Sagittal Imbalance.

Background: Previous reports with proximal junctional failure (PJF) included relatively young patients or deformity without sagittal imbalance. The present study focused on the two well-known risk factors for PJF, old age and severe sagittal imbalance. With these high-risk patients, the present study aimed to identify a strategy that could prevent PJF and to investigate whether the degree of correction would really affect the PJF occurrence. Methods: Patients who were ≥ 60 years of age and underwent long fusion (≥ 4) to the sacrum for severe sagittal imbalance (defined as pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] ≥ 30°) were included. PJF was defined as a vertebral fracture at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, failure of UIV fixation, myelopathy, or any need for proximal extension of fusion. Presumed risk factors were compared between the patients with and without PJF. Results: Total 146 patients (mean age, 68.4 years) with preoperative mean PI-LL of 46.8° were included. PJF developed in 39 patients (26.7%) at a mean of 18.1 months after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.812; p = 0.019) and UIV located below T10 (OR, 3.773; p = 0.010) were significant risk factors for developing PJF. However, the degree of correction did not affect PJF occurrence. Conclusions: The present study indicates that osteoporosis should be well corrected preoperatively and extending the fusion above T10 should be considered for severe imbalance in old patients. However, the amount of correction was not associated with PJF development.

Introduction of a New Radiographic Parameter to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: UIVPTA (Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra-Pelvic Tilt Angle).

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new sagittal parameter, uppermost instrumented vertebra-pelvic tilt angle (UIVPTA), and to determine the effects on the proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS: Patients ≥ 60 years with ASD who underwent low thoracic spine to pelvis fusion with a minimum of 2-years of follow-up were included in this study. Two groups were created according to PJK development. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between PJK and non-PJK groups to identify the risk factors for PJK. Cutoff value of UIVPTA for PJK development was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve according to different pelvic incidence groups. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors to affect UIVPTA. RESULTS: One hundred fifity-one patients were included in this study. There were 135 female patients (89.4%). Mean age was 70.5 years. PJK developed in 65 patients (43.0%). Multivariate analysis showed that overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence (PI) minus lumbar lordosis (LL) (PI-LL) target and lower UIVPTA were independent risk factors for PJK. The cutoff value of UIVPTA for PJK development was calculated as 4.0° in patients with PI less than 45°, 9.5° in patients with PI between 45° and 60°, and 13.0° in patients with PI greater than 60°. Linear regression analysis showed that UIVPTA was positively affected by postoperative values of LL (coefficient = 0.505), PI-LL (coefficient = 0.674), and pelvic tilt (coefficient = 0.286). CONCLUSION: Optimal correction within the age-adjusted PI-LL combined with keeping UIVPTA within optimal range is suggested for the prevention of PJK.

Risk factors for radiographic progression of proximal junctional fracture in patients undergoing surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity.

OBJECTIVE: Proximal junctional fracture (PJFx) at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1 is the most common mechanism of proximal junctional failure (PJF). Few studies have assessed radiographic progression after PJFx development. Therefore, this study sought to identify the risk factors for radiographic progression of PJFx in the surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: In this retrospective study, among 317 patients aged > 60 years who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion from the sacrum, 76 with PJFx development were included. On the basis of the change in the proximal junctional angle (PJA), 2 groups were created: progression group (group P) (change ≥ 10°) and nonprogression group (group NP) (change < 10°). Patient, surgical, and radiographic variables were compared between the groups with univariate and multivariate analyses to demonstrate the risk factors for PJFx progression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate cutoff values. Clinical outcomes, such as visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 score, and the revision rate were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean age at index surgery was 71.1 years, and 67 women were enrolled in the study (88.2%). There were 45 patients in group P and 31 in group NP. The mean increase in PJA was 15.6° (from 23.2° to 38.8°) in group P and 3.7° (from 17.2° to 20.9°) in group NP. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in group NP than group P, including VAS-back score, ODI score, and SRS-22 scores for all items. The revision rate was significantly greater in group P than in group NP (53.3% vs 25.8%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted ideal pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) target at index surgery (OR 4.484, p = 0.030), PJA at the time of PJFx identification (OR 1.097, p = 0.009), and fracture at UIV (vs UIV+1) (OR 3.410, p = 0.027) were significant risk factors for PJFx progression. The cutoff value of PJA for PJFx progression was calculated as 21° by using the ROC curve. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for further progression of PJFx were overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted PI-LL target at index surgery, PJA > 21° at initial presentation, and fracture at the UIV level. Close monitoring is warranted for such patients in order to not miss timely revision surgery.

In vivo Comparison of Positive Microbial Culture by Wound Irrigation Methods: Biportal Endoscopic versus Open Microscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and prevalence of intraoperative contamination (IoC) through the microbial culture of superficial and deep samples obtained during surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical site infection (SSI) in spinal surgery is a serious complication. The prevalence of IoC may differ based on surgical approach and technique, even in the setting of the same procedure. METHODS: In this in-vivo study, microbial cultivation was performed with superficial (ligamentum flavum, LF) and deep (nucleus pulposus, NP) surgical specimens to evaluate IoC in 132 patients undergoing single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Biportal endoscopic (BE) TLIF was performed under continuous wound irrigation (group A, n=66), whereas open microscopic (OM) TLIF was performed under intermittent wound irrigation (group B, n=66). LF and NP specimens were homogenized, gram-stained, and cultured in aerobic and anaerobic media for 14 days. Microbial culture results and occurrence of SSI in the two groups were assessed. The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to determine significant differences among categorical variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of patient characteristics on the prevalence of positive microbial cultures. RESULTS: Of the 132 patients, 34 (25.8%) had positive microbial cultures, and positive culture required an incubation period of 72 h to 2 weeks in all these patients except for three. Overall positive culture was significantly higher in group B than in group A (P=0.029). The subgroups of LF- and NP-positive cultures were 18.18% (n=24) and 12.88% (n=17), respectively; the SSI was 0.76% (n=1). Group A had a significantly lower subgroup of NP-positive culture than group B (P=0.035). OM technique was an independent risk factor associatd with overall positive culture (P<0.05). The most common microorganism was Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes). CONCLUSION: BE-TLIF with continuous wound irrigation showed significantly lower overall, and NP-positive cultures, than OM-TLIF with intermittent irrigation. The most common strain of positive culture was C. acnes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Radiographic Factors of Proximal Junctional Failure According to Age Groups in Adult Spinal Deformity.

Background: Patient age has been associated with the development of proximal junctional failure (PJF). The characteristics of adult spinal deformity (ASD) are considered different between younger and older age groups. We hypothesized that the radiographic risk factors of PJF would be different according to age groups. This study aimed to evaluate different radiographic risk factors of PJF between two age groups undergoing thoracolumbar fusion for ASD. Methods: ASD patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent thoracolumbar fusion from the low thoracic level (T9-T12) to the sacrum were included. The minimum follow-up duration was 2 years. PJF was defined as proximal junctional angle (PJA) ≥ 20°, fixation failure, fracture, myelopathy, or necessity of revision surgery. Using various radiographic risk factors including age-adjusted ideal pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL), univariate and multivariate analyses were performed separately in two age groups: < 70 years and ≥ 70 years. Results: A total of 186 patients (90.3% women) with a mean age of 69 years were enrolled. The mean follow-up duration was 67.4 months. PJF developed in 97 patients (52.2%). There were fractures in 53 patients, PJA ≥ 20° in 26, fixation failure in 12, and myelopathy in 6. PJF developed more frequently in patients 70 years or older than in those younger than 70 years. In patients aged less than 70 years, preoperative LL, PI-LL, and a change in LL were significant risk factors in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed only a change in LL was significant for PJF development (odds ratio [OR], 1.025; p = 0.021). On the other hand, in patients 70 years or older, postoperative LL, postoperative PI-LL, and overcorrection relative to the conventional PI-LL target (within ± 10°) and age-adjusted ideal PI-LL target were significant risk factors. On multivariate analysis, only overcorrection of PI-LL relative to the age-adjusted ideal target was a single significant risk factor of PJF (OR, 5.250; p = 0.024). Conclusions: In patients younger than 70 years, a greater change in LL was associated with PJF development regardless of PI-related values. However, in older patients, overcorrection of PI-LL relative to the age-adjusted PI-LL target was a significant risk factor of PJF.

Does the Amount of Correction of Sagittal Deformity Really Promote Proximal Junctional Kyphosis? Multivariate Analyses According to Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra Levels.

BACKGROUND: The present study assumed that the effects of deformity correction amounts on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development after long deformity surgery would vary according to uppermost instrumented vertebrae (UIV) levels. Our study was to reveal the association between the amount of correction and PJK according to UIV levels. METHODS: Adult spinal deformity patients aged >50 years who underwent thoracolumbar fusion (≥4 levels) were included. PJK was defined by proximal junctional angles ≥15°. Presumed demographic and radiographic risk factors for PJK were evaluated including parameters regarding the correction amount such as postoperative change in lumbar lordosis and postoperative offset grouping, the value associated with age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch. The patients were divided according to UIV levels of T10 or above (group A) and T11 or below (group B). Multivariate analyses were performed separately for both groups. RESULTS: The present study included 241 patients (74 for group A and 167 for group B). PJK developed in approximately half of all patients within an average of 5 years of follow-up. For group A, only body mass index (P = 0.002) was associated with PJK. No radiographic parameters were correlated. For group B, postoperative change in lumbar lordosis (P = 0.009) and offset value (P = 0.030) were significant risk factors for PJK development. CONCLUSIONS: The correction amount of sagittal deformity increased the risk of PJK only in patients with UIV at or below T11. However, it was not associated with PJK development in patients with UIV at or above T10.

Long-term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Selective Thoracic Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With Lenke 1C Curve.

BACKGROUND: Despite the promising results with selective thoracic fusion (STF) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) of the Lenke 1C curve, postoperative coronal imbalance and progression of the unfused lumbar curve have been concerns in long-term follow-up. In this study, we aimed to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes after STF for AIS with Lenke 1C curve with long-term follow-up. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with AIS with Lenke 1C curves who underwent STF between 2005 and 2017 were included. Minimum follow-up duration was 5 years. Time-dependent changes in radiographic parameters were investigated preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. In addition, radiographic adverse events such as coronal decompensation (CD), lumbar decompensation (LD), distal adding-on (DA) phenomenon, and trunk shift were evaluated at the last follow-up. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 score was used for clinical outcome evaluation. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery was 13.8 years. The mean follow-up duration was 6.7 ± 0.8 years. The main thoracic curve significantly improved from 57 degrees to 23 degrees (60% correction), and the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve significantly improved from 47 degrees to 28 degrees (41% correction). Coronal balance was 15 mm after surgery but significantly improved to 10 mm at the last follow-up ( P = 0.033). At the final follow-up, 11 patients (37%) sustained at least one of the radiographic adverse events: CD in 5 patients (17%), LD in 3 (10%), DA in 4 (13%), and trunk shift in 3 (10.%). However, there were no cases requiring revision surgery. In addition, there were no significant differences in any items or total Scoliosis Research Society-22 score between the patients with and without radiographic adverse events. CONCLUSION: STF in Lenke 1C curves showed an acceptable risk of adverse radiographic events such as CD, LD, DA, and trunk shift in long-term follow-up. We suggest that STF without fusion to the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve would be sufficient in treating AIS with Lenke 1C curve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Time-Dependent Changes in Stiffness-Related Functional Disability After Long Segmental Fusion in Elderly Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity-Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Results.

BACKGROUND: Although several studies were performed to measure stiffness-related functional disability (SRFD) after long segmental fusion for adult spinal deformity, the evaluation of SRFD was done at a single point in time. We do not know whether the disability will stay the same, worsen, or improve over time. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time-dependent changes of SRFD and any factors affecting these changes. METHODS: Patients who had ≥4-segment fusion with the sacrum were reviewed retrospectively. Specific Functional Disability Index (SFDI), consisting of a 12-item tool with 4 categories (sitting on the floor, sanitation activities, lower body activities, and moving activities), was used to assess the severity of SRFD. The SFDI taken at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively and at the last follow-up were used for evaluating the changes in SRFD. The presumed factors affecting these changes were analyzed. RESULTS: This study included 116 patients. Total SFDI scores significantly improved from 3-month to the last follow-up. Among the 4-category of SFDI, sitting on the floor showed the highest scores followed by lower body activities, sanitation activities, and moving activities at all time points. All categories except for sitting on the floor showed significant improvement from 3 months until the last follow-up. This improvement was most pronounced between 3 months and 1 year. American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade was identified as the only factor affecting time-dependent changes. CONCLUSION: SRFD was highest at 3 months, but it improved over time except for sitting on the floor. The improvement was observed greatest between 3 months and 1 year. Patients with less American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade experienced more improvement in SRFD.

A Validation Study of Four Preoperative Surgical Planning Tools for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Four guidelines have been suggested for optimal correction in adult spinal deformity surgery: Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification, age-adjusted sagittal alignment goals, Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score, and the Roussouly algorithm. Whether these goals provide benefit in both proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) reduction and clinical outcome improvement remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To validate 4 preoperative surgical planning tools in PJK development and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ≥5-segment fusion including the sacrum for adult spinal deformity with a follow-up of ≥2-year. PJK development and clinical outcomes were compared among the groups separately using 4 surgical guidelines: SRS-Schwab pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) modifier (Group 0, +, ++), age-adjusted PI-LL goal (undercorrection, matched correction, and overcorrection), GAP score (proportioned, moderately disproportioned, and severely disproportioned groups), and the Roussouly algorithm (restored and nonrestored groups). RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 68.3 years, and there were 162 women (85.7%). There were no differences in the rate of PJK development and clinical outcomes among SRS-Schwab PI-LL modifier and GAP score groups. With the age-adjusted PI-LL goal, PJK developed significantly less frequently in the matched group compared with the under- and overcorrection groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in the matched group compared with the under- and overcorrection groups. With the Roussouly algorithm, PJK developed significantly less frequently in the restored group than in the nonrestored group. However, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 Roussouly groups. CONCLUSION: Correction according to the age-adjusted PI-LL goal and the restored Roussouly type was associated with reduced PJK development. However, differences in clinical outcomes were only observed in the age-adjusted PI-LL groups.

Trends in Survival and Surgical Methods in Patients Surgically Treated for Metastatic Spinal Tumors: 25-Year Experience in a Single Institution.

Background: This study aimed to examine trends in postoperative survival and surgical methods over a 25-year period in patients surgically treated for metastatic spinal tumors. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent surgical treatment for metastatic spinal tumors between 1996 and 2020. For trend analysis, the study cohort was divided into three groups according to the year of surgery: 1996-2004, 2005-2012, and 2013-2020. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to examine survival, and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival of the top six common cancers among the periods. The surgical methods were grouped and examined as follows: fixation only, palliative decompression and fixation, gross total removal and fixation, and total en bloc spondylectomy. Results: This study included a total of 608 patients. There were 78 patients in 1996-2004, 236 in 2005-2012, and 294 in 2013-2020. Regarding the overall survival trend, the group 2013-2020 had a significantly improved survival as compared to the other two groups (p < 0.001). According to specific cancer sites, significant survival improvement was observed in patients with lung, kidney, and breast cancers (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.022, respectively). There were no significant changes in the primary sites of the liver, colorectum, or prostate. Regarding surgical methods, the proportion of gross total tumor removal declined, whereas the proportion of palliative decompression and fixation and fixation only procedures increased. Conclusions: During the past 25 years, significant survival improvement was observed in patients with lung, kidney, and breast cancers. There was no improvement in survival in patients with liver, colorectal, and prostate cancers. In terms of surgical techniques, palliative decompression and fixation only procedures increased, while gross total tumor removal declined.

Validation of Age-adjusted Ideal Sagittal Alignment in Terms of Proximal Junctional Failure and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To validate the age-adjusted ideal sagittal alignment in terms of proximal junctional failure (PJF) and clinical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: It is reported that optimal sagittal correction with regard to the age-adjusted ideal sagittal alignment reduces the risk of PJF development. However, few studies have validated this concept. The age-considered optimal correction is likely to be undercorrection in terms of conventional surgical target, such as pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) within ±9°. Therefore, the clinical impact of age-adjusted sagittal alignment should be evaluated along with radiographic effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult spinal deformity patients, aged 50 years and above, who underwent greater than or equal to four-level fusion to sacrum with a minimum of four years of follow-up data were included in this study. Radiographic risk factors for PJF (including age-adjusted ideal PI-LL) were evaluated with multivariate analyses. Three groups were created based on PI-LL offset between age-adjusted ideal PI-LL and actual actual PI-LL: undercorrection, ideal correction, and overcorrection. Clinical outcomes were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: This study included 194 adult spinal deformity patients. The mean age was 68.5 years and there were 172 females (88.7%). PJF developed in 99 patients (51.0%) at a mean postoperative period of 14.9 months. Multivariate analysis for PJF revealed that only PI-LL offset group had statistical significance. The proportion of patients with PJF was greatest in the overcorrection group followed by the ideal correction and undercorrection groups. Overcorrected patients regard to the age-adjusted ideal alignment showed poorer clinical outcomes than the other patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overcorrection relative to age-adjusted sagittal alignment increases the risk of PJF development and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Older patients and those with small PI are likely to be overcorrected in terms of the age-adjusted PI-LL target. Therefore, the age-adjusted alignment should be considered more strictly in these patients.

Factors Affecting Stiffness-Related Functional Disability After Long Segmental Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity.

BACKGROUND: In general, stiffness-related functional disability (SRFD) is expected to increase as longer fusion length, but there have been no studies on factors affecting SRFD besides fusion length. OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors affecting SRFD after long segmental fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent ≥4-segment fusion including sacrum for ASD. The severity of SRFD was evaluated using the Specific Functional Disability Index (SFDI) consisting of 12 items with 4 categories as follows: sitting on the floor, sanitation activity, lower body activity, and moving activity. Each category contains 3 items which was given a maximum of 4 points. The presumed factors affecting SFDI were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients were included in the study with their mean age of 67.3 years. The mean fusion length was 6.4 segments. The mean score of each SFDI category was highest in sitting on the floor (9.9), followed by lower body activities (7.6), sanitation activities (6.0), and moving activities (5.9). The total sum was 29.3 points. In multivariate analysis, total sum of SFDI was significantly higher in female sex, patients with higher American Society of Anesthesiology grade, and longer fusion length. However, the sagittal parameters did not show a significant correlation with SRFD, except pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis which correlated with only one category (lower body activities). CONCLUSION: This study showed that female sex, higher American Society of Anesthesiology grades, and longer fusion length influenced SRFD after long segmental fusion for ASD. Sagittal parameters related to the degree of deformity correction did not significantly affect SRFD.

L5-S1 nonunion occurrence even after anterior column support combined with iliac screw fixation in long fusion for adult spinal deformity: CT-based analysis at 2-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Iliac screw fixation and anterior column support are highly recommended to prevent lumbosacral pseudarthrosis after long-level adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Despite modern instrumentation techniques, a considerable number of patients still experience nonunion at the lumbosacral junction. However, most previous studies evaluating nonunion relied only on plain radiographs and only assessed when the implant failures occurred. Therefore, using CT, it is important to know the prevalence after iliac fixation and to evaluate risk factors for nonunion at L5-S1. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients who underwent ≥ 4-level fusion to the sacrum using iliac screws for ASD and completed a 2-year postoperative CT scan were included in the present study. All L5-S1 segments were treated by interbody fusion. Lumbosacral fusion status was evaluated on 2-year postoperative CT scans using Brantigan, Steffee, and Fraser criteria. Risk factors for nonunion were analyzed using patient, surgical, and radiographic factors. The metal failure and its association with fusion status at L5-S1 were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 77 patients, 12 (15.6%) showed nonunion at the lumbosacral junction on the 2-year CT scans. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression revealed that only higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade was a risk factor for nonunion (OR 25.6, 95% CI 3.196-205.048, p = 0.002). There were no radiographic parameters associated with fusion status at L5-S1. Lumbosacral junction rod fracture occurred more frequently in patients with nonunion than in patients with fusion (33.3% vs 6.2%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Although iliac screw fixation and anterior column support have been performed to prevent lumbosacral nonunion during ASD surgery, 15.6% of patients still showed nonunion on 2-year postoperative CT scans. High ASA grade was a significant risk factor for nonunion. Rod fracture between L5 and S1 occurred more frequently in the nonunion group.