Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 8(8): 2727-2735, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32247684

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peanut oral immunotherapy is an effective treatment for desensitizing peanut-allergic patients, but the frequency of adverse reactions has limited its widespread use. OBJECTIVE: To review the frequency of adverse reactions that patients on peanut oral immunotherapy experience during build-up and maintenance phases and explore factors that may contribute to adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children and adults with peanut allergy undergoing peanut oral immunotherapy at the New England Food Allergy Treatment Center in West Hartford, Conn was performed. Data on patient demographics, allergic profile, peanut allergy testing, and details of reactions in build-up and maintenance phases were collected. A systemic reaction was defined as one of the following: (1) severe reaction involving 1 system, such as generalized hives and/or angioedema; (2) 2 or more of the following symptoms: cutaneous or oral, respiratory, or gastrointestinal symptoms; (3) drop in blood pressure; or (4) need for epinephrine. RESULTS: Data were available on 783 patients aged 3.5 to 48.3 years. During buildup, 78 patients (10%) experienced at least 1 systemic reaction, 660 (84%) at least 1 gastrointestinal adverse event, 369 (47%) at least 1 cutaneous adverse event, and 157 (20%) at least 1 respiratory adverse event. Thirty-four patients (4%) required epinephrine during buildup. Six hundred ninety-seven patients (89%) completed buildup and progressed to maintenance. During maintenance, 131 patients (19%) experienced at least 1 systemic reaction, 190 (27%) at least 1 gastrointestinal adverse event, 104 (15%) at least 1 cutaneous adverse event, and 50 (7%) at least 1 respiratory adverse event. Seventy-four patients (11%) required epinephrine during maintenance. None of the adverse events required hospitalizations, and there were no mortalities. Nine patients (1%) were diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis during buildup or maintenance. Increasing pretreatment peanut specific IgE levels were associated with increased odds of a systemic reaction during buildup. Increasing age, pretreatment peanut specific IgE level, and a systemic reaction in buildup were associated with increased odds of a systemic reaction during maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut oral immunotherapy may be an effective and safe treatment for carefully selected peanut-allergic patients under the guidance of experienced providers. Specific patient characteristics and immunologic factors may help predict adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos , Arachis , Niño , Preescolar , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/terapia , Práctica Privada , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 2(1): 91-6, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24565775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy creates the risk of life-threatening anaphylaxis that can disrupt psychosocial development and family life. The avoidance management strategy often fails to prevent anaphylaxis and may contribute to social dysfunction. Peanut oral immunotherapy may address these problems, but there are safety concerns regarding implementation in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to communicate observations about the frequency of epinephrine-treated reactions during peanut oral immunotherapy in 5 different allergy/immunology practices. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of peanut oral immunotherapy performed in 5 clinical allergy practices. RESULTS: A total of 352 treated patients received 240,351 doses of peanut, peanut butter, or peanut flour, and experienced 95 reactions that were treated with epinephrine. Only 3 patients received 2 doses of epinephrine, and no patient required more intensive treatment. A total of 298 patients achieved the target maintenance dose for a success rate of 85%. CONCLUSION: Peanut oral immunotherapy carries a risk of systemic reactions. In the context of oral immunotherapy, those reactions were recognized and treated promptly. Peanut oral immunotherapy may be a suitable therapy for patients managed by qualified allergists/immunologists.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas Adrenérgicos/uso terapéutico , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Anafilaxia/tratamiento farmacológico , Arachis/efectos adversos , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/terapia , Proteínas de Plantas/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiología , Arachis/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Israel , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/inmunología , Proteínas de Plantas/efectos adversos , Proteínas de Plantas/inmunología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...