The effect of intraoperative lidocaine administration in a disrupted erector spinae fascial plane on intercostal transcranial motor evoked potentials.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks have been recently described for postoperative pain management following spine surgery but their effects on intraoperative neuromonitoring are unknown. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Pediatric patients at a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: 26 pediatric patients who received bilateral surgically-placed ESP catheters for single-stage posterior spine fusion (PSF) from August 2020 to June 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in this study did not receive any special interventions as part of this observational retrospective study. MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective study investigated the effects of local anesthesia administration through bilateral surgically-placed ESP catheters on intraoperative intercostal transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs) in the setting of a disrupted erector spinae fascial plane in pediatric patients undergoing single-stage posterior spine fusion. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 26 patients that received bilateral surgically-placed ESP catheters for pediatric posterior spine fusion surgery, none exhibited any changes in intercostal tcMEPs attributable to intraoperative lidocaine administration through the ESP catheters. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of a local anesthetic into a disrupted erector spinae fascial plane does not appear to interfere with intraoperative neuromonitoring of posterior spine fusion surgeries.

Clinical Neurophysiology Fellowship Program Directors Survey on a Standardized Fellowship Match Process: A Call for Action.

PURPOSE: To survey US Clinical Neurophysiology (CNP) fellowship program directors on the nature of CNP and related training programs, current recruitment cycle, and views for a standardized process. METHODS: A 23-question electronic survey was sent to all 93 US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited CNP fellowship program directors from December 2020 to January 2021. RESULTS: The response rate was 60%. There was great variability in the number of CNP positions and CNP tracks offered. The following tracks were identified: 48% EEG dominant, 26% EMG dominant, 22% split equally between EEG and EMG, and 2% and 1% were neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring and autonomic dominant, respectively. Of the responding institutions, 43% offered a second year of training options to CNP fellows, mainly in conjunction with Epilepsy fellowship, which was pursued by 25% of CNP fellows. Many programs indicated flexibility in their design between different CNP tracks or between CNP and other related training programs based on the available candidates. The median percentage of CNP fellowship positions filled over the last 5 years was 80%, and there was great variation in the recruitment timeline across institutions. Overall, 86% of program directors favored a universal timeline and 71% favored a formal match for CNP. The respondents were split between an independent CNP match (39%) and joining the initiatives of affiliate societies on a standardized process (61%). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant heterogeneity in the makeup of the CNP fellowship programs and the recruitment process. The majority of CNP program directors are in favor of standardization of the recruitment process.

Intraoperative Transcranial Motor-evoked Potential Stimulation Does Not Seem to Cause Seizures.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is of critical importance in evaluating the functional integrity of the central nervous system during surgery of the central or peripheral nervous system. In a large recent study, transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) were found to be associated with a 0.7% risk of inducing a seizure as diagnosed by clinical observation and electromyography in patients having general anesthesia with intravenous anesthetics. The gold standard for seizure diagnosis, however, is electroencephalography (EEG). The aim of this single-institution retrospective study is to ascertain the risk of intraoperative seizures detected using EEG during surgeries in adult patients undergoing intraoperative monitoring with TcMEPs. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the intraoperative EEG records of 1175 patients anesthetized with a variety of anesthetic agents, including volatile and intravenous anesthetics, to ascertain the rate of EEG-diagnosed seizures attributable to TcMEPs. RESULT: Our analysis did not reveal a single seizure event attributable to TcMEPs in 1175 patients. CONCLUSION: The intraoperative use of TcMEPs does not seem to cause seizures.