Facial Filler in Facial Paralysis: A Prospective Case Study and Multidimensional Assessment.

Background: Facial filler is emerging as a nonsurgical alternative for addressing static asymmetry in facial paralysis (FP). Objectives: To elucidate the patient experience for facial filler and to facilitate preprocedure counseling and education. Materials and Methods: Patients receiving hyaluronic acid filler for FP at a tertiary academic medical center were prospectively recruited. Primary outcomes included patient-reported pain, facial symmetry (on a visual analog scale), and the results of quality-of-life surveys (FACE-Q satisfaction with facial appearance [SFA], FACE-Q psychosocial distress [PSD], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9], and Euro Quality of Life 5-Dimension [EQ5D]) preprocedure and at 1 and 14 days postprocedure. Results: Twenty patients (90% women, average age 55 ± 11) completed the study. Sites of filler included the cheek, lower lip, nasolabial fold, chin, and temple regions. Patients reported minimal pain at postprocedure days (PPDs) 1 and 14. Patient-perceived symmetry scores improved significantly (p < 0.0001), as did FACE-Q SFA and FACE-Q PSD scores (p < 0.0001, <0.0001) when comparing preprocedure with PPD 14. Depression, assessed by PHQ-9, and the anxiety/depression domain of EQ5D, decreased after treatment (p = 0.016, 0.014) but no change was observed in the other domains of EQ5D. Conclusion: Facial filler for FP can be performed with minimal morbidity (pain, impact on daily routine, and complications) and leads to improvements across multiple psychosocial domains.

Variations in Payer-Negotiated Prices for Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about pricing for reconstructive procedures of the head and neck. As of January 2021, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires hospitals to disclose payer-negotiated prices for services, offering new insight into prices for privately insured patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Turquoise database. METHODS: Payer-negotiated facility fees for 41 reconstructive surgeries were grouped by procedure type: primary closure, skin grafts, tissue rearrangement, locoregional flaps, or free flaps. Prices were normalized to account for local labor costs, then calculated as percent markup in excess of Medicare reimbursement. The mean percent markup between procedure groups was compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Subset analyses were performed to compare mean percent markup using a Student's t test. We also assessed price variation by calculating the ratio of 90th/10th percentile mean prices both across and within hospitals. RESULTS: In total, 1324 hospitals (85% urban, 81% nonprofit, 49% teaching) were included. Median payer-negotiated fees showed an increasing trend with more complex procedures, ranging from $379.54 (interquartile range [IQR], $230.87-$656.96) for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 12001 ("simple repair of superficial wounds ≤2.5 cm") to $5422.60 ($3983.55-$8169.41) for CPT code 20969 ("free osteocutaneous flap with microvascular anastomosis"). Median percent markup was highest for primary closure procedures (576.17% [IQR, 326.28%-1089.34%]) and lowest for free flaps (99.56% [37.86%-194.02%]). Higher mean percent markups were observed for rural, for-profit, non-Northeast, nonteaching, and smaller hospitals. CONCLUSION: Wide variation in private payer-negotiated facility fees exists for head/neck reconstruction surgeries. Further research is necessary to better understand how pricing variation may correlate with out-of-pocket costs and quality of care.

Opioid-Sparing Pain Control after Rhinoplasty: Updated Review of the Literature.

Rhinoplasty is one of the most performed elective surgeries, and given the opioid crisis, increasing research and studies are focused on successful pain control with multimodality opioid-sparing techniques, such as acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and gabapentin. Although limiting overuse of opioids is critical, this cannot be at the expense of inadequate pain control, particularly as insufficient pain control can be correlated with patient dissatisfaction and the postoperative experience in elective surgery. There is likely significant opioid overprescription, as patients often report taking less than 50% of their prescribed opioids. Furthermore, excess opioids provide opportunities for misuse and opioid diversion if not disposed of properly. To optimize postoperative pain control and minimize opioid requirements, interventions must occur at the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative time points. Preoperative counseling is imperative to set expectations for pain and to screen for predisposing factors for opioid misuse. Intraoperatively, use of local nerve blocks and long-acting analgesia in conjunction with modified surgical techniques can lead to prolonged pain control. Postoperatively, pain should be managed with a multimodal approach, incorporating acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and potentially gabapentin with opioids reserved for rescue analgesia. Rhinoplasty represents a category of short-stay, low/medium pain, and elective procedures highly susceptible to overprescription and consequently, are readily amenable to opioid minimization through standardized perioperative interventions. Recent literature on regimens and interventions to help limit opioids after rhinoplasty are reviewed and discussed here.

Effect of Filler Therapy on Psychosocial Distress in Facial Paralysis: Patients with Major Asymmetry Derive Greater Benefit.

Background: Facial filler is an effective nonsurgical treatment option for improving facial symmetry in patients with facial paralysis (FP). Objective: To compare the effects of filler among patients with FP that is self-perceived as major or minor asymmetry, by measuring psychosocial distress. Methods: In this prospective cohort study of patients with FP undergoing filler at a tertiary academic center, patients were classified as having minor or major self-perceived asymmetry using a visual analog scale (VAS). FACE-Q Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress was administered before and after filler. Descriptive statistics and a random-effects generalized linear model assessed the relationship between perceived facial asymmetry and change in psychosocial distress. Results: A total of 28 patients participated. Twenty-five (89%) patients were female with median age of 54 (interquartile range [IQR]: 49-66). Median VAS score was 2 (IQR: 1-3.5, 0 = completely asymmetric, 10 = no asymmetry). Psychosocial distress improved in all patients after filler. In multivariable modeling, patients with major asymmetry experienced 2.45 (confidence interval: 0.46-4.44, p = 0.016) points more improvement in psychosocial distress than patients with minor asymmetry. Age, gender, and FP duration were not associated with change in psychosocial distress. Conclusion: Facial filler treatment was seen to improve psychosocial distress in patients with FP, especially by those with more self-perceived deficit.

Health Utility Measures Among Patients with Androgenetic Alopecia After Hair Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Hair loss causes significant psychosocial distress to patients. Health utility measurements offer an objective, quantitative assessment of health-related quality of life (QOL). METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study on patients with hair loss between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. Patient metrics were compared with layperson perception of alopecia, prospectively collected between August 1 and December 31, 2017. Health utility measures were quantified using the visual analog scale (VAS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and relative to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Bonferroni correction to the significance threshold was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with alopecia were compared with 237 laypeople. Patient metrics for female hair loss were all significantly lower than laypeople measures (VAS QALYs 0.65 ± 0.21 vs. 0.83 ± 0.18, p = 0.0001). Mean SG QALYs were lower for patients in the male alopecia state (0.86 ± 0.23 vs. 0.96 ± 0.12, p = 0.0278). Post-hair transplant improvement in TTO was significantly greater for patients (+ 0.08 ± 0.12 vs. + 0.02 ± 0.09, p = 0.0070) and significantly more often exceeded the MCID (45.2% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: Alopecia negatively impacts QOL, and the true patient experience is more taxing than what is perceived by laypeople. Hair transplantation improves QOL more for male patients than common perception. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Otolaryngologists Trail Other Specialties in Industry Payments From Dermal Filler Companies.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Dermal filler (DF) is a widely used nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation with a rapidly expanding market. Physician payments by DF industry leaders have yet to be characterized. We sought to investigate trends in physician-industry payments by DF companies over 6 years. Differences in payments based on physician specialty and time were characterized. STUDY DESIGN: Database review. METHODS: The Open Payments Database was queried from 2013 to 2018. Payments made by the three largest DF companies by market share to otolaryngologists, plastic surgeons, and dermatologists were analyzed. Total dollars paid, number of payments made, type of payments made, and total number of specialists paid were recorded. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Otolaryngologists, plastic surgeons, and dermatologists received average annual payments of $0.36 million, $6.3 million, and $6.6 million respectively (P < .001). An average of 330 otolaryngologists, 2,128 plastic surgeons, and 5,980 dermatologists were paid annually (P < .001). Accredited speaking arrangements, consulting fees, and royalty/licensing fees comprised the majority of dollars paid to physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Average physician payment by DF companies exceeds $12 million annually, with otolaryngologists receiving significantly less compared to plastic surgeons and dermatologists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 132:301-306, 2022.

Opioid Prescribing Patterns Among Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons in the Medicare Population.

Objective: To evaluate opioid prescribing patterns among American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS) members in the Medicare population. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of AAFPRS members in the Medicare Part D Prescriber dataset. Results: From 2014 to 2016, there was a significant decrease in the number of days of opioids supplied per beneficiary (5.9 vs. 4.9 days, p < 0.005), as well as the opioid prescription cost per beneficiary ($14.52 vs. $11.79, p = 0.005). The highest prescription rate was found in the Midwest (20.5%) and lowest in the Northeast (14.0%), however, the difference between geographic regions was not significant (p = 0.11). There was a significant decrease in the number of total opioid days supplied per beneficiary in the South (p = 0.001), Midwest (p = 0.05), and West regions (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in opioid prescription rate (p = 0.89) or total opioid days supplied per beneficiary (p = 0.26) when states were stratified by age-adjusted opioid-specific death rate. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a national trend toward fewer opioid days supplied and less opioid cost per Medicare beneficiary among AAFPRS members between 2014 and 2016.

National Variation of Insurance Coverage for Gender-Affirming Facial Feminization Surgery.

Background: Gender-affirming surgery may be pursued by individuals experiencing gender dysphoria. Although genital and chest procedures are classified as medically necessary, facial feminization surgeries (FFSs) are often considered cosmetic. Insurance companies may limit coverage of these procedures, especially in states less supportive of transgender individuals. Objectives: To determine insurance coverage and ease of finding policy information for FFSs, and to analyze differences based on state advocacy. Methods: Insurance policies for the top three commercial health plans per state were reviewed. Coverage status was determined by web-based search and telephone interviews. Ease of gathering policy information was assessed using a post-task questionnaire graded on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher numbers (e.g., 7) representing relative ease. State advocacy was determined by the number of state laws and policies affecting the transgender community. Results: Of the 150 insurance policies, only 27 (18%) held favorable policies for FFS. Most favorable companies covered chondrolaryngoplasty, with 78% (n = 21) offering preauthorization. Mean ease of use was rated 6, with 12 companies requiring a telephone interview. Insurance policies in states with laws driving transgender equity covered more FFS procedures (p = 0.043), whereas those in restrictive states offered less overall coverage (p = 0.023). Conclusions: FFS is rarely covered by commercial insurance companies, especially in states with less legal support for transgender individuals. Policy information remains difficult to obtain, with variable coverage by employer and no standardized medical necessity criteria. Limited coverage, lack of easily accessible information, and absence of universal criteria may act as barriers to FFS.

Discovery and characterization of a neutralizing pan-ELR+CXC chemokine monoclonal antibody.

CXCR1 and CXCR2 signaling play a critical role in neutrophil migration, angiogenesis, and tumorigenesis and are therefore an attractive signaling axis to target in a variety of indications. In human, a total of seven chemokines signal through these receptors and comprise the ELR+CXC chemokine family, so named because of the conserved ELRCXC N-terminal motif. To fully antagonize CXCR1 and CXCR2 signaling, an effective therapeutic should block either both receptors or all seven ligands, yet neither approach has been fully realized clinically. In this work, we describe the generation and characterization of LY3041658, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralizes all seven human and cynomolgus monkey ELR+CXC chemokines and three of five mouse and rat ELR+CXC chemokines with high affinity. LY3041658 is able to block ELR+CXC chemokine-induced Ca2+ mobilization, CXCR2 internalization, and chemotaxis in vitro as well as neutrophil mobilization in vivo without affecting other neutrophil functions. In addition to the in vitro and in vivo activity, we characterized the epitope and structural basis for binding in detail through alanine scanning, crystallography, and mutagenesis. Together, these data provide a robust preclinical characterization of LY3041658 for which the efficacy and safety is being evaluated in human clinical trials for neutrophilic skin diseases.

Considerations for the otolaryngologist in the era of COVID-19: a review of the literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic, referred to as COVID-19, has spread throughout the globe since its first case in China in December 2019, leaving a significant number of people infected and clinically ill. The purpose of this review is to provide the current known clinical characteristics of and management for COVID-19 as it relates to otolaryngology. RECENT FINDINGS: COVID-19 is a highly transmissible respiratory disease with common presenting symptoms of fever, cough, and fatigue. In the absence of available vaccines or antiviral therapies, symptomatic and respiratory support is the current standard of therapy. Measures to prevent further transmission have been enacted globally including social distancing and cancellation of public events. Given elevated viral load in the upper aerodigestive tract, extra precautions in patients with otolaryngology needs have been recommended for protection of both healthcare workers and patients. SUMMARY: Otolaryngologists face unique risk from COVID-19. Maintaining appropriate preventive health measures and remaining updated on institutional clinical guidelines is paramount for both caretaker safety and patient care.

Dermal Filler Treatment Improves Psychosocial Well-Being in Facial Paralysis Patients.

Background: In the care of the facial paralysis (FP) patient, outcomes have historically focused on facial function rather than the psychosocial burden of the disease state. Yet, FP patients often describe the impact of their disease on domains of psychosocial health. These patient concerns have motivated clinicians to formally recognize and treat nonfunctional sequelae of the disease. Dermal filler therapy (DFT) is a minimally invasive reversible procedure that can be used to treat facial asymmetry and improve psychosocial well-being in FP patients. However, there are no data describing outcomes of DFT in FP-related facial asymmetry. Therefore, we sought to formally characterize FP patients' facial symmetry and psychosocial well-being before and after DFT. Methods: FP patients presenting for DFT at a tertiary academic medical center were prospectively interviewed. Patients completed the validated FACE-Q for Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress instrument. Self-reported facial symmetry scores were recorded. Patients were evaluated before and 2 weeks after DFT. Statistical analysis was performed on R software using paired sample t-tests. Results: Twenty FP patients completed DFT treatment and two surveys. The cohort was predominantly female (n = 19, 95%) with an average age of 54 years. After a single treatment of DFT averaging 2.3 mL, patients had significant improvement in facial symmetry and psychosocial well-being. Patients felt particular improvement in self-confidence and emotional expression (p < 0.0001 for all stated comparisons). Conclusion: FP of varying etiologies is associated with significant functional, psychosocial, and quality-of-life impairments. This is the first prospective study to demonstrate statistically significant improvements in facial symmetry and psychosocial well-being after a single office-based treatment of dermal filler. In addition, our study's emphasis on psychosocial health instruments reflects an increased awareness of this important domain in the care of the FP patient.

Quality Assessment of Online Patient Information for Cosmetic Botulinum Toxin.

BACKGROUND: In an era of widespread Internet access, patients increasingly look online for health information. Given the frequency with which cosmetic botulinum toxin injection is performed, there is a need to provide patients with high-quality information about this procedure. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the quality of printed online education materials (POEMs) about cosmetic botulinum toxin. METHODS: An Internet search was performed to identify 32 websites of various authorship types. Materials were evaluated for accuracy and inclusion of key content points. Readability was measured by Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Understandability and actionability were assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printed Materials. The effect of authorship was measured by undertaking analysis of variance between groups. RESULTS: The mean [standard deviation] accuracy score among all POEMs was 4.2 [0.7], which represents an accuracy of 76% to 99%. Mean comprehensiveness was 47.0% [16.4%]. Mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Flesch Reading Ease scores were 10.7 [2.1] and 47.9 [10.0], respectively. Mean understandability and actionability were 62.8% [18.8%] and 36.2% [26.5%], respectively. There were no significant differences between accuracy (P > 0.2), comprehensiveness (P > 0.5), readability (P > 0.1), understandability (P > 0.3), or actionability (P > 0.2) by authorship. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variability in the quality of cosmetic botulinum toxin POEMs regardless of authorship type. The majority of materials are written above the recommended reading level and fail to include important content points. It is critical that providers take an active role in the evaluation and endorsement of online patient education materials.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Hair Restoration.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a promising treatment for hair restoration in patients with androgenic alopecia. Created from a platelet concentrate from an autologous blood draw, PRP is a safe therapeutic option for patients with hair loss. It is used alone or in conjunction with topical and oral therapies. Most studies of hair restoration with PRP report positive outcomes. Further research to optimize PRP preparation/administration procedures and identify patient populations that benefit most from this treatment are needed, as is long-term follow-up of objective hair loss outcomes. PRP appears to be a safe technology with excellent potential for promoting hair restoration.

Prospective Qualitative Multidimensional Assessment of the Postoperative Rhinoplasty Experience.

Background: Understanding the multidimensional postoperative patient experience after rhinoplasty is critical for preoperative counseling and postoperative management. Methods: A prospective clinical study was conducted from June to December 2019 for 60 patients undergoing cosmetic and/or functional rhinoplasty by two facial plastic surgeons. All patients were administered the brief pain inventory, a clinically validated pain instrument, including multiple quality of life (QOL) domains, survey at postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 3, and 8. Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores were used to predict patients having greatest QOL disturbance. Primary outcomes were postoperative QOL domains, pain scores, and oxycodone usage. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 14.0 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX). Preoperative NOSE and postoperative Euro Quality of Life 5-Dimension scores were also recorded. Results: Patients showed greatest disruption to QOL in the first 3 PODs and essentially returned to normal levels by POD8, which mirrored trends in pain and opioid usage. All tested QOL domains (general activity, sleep, work, mood, enjoyment, and relationships) were strongly correlated with overall pain. NOSE scores were not significantly associated with pain or QOL impairment. Conclusions: This is the first study to prospectively evaluate the rhinoplasty patient's postoperative experience using a pain instrument, including multiple QOL domains. Utilizing a validated clinical instrument allows for standardized comparison of postrhinoplasty pain and QOL disruption with other surgical procedures and disease processes. These data may help guide preoperative counseling and set accurate patient expectations for the postoperative period.

Reframing Our Approach to Facial Analysis.

Facial analysis is a foundational aspect of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. Unfortunately, ideal proportions of beauty are commonly discussed without much thought regarding their historical derivation and associated cultural implications. Facial analysis often is limited to narrow ethnic and gender-normative aesthetics. As we evolve as a specialty that treats disparate patient populations and embraces a diverse community of surgical trainees, it may be time to reframe our approach to facial analysis education.

Health utility of rhinectomy, surgical nasal reconstruction, and prosthetic rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: Advanced nasal malignancies may require rhinectomy, which can have profound psychosocial impacts. Rhinectomy defects can be rehabilitated through surgery or prosthetics. We seek to understand the health utility of the rhinectomy defect, surgical, and prosthetic reconstruction, which have not been previously studied. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study METHODS: Adult naïve observers (n = 273) ranked the utility of five randomized health states (monocular blindness, binocular blindness, post-rhinectomy nasal defect, postsurgical reconstruction, and post-prosthetic rehabilitation). Health utilities were measured using visual analogue scale (VAS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Scheffe's test and the independent samples T-test for a priori comparisons were performed. Multiple linear regression was performed using participant demographics as independent predictors of utility scores. RESULTS: Health utilities (VAS, SG, TTO) were reported as follows (mean ± SD): monocular blindness (0.71 ± 0.21, 0.84 ± 0.20, 0.85 ± 0.19), binocular blindness (0.48 ± 0.25, 0.68 ± 0.28, 0.63 ± 0.28), post-rhinectomy nasal defect (0.59 ± 0.24, 0.74 ± 0.24, 0.74 ± 0.24), postsurgical reconstruction (0.88 ± 0.16, 0.90 ± 0.18, 0.89 ± 0.13), and post-prosthetic rehabilitation (0.67 ± 0.22, 0.80 ± 0.23, 0.82 ± 0.20). Both surgical reconstruction (P < .001) and prosthetic rehabilitation (P < .001) significantly improved health utility. SG and TTO utility scores were inversely associated with observer age (P < .001) and participants who identified themselves as non-Caucasians (P < .05) in post-rhinectomy nasal defect, post-nasal surgical reconstruction, and post-nasal prosthetic rehabilitation health states, while higher levels of education were directly associated with SG scores (P < .05), respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate the significant negative impact of the rhinectomy nasal defect on health utility. Rehabilitation by surgical or prosthetic techniques significantly increases health utility as rated by naïve observers. Laryngoscope, 130:1674-1679, 2020.