USAFSAM Aeromedical Consultation Service Medical Risk Assessment and Airworthiness Matrix.

INTRODUCTION: The 1% rule has long been a standard threshold for aerospace medical risk acceptance, but medical literature has noted multiple shortcomings with this threshold. Previous studies have suggested a risk matrix approach in aeromedical decision-making. General use of risk matrices for risk assessment is already codified in the U.S. Air Force (USAF). Based on this, the USAF School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM) Aeromedical Consultation Service (ACS) generated and evaluated the ACS Medical Risk Assessment and Airworthiness Matrix (AMRAAM).METHODS: The ACS adapted existing USAF standards to build the AMRAAM, gathered expert feedback, and sampled 100 previously adjudicated cases to compare legacy case dispositions to AMRAAM dispositions using polychoric correlation.RESULTS: The AMRAAM disposition showed strong agreement with legacy dispositions (ρ* = 0.9424). One case was discarded as it did not meet inclusion criteria. Of the 99 remaining cases, 88 had perfect agreement between legacy and AMRAAM dispositions. With the AMRAAM, eight cases were less restrictive and three were more restrictive (two due to an erroneous omission in the legacy disposition).DISCUSSION: The AMRAAM produces disposition recommendations that are highly consistent with the legacy approach informed by the 1% rule, with discordant AMRAAM dispositions tending to be more permissive. The USAFSAM AMRAAM allows a more dimensional risk evaluation than the 1% rule, communicates aeromedical risk consistent with nonmedical USAF organizations, and harmonizes aeromedical risk with the level of risk the USAF has defined for all flying systems. The ACS will use the AMRAAM as standard practice in future aeromedical risk assessments.Mayes RS, Keirns CJ, Hicks AG, Menner LD, Lee MS, Wagner JH, Baltzer RL. USAFSAM Aeromedical Consultation Service Medical Risk Assessment and Airworthiness Matrix. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(7):514-522.

Exercise Effects on Neck Function Among F-15E Aircrew.

BACKGROUND: Neck pain (NP) is common among high performance aircrew, yet evidence remains insufficient to guide examination, treatment, and prevention. The purpose of this randomized pilot study was to collect baseline data for neck function for F-15E aircrew and determine efficacy and feasibility of two separate exercise protocols in measuring short-term outcomes of subjective and objective neck function in order to inform future study design. METHODS: Randomized to either progressive (PRO) or general (GEN) exercise groups were 41 F-15E aircrew. Data collection occurred at baseline, 3 wk, and 3 mo. RESULTS: At baseline, 39% of the subjects reported current NP, 79.5% reported a history of NP attributed to flying, 12.8% reported being removed from flying duties due to NP, and 10% reported receiving medical care for NP. PRO and GEN group randomization showed similar baseline assessment data. Blinding was successful and exercise logs showed 31.6% compliance with prescribed exercise regimens. There were small but statistically significant increases in neck range of motion in both groups over the course of the study. Aircrew with current NP had significantly higher F-15E flight hours. DISCUSSION: This study supports the high prevalence of NP in aircrew, yet low frequency of seeking care for NP. Future studies to assess NP prevention and treatment in aircrew require an integrated approach that includes operational exercise policy and long-term data collection in flying units with dedicated resources for assessment and analysis. Lee MS, Briggs R, Scheirer V, Kearby G, Young BA. Exercise effects on neck function among F-15E aircrew. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(10):815824.

The Growing Public Health Challenges of Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation From Use of Indoor Tanning Devices in the United States.

Ultraviolet radiation is recognized as a human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the world's authority on cancer research. In particular, exposure to ultraviolet radiation can lead to melanoma of the skin, which is the deadliest form of skin cancer in the United States. Yet despite the significant public health burden that is associated with skin cancer in the United States, each year over a million Americans engage in indoor tanning where exposure to artificial ultraviolet radiation occurs. In this article, we argue for an immediate ban on the use of commercial indoor tanning by minors and, based on international precedents, the phasing out of all commercial tanning operations in the United States. We consider the use of indoor tanning devices in the United States, epidemiological data on indoor tanning devices and cancer, regulation of tanning devices, and scientific evidence for increased government intervention.