Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Cardiol ; 9(2): 125-133, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38117483

RESUMEN

Importance: In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who have high ischemic risk, data on the efficacy and safety of the de-escalation strategy of switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel are lacking. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of the de-escalation strategy compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor in stabilized patients with AMI and high ischemic risk following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a post hoc analysis of the Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Stabilized Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (TALOS-AMI) trial, an open-label, assessor-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients with AMI who had no event during 1 month of ticagrelor-based DAPT after PCI were included. High ischemic risk was defined as having a history of diabetes or chronic kidney disease, multivessel PCI, at least 3 lesions treated, total stent length greater than 60 mm, at least 3 stents implanted, left main PCI, or bifurcation PCI with at least 2 stents. Data were collected from February 14, 2014, to January 21, 2021, and analyzed from December 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to either de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel or ticagrelor-based DAPT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ischemic outcomes (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis) and bleeding outcomes (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding) were evaluated. Results: Of 2697 patients with AMI (mean [SD] age, 60.0 [11.4] years; 454 [16.8%] female), 1371 (50.8%; 684 assigned to de-escalation and 687 assigned to ticagrelor-based DAPT) had high ischemic risk features and a significantly higher risk of ischemic outcomes than those without high ischemic risk (1326 patients [49.2%], including 665 assigned to de-escalation and 661 assigned to ticagrelor-based DAPT) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.15-2.63; P = .01). De-escalation to clopidogrel, compared with ticagrelor-based DAPT, showed no significant difference in ischemic risk across the high ischemic risk group (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.54-1.45; P = .62) and the non-high ischemic risk group (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.33-1.28; P = .21), without heterogeneity (P for interaction = .47). The bleeding risk of the de-escalation group was consistent in both the high ischemic risk group (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.37-1.11; P = .11) and the non-high ischemic risk group (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.75; P = .003), without heterogeneity (P for interaction = .32). Conclusions and Relevance: In stabilized patients with AMI, the ischemic and bleeding outcomes of an unguided de-escalation strategy with clopidogrel compared with a ticagrelor-based DAPT strategy were consistent without significant interaction, regardless of the presence of high ischemic risk.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 12(15): e028976, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37493020

RESUMEN

Background The benefits of long-term maintenance beta-blocker (BB) therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been well established. Methods and Results Using the Korean nationwide registry, a total of 7159 patients with AMI treated with PCI who received BBs at discharge and were free from death or cardiovascular events for 3 months after PCI were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to BB maintenance duration: <12 months, 12 to <24 months, 24 to <36 months, and ≥36 months. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, heart failure, or hospitalization for unstable angina. During a mean 5.0±2.8 years of follow-up, over half of patients with AMI (52.5%) continued BB therapy beyond 3 years following PCI. After propensity score matching and propensity score marginal mean weighting through stratification, a stepwise inverse correlation was noted between BB duration and risk of the primary outcome (<12 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.19 [95% CI, 1.95-2.46]; 12 to <24 months: HR, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.81-2.43];, and 24 to <36 months: HR, 1.68 [95%CI, 1.45-1.94]; reference: ≥36 months). In a 3-year landmark analysis, BB use for <36 months was associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.37-1.85]) compared with BB use for ≥36 months. Conclusions Among stabilized patients with AMI following PCI, longer maintenance BB therapy, especially for >36 months, was associated with better clinical outcomes. These findings might imply that a better prognosis can be expected if patients with AMI maintain BB therapy for ≥36 months after PCI. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02806102.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Pronóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 10940, 2023 07 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37414847

RESUMEN

Statin therapy is essential for secondary prevention in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, the effects of statin therapy in patients receiving chronic dialysis remain uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on long-term mortality in patients on dialysis after a first-time ASCVD. Patients receiving maintenance dialysis aged ≥ 18 years with a first-time ASCVD event between 2013 and 2018 were included in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Associations of statin use with long-term mortality were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for demographics and comorbidities. Among 17,242 patients on dialysis, 9611 (55.7%) were prescribed statins after a first-time ASCVD event. Among statin users, 7376 (76.7%) used moderate-intensity statins. During a mean follow-up of 32.6 ± 20.9 months, statin use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality than statin nonuse after adjusting for confounding factors (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.97; p = 0.0009). Despite a lack of evidence, more than half of patients on dialysis were prescribed statins after an ASCVD event. In patients on dialysis after ASCVD, statin therapy significantly reduced the risk of long-term all-cause mortality.


Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diálisis Renal , Aterosclerosis/prevención & control
4.
ESC Heart Fail ; 10(4): 2567-2576, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37312276

RESUMEN

AIMS: Although various non-invasive cardiac examinations are known to be predictive of long-term outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), combining them properly would provide synergism. We aimed to show that non-invasive cardiac assessments targeting left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP), left atrial remodelling, and exercise capacity would provide better prognostication in combination. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective observational study included consecutive hospitalized stage A-C HF patients evaluated with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), echocardiography including two-dimensional speckle tracking, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. According to NT-proBNP and echocardiographic semi-quantitative LVFP grading (Echo-LVFP), patients were classified into three LVFP groups: normal range of both Echo-LVFP and NT-proBNP (Group 1), normal range of Echo-LVFP but elevated NT-proBNP (Group 2), and elevated Echo-LVFP and NT-proBNP (Group 3). The adverse outcome was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal acute coronary syndrome, acute stroke, or HF-related hospitalization. Among 224 HF patients (mean age of 63.8 ± 11.6 years, 158 men) analysed, 160 (71.4%) had ischaemic aetiology. During the follow-up of 18.6 ± 9.8 months, event-free survival in Group 2 (n = 56, age of 65.4 ± 12.4) was better than that in Group 3 (n = 45, age of 68.5 ± 11.5) but worse than that in Group 1 (n = 123, mean age of 61.4 ± 10.5) (log-rank P < 0.001). Mechanical left atrial dysfunction (peak longitudinal strain <28%) (adjusted hazard ratio 5.69, 95% confidence interval 1.06-4.48) and limited exercise capacity (peak VO2 per +5 mL/kg/min) (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.87) were also predictable adverse outcomes. Serial addition of peak VO2 and left atrial strain to the model incrementally enhanced the predictive power of LVFP-based risk stratification for adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of NT-proBNP and Echo-LVFP could be used to predict adverse outcomes in patients with HF of various stages. Left atrial mechanics and exercise capacity are incremental to prognostication. Non-invasive test findings could be strategically combined to provide an integrative profile of cardiac performance.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Volumen Sistólico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografía , Estudios Prospectivos
5.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0286670, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37267287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although statins are an effective strategy for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the general population, the benefits for dialysis patients are controversial. We sought to assess trends of statin use and evaluate outcomes of statin therapy in dialysis patients with different types of ASCVD. METHODS: This nationwide retrospective population-based cohort study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service included adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) undergoing chronic dialysis who had an initial ASCVD event in the time period of 2013 to 2018. Annual trends of statin use according to age, sex, and ASCVD types were analyzed. The association between 1-year mortality and statin use was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 17,242 subjects, 9,611(55.7%) patients were statin users. The overall prevalence of statin use increased from 52.9% in 2013 to 57.7% in 2018; the majority (77%) of dialysis patients were prescribed moderate-intensity statins. The proportions of low- or moderate-intensity statin use were similar, but high-intensity statin use increased from 5.7% in 2013 to 10.5% in 2018. The use of the statin/ezetimibe combination has gradually increased since 2016. Statin use was independently associated with the reduced 1-year all-cause mortality after adjusting for confounding factors (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.96, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of statin prescriptions in dialysis patients after ASCVD event increased from 2013 to 2018. Most patients received moderate-intensity statin. However, high-intensity statin and statin/ezetimibe combination therapy has remarkably increased. Statin use was associated with decreased 1-year all-cause mortality in dialysis patients with ASCVD.


Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Adulto , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Diálisis Renal , Aterosclerosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Aterosclerosis/epidemiología , Aterosclerosis/prevención & control , Ezetimiba
6.
Int J Cardiol ; 386: 74-82, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37230429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: HFA-PEFF and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) are comprehensive diagnostic tools for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aimed to investigate the incremental prognostic value of CPET for the HFA-PEFF score among patients with unexplained dyspnea with preserved ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: Consecutive patients with dyspnea and preserved EF (n = 292) were enrolled between August 2019 and July 2021. All patients underwent CPET and comprehensive echocardiography, including two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in the left ventricle, left atrium and right ventricle. The primary outcome was defined as a composite cardiovascular event including cardiovascular-related mortality, acute recurrent heart failure hospitalization, urgent repeat revascularization/myocardial infarction or any hospitalization due to cardiovascular events. RESULTS: The mean age was 58 ± 14.5 years, and 166 (56.8%) participants were male. The study population was divided into three groups based on the HFA-PEFF score: < 2 (n = 81), 2-4 (n = 159), and ≥ 5 (n = 52). HFA-PEFF score ≥ 5, VE/VCO2 slope, peak systolic strain rate of the left atrium and resting diastolic blood pressure were independently associated with composite cardiovascular events. Furthermore, the addition of VE/VCO2 and HFA-PEFF to the base model showed incremental prognostic value for predicting composite cardiovascular events (C-statistic 0.898; integrated discrimination improvement 0.129, p = 0.032; net reclassification improvement 1.043, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CPET could be exploited for the HFA-PEFF approach in terms of incremental prognostic value and diagnosis among patients with unexplained dyspnea with preserved EF.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Disnea/diagnóstico por imagen , Disnea/complicaciones
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 12(10): e024370, 2023 05 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37158100

RESUMEN

Background The secondary prevention with pharmacologic therapy is essential for preventing recurrent cardiovascular events in patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction. Guideline-based optimal medical therapy (OMT) for patients with acute myocardial infarction consists of antiplatelet therapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, ß-blockers, and statins. We aimed to determine the prescription rate of OMT use at discharge and to evaluate the impact of OMT on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era using nationwide cohort data. Methods and Results Using the National Health Insurance claims data in South Korea, patients with acute myocardial infarction who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent between July 2013 and June 2017 were enrolled. A total of 35 972 patients were classified into the OMT and non-OMT groups according to the post-percutaneous coronary intervention discharge medication. The primary end point was all-cause death, and the 2 groups were compared using a propensity-score matching analysis. Fifty-seven percent of patients were prescribed OMT at discharge. During the follow-up period (median, 2.0 years [interquartile range, 1.1-3.2 years]), OMT was associated with a significant reduction in the all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76-0.90]; P<0.001) and composite outcome of death or coronary revascularization (aHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.85-0.93]; P<0.001). Conclusions OMT was prescribed at suboptimal rates in South Korea. However, our nationwide cohort study showed that OMT has a benefit for long-term clinical outcomes on all-cause mortality and composite outcome of death or coronary revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era.


Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
PLoS One ; 17(6): e0269301, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35704630

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The available data are not sufficient to understand the clinical impact of statin intensity in elderly patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Using the COREA-AMI registry, we sought to compare the clinical impact of high- versus low-to-moderate-intensity statin in younger (<75 years old) and elderly (≥75 years old) patients. Of 10,719 patients, we included 8,096 patients treated with drug-eluting stents. All patients were classified into high-intensity versus low-to-moderate-intensity statin group according to statin type and dose at discharge. The primary end point was target-vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel MI, or target-lesion revascularization (TLR) from 1 month to 12 months after index PCI. RESULTS: In younger patients, high-intensity statin showed the better clinical outcomes than low-to-moderate-intensity statin (TVF: 79 [5.4%] vs. 329 [6.8%], adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.99; P = 0.038). However, in elderly patients, the incidence rates of the adverse clinical outcomes were similar between two statin-intensity groups (TVF: 38 [11.4%] vs. 131 [10.6%], aHR 1.1; 95% CI 0.76-1.59; P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: In this AMI cohort underwent PCI, high-intensity statin showed the better 1-year clinical outcomes than low-to-moderate-intensity statin in younger patients. Meanwhile, the incidence rates of adverse clinical events between high- and low-to-moderate-intensity statin were not statistically different in elderly patients. Further randomized study with large elderly population is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Can J Cardiol ; 38(1): 92-101, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34737035

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the association between serial high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) measurements and long-term outcomes in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of serial hsCRP measurements for risk stratification in stabilised post-MI patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A total of 1018 patients who had hsCRP values at both baseline and 1 year after MI were included. High inflammatory status was defined as hsCRP > 2 mg/L. Patients were classified into 4 groups: persistently low, falling (first high then low hsCRP), rising (first low then high hsCRP), and persistently high hsCRP. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: a composite of all-cause of death, MI, and cerebrovascular accident) within 4 years after the second hsCRP measurement. RESULTS: At 1 year after MI, the numbers of patients in the persistently low, falling, rising, and persistently high hsCRP groups were 394 (38.7%), 358 (35.2%), 69 (6.8%), and 197 (19.4%), respectively. The incidence of MACCE was progressively elevated from the persistently low to the falling, rising, and persistently high hsCRP groups (4.8%, 8.1%, 10.1%, and 13.2%, respectively; P = 0.004). Persistently high hsCRP was an independent predictor of MACCE (adjusted hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.35-4.81; P = 0.004) and provided incremental prognostic value beyond that of the baseline clinical risk model (net reclassification improvement = 0.397; integrated discrimination improvement = 0.025; all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among stabilised post-MI patients who underwent PCI, persistently high hsCRP was frequently seen 1 year after MI and was strongly associated with long-term adverse clinical outcomes. Serial measurements of hsCRP during clinical follow-up after MI may help to identify patients at higher risk for mortality and morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Predicción , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Pronóstico , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias
12.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0258525, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34644362

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A substantial number of patients presenting with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) have severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%). But data are lacking regarding optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy for these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of IRA (infarct-related artery)-only and multivessel PCI in patients with NSTEMI and MVD complicated by severe LVSD. METHODS: Among 13,104 patients enrolled in the PCI registry from November 2011 to December 2015, patients with NSTEMI and MVD with severe LVSD who underwent successful PCI were screened. The primary outcome was 3-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, stroke, and any revascularization. RESULTS: Overall, 228 patients were treated with IRA-only PCI (n = 104) or MV-PCI (n = 124). The MACE risk was significantly lower in the MV-PCI group than in the IRA-only PCI group (35.5% vs. 54.8%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.561; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.378-0.832; p = 0.04). This result was mainly driven by a significantly lower risk of all-cause death (23.4% vs. 41.4%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.503; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.314-0.806; p = 0.004). The results were consistent after multivariate regression, propensity-score matching, and inverse probability weighting to adjust for baseline differences. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with NSTEMI and MVD complicated with severe LVSD, multivessel PCI was associated with a significantly lower MACE risk. The findings may provide valuable information to physicians who are involved in decision-making for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Enfermedades Vasculares/patología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Función Ventricular Izquierda
13.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(7)2021 Jul 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34356975

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Data is still limited regarding clinical outcomes of rotational atherectomy (RA) after percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of RA. Materials and Methods: This multi-center registry enrolled patients who underwent RA during PCI from nine tertiary centers in Korea between January 2010 and October 2019. The primary endpoint was target-vessel failure (TVF; the composite outcome of cardiac death, target-vessel spontaneous myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization). Results: Of 540 patients (583 lesions), the mean patient age was 71.4 ± 0.4 years, 323 patients (59.8%) were men, and 305 patients (56.5%) had diabetes mellitus. Technical success rate was 96.4%. In-hospital major adverse cerebral and cardiac events occurred in 63 cases (10.8%). At 1.5 years, 72 (16.0%) of TVFs were occurred. We evaluated independent predictors of TVF, which included current smoker (hazard ratio (HR), 1.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-3.16; p = 0.01), chronic renal disease (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.14-3.08; p = 0.013), history of cerebrovascular attack (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.24-3.68; p = 0.006), left ventricle ejection fraction (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.999; p = 0.037), and left main disease (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.11-3.37; p = 0.019). Conclusions: From this registry, we demonstrated acceptable success rates, in-hospital and mid-term clinical outcomes of RA in the DES era.


Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Calcificación Vascular , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Cancer Med ; 10(12): 3964-3973, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33998163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no proven primary preventive strategy for doxorubicin-induced subclinical cardiotoxicity (DISC), especially among patients without a cardiovascular (CV) risk. We investigated the primary preventive effect on DISC of the concomitant use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or beta-blockers (BBs), especially among breast cancer patients without a CV risk. METHODS: A total of 385 patients who were scheduled for doxorubicin chemotherapy were screened. Among them, 195 patients of the study populations were included and were randomly divided into two groups [candesartan 4 mg q.d. vs. carvedilol 3.125 mg q.d.] and patients who were unwilling to take one of the medications were evaluated as controls. The primary outcomes were the incidence of early DISC (DISC developing within 6 months after chemotherapy), and late DISC (DISC developing only at least 12 months after chemotherapy). RESULT: Compared with the control group (8 out of 43 patients (18.6%)), only the candesartan group (4 out of 82 patients (4.9%)) showed a significantly lower incidence of early DISC (p = 0.022). Compared with the control group, the candesartan group demonstrated a significantly reduced decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) throughout the study period [-1.0% vs. -3.00 (p < 0.001) at the first follow-up, -1.10% vs. -3.40(p = 0.009) at the second follow-up]. CONCLUSIONS: Among breast cancer patients without a CV risk treated with doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy, subclinical cardiotoxicity is prevalent and concomitant administration of low-dose candesartan might be effective to prevent an early decrease in LVEF. Further large-scale, randomized controlled trials will be needed to confirm our findings.


Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bifenilo/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiotoxicidad/prevención & control , Carvedilol/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Bifenilo/administración & dosificación , Cardiotoxicidad/epidemiología , Carvedilol/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Tetrazoles/administración & dosificación , Función Ventricular Izquierda/efectos de los fármacos
15.
J Geriatr Cardiol ; 17(11): 680-693, 2020 Nov 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33343647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are numerous but conflicting data regarding gender differences in outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Furthermore, gender differences in clinical outcomes with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following PCI in Asian population remain uncertain because of the under-representation of Asian in previous trials. METHODS: A total of 13, 104 AMI patients from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH) between November 2011 and December 2015 were classified into male (n = 8021, 75.9%) and female (n = 2547, 24.1%). We compared the demographic, clinical and angiographic characteristics, 30-days and 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in women with those in men after AMI by using propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: Compared with men, women were older, had more comorbidities and more often presented with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and reduced left ventricular systolic function. Over the median follow-up of 363 days, gender differences in both 30-days and 1-year MACCE as well as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction minor bleeding risk were not observed in the PS matched population (30-days MACCE: 5.3% vs. 4.7%, log-rank P = 0.494, HR = 1.126, 95% CI: 0.800-1.585; 1-year MACCE: 9.3% vs. 9.0%, log-rank P = 0.803, HR = 1.032, 95% CI: 0.802-1.328; TIMI minor bleeding: 4.9% vs. 3.9%, log-rank P= 0.215, HR = 1.255, 95% CI: 0.869-1.814). CONCLUSIONS: Among Korean AMI population undergoing contemporary PCI, women, as compared with men, had different clinical and angiographic characteristics but showed similar 30-days and 1-year clinical outcomes. The risk of bleeding after PCI was comparable between men and women during one-year follow up.

16.
World J Gastroenterol ; 10(8): 1191-7, 2004 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15069724

RESUMEN

AIM: rAAV mediated endostatin gene therapy has been examined as a new method for treating cancer. However, a sustained and high protein delivery is required to achieve the desired therapeutic effects. We evaluated the impact of topoisomerase inhibitors in rAAV delivered endostatin gene therapy in a liver tumor model. METHODS: rAAV containing endostatin expression cassettes were transduced into hepatoma cell lines. To test whether the topoisomerase inhibitor pretreatment increased the expression of endostatin, Western blotting and ELISA were performed. The biologic activity of endostatin was confirmed by endothelial cell proliferation and tube formation assays. The anti-tumor effects of the rAAV-endostatin vector combined with a topoisomerase inhibitor, etoposide, were evaluated in a mouse liver tumor model. RESULTS: Topoisomerase inhibitors, including camptothecin and etoposide, were found to increase the endostatin expression level in vitro. The over-expressed endostatin, as a result of pretreatment with a topoisomerase inhibitor, was also biologically active. In animal experiments, the combined therapy of topoisomerase inhibitor, etoposide with the rAAV-endostatin vector had the best tumor-suppressive effect and tumor foci were barely observed in livers of the treated mice. Pretreatment with an etoposide increased the level of endostatin in the liver and serum of rAAV-endostatin treated mice. Finally, the mice treated with rAAV-endostatin in combination with etoposide showed the longest survival among the experimental models. CONCLUSION: rAAV delivered endostatin gene therapy in combination with a topoisomerase inhibitor pretreatment is an effective modality for anticancer gene therapy.


Asunto(s)
Adenoviridae/genética , Camptotecina/farmacología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Terapia Genética/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/farmacología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Línea Celular Tumoral , Terapia Combinada , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Endostatinas/farmacología , Endotelio Vascular/citología , Etopósido/farmacología , Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Ratones , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Inhibidores de Topoisomerasa , Venas Umbilicales/citología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...