Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 63(1): e59-e74, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34271142

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Caring for dying neonates is distressing for healthcare professionals (HCP)s. Yet, the extent of these effects is poorly understood, compromising support of HCPs. To better understand and support HCPs, a systematic scoping review (SSR) of prevailing data is proposed. OBJECTIVES: In mapping prevailing data on the impact of caring for dying neonates on HCPs, an SSR proffers new insights on changes to their beliefs, values, coping, actions, relationships and self-concepts of personhood. METHODS: Krishna's Systematic Evidenced Based Approach (SEBA) supports a robust, reproducible review whilst its constructivist approach and relativist lens effectively contends with diverse data sources, facilitating a holistic study. RESULTS: A total of 9826 abstracts were reviewed and 69 articles were included. Thematic and content analysis were used simultanously. The four categories drawn from the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) complements the four themes identified: Emotional and Physical Difficulties, Coping Mechanisms, Conflict and Recommendations. CONCLUSION: In highlighting significant longitudinal effects upon all aspects of their lives, this SSR in SEBA reveals a critical need for timely, appropriate and personalized support. We recommend adapting the RToP as an assessment tool to identify and evaluate the needs of these HCPs. It may also be used to structure a holistic support mechanism. Future studies are required to validate its use and appraise other aspects of support available for HCPs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Médicos , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Personeidad , Autoimagen
2.
BMC Palliat Care ; 20(1): 136, 2021 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34481491

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Losing a child tragically impacts the well-being and functioning of parents. With these effects extending beyond emotional, physical morbidity and compromising self-perceptions, appropriate, longitudinal, timely and personalised support is key to effective care of bereaved parents. However, in the absence of a comprehensive understanding of parental bereavement, effective support of bereaved parents remains suboptimal. To address this gap, we scrutinise prevailing data on the effects of a child's death, aged 0-12 years, through the lens of the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP). METHODS: To study prevailing accounts of bereaved parents following the death of a child, we adopt Krishna's Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) to structure our Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA). RESULTS: Three thousand seventy-four abstracts were reviewed, 160 full text articles were evaluated, and 111 articles were included and analysed using thematic and content analysis. Four themes/categories were identified relating to the four rings of the RToP. Findings reveal that static concepts of protective and risk factors for grief are misplaced and that the support of healthcare professionals is key to assisting bereaved parents. CONCLUSION: In the absence of consistent support of bereaved parents, this study highlights the need for effective training of healthcare professionals, beginning with an appreciation that every aspect of an individual parent's personhood is impacted by the loss of their child. Acknowledging grief as a complex, evolving and personalised process subjected to parental characteristics, settings, context and available support, this SSR in SEBA calls attention to effective nurturing of the relationship between parents and healthcare professionals, and suggests use of the RToP to assess and direct personalised, timely, specific support of parents in evolving conditions. We believe the findings of this review also call for further studies to support healthcare professionals as they journey with bereaved parents.


Asunto(s)
Aflicción , Personeidad , Niño , Pesar , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Padres
3.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 57(3): 409-416, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31863251

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) may provide incremental benefits for arrhythmia management in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of endocardial ablation and LAA exclusion with LARIAT device for electrical and mechanical exclusion of LAA. METHODS: We compared patients who underwent endocardial LAA isolation during index RFA for persistent AF and underwent a repeat RFA to patients who underwent LAA exclusion with LARIAT device followed by RFA for AF in this multicenter registry. Efficacy of electrical and mechanical isolation of LAA was assessed. RESULTS: We included 182 patients of which 91 patients underwent endocardial LAA isolation during RFA for AF, and 91 patients underwent LAA exclusion with LARIAT device followed by RFA for AF. Baseline characteristics were similar except for higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, coronary artery disease, and prior stroke rate in LARIAT arm. Persistence of electrical isolation (measured at beginning of second procedure) after LARIAT procedure was higher than one-time AF-RFA (96.7% vs 52.8%, p < 0.01). Acute pulmonary vein isolation rates were similar in both arms. AF recurrence rate after second isolation attempts at 1 year was similar in both arms. No difference in major complications was noted between both arms. CONCLUSIONS: LAA exclusion with LARIAT device appears to be more efficacious as compared to one-time endocardial ablation, but not compared to repeat isolation, in achieving complete electrical isolation of LAA for persistent AF.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/métodos , Anciano , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Mapeo Epicárdico , Femenino , Humanos , Ligadura/instrumentación , Masculino , Seguridad del Paciente , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Europace ; 19(1): 4-15, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27540038

RESUMEN

The increasing interest in left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for ischaemic stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) fuels the need for more clinical data on the safety and effectiveness of this therapy. Besides an assessment of the effectiveness of the therapy in specific patients groups, comparisons with pharmacological stroke prophylaxis, surgical approaches, and other device-based therapies are warranted. This paper documents the consensus reached among clinical experts in relevant disciplines from Europe and North America, European cardiology professional societies, and representatives from the medical device industry regarding definitions for parameters and endpoints to be assessed in clinical studies. Adherence to these definitions is proposed in order to achieve a consistent approach across clinical studies on LAAO among the involved stakeholders and various clinical disciplines and thereby facilitate continued evaluation of therapeutic strategies available.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Recolección de Datos , Determinación de Punto Final , Proyectos de Investigación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidad , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidad , Consenso , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Cooperación Internacional , Selección de Paciente , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
EuroIntervention ; 12(1): 103-11, 2016 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27173870

RESUMEN

The increasing interest in left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for ischaemic stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) fuels the need for more clinical data on the safety and effectiveness of this therapy. Besides an assessment of the effectiveness of the therapy in specific patient groups, comparisons with pharmacological stroke prophylaxis, surgical approaches and other device-based therapies are warranted. This paper documents the consensus reached among clinical experts in relevant disciplines from Europe and North America, European cardiology professional societies and representatives from the medical device industry regarding definitions for parameters and endpoints to be assessed in clinical studies. Adherence to these definitions is proposed in order to achieve a consistent approach across clinical studies on LAAO among the involved stakeholders and various clinical disciplines and thereby facilitate continued evaluation of therapeutic strategies available.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Recolección de Datos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Consenso , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...