Should sub-millimeter margins be deemed positive in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: While several studies have indicated that a margin status of < 1 mm should be classified as a positive margin in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), there is a lack of extensive cohort studies comparing the clinical outcomes between patients with positive margins and margins < 1 mm. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2020, we identified 18,416 Taiwanese OCSCC patients who underwent tumor resection and neck dissection. Of these, 311 had margins < 1 mm and 1013 had positive margins. To compare patients with margins < 1 mm and those with positive margins, a propensity score (PS)-matched analysis (n = 253 in each group) was conducted. RESULTS: The group with margins < 1 mm displayed a notably higher prevalence of several variables: 1) tongue subsite, 2) younger age, 3) smaller depth of invasion), 4) early tumor stage, and 5) treatment with surgery alone. Patients with margins < 1 mm demonstrated significantly better disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates compared to those with positive margins (74 % versus 53 %, 65 % versus 43 %, both p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis further confirmed that positive margins were an independent predictor of worse 5-year DSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.38, p = 0.0103) and OS (HR = 1.28, p = 0.0222). In the PS-matched cohort, the 5-year outcomes for patients with margins < 1 mm compared to positive margins were as follows: DSS, 71 % versus 59 %, respectively (p = 0.0127) and OS, 60 % versus 48 %, respectively (p = 0.0398). CONCLUSIONS: OCSCC patients with a margin status < 1 mm exhibited distinct clinicopathological characteristics and a more favorable prognosis compared to those with positive resection margins.

Is elective neck dissection justified in cT2N0M0 oral cavity cancer defined according to the AJCC eighth edition staging system?

BACKGROUND: The current NCCN guidelines recommend considering elective neck dissection (END) for early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with a depth of invasion (DOI) exceeding 3 mm. However, this DOI threshold, determined by evaluating the occult lymph node metastatic rate, lacks robust supporting evidence regarding its impact on patient outcomes. In this nationwide study, we sought to explore the specific indications for END in patients diagnosed with OCSCC at stage cT2N0M0, as defined by the AJCC Eighth Edition staging criteria. METHODS: We examined 4723 patients with cT2N0M0 OCSCC, of which 3744 underwent END and 979 were monitored through neck observation (NO). RESULTS: Patients who underwent END had better 5-year outcomes compared to those in the NO group. The END group had higher rates of neck control (95% vs. 84%, p < 0.0001), disease-specific survival (DSS; 87% vs. 84%, p = 0.0259), and overall survival (OS; 79% vs. 73%, p = 0.0002). Multivariable analysis identified NO, DOI ≥5.0 mm, and moderate-to-poor tumor differentiation as independent risk factors for 5-year neck control, DSS, and OS. Based on these prognostic variables, three distinct outcome subgroups were identified within the NO group. These included a low-risk subgroup (DOI <5 mm plus well-differentiated tumor), an intermediate-risk subgroup (DOI ≥5.0 mm or moderately differentiated tumor), and a high-risk subgroup (poorly differentiated tumor or DOI ≥5.0 mm plus moderately differentiated tumor). Notably, the 5-year survival outcomes (neck control/DSS/OS) for the low-risk subgroup within the NO group (97%/95%/85%, n = 251) were not inferior to those of the END group (95%/87%/79%). CONCLUSIONS: By implementing risk stratification within the NO group, we found that 26% (251/979) of low-risk patients achieved outcomes similar to those in the END group. Therefore, when making decisions regarding the implementation of END in patients with cT2N0M0 OCSCC, factors such as DOI and tumor differentiation should be taken into account.

Indications for elective neck dissection in cT1N0M0 oral cavity cancer according to the AJCC eight edition: A nationwide study.

OBJECTIVES: According to the NCCN guidelines, there is weak evidence to support the use of elective neck dissection (END) in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). We sought to examine the indications for END in patients with cT1N0M0 OCSCC defined according to the AJCC Staging Manual, Eight Edition. METHODS: Of the 3886 patients diagnosed with cT1N0M0 included in the study, 2065 underwent END and 1821 neck observation. RESULTS: The 5-year outcomes for patients who received END versus neck observation before and after propensity score matching (n = 1406 each) were as follows: neck control, 96 %/90 % (before matching), p < 0.0001; 96 %/90 % (after matching), p < 0.0001; disease-specific survival (DSS), 93 %/92 % (before matching), p = 0.0227; 93 %/92 % (after matching), p = 0.1436. Multivariable analyses revealed that neck observation, depth of invasion (DOI) > 2.5 mm, and poor differentiation were independent risk factors for 5-year outcomes. Upon the application of a scoring system ranging from 0 (no risk factor) to 3 (presence of the three risk factors), the following 5-year rates were observed: neck control, 98 %/95 %/84 %/85 %; DSS, 96 %/93 %/88 %/85 %; and overall survival, 90 %/86 %/79 %/59 %, respectively (all p < 0.0001). The survival outcomes of patients with scores of 0 and 1 were similar. The occult metastasis rates in the entire study cohort, DOI > 2.5 mm, and poor differentiation were 6.8 %/9.2 %/17.1 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: Because all patients who received neck observation had a score of 1 or higher, END should be performed when a DOI > 2.5 mm or poorly differentiated tumors are present. Under these circumstances, 48.6 % (1888/3886) of cT1N0M0 patients may avoid END without compromising oncological outcomes.

Early relapse is an adverse prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: results from a nationwide registry study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of the relapse interval in patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is a matter of ongoing debate. In this large-scale, registry-based, nationwide study, we examined whether the time interval between surgery and the first disease relapse may affect survival outcomes in Taiwanese patients with OCSCC. METHODS: Data made available by the Taiwan Health Promotion Administration as of 2004 were obtained. The study cohort consisted of patients who were included in the registry between 2011 and 2017. Disease staging was performed according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, Eight Edition. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 13,789 patients with OCSCC who received surgical treatment. A total of 2327 (16.9%) patients experienced a first disease relapse. The optimal cutoff value for the relapse interval was 330 days when both 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) (≤ 330/>330 days, n = 1630/697) were taken into account. In addition, we undertook a propensity score (PS)-matched analysis of patients (n = 654 each) with early (≤ 330 days) versus late (> 330 days) relapse. RESULTS: The median follow-up time in the entire study cohort was 702 days (433 and 2001 days in the early and late relapse groups, respectively). Compared with patients who experienced late relapse, those with early relapse showed a higher prevalence of the following adverse prognostic factors: pT4, pN3, pStage IV, poor differentiation, depth of invasion ≥ 10 mm, and extra-nodal extension. Multivariable analysis revealed that early relapse was an independent adverse prognostic factor for both 5-year DSS and OS (average hazard ratios [AHRs]: 3.24 and 3.91, respectively). In the PS-matched cohort, patients who experienced early relapse showed less favorable 5-year DSS: 58% versus 30%, p < 0.0001 (AHR: 3.10 [2.69 - 3.57]) and OS: 49% versus 22%, p < 0.0001 (AHR: 3.32 [2.89 - 3.81]). CONCLUSION: After adjustment for potential confounders and PS matching, early relapse was an adverse prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with OCSCC. Our findings may have significant implications for risk stratification.

Prevalence and Comorbidity of Gender Dysphoria in Taiwan, 2010-2019.

Gender dysphoria (GD) is a condition in which a person exhibits marked incongruence between their expressed or experienced gender and their sex assigned at birth. The last survey of individuals with GD in Taiwan was conducted approximately 10 years ago. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of GD in Taiwan within the last 10 years as well as comorbidities. A retrospective medical record review was performed for all patients in the database of the Health and Welfare Data Science Center covered by National Health Insurance in Taiwan from January 2010 until December 2019. The study population of persons with GD was defined as individuals who had been diagnosed with transsexualism (transgender or transsexual) or gender identity disorders. Our review found case numbers and prevalence of GD in 2019 were about twice that of patients in 2010 for both assigned males and assigned females at birth. Case numbers for 2010 versus 2019 were 440 versus 867 for assigned males at birth, and 189 versus 386 for assigned females at birth. The 1-year prevalence for 2010 versus 2019 was 3.8/100,000 versus 7.4/100,000 for assigned males at birth, and 1.6/100,000 versus 3.2/100,000 for assigned females at birth. Comorbidities of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and psychosis were more likely in children with GD younger than 12 years of age; comorbid depression was more likely in adolescents and adults with GD. Improvements in social and mental health support should be provided to help address these comorbidities of ADHD, ASD, and depression among individuals with GD.

Optimizing margin status for improving prognosis in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study from the two highest-volume Taiwanese hospitals.

Background: In the treatment of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), surgical quality measures which are expected to affect outcomes, including the achievement of a clear margin, are surgeon-dependent but might not be invariably associated with hospital volume. Our objective was to explore surgical margin variations and survival differences of OCSCC between two highest-volume hospitals in Taiwan. Materials and methods: A total of 2009 and 1019 patients with OCSCC who were treated at the two highest-volume Taiwanese hospitals (termed Hospital 1 and Hospital 2, respectively) were included. We examined how a pathological margin <5 mm impacted patient outcomes before and after propensity score (PS) matching. Results: The prevalence of margins <5 mm was markedly lower in Hospital 1 than in Hospital 2 (34.5%/65.2%, p<0.0001). Compared with Hospital 2, tumor severity was higher in Hospital 1. On univariable analysis, being treated in Hospital 2 (versus Hospital 1; hazard ratio [HR] for 5-year disease-specific survival [DSS] = 1.34, p=0.0002; HR for 5-year overall survival [OS] = 1.17, p=0.0271) and margins <5 mm (versus ≥5 mm; HR for 5-year DSS = 1.63, p<0.0001; HR for 5-year OS = 1.48, p<0.0001) were identified as adverse factors. The associations of treatment in Hospital 2 and margins <5 mm with less favorable outcomes remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders in multivariable analyses, as well as in the PS-matched cohort. The 5-year survival differences between patients operated in Hospital 1 and Hospital 2 were even more pronounced in the PS-matched cohort (before PS matching: DSS, 79%/74%, p=0.0002; OS, 71%/68%, p=0.0269; after PS matching: DSS, 84%/72%, p<0.0001; OS, 75%/66%, p<0.0001). In the entire cohort, the rate of adjuvant therapy was found to be lower in patients with margins ≥5 mm than in those with margins <5 mm (42.7%/57.0%, p<0.0001). Conclusions: Within the two highest-volume hospitals in Taiwan, patients with OCSCC with a clear margin status (≥5 mm) achieved more favorable outcomes. These results have clinical implications and show how initiatives aimed at improving the margin quality can translate in better outcomes. A clear margin status can reduce the need for adjuvant therapy, ultimately improving quality of life.

Towards an Improved Pathological Node Classification for Prognostic Stratification of Patients With Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Nationwide Registry Study.

Background: To assess the prognostic significance of different nodal parameters [i.e., number of pathologically positive nodes, log odds of positive lymph nodes, lymph node ratio (LNR), and extra-nodal extension (ENE)] in Taiwanese patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), and to devise an optimized pN classification system for predicting survival in OCSCC. Methods: A total of 4287 Taiwanese patients with first primary OCSCC and nodal metastases were enrolled. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with the spline method was applied to identify the optimal cut-off values for LNR, log odds of positive lymph nodes, and number of pathologically positive nodes. Results: On multivariable analysis, we identified a LNR ≥0.078/0.079, the presence of at least three pathologically positive nodes, and ENE as independent prognosticators for 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates. We therefore devised a four-point prognostic scoring system according to the presence or absence of each variable. The 5-year DSS and OS rates of patients with scores of 0-3 were 70%/62%/50%/36% (p <0.0001) and 61%/52%/40%25%, respectively (p <0.0001). On analyzing the AJCC 2017 pN classification, patients with pN3a displayed better survival rates than those with pN2 disease. The 5-year DSS and OS rates of patients with pN1/pN2/pN3a/pN3b disease were 72%/60%/67%/43% (p <0.0001) and 63%/51%/67%/33%, respectively (p <0.0001). Conclusions: Three nodal parameters (i.e., a LNR ≥0.078/0.079, the presence of at least three pathologically positive nodes, and ENE) assessed in combination provided a better prognostic stratification than the traditional AJCC pN classification.

Adjuvant therapy with traditional Chinese medicine and long-term mortality in patients with stroke: A nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the use of adjuvant traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapy, a form of complementary and alternative medicine, is associated with long-term mortality after stroke. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study and used claims data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance program linked to the National Registry of Death. The cohort included patients aged ≥18 years who were hospitalized for their first stroke event between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2013. Adjuvant TCM therapy was defined as additional treatments with TCM, which included acupuncture, Chinese herbal medicine, and Tuina, during hospitalization for up to six months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The mortality rate was measured through to December 31, 2014. RESULTS: Of 321,157 patients with stroke, 14,579 received adjuvant TCM therapy. Propensity score matching resulted in 13,918 matched pairs of patients who did and did not receive adjuvant TCM care. Both multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.69) and propensity score-matching analysis (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60-0.66) revealed a reduced mortality risk associated with the use of adjuvant TCM therapy, as compared with routine inpatient care only. Acupuncture was the most commonly used TCM therapy. Patients treated with acupuncture only, which accounted for 41.3% of TCM users, had a reduced risk of mortality compared with those treated with routine inpatient care. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TCM therapy adjuvant to Western inpatient care in the acute and subacute stages of stroke recovery is associated with a reduced risk of long-term mortality.

Clinical outcomes of patients with pT4a and pT4b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone surgery: Results from a Taiwanese registry-based, nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: While the NCCN guidelines maintain that T4b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) should undergo either non-surgical treatments or clinical trials, promising outcomes of T4b OCSCC having surgical excision have been reported. We analyzed and compared the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with pT4a and pT4b OCSCC who had undergone surgical treatment. METHODS: From 2011 to 2017, a total of 4031 and 355 patients with first primary pT4a and pT4b OCSCC were identified. A propensity score (PS)-matched analysis of patients (n = 351 each) for pT4a and pT4b tumors was also performed. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-specific and overall survival (DSS/OS) rates were more favorable in patients with pT4a than in those with pT4b OCSCC (64%/55%, p < 0.0001; 55%/43%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Compared with pT4a, those with pT4b tumors had a higher burden of the following risk factors: buccal/retromolar/hard palate subsite, male sex, depth ≥ 10 mm, and positive margins. Before PS matching, multivariable analyses revealed that pT4b tumors (versus pT4a) were an adverse prognosticator for both 5-year DSS and OS (hazard ratios: 1.32 and 1.39, respectively). However, in the PS-matched cohort, no significant differences in 5-year DSS and OS rates were observed between pT4a and pT4b OCSCC (57%/56%, p = 0.4024; 48%/44%, p = 0.1807, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: No significant outcome differences were evident between pT4b and pT4a OCSCC after PS matching. The most plausible hypothesis for the observed survival difference between T4a and T4b tumors is that it was driven by positive margins. We suggest that T4b OCSCC should undergo initial surgical excision if adequate resection is possible.

Clinical Outcomes of Taiwanese Patients with Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Reconstruction with Free Versus Local Flaps.

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) who underwent reconstruction with free versus local flaps. METHODS: From 2011 to 2017, we examined 8646 patients with first primary OCSCC who received surgery either with or without adjuvant therapy. Of these patients, 7297 and 1349 received free and local flap reconstruction, respectively. Two propensity score-matched groups of patients who underwent free versus local flap (n = 1268 each) reconstructions were examined. Margin status was not included as a propensity score-matched variable. RESULTS: Compared with local flaps, patients who received free flaps had a higher prevalence of the following variables: male sex, age < 65 years, pT3-4, pN1-3, p-Stage III-IV, depth ≥ 10 mm, margin > 4 mm, extranodal extension (ENE), and adjuvant therapy (all p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis identified the reconstruction method (local vs. free flaps, only overall survival [OS]), age ≥ 65 years, pT3-4, pN1-3, p-Stage III-IV, depth ≥ 10 mm (only OS), margins ≤ 4 mm, and ENE as independent adverse prognosticators for disease-specific survival (DSS) and OS. The results of propensity score-matched analyses revealed that, compared with free flaps, patients who underwent local flap reconstruction showed less favorable 5-year DSS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 82%/77%; p = 0.0100) and OS (HR 1.21, 73%/68%; p = 0.0079). CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for covariates using multivariate models, and also by propensity score modeling, OCSCC patients who underwent free flap reconstruction showed a higher frequency of clear margins and a significant survival advantage compared with those who received local flaps.

cN+pN0 disease does not portend a less favorable prognosis compared with cN0pN0 in patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with cN+pN0 versus cN0pN0 disease. METHODS: A total of 1309 OCSCC patients with pN0 disease were included. Of them, 1019 and 290 cases had cN0pN0 and cN+pN0 disease, respectively. For comparison purposes, we also examined 799 patients with pN+disease (cN0pN+/cN+pN+, n = 239/560). Subgroup analysis was performed in a propensity score-matched cohort with cN0pN0 and cN+pN0 disease (n = 284 each). RESULTS: Compared with cN0pN0, patients with cN+pN0 had a higher prevalence of the following variables: betel chewing, pT3-4, depth ≥10 mm, perineural invasion, and treatment with surgery and adjuvant therapy. The prognosis of patients with cN+pN0 (mean: 52 nodes) and cN0pN0 (mean: 39 nodes) disease was similar both in the original cohort and after propensity score matching. However, the 5-year outcomes were more favorable for cN+pN0/cN0pN0 compared with cN0pN+/cN+pN+ (local control, 88%/88%/83%/81%; neck control, 94%/93%/82%/76%; distant metastases, 4%/3%/13%/31%; disease-free survival, 84%/83%/68%/52%; disease-specific survival, 92%/92%/77%/57%; overall survival, 81%/82%/59%/42%; all p values <0.001; cN+pN0 versus cN0pN0, all p values >0.05). cN+pN0 disease (vs. cN0pN0) was not significantly associated with local control, neck control, distant metastases, and survivals either in univariable or multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher risk factor burden, the prognosis of patients with cN+pN0 disease did not differ from that of cases with cN0pN0. The higher nodal yield and the more frequent use of adjuvant therapy in cN+pN0 disease may explain the lack of significant differences in terms of neck control compared with cN0pN0 disease.

Clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with resected squamous cell carcinoma of the upper and lower gum.

OBJECTIVES: This large-scale cohort study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the upper versus lower gum. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2017, we identified 4244 patients with first primary SCC of the gum (694 upper gum; 3550 lower gum) who were treated with surgery either with or without adjuvant therapy. Of them, 1990 patients (329 upper gum; 1661 lower gum) enrolled from 2011 to 2017 had a higher number of histopathological variables and entered subgroup analyses. Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates served as outcome measures. RESULTS: The 5-year DSS and OS rates of patients with upper gum SCC were lower than those of cases with lower gum SCC (65%/74%, p < 0.0001; and 55%/65%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Compared with lower gum SCC, upper gum SCC had a higher prevalence of the following variables: female sex, age ≥ 65 years, pNx (without neck dissection), no-betel chewing (2011-2017), no-smoking (2011-2017), and margin status ≤ 4 mm (positive and close margins, 2011-2017). On multivariable analysis, gum subsite (upper versus lower), age (≥65 versus < 65 years), pT (T3 - 4 versus T1 - 2), pN (N1 - 3 versus N0/Nx), depth (≥10 mm versus < 10 mm, 2011-2017), ENE (present versus absent, 2011-2017), and margins (≤4 mm versus > 4 mm 2011-2017, only DSS) were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors for 5-year DSS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to lower gum SCC, upper gum SCC had less favorable 5-year outcomes. Wide resection margins are recommended to improve prognosis of upper gum SCC.

Treatment of Varicose Veins Affects the Incidences of Venous Thromboembolism and Peripheral Artery Disease.

[Figure: see text].

Seeking Medical Assistance for Dysphonia Is Associated with an Improved Survival Rate in Laryngeal Cancer: Real-World Evidence.

(1) Background: Patients with laryngeal cancer usually present with dysphonia. However, some studies reported that the duration from dysphonia to cancer diagnosis has been prolonged significantly in recent years. This study aimed to evaluate that in the initial dysphonia-related diagnosis and the interval between the diagnosis of laryngeal cancer may affect the overall survival (OS). (2) Methods: The 1997-2013 Longitudinal Health Insurance Database was used in this study. A propensity score with 1-to-1 matching was applied to balance the baseline characteristics. The OS was examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. (3) Results: A total of 2753 patients with a first primary laryngeal cancer diagnosis were identified. The patients without prior dysphonia-related diagnosis (PD-) group did have a significantly worse five-year survival (p = 0.015) comparing with those with a prior dysphonia-related diagnosis (PD+) group among glottic cancer patients. The group with a shorter dysphonia-to-diagnosis interval had a better five-year OS than the prolonged group (p = 0.007) in laryngeal cancer. (4) Conclusions: Looking for medical assistance before a diagnosis of glottic cancer is associated with a better overall survival, while a diagnostic delay of more than 30 days from the first medical examination for dysphonia is associated with a worse outcome among in patients with laryngeal cancer.

Surgical Margins Status and Prognosis after Resection of Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results from a Taiwanese Nationwide Registry-Based Study.

(1) Background: The optimal cutoff value that maximizes the prognostic value of surgical margins in patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma has not yet been identified. (2) Methods: Data for this study were retrieved from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. A total of 13,768 Taiwanese patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma were identified and stratified according to different margin statuses (0, 0.1-4 and > 4 mm). The five-year local control, disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were the main outcome measures. (3) Results: The 5-year local control, disease-specific survival and overall survival rates of patients with close margins (0 and 0.1-4 mm) were significantly lower than those observed in patients with clear margins (> 4 mm; all p values < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, margin status, depth of invasion and extra-nodal extension were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors for 5-year local control. (4) Conclusions: A thorough assessment of surgical margins can provide a reliable prognostic prediction in patients with OCSCC. This has potential implications for treatment approaches tailored to the individual level. The achievement of clear margins (>4 mm) should be considered a key surgical goal to improve outcomes in this patient group.

Precision Adjuvant Therapy Based on Detailed Pathologic Risk Factors for Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Outcome Comparison of CGMH and NCCN Guidelines.

PURPOSE: The evidence for adjuvant therapy of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines is derived from patients with head and neck cancer. Here, we examined whether adjuvant therapy should be guided by a detailed analysis of pathologic risk factors in patients with pure OCSCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2004 and 2016, we retrospectively reviewed 1200 consecutive patients with OCSCC who underwent radical surgery and neck dissection in the Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH). Patients were divided into 3 prognostic groups. High-risk patients were those with extranodal extension (ENE) and/or positive margins (ENE/margins+, n = 267). Intermediate-risk patients were further divided into 3 subgroups: (1) patients in whom adjuvant therapy was indicated according to the CGMH but not the NCCN guidelines (NCCN[-]/CGMH[+], n = 14); (2) patients in whom adjuvant therapy was indicated by the NCCN but not the CGMH guidelines (NCCN[+]/CGMH[-], n = 160); and (3) patients in whom adjuvant therapy was indicated according to both guidelines (NCCN[+]/CGMH[+], n = 411). Low-risk patients were those for whom adjuvant therapy was not suggested in light of either guideline (NCCN[-]/CGMH[-], n = 348). RESULTS: According to NCCN guidelines, postoperative adjuvant therapy was indicated in 69.8% of the participants. However, only 57.7% of patients were in need of adjuvant therapy by CGMH guidelines. The following 5-year outcomes were observed in the NCCN(-)/CGMH(-), NCCN(-)/CGMH(+), NCCN(+)/CGMH(-), NCCN(+)/CGMH(+), and ENE/margins+ subgroups: locoregional control, 88%/70%/83%/79%/68%, P < .001 (NCCN[+]/CGMH[-] vs NCCN[+]/CGMH[+], P = .576); distant metastases, 2%/7%/2%/9%/36%, P < .001 (NCCN[+]/CGMH[-] vs NCCN[+]/CGMH[+], P = .003); disease-specific survival, 97%/86%/94%/84%/56%, P < .001 (NCCN[+]/CGMH[-] vs NCCN[+]/CGMH[+], P < .001); and overall survival, 92%/86%/87%/68%/42%, P < .001 (NCCN[+]/CGMH[-] vs NCCN[+]/CGMH[+], P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the NCCN(+)/CGMH(-) subgroup, 28% (160/571[160 + 411]) of NCCN intermediate-risk patients, had more favorable 5-year disease-specific and overall survival (94% and 87%) than the NCCN(+)/CGMH(+) subgroup. The former are unlikely to derive clinical benefits from NCCN guidelines. The 70% adjuvant therapy rate required by NCCN guidelines after radical surgery might be too high, ultimately leaving room for improvement.

Nationwide trends in the epidemiology of diabetic foot complications and lower-extremity amputation over an 8-year period.

Objective: To study the prevalence and trends of lower extremity complications of diabetes over an 8-year period in a single nation. Research design and methods: Nationwide data for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and diabetic foot complications (DFCs) were analyzed over an 8-year period (2007-2014) from National Health Insurance Research Database using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision disease coding. The DFCs were defined as ulcers, infections, gangrene, and hospitalization for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Trends of patient characteristics, foot presentation, and the execution of major procedures were studied, including lower-extremity amputations (LEAs). Results: Along with the T2D population increasing over time, the absolute number of people with DFCs increased by 33.4%, but retained a prevalence of around 2% per year. The annual incident of LEAs decreased from 2.85 to 2.06 per 1000 T2D population (p=0.001) with the major LEA proportion decreasing from 56.2% to 47.4% (p<0.001).The mean age of patients increased from 65.3 to 66.3 years and most of the associated comorbidities of diabetes were increased. For example, end-stage renal disease increased from 4.9% to 7.7% (p=0.008). The incidence of gangrene on presentation decreased from 14.7% to 11.3% (p<0.001) with a concomitant increase in vascular interventions (6.2% to 19.5%, p<0.001). Conclusions: DFCs remain a sustained major medical problem. These nationwide long-term data suggest trends toward older people with greater comorbidities such as PAD and renal disease. Nevertheless, promising trends of reducing gangrene on presentation paired with increases in vascular interventions support continued vigilance and rapid, coordinated interdisciplinary diabetic foot care.

Comparative clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with resected buccal and tongue squamous cell carcinomas.

OBJECTIVES: Although patients with buccal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) usually show acceptable outcomes, local control and survival rates are generally lower than those observed for tongue SCC. This study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with these two common oral cavity malignancies. METHODS: Patients with first primary buccal or tongue SCC who were included in the Taiwanese Cancer Registry Database between 2004 and 2012 were eligible. The study sample consisted of 16,379 patients (7870 buccal SCC and 8509 tongue SCC) who received surgery with or without adjuvant therapy. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates served as the outcome measures. RESULTS: Compared with tongue SCC, patients with buccal SCC had a higher prevalence of males (95.7% vs. 86.4%, p<0.0001), pT4 disease (21.4% vs. 12.7%, p<0.0001), and p-Stage IV (30.4% vs. 24.8%, p<0.0001) but a lower frequency of pN2 disease (15.2% vs. 18.5%, p<0.0001). The 5-year DSS and OS rates of buccal SCC patients were slightly higher than those of tongue SCC (78% vs. 77%, p=0.0297; and 71% vs. 69%, p=0.0231, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified tumor site (tongue vs. buccal SCC), sex (male vs. female), age (≥65 vs. <65years), pT classification (T4/T3/T2 vs. T1), and pN classification (N3/N2/N1vs. N0) as independent prognostic factors in the entire study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The survival advantage of buccal SCC over tongue SCC appears significant in large clinical samples, despite a higher prevalence of p-Stage IV disease in the former.

Association between the diagnosis-to-treatment interval and overall survival in Taiwanese patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the association between the diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) and overall survival (OS) in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: A total of 18,677 patients with first primary OSCC identified in the Taiwanese Cancer Registry Database between 2004 and 2010 were examined. The effect of DTI on 5-year OS rates was investigated with multivariate Cox regression analysis. After the identification of the optimal cutoff for DTI based on the 5-year OS rates, DTI was classified in the following 20-day groups: ≤20 days (57% of the study patients), 21-45 days (34%), 46-90 days (6%) and ≥91 days (3%). In additional exploratory analyses, DTI was reclassified in the following 30-day interval groups: ≤30 days (81% of the study patients), 31-60 days (14%), 61-90 days (2%) and ≥91 days (3%). RESULTS: Multivariate analyses identified DTI (≤20 days versus other subgroups), sex (female versus male), age (<65 versus ≥65 years), clinical stage (p-stage I versus p-stage II, III, IV) and treatment modality (initial surgery versus initial non-surgery) as independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS. Compared with a DTI ≤20 days, the DTI categories ≥91 days (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.28, P < 0.001), 46-90 days (HR: 1.25, P < 0.001) and 21-45 days (HR: 1.07, P = 0.007) were independently associated with a higher risk of 5-year mortality. Similar results were obtained for DTI ≤30 days groups. CONCLUSIONS: DTI is independently associated with 5-year OS in OSCC patients. A DTI longer than 30 days or even 20 days may potentially decrease survival.

Clinical Outcomes of Taiwanese Patients with cT4 Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Toward the Identification of the Optimal Initial Treatment Approach for cT4b Patients.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend that patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and cT4b disease should be either included in clinical trials or treated with a nonsurgical approach. However, surgery may be feasible in selected patients with adequate safety margins. Using the nationwide Taiwanese Cancer Registry Database, we examined the prognosis of cT4b OSCC patients in relation to their treatment approach. METHODS: Of the 18,910 patients with previously untreated first primary OSCC identified between 2004 and 2010, 492 (2.6 %) had cT4b tumors. Of them, 327 (66 %) received initial treatment with surgery, whereas 165 (34 %) were initially treated with a nonsurgical approach. Of the latter group, 78 patients subsequently underwent surgery. A 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) ≥45 % was considered as a favorable outcome. RESULTS: Better 5-year DSS and overall survival (OS) rates were observed in cT4b patients initially treated with surgery (vs. nonsurgery; DSS, 51 vs. 38 %; OS, 43 vs. 27 %, respectively, p < 0.001). Of the participants initially treated with surgery, patients with cN0-2 disease had better 5-year survival rates (DSS: cN0, 59 %; cN1, 53 %; cN2, 46 %; OS: cN0, 49 %; cN1, 50 %; cN2, 37 %) than those with cN3 disease (DSS: 0 %; OS: 0 %). Among cT4b patients who initially received a nonsurgical treatment, subjects who subsequently underwent surgery showed better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Primary surgery is performed in approximately two-thirds of cT4b OSCC patients, with cN0-2 cases showing a good prognosis. Patients who initially received a nonsurgical approach can subsequently be treated with surgery and achieve favorable outcomes.