Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36429793

RESUMEN

This cross-sectional study assessed the moderating effects of self-esteem and perceived support from friends on the association between self-stigma and suicide risk in individuals with schizophrenia. We included 300 participants (267 with schizophrenia and 33 with schizoaffective disorder). Suicide risk was assessed using items adopted from the suicide module of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview; self-stigma was assessed using the Self-Stigma Scale-Short; perceived support from friends was assessed using the Friend Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve Index; and self-esteem was assessed using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. A moderation analysis was performed to examine the moderating effects of self-esteem and perceived support from friends on the association between self-stigma and suicide risk. The results indicated that self-stigma was positively associated with suicide risk after the effects of other factors were controlled for. Both perceived support from friends and self-esteem significantly reduced the magnitude of suicide risk in participants with self-stigma. Our findings highlight the value of interventions geared toward ameliorating self-stigma and enhancing self-esteem in order to reduce suicide risk in individuals with schizophrenia.


Asunto(s)
Esquizofrenia , Suicidio , Humanos , Amigos , Estudios Transversales , Estigma Social
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35886310

RESUMEN

The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3; UCLA-LSV3) is widely used for assessing loneliness. Nevertheless, the validity of this scale for assessing loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder has not been determined. Additionally, studies validating the eight-item and three-item versions of UCLA-LSV3 have not included individuals with severe mental illness; therefore, whether the short versions are comparable to the full 20-item version of UCLA-LSV3 for this population is unclear. The present study examined the unidimensional structure, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability of the Chinese versions of UCLA-LSV3 (i.e., 20-item, 8-item, and 3-item versions) to determine which version is most appropriate for assessing loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in Taiwan. A total of 300 participants (267 with schizophrenia and 33 with schizoaffective disorder) completed the scales, comprising UCLA-LSV3, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the suicidality module of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Epidemiological Version (K-SADS-E), and the family and peer Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (APGAR) index. Construct validity was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis. The three versions of UCLA-LSV3 were compared with the CES-D, the suicidality module of the K-SADS-E, and the family and peer APGAR index to establish concurrent validity. The results indicated that all three versions of UCLA-LSV3 exhibited acceptable to satisfactory psychometric properties in terms of unidimensional constructs, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability. The full version of UCLA-LSV3 had the best performance, followed by the eight-item version and the three-item version. Moreover, the three versions had relatively strong associations with each other. Therefore, when deliberating which version of UCLA-LSV3 is the best choice for assessing loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, healthcare providers and therapists should consider time availability and practicality.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Soledad/psicología , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Singapore Med J ; 54(11): e218-20, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24276107

RESUMEN

The ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric (IG-IH) nerve block provides effective opioid-sparing analgesia for inguinal surgeries. The technique is especially useful in apnoea-prone premature neonates with sacral anomalies and coagulopathy. A recent retrospective review of 82 ex-premature neonates who underwent inguinal herniotomy at KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, reported a success rate of 89% for landmark-guided IG-IH blocks. All blocks in that study were performed by senior paediatric anaesthetists using the landmark-based technique, which relies on fascial clicks. The IG-IH block is expected to be technically more difficult in neonates. There is also a stronger need to ensure success in these patients in order to avoid the use of opioids and reduce the risk of postoperative apnoea. Ultrasonographic guidance has been reported to improve the success of IG-IH blocks in older children to up to 94%. Herein, we report a series of six ex-premature neonates in whom ultrasonography-guided IG-IH blocks were successfully performed using reduced volumes of local anaesthetics (mean volume 0.17 mL/kg) for inguinal herniotomy.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Plexo Hipogástrico/cirugía , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hernia Inguinal/congénito , Hernia Inguinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Singapur , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color
4.
Anesth Analg ; 108(1): 252-4, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19095859

RESUMEN

In this study, we aimed to identify the incidence and predictive factors associated with failed labor epidural augmentation for cesarean delivery. Data of parturients, who had received neuraxial labor analgesia and who subsequently required intrapartum cesarean delivery during an 18-mo period, were retrospectively studied. Predictors associated with failure of extension of epidural analgesia in the presence of adequate time for onset of epidural anesthesia were identified by univariate logistic regression. Of the 1025 parturients, 1.7% had failed epidural extension. Predictors of failed epidural anesthesia included initiation of labor analgesia with plain epidural technique (compared to combined spinal-epidural) (P = 0.001), >or=2 episodes of breakthrough pain during labor (P < 0.001) and prolonged duration of neuraxial labor analgesia (P = 0.02).


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Anestesia Epidural , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Anestesia Raquidea , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Cesárea , Dolor de Parto/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Oportunidad Relativa , Dimensión del Dolor , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA