Long-term Outcomes of Ampullary Adenoma According to Resected Margin Status after Endoscopic Papillectomy.

Background/Aims: : Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is increasingly used as an alternative to surgery for managing benign ampullary neoplasms. However, post-EP resection margins are often positive or indeterminate, and there is no consensus on the management of ampullary adenomas with positive or indeterminate margins after EP. This study was designed to compare the long-term outcomes between resected margin-negative (RMN) and resected margin-positive/indeterminate (RMPI) groups and to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes. Methods: : This retrospective analysis included patients with ampullary adenoma without evidence of adenocarcinoma who underwent EP between 2004 and 2016. The RMN and RMPI groups were compared for recurrence rates and recurrence-free duration during a mean follow-up duration of 71.7±39.8 months. Factors related to clinical outcomes were identified using multivariate analysis. Results: : Of the 129 patients who underwent EP, 82 were in the RMN group and 47 were in the RMPI group. The RMPI group exhibited a higher recurrence rate compared to the RMN group (14.6% vs 34.0%, p=0.019). However, the recurrence-free duration was not significantly different between the groups (34.7±32.6 months vs 36.2±27.4 months, p=0.900). Endoscopic treatment successfully managed recurrence in both groups (75% vs 75%). Submucosal injection was a significant risk factor for residual lesions (hazard ratio, 4.11; p=0.009) and recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.57; p=0.021). Conclusions: : Although ampullary adenomas with positive or indeterminate margins after EP showed a higher rate of recurrence at long-term follow-up, endoscopic treatment was effective with favorable long-term outcomes. Submucosal injection prior to resection was associated with increased risk of recurrence and residual lesions.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Ablation Vs Surgery for Pancreatic Cystic Tumors.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic cyst ablation (EUS-PCA) is performed as an alternative to surgical resection in selected patients with pancreatic cystic tumors (PCTs). We aimed to directly compare the long-term outcomes between EUS-PCA and surgery for PCTs. METHODS: We reviewed a PCT database to identify patients with unilocular or oligolocular PCTs who underwent EUS-PCA or surgery between January 2004 and July 2019. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching based on potential confounding factors. The primary outcome was long-term morbidities. Secondary outcomes included early (≤14 days) and late (>14 days) major adverse events (MAEs), development of diabetes mellitus, readmission, length of hospital stay, and therapeutic efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 620 patients (EUS-PCA, n = 310; surgery, n = 310) were selected after propensity score matching. The EUS-PCA group showed a lower 10-year rate of cumulative long-term morbidities (1.6% vs 33.5%; P = .001) as well as lower rates of early MAE (1.0% vs 8.7%; P = .001), late MAE (0.3% vs 5.5%; P = .001), and readmission (1.0% vs 15.2%; P = .001). The EUS-PCA group had a shorter hospital stay (3.5 vs 10.3 d; P = .001) and a lower incidence of diabetes mellitus (2.2% vs 22.8%; P = .001), whereas the surgery group had a higher complete resolution rate (76.5% vs 100%; P = .001) and a lower relapse rate (4.6% vs 0.3%; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: For select patients with PCTs, EUS-PCA showed superior results to surgery in terms of long-term safety profile and preservation of pancreatic function.

Long-term outcomes of fully covered self-expandable metal stents for refractory biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective study at a tertiary center.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic multiple plastic stents are an established first-line treatment for anastomotic biliary stricture (ABS) management after liver transplantation (LT). Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) have recently been used with favorable outcomes, but long-term treatment outcomes remain an issue for ABS. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of FCSEMS for the management of refractory ABS after LT. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected and maintained endoscopic retrograde cholangiography database at Asan Medical Center to retrieve consecutive post-LT ABS cases that underwent an endoscopic FCSEMS placement between August 2009 and August 2019 after MPS placement failure. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled in this study. Technical success had been achieved in all subjects (100%). The median stent placement duration was 3.1 months (IQR 2.7-6.1). Stricture resolution was achieved in 26 patients (clinical success 76.5%, 95% confidence interval 62-91). Early adverse events developed in 3 patients (8.8%), including distal stent migration. Late adverse events occurred in 9 patients (26.5%), including cholangitis (n = 7, 20.6%) and asymptomatic distal stent migration (n = 2, 5.9%). The median follow-up period was 57.9 months (IQR 51.9-64.3). Stricture recurrence occurred in 3 of 26 patients who achieved clinical success (11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: FCSEMS placement appears to be an effective and advisable intervention for refractory ABS as it can provide persistent stricture improvement over the long-term.

Impact of the Supra-papilla Method on Patency in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: /aims: Placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) across the duodenal major papilla carries a risk of duodenobiliary reflux (DBR). The supra-papilla method of stenting may reduce DBR and improve stent patency compared to the trans-papilla method. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between the supra-papilla and trans-papilla methods for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). METHODS: Between January 2021 and January 2023, consecutive patients with DMBO from six centers in Korea were randomly assigned to either the supra-papilla or trans-papilla method arm in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the duration of stent patency, and secondary outcomes included the cause of stent dysfunction, adverse events, and overall survival rate. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were equally assigned to each group. The most common cause of DMBO was pancreatic cancer (n=50, 59.5%), followed by bile duct (n=20, 23.8%), gallbladder (n=11, 13.1%), and other cancers (n=3, 3.6%). Stent patency was significantly longer in the supra-papilla group (median [95% confidence interval], 369 [289-497] vs. 154 [78-361] days; P < 0.01). Development of DBR was significantly lower in the supra-papilla group (9.4% vs 40.8%, P < 0.01). Adverse events and overall survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of SEMS using the supra-papilla method resulted in a significantly longer duration of stent patency. It is advisable to place the SEMS using the supra-papilla method in DMBO. Further studies with a larger number of patients are required to validate the benefits of the supra-papilla method.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage for right intrahepatic duct dilatation in malignant hilar obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage is being increasingly performed as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) to treat malignant hilar obstruction (MHO) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, no study has compared EUS-guided hepaticoduodenostomy (EUS-HDS) with PTBD for right intrahepatic duct (IHD) obstruction after failed ERCP in patients with unresectable MHO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients with right IHD obstruction developed by unresectable MHO who underwent EUS-HDS or PTBD after a previous placement of a stent in the left and/or right IHD between March 2018 and October 2021. Technical success, clinical success, stent or tube-related adverse events, frequency of reintervention, and stent patency were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (18 EUS-HDS, 24 PTBD) were analyzed. Both groups did not show significant differences in technical success (EUS-HDS, 94% vs PTBD, 100%; P = 0.429), clinical success (83% vs 83%; P = 0.999), early adverse events (24% vs 46%; P = 0.144), and stent or tube-related late adverse events (29% vs 54%; P = 0.116). During follow-up, the EUS-HDS group had a longer median duration of patency (131 days vs 58.5 days; P = 0.041), and lower mean frequency of reinterventions per patient (0.35 vs 1.92; P = 0.030) than the PTBD group. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-HDS showed comparable efficacy and safety to PTBD for drainage of the right biliary system and produced longer duration of patency and lower frequency of reinterventions in patients with unresectable MHO.

Expanded indication for EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation: management of adrenal tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been performed as an alternative to surgery for the treatment of pancreatic tumors. The promising results obtained using this procedure suggest that the indication for EUS-RFA could be expanded to the management of extrapancreatic tumors. Here, we evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EUS-RFA in the treatment of left adrenal tumors. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study was conducted at Asan Medical Center between January 2016 and November 2021. A total of 11 patients with left adrenal tumors were enrolled in the study. The technical success rate, treatment response, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: EUS-RFA was performed successfully in all patients (technical success rate, 100%). The indications for the procedure were an increase in tumor size (n = 8), and adrenal tumor with adrenal hormone excess (n = 3). After a median of 2 EUS-RFA sessions (range, 1-2), 73% of patients had a complete response, and 27% had a partial response. During follow-up, 5 patients experienced self-limiting mild abdominal pain; no moderate or severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-RFA showed high technical feasibility, clinical success, and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of left adrenal tumors. In patients at high surgical risk, EUS-RFA can be considered as an alternative therapeutic modality to surgery for the treatment of left adrenal tumors.

Long-term clinical outcomes of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent for refractory pancreatic strictures in symptomatic chronic pancreatitis: An 11-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) has recently been applied in the management of chronic pancreatitis patients with pancreatic strictures. However, related long-term effects remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of FCSEMS placement in chronic pancreatitis patients with refractory strictures. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients undergoing FCSEMS placement for refractory pancreatic strictures between September 2008 and December 2010. The main outcomes were technical, radiological, and clinical success, as well as recurrence and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The median FCSEMS indwelling time was 3.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-4.9 months). Radiological success was achieved in all patients (complete, n = 2; partial, n = 33). Clinical success was achieved in 29 patients (82.9%; complete analgesic cessation, n = 19; analgesic reduction >50%, n = 11). During the median follow-up of 136 months, (IQR, 85.8-145.5 months), eight patients (22.9%) experienced recurrence. The median interval from stent removal to recurrence was 24.9 months (IQR, 11.3-30.3 months). Biliary obstruction, an early adverse event, occurred in two patients (5.7%); the late adverse event stent-induced de novo stricture was observed in 17 patients (48.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that an FCSEMS is effective for relieving refractory strictures in chronic pancreatitis. However, FCSEMSs were associated with stent-induced de novo strictures in nearly half of the patients. Prospective studies are required to further evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of FCSEMSs in chronic pancreatitis.

Comparison of the long-term outcomes between proximal and distal IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis: A multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) is considered a biliary manifestation of IgG4-related diseases. However, there has been a controversy on the clinical outcomes according to the location of the involved bile duct. We therefore compared the clinical outcomes and long-term prognosis of IgG4-SC with proximal bile duct involvement (proximal IgG4-SC) and IgG4-SC with distal bile duct involvement (distal IgG4-SC). METHODS: We reviewed the data of patients with IgG4-SC that were prospectively collected at 10 tertiary centers between March 2002 and October 2020. Clinical manifestations, outcomes, association with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), steroid-responsiveness, and relapse of IgG4-SC were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients (proximal IgG4-SC, n = 59; distal IgG4-SC, n = 89) were analyzed. The median age was 65 years (IQR, 56.25-71), and 86% were male. The two groups were similar in terms of jaundice at initial presentation (51% vs 65%; P = 0.082) and presence of elevated serum IgG4 (66% vs 70%; P = 0.649). The two groups showed significant differences in terms of steroid-responsiveness (91% vs 100%; P = 0.008), association with AIP (75% vs 99%; P = 0.001), and occurrence of liver cirrhosis (9% vs 1%; P = 0.034). During a median follow-up of 64 months (IQR, 21.9-84.7), the cumulative relapse-free survival was significantly different between the two groups (67% vs 79% at 5 years; P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Relapse of IgG4-SC frequently occurred during follow-up. Proximal IgG4-SC and distal IgG4-SC had different long-term outcomes in terms of steroid-responsiveness, occurrence of liver cirrhosis, and recurrence. It may be advantageous to determine the therapeutic and follow-up strategies according to the location of bile duct involvement.

Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation for Ampullary Adenoma with Intraductal Extension after Endoscopic Snare Papillectomy.

Background/Aims: There are limitations in treating ampullary adenomas with intraductal extension using conventional endoscopic modalities. Endoscopic intraductal radiofrequency ablation (ID-RFA) may be useful for treating intraductal (common bile duct [CBD] and/or pancreatic duct [PD]) extensions of ampullary adenomas, but long-term data are lacking. We thus evaluated the long-term outcomes of endoscopic ID-RFA for managing ampullary adenomas with intraductal extension. Methods: Prospectively collected endoscopic ID-RFA database at Asan Medical Center was reviewed to identify consecutive patients with ampullary adenoma who underwent ID-RFA for intraductal extension between January 2018 and August 2021. Technical success, short-term and long-term clinical success, and adverse events were evaluated. Results: A total of 29 patients (14 CBD, 1 PD, and 14 CBD and PD) were analyzed. All patients had undergone endoscopic snare papillectomy prior to ID-RFA. A median of one session of ID-RFA (range, 1 to 3) for residual or relapsed intraductal extension of ampullary adenoma were successfully performed (technical success=100%). Both biliary and pancreatic stenting were routinely performed after ID-RFA to prevent ductal stricture. After a median follow-up of 776 days (interquartile range, 470 to 984 days), the short-term and long-term clinical success rates were 93% and 76%, respectively. Seven patients experienced procedural adverse events and three patients developed ductal strictures. Conclusions: Endoscopic ID-RFA showed good long-term outcomes in treating residual or relapsed ampullary adenomas with intraductal extension. Repeated ID-RFA may be considered as an option for managing recurrence. Further studies are needed to standardize the procedure.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage versus in situ or ex situ percutaneous gallbladder drainage in real-world practice.

OBJECTIVES: Many studies showed better outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) when compared with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (P-GBD) in which most tubes were left in situ. However, no studies have directly compared EUS-GBD with P-GBD after tube removal (ex situ). We compared the long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD and ex situ or in situ P-GBD in high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 182 patients (EUS-GBD, n = 75; P-GBD, n = 107) who underwent gallbladder drainage. The procedural outcomes, long-term outcomes, and adverse events were compared. RESULTS: The EUS-GBD group and the P-GBD group had similar rates of technical and clinical success. Early adverse events were less common in the EUS-GBD group (5.5% vs. 18.9%, P = 0.010). The long-term outcomes were evaluated in 168 patients (EUS-GBD, n = 67; P-GBD ex situ, n = 84; P-GBD in situ, n = 17). The rate of cholecystitis recurrence in the EUS-GBD group (6.0%) was similar to that in the P-GBD ex situ group (9.6%, P = 0.422), but significantly lower than that in the P-GBD in situ group (23.5%, P = 0.049). P-GBD in situ was a significant predictor of recurrent cholecystitis (hazard ratio 14.6; 95% confidence interval 2.9-72.8). CONCLUSION: The long-term recurrence rate of acute cholecystitis in patients who underwent EUS-GBD was comparable to that in patients whose P-GBD could be removed. However, patients in whom P-GBD could not be removed showed higher rates of recurrent cholecystitis than patients with EUS-GBD.

The usefulness of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation before metal stent placement in unresectable malignant hilar obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: EB-RFA with self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) may improve the stent patency and patient survival in malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction. However, there are few studies on the role of EB-RFA for malignant hilar obstruction (MHO). This study aimed to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EB-RFA for MHO. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the stent patency and survival among 79 consecutive patients with MHO who underwent bilateral uncovered SEMS placement without and with EB-RFA between April 2016 and January 2020. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (64.6%) underwent SEMS placement alone (stent alone group), whereas 28 (35.4%) underwent SEMS placement after EB-RFA (RFA-stent group). All procedures were successful (100%). During follow-up, stent occlusion occurred in 59 patients (74.7%), of which 40 (78.4%) and 19 (67.9%) were in the stent alone and RFA-stent groups, respectively. There was no difference in stent patency (192 ± 39.2 days vs 140 ± 53.7 days, P = 0.41) and survival (311 ± 24.7 days vs 311 ± 46.9 days, P = 0.73) between the stent alone and RFA-stent groups. Multivariate cox analysis showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.892 (1.579-5.294, P = 0.001) for stent occlusion in patients who did not receive chemotherapy. EB-RFA had no significant effect on stent occlusion (HR, 1.150, 0.644-2.053, P = 0.636). CONCLUSIONS: SEMS placement after EB-RFA in MHO was not associated with improvement in the stent patency or patient survival. Further prospective randomized studies are necessary to establish the effectiveness of EB-RFA with stents in MHO.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

In locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been applied as an alternative to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT); however, direct comparative evidence between these two modalities is scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of SBRT with CCRT for LAPC. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with LAPC who received SBRT (n = 95) or CCRT (n = 66) with a concurrent 5-FU-based regimen between January 2008 and July 2016. The clinical outcomes of freedom from local progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were analyzed before and after propensity score (PS) matching. After a median follow-up duration of 15.5 months (range, 2.3-64.5), the median OS, PFS, and FFLP of the unmatched patients were 17.3 months, 11 months, and 19.6 months, respectively. After PS matching, there were no significant differences between the SBRT and CCRT groups in terms of the 1-year rates of OS (66.7% vs. 80%, p = 0.455), PFS (40.0% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.123), and FFLP (77.2% and 87.1%, p = 0.691). Our results suggest SBRT could be a feasible alternative to CCRT in treating patients with LAPC.

Clinical outcomes of EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation for unresectable pancreatic cancer: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been increasingly used for the treatment of pancreatic neoplasms. The role of EUS-RFA in the management of pancreatic cancer has not yet been elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the survival impact of EUS-RFA in unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (n = 14, locally advanced unresectable; n = 8, metastatic) with unresectable pancreatic cancer underwent EUS-RFA combined with subsequent chemotherapy between May 2016 and June 2019. Survival outcomes including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. RESULTS: EUS-RFA was successful in all patients. The median number of RFA sessions was 5 (interquartile range, [IQR], 3.25-5.75). After successful EUS-RFA, subsequent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was performed. Early procedure-related adverse events occurred in 4 out of 107 sessions (3.74%), including peritonitis (n = 1) and abdominal pain (n = 3). During follow-up over a median of 21.23 months (IQR, 10.73-27.1), the median OS and PFS were 24.03 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16-35.8) and 16.37 months (95% CI, 8.87-19), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-RFA is technically feasible and safe for the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer. EUS-RFA combined with systemic chemotherapy may be associated with favorable survival outcomes. Further larger-scale prospective comparative study is required to confirm these findings.

Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided through-the-needle microforceps biopsy sampling in categorizing the type of pancreatic cystic lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-TTNB) using microbiopsy forceps is performed for the accurate diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). However, there are no standardized protocols for this procedure, and the amount of data on its efficacy is limited. Here, we evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EUS-TTNB in categorizing the types of PCLs and identified the factors associated with diagnostic failure. METHODS: The prospectively collected and maintained EUS-TTNB database at Asan Medical Center was reviewed to identify patients with PCLs who underwent EUS-TTNB between January 2019 and January 2021. The primary outcomes were technical success, diagnostic yield, and adverse events. Factors contributing to diagnostic failure and the discrepancies in the diagnosis made by conventional modalities (ie, EUS morphology, cross-sectional imaging, and cystic fluid analysis) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were analyzed. EUS-TTNB was successfully performed in all patients (technical success, 100%). Histologic diagnosis of PCLs was made in 37 patients (diagnostic yield, 82%). When comparing EUS-TTNB with a presumptive diagnosis, EUS-TTNB changed the diagnosis in 10 patients in terms of the categorization of the types of PCLs. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher in those who had 4 or more visible biopsy specimens per session (93%) than in those with fewer than 4 visible biopsy specimens per session (67%; P = .045). During follow-up, 3 patients (7%) experienced adverse events (2 acute pancreatitis, 1 intracystic bleeding), and no life-threatening adverse event occurred. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TTNB showed high technical feasibility, diagnostic yield, and good safety profile. EUS-TTNB may improve the categorization of the types of PCLs. Studies with standardized procedure protocols are needed to reduce the diagnostic failure for the types of PCLs.

The impact of preoperative EUS-FNA for distal resectable pancreatic cancer: Is it really effective enough to take risks?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is frequently used for the preoperative histologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. However, debate continues regarding the clinical merits of preoperative EUS-FNA for the management of resectable pancreatic cancer. We aimed to evaluate the benefits and safety of preoperative EUS-FNA for resectable distal pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The medical records of 304 consecutive patients with suspected distal pancreatic cancer who underwent EUS-FNA were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the clinical benefits of preoperative EUS-FNA. We also reviewed the medical records of 528 patients diagnosed with distal pancreatic cancer who underwent distal pancreatectomy with or without EUS-FNA. The recurrence rates and cancer-free survival periods of patients who did or did not undergo preoperative EUS-FNA were compared. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of preoperative EUS-FNA was high (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value 100%; accuracy, 90.7%; negative predictive value, 73.8%). Among patients, 26.7% (79/304) avoided surgery based on the preoperative EUS-FNA findings. Of the 528 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy, 193 patients received EUS-FNA and 335 did not. During follow-up (median 21.7 months), the recurrence rate was similar in the two groups (EUS-FNA, 72.7%; non-EUS-FNA, 75%; P = 0.58). The median cancer-free survival was also similar (P = 0.58); however, gastric wall recurrence was only encountered in the patients with EUS-FNA (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Preoperative EUS-FNA is not associated with increased risks of cancer-specific or overall survival. However, clinicians must consider the potential risks of needle tract seeding, and care should be taken when selecting patients.

Clinical utility of directional eFLOW compared with contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for assessing the vascularity of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) can be used for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions by evaluating microvascular circulation and patterns of contrast enhancement. However, routine use of CEH-EUS is limited by its high cost, the lack of contrast agent availability and the absence of expertise with this technique. Directional eFLOW (D-eFLOW) (Aloka Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was introduced as a new high-definition modality that detects blood flow in microvessels. Because it uses built-in functions, it entails no additional cost and reduces time for examination. The present study compared the usefulness of D-eFLOW and CEH-EUS for differential diagnosis of pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 130 patients who underwent EUS and D-eFLOW examinations from January 2016 to March 2020 to evaluate pancreatic and peripancreatic masses. RESULTS: All 130 patients underwent D-eFLOW and CEH-EUS examinations. Histological diagnoses were confirmed in 130 patients by EUS-FNA and/or surgery. D-eFLOW and CEH-EUS showed good correlation in evaluating the vascularity of pancreatic and peripancreatic tumors (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In evaluating the characteristics of tumorous lesions, vascularity detected by D-eFLOW showed good correlation with enhancement patterns of CEH-EUS. D-eFLOW can be considered a good alternative to CEH-EUS in diagnosing pancreatic and peripancreatic masses.

Effectiveness of early endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage for postoperative fluid collection.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative abdominal fluid collections (PAFCs) are a potentially fatal complication of pancreatobiliary surgery. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage has recently been shown to be effective in treating PAFCs of more than 4 weeks old. Little is currently known, however, regarding the EUS-guided drainage of PAFCs of less than 4 weeks. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the early drainage (< 4 weeks) of PAFCs via EUS guidance. METHODS: The data of patients who had undergone EUS-guided PAFC drainage between July 2008 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Data of EUS-guided PAFC drainage were obtained from prospectively collected EUS database of our institute and reviewed of patients' clinical parameters based on electrical medical record. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients who had undergone EUS-guided PAFC drainage within 4 weeks of pancreatobiliary surgery were enrolled. The indications of procedure included abdominal pain (n = 27), fever (n = 18), leukocytosis (n = 2), and increased size of PAFC during external tube drainage (n = 1). Technical success was achieved in all cases, and the clinical success rate was 95.8% (46/48). Four patients underwent secondary procedures. The median period from surgery to EUS-guide drainage was 14 days (Interquartile range [IQR] 10-16), and median time to resolution was 23.5 days (IQR 8.5-33.8). Adverse events occurred in two cases that were developed intracystic bleeding and were successfully resolved by arterial coil embolization. CONCLUSIONS: Early EUS-guided drainage is a technically feasible, effective, and safe method in patients who have developing PAFCs within 4 weeks of pancreatobiliary surgery.

Clinical outcomes of EUS-guided transluminal drainage with a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for postoperative pancreatic fluid collection after pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) is increasingly used for the treatment of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFCs). A novel lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was recently developed and used for the drainage of POPFCs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel LAMS in patients with POPFCs. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with symptomatic POPFCs who underwent EUS-TD with a novel LAMS (Niti-S SPAXUS; Taewoong Medical Co, Ltd, Ilsan, South Korea) between April 2019 and July 2020 were included in this study. Clinical outcomes, including technical success, clinical success, and adverse events, were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: EUS-TD was technically successful in 41 of 47 patients (87.2%). Clinical success was achieved in 37 of 41 patients (90.2%). The mean procedure time was 13.7 ± 3.5 minutes. The mean POPFC size was 59 ± 18.9 mm. The mean time interval from surgery to EUS-TD was 24.2 ± 37.6 days. Five patients experienced 6 procedural adverse events (12.8%): 4 (8.5%) POPFC infections and 2 (4.3%) distal stent migrations. The 4 patients with POPFC infection underwent additional endoscopic interventions. Of the 2 patients with stent migration, 1 underwent laparoscopic exploration and surgical extraction of the stent and 1 (2.1%) experienced POPFC recurrence, which was managed with percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TD for symptomatic POPFCs with a novel LAMS is technically feasible and effective, with an acceptable adverse event rate. Further larger-scale prospective studies are required to confirm the findings of this study.

Pancreatic/peripancreatic neurogenic tumor; little known masses not to be missed.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal neurogenic tumors are extremely rare pathological entities; therefore, few clinical features and natural courses, especially originating from the pancreatic/peripancreatic regions, have been reported. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features of pancreatic and peripancreatic neurogenic tumors and assess the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). METHODS: Between 2006 and 2018, patients who were diagnosed with neurogenic tumors were included. In total, 90 histologically confirmed cases of neurogenic tumors located in the pancreatic/peripancreatic regions were selected for analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 49.2 ± 13.1 years. There were no differences in sex distribution of the tumors. Schwannomas (44.4%) and paragangliomas (41.1%) were the most common neurogenic tumors. The sensitivity of CT was 62.2% in 90 cases. EUS-FNB was performed in 30 cases and the sensitivity of it was 83.3%. The diagnosis of neurogenic tumors with EUS-FNB or CT was not significantly associated with tumor location and size. Surgical resection was performed in 78 cases. Of the 12 patients who did not undergo surgery, 10 cases were followed-up without any increase in tumor size. CONCLUSIONS: Through the present study, we verified radiological, pathological, and clinical aspects of the pancreatic/peripancreatic neurogenic tumors which little known before, therefore, this study can serve as the basis for research to present an optimal diagnosis and treatment of neurogenic tumors. In addition, EUS-FNB is useful in the diagnosis of pancreatic/peripancreatic neurogenic tumors with relatively high sensitivity and can help establish therapeutic plans before the surgery.

Indication and surgical techniques of bypass choledochojejunostomy for intractable choledocholithiasis.

Despite development in endoscopic treatment and minimally invasive surgery for choledocholithiasis, there remains a small number of patients who require bypass Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (RYCJ) because of the intractable occurrence of common bile duct (CBD) stones. We herein present the detailed procedures of open RYCJ customized for intractable choledocholithiasis. The first method is a side-to-end choledochojejunostomy with intraluminal closure of the distal CBD. This method was applied to a 79-year-old female patient who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) more than 10 times in the past 14 years (Case No. 1). The distal CBD was explored through choledochotomy and then the distal CBD lumen was occluded with internal running sutures. A large-sized choledochojejunostomy was performed. The patient recovered uneventfully and has been doing well for the past 2 years. The second method is an end-to-end choledochojejunostomy with segmental CBD resection. It was applied to a 75-year-old male patient who underwent ERCP 9 times in the past 10 years (Case No. 2). The CBD was resected segmentally and a large-sized choledochojejunostomy was performed. The patient also recovered uneventfully and has been doing well for the past 2 years. In conclusion, the primary indication of bypass RYCJ is intractable choledocholithiasis which requires numerous sessions of endoscopic stone removal over a long period. Open RYCJ is the preferred procedure to date. If the papilla is patulous, the distal CBD should be occluded or resected to prevent reflux ascending cholangitis. We recommend to resect the intrapancreatic distal CBD if it is markedly dilated like choledochal cyst.