RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology and patterns of gymnastics-related Head & Neck trauma injuries using the NEISS database from 2001 to 2020. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of a national database. METHODS: Gymnastics-related ED visits between 2001 and 2020 were queried from the NEISS database. Bivariate chi-squared analyses were used to compare injury demographics, location, type, and disposition. Fracture location was identified using the narrative description of each case and were divided into subtypes for further analysis. RESULTS: 1455 gymnastics-related head and neck traumatic injuries were identified. The majority were in females (65.8%). The most common presenting age group was pediatric (≤18 years) (92.7%), and the largest racial group was Caucasian (51.5%). Of all location subtypes, facial injuries were the most common presenting injury type overall (45.2%). Regarding injury types, lacerations were most common (36.8%), followed by dental injury (30.7%) and fractures (21.2%). The most common location of head and neck fractures was the nose (45.8%), followed by cervical spine (16.7%) and orbit (13.3%). The majority (95.7%) of gymnastics-related head and neck traumatic injuries presenting to the ED were treated and discharged. CONCLUSION: This study characterizes gymnastics-related head and neck injuries which is a topic that is under-studied. The findings from this study are helpful for gymnasts and those who care for them including providers, coaches and guardians, and this data may help inform future guidelines for treatment and injury prevention.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Gimnasia , Traumatismos del Cuello , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Niño , Traumatismos del Cuello/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Gimnasia/lesiones , Adulto Joven , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Preescolar , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Faciales/epidemiología , Traumatismos de los Dientes/epidemiología , Laceraciones/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To present the clinical course of a patient with recurrent NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL) involving the orbit and to review the literature on patients with NKTL involving the orbit. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for all cases of NKTL involving orbital, intraocular, or adnexal ocular structures. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age of diagnosis was 48.1 ± 16.8 years. The patients were 53/96 (55.2%) male and 43/96 (44.8%) female. Tumor location varied and included the orbit in 80/96 (83.3%), nasosinus in 56/96 (58.3%), uvea in 11/96 (11.5%), lacrimal gland in 9/96 (9.4%), lacrimal drainage system in 11/96 (11.5%), and conjunctiva in 7/96 (7.3%) cases. Management included surgical debulking in 29/96 (30.2%) cases, radiotherapy in 52/96 (54.2%) cases, and chemotherapy in 82/96 (85.4%) cases. Median survival was 6 months (95% CI: 5-9). Chemotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.95, p = 0.013), radiotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.87, p < 0.001), and orbital involvement being a recurrence of disease (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.95, p = 0.009) were associated with improved survival. Advanced Ann Arbor stage (III-IV) at diagnosis (hazard ratio = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.08-1.38, p = 0.001), vision loss (hazard ratio = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04-1.34, p = 0.009), proptosis (hazard ratio = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.30, p = 0.035) and periorbital swelling (hazard ratio = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.00-1.33, p = 0.048) were associated with poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: NK/T-cell lymphoma involving the orbit, globe, or ocular adnexa heralds a poor prognosis where early diagnosis and therapy are critical. The use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is associated with improved survival.
Asunto(s)
Aparato Lagrimal , Linfoma de Células T , Neoplasias Orbitales , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Orbitales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Orbitales/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Linfoma de Células T/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células T/terapia , Aparato Lagrimal/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 2020 to 2021 Otolaryngology residency application cycle in the context of recent trends. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. SETTING: Disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may significantly alter trends among residency applicants, especially in highly competitive and/or smaller specialties. METHODS: Applicant and residency statistics from Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) were extracted from the 2016 to 2021 and 2011 to 2021, respectively. Trends in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) were compared to peer specialties (PS) including Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, and Integrated Pathway for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS). The ratio of the number of applicants per positions (APP) was used to reflect the degree of competition. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2021, the number of OHNS programs and positions expanded less than those of PS and General Surgery. The increase in the APP ratio was significantly greater for OHNS compared to those Dermatology, Orthopedic Surgery, General Surgery and all PGY1 residency positions for both US MD and all applicants (P < .01 for each). OHNS expansion of US MD (P = .046), but not all applicants (P = .169), outgrew that of Neurosurgery. CONCLUSION: The 2020 to 2021 cycle affected by the COVID-19 pandemic saw a continuation of the recent trend in the expanding OHNS applicant pool. OHNS remains one of the specialties with the highest APP ratio and has observed a significant growth compared to PS since 2018. Understanding and anticipating trends in residency application cycles is critical for designing processes to optimize the best fit between applicants and programs.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Internado y Residencia , Otolaringología , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Otolaringología/educaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To perform a literature review on burnout prevalence, factors that affect burnout and well-being, and solutions to address burnout in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OTO-HNS) residents and residents in other surgical specialties. DATA SOURCES: Ovid Medline, Embase, and article reference lists. REVIEW METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify articles on resident burnout, distress, wellness, well-being, and quality of life. Articles deemed outside the scope of the current work were excluded. Search was limited to the past 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to high burnout has been reported in 35% to 86% of OTO-HNS residents. Among other surgical specialties, resident burnout ranges between 58% and 66% in plastics, 11% and 67% in neurosurgery, 38% and 68% in urology, and 31% and 56% in orthopedics. Highest burnout rates were seen in postgraduate year 2 residents. Factors significantly associated with burnout included hours worked (>80 h/wk), level of autonomy, exercise, and program support. Reported resident work hours have steadily increased: 8% of OTO-HNS residents in 2005 vs 26% in 2019 reported averaging >80 h/wk. Practical implications of resident burnout include decreased empathy, moral distress and injury, poor health, decreased quality of life, increased attrition, decreased desire to pursue fellowship, and increased likelihood of medical errors. Structured mentorship programs, wellness initiatives, and increased ancillary support have been associated with lower burnout rates and improvements in resident well-being across specialties. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Addressing burnout, which is prevalent in OTO-HNS residents, is critical to improving patient care and physician well-being. Surgical specialties can share strategies to effectively address resident burnout through institutional interventions, which can be essential quality improvement initiatives, to promote well-being.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Internado y Residencia , Otolaringología , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Otolaringología/educación , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Labio Leporino , Rinoplastia , Humanos , Cartílagos Nasales/cirugía , Labio Leporino/cirugía , Nariz/cirugíaRESUMEN
Facial trauma accounts for over 3 million emergency room encounters each year in the United States and places significant financial burden on the health care system and surgeons. However, data on facial trauma call practices among plastic surgeons are lacking. We surveyed members of the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons (ASMS) regarding their experience with facial trauma call. A 27-question online survey was distributed through e-mail to ASMS members. Forty-five ASMS members completed the survey, of whom 64% were required to take facial trauma call and 44% were compensated for call. Respondents in the North-East were less likely [odds ratio (OR): 0.234, confidence interval (CI), 0.054-1.015; P =0.052] to be compensated for taking call, whereas those who worked at level 1 trauma centers were more likely odds ratio: 5.42, CI, 0.892-32.89; P =0.066) to be compensated. Surgeons required to take facial trauma call were 4.646 (CI, 1.203-17.944; P =0.026) times more likely to take call ≥5 days per month. These results highlight a relatively low proportion of plastic surgeons receiving additional compensation for facial trauma call while work at a level 1 trauma center was associated with higher likelihood of compensation. Surgeons in the Northeast may be compensated less frequently than other regions. Plastic surgeons should be aware of these trends, as they decide how to incorporate facial trauma call into their practice.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Faciales , Cirugía Bucal , Cirugía Plástica , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Traumatismos Faciales/cirugía , Cirujanos Oromaxilofaciales , Centros Traumatológicos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Laryngotracheal trauma is poorly studied and associated with serious morbidity and mortality. This study reports features associated with laryngotracheal fractures, and factors associated with laryngeal fracture repair. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study SETTING: American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP®) METHODS: ACS-TQIP® 2014-2015 participant user data files were queried for laryngotracheal fractures using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th edition encodings. Demographic, diagnostic and procedure characteristics were analyzed with univariate chi-squared analysis and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: We extracted 635 cases of laryngotracheal injury, with a median Injury Severity Score of 16 (IQR: 10 - 25). Most were caused unintentionally (65.7%), followed by assault (28.8%). Blunt trauma (79.5%) was more common than penetrating trauma (20.0%). These trends were upheld in the subgroup of repaired fractures, which made up 12.6% (80/635) of cases. The median length of hospital stay was 6 days (IQR: 3 - 13) in all fractures and 10 days (IQR: 6 - 14) in the subgroup of repaired fractures, while the median length of ICU stay was 4 days (IQR: 2 - 9) in all fractures and 4.5 (IQR: 6 - 14.3) in the subgroup of repaired fractures. Cut/pierce injuries (OR: 4.7, P < 0.001) and ISS (OR: 0.97, pP = 0.026) significantly affected rate of laryngeal fracture repair. CONCLUSION: Laryngotracheal fractures are uncommon but serious injuries. Our results show that penetrating causes of injuries have the shortest time to repair, and that a higher ISS score is negatively associated with repair.
Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud/organización & administración , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Rol Profesional , Técnicos Medios en Salud/economía , Documentación/economía , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/economía , Humanos , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Cirujanos/economíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study include characterizing the practice patterns and testing strategies of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS) fellowship directors (FDs) secondary to COVID-19 and to quantify the impact of COVID-19 on FPRS fellowship training. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Online. METHODS: A survey was sent to all American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery FDs and co-FDs in September 2020. Descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 77 eligible FDs, 45 responded (58.4%) representing a diverse group across the United States. All but 1 FD routinely screened patients for COVID-19 in the preoperative setting. FDs largely believed that universal preoperative testing was cost-effective (66.7%), improved patient safety (80.0%) and health care worker safety (95.6%), and was not burdensome for patients (53.3%). With regard to volume of cosmetic/aesthetic, reconstructive, facial nerve, and trauma surgery, FDs indicated largely no change in volume (34.9%, 71.0%, 68.4%, and 80.0%, respectively) or fellow experience (67.4%, 80.6%, 84.2%, and 80.0%). Half (50.0%) of the FDs reported decreased volume of congenital/craniofacial surgery, but 75.0% did not believe that there was a change in fellow experience. Overall, of the 15 responses indicating "worsened training" across all domains of FPRS, 14 were located in the Northeast (93.33%). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has had the least impact on the volume of reconstructive procedures, facial nerve operations, and trauma surgery and a negative impact on congenital/craniofacial surgery volume, and it has accelerated the demand for cosmetic/aesthetic operations. Overall, the majority of FDs did not feel as though their fellows' trainings would be adversely affected by the ongoing pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Aplicación de la Ley , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A deviated nose can be attributable to multiple anatomical factors, including asymmetric maxilla. A subalar graft helps to correct maxillary hypoplasia and may be a useful tool for correcting a deviated nose. The authors' objective is to show the effects of the subalar graft in improving nostril symmetry and to propose an algorithm for using this graft in open and endonasal rhinoplasty. METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed on patients who had undergone rhinoplasty performed by the senior author (R.W.) from September of 2008 to July of 2015. Patients with at least 3 months of follow-up and adequate photographs were included. The mean follow-up period was 11.0 months (range, 3 to 72 months). A total of 68 patients were included. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were analyzed to measure changes in nasal axis deviation, alar facial angle on base view, alar facial angle on frontal view, and nostril show bilaterally. RESULTS: Of the 68 patients, statistically significant improvement of nasal axis deviation of 4.32 degrees toward the midline was observed. Alar facial angle on base view was improved 1.01 degrees toward the horizontal. Nostril symmetry also improved based on the ratio between the shorter side and the longer side. The mean change in nostril show ratio was 0.19 toward a 1:1 ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have shown that the subalar grafting technique is an important adjunctive technique in rhinoplasty for patients with midfacial asymmetries. This case series demonstrates that this technique can provide sustained results in the correction of the nasal foundation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Asunto(s)
Cartílagos Nasales/trasplante , Nariz/anatomía & histología , Rinoplastia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Sports-related injuries contribute to a considerable proportion of pediatric and adolescent craniofacial trauma, which can have severe and longstanding consequences on physical and mental health. The growing popularity of sports within this at-risk group warrants further characterization of such injuries in order to enhance management and prevention strategies. In this study, the authors summarized key trends in 1452 sports-related injuries among individuals aged 16 to 19 using the American College of Surgeon's Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2014 to 2016. The authors observed a preponderance of injuries associated with skateboarding, snowboarding, and skiing, with significantly higher percentages of traumatic brain injuries among skateboarding-related traumas. Notably, we observed that traumatic brain injurie rates were slightly higher among subjects who wore helmets. Intensive care unit durations and hospital stays appeared to vary by sport and craniofacial fracture. Altogether, this study contributes to the adolescent sports-related injuries and craniofacial trauma literature.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Esquí , Deportes Juveniles , Adolescente , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/prevención & control , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To (1) summarize strategies proposed in the recent otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OTO-HNS) literature for improving the residency application and selection process, (2) evaluate the effects of recently implemented changes to the OTO-HNS match, and (3) discuss recommendations for future changes to the OTO-HNS residency application and selection process. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline Ovid database, and article reference lists. REVIEW METHODS: A structured literature search was performed to identify current English language articles relating to the objectives of this study using the aforementioned data sources, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was limited to submissions published between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous proposals have been made for improving the otolaryngology residency application and selection process and addressing the competitive nature of the Match. These proposals include but are not limited to mandating a secondary essay, implementing consortia and early match processes, using a signaling system, conducting regional and web-based interviews, offering early engagement with interest groups, instituting a hard cap on applications, increasing costs of applying, counseling self-restraint to prospective applicants, and creating application filters. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As the volume of literature surrounding the OTO-HNS Match continues to increase, this review aims to provide a summary of past proposals and serve as a guide for possible future innovations. We propose 3 initiatives that may improve the residency application and selection process for both program and resident, with minimal impact to the current National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Match structure.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Solicitud de Empleo , Otolaringología/educación , Selección de Personal/métodos , Cabeza/cirugía , Humanos , Cuello/cirugía , Selección de Personal/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The Federation of State Medical Boards and the National Board of Medical Examiners recently announced a change in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scoring convention to take effect, at the earliest, on January 1, 2022. There are many reasons for this change, including decreasing medical student stress and incentivizing students to learn freely without solely focusing on Step 1 performance. The question remains how this will affect the future of the otolaryngology-head and neck surgery match. By eradicating Step 1 grades, other factors, such as research, may garner increased importance in the application process. Such a shift may discriminate against students from less well-known medical schools, international medical graduates, and students from low socioeconomic backgrounds, who have fewer academic resources and access to research. Residency programs should try to anticipate such unintended consequences of the change and work on solutions heading into 2022.