A comparison of conventional cytology, DNA ploidy analysis, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

New detection methods with prognostic power are needed for early identification of dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). This study assessed the relative sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology, DNA ploidy analysis with digital image analysis (DIA), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in endoscopic brushing specimens from 92 patients undergoing endoscopic surveillance for BE. FISH used probes to 8q24 (C-MYC), 9p21 (P16), 17q12 (HER2), and 20q13. Four-quadrant biopsies taken every centimeter throughout visible Barrett's mucosa were used as the gold standard. The sensitivity of cytology, DIA, and FISH for low-grade dysplasia was 5%, 5%, and 50%, respectively; for high-grade dysplasia (HGD), 32%, 45%, and 82%, respectively; and for EA, 45%, 45%, and 100%, respectively. FISH was more sensitive (P < .05) than cytology and DIA for low-grade dysplasia, HGD, and EA. The specificity of cytology, DIA, and FISH among patients (n = 14) with tissue showing only benign squamous mucosa was 93%, 86%, and 100% (P = .22), respectively. All patients with a polysomic FISH result had HGD and/or EA within 6 months (n = 33). There was a significant difference between FISH categories (negative, 9p21 loss, gain of a single locus, and polysomy) for progression to HGD/EA (P < .001). These findings suggest that FISH has high sensitivity for the detection of dysplasia and EA in BE patients, with the power to stratify patients by FISH abnormality for progression to HGD/EA. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate the clinical use of FISH.

The development of a fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

The goal of this study was to identify a set of fluorescence in situ hybridization probes for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus. We examined 170 brushing specimens from 138 patients with Barrett's esophagus or a history of Barrett's esophagus using fluorescence in situ hybridization with probes to 5p15, 5q21-22, centromere 7, 7p12, 8q24.12-13, centromere 9, 9p21, centromere 17, 17p13.1, 17q11.2-12, 20q13.2, and centromere Y. Receiver-operator curves were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of various four-probe combinations for detecting low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic biopsy results were used as the gold standard. Numerous four-probe combinations provided a similarly high sensitivity and specificity. Of these, a set consisting of probes to 8q24, 9p21, 17q11.2, and 20q13.2 was found to have a sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of 70% and 89% for low-grade dysplasia, 84% and 93% for high-grade dysplasia, and 94% and 93% for esophageal adenocarcinoma. This probe set was chosen for future prospective clinical evaluations based on its high sensitivity and specificity, its ability to distinguish adenocarcinoma and high-grade or low-grade dysplasia from lesser diagnostic categories, and the favorable signal quality for each of the probes.

Gene copy mapping of the ERBB2/TOP2A region in breast cancer.

ERBB2 is one of the most important oncogenes in breast cancer, and its disordered expression is commonly associated with gene amplification. Amplification of at least one gene near ERBB2, topoisomerase IIalpha (TOP2A), has been shown to be clinically significant, but the prevailing patterns of gene amplification in this region of chromosome arm 17q have not been studied systematically in clinical cases of breast cancer. For characterizing this region, a commercial ERBB2-containing contig probe and 7 probes prepared from single overlapping BAC and P1 clones lying telomeric to ERBB2 and including TOP2A were hybridized to 77 ERBB2-amplified archival breast tumor specimens from 75 patients. The 7 single-clone probes covered a region of approximately 650 kb starting 114 kb telomeric to ERBB2. Amplification of the ERBB2 contig target alone was found in 32% of the tumors, whereas all 8 probe targets were amplified in 12% of the tumors, based on an amplification criterion of there being more than or equal to 2 targets per chromosome 17 centromere. When one of the 7 overlapping probes encompassing TOP2A indicated amplification within a specimen, all probes telomeric to that probe usually showed amplification. Only 5 specimens had regions of normal or deleted targets separating 2 amplified targets. Also, tumors that showed deletion of TOP2A usually showed deletion of one or more contiguous targets. The observed patterns of amplification and deletion are consistent with the break-fusion-bridge model for gene amplification. TOP2A was amplified in 25% of all tumor specimens and was deleted in 24%, based on a deletion criterion of there being fewer than or equal to 0.75 targets per chromosome 17 centromere. Considering the relevance of the TOP2A gene product to anthracycline therapy and the wealth of other cancer-associated genes within the ERBB2/TOP2A region, the pattern of amplification and deletion near ERBB2 and TOP2A may have a dramatic effect on the malignant potential of breast carcinomas and their response to therapy.

Chromosomal gains and genomic loss of p53 and p16 genes in Barrett's esophagus detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization of cytology specimens.

Endoscopic brush cytology is a promising surveillance technique for Barrett's esophagus. Ancillary markers are sought to increase the sensitivity of cytology and allow identification of patients at increased risk for disease progression. To determine if there are specific genetic changes in Barrett's esophagus with associated high-grade dysplasia/intramucosal adenocarcinoma compared to those without dysplasia, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on cytologic specimens using probes to chromosomes and genomic regions previously described as altered in this disease. We studied archival brush cytology slides from 40 Barrett's esophagus patients: 21 with biopsy-proven high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma and 19 with no dysplasia and a minimum 5 years of negative follow-up. Centromeric enumeration probes (CEP) for chromosomes 6, 7, 11, and 12, and locus-specific probes (LSI) for 9p21 (p16 gene), and 17p13.1 (p53 gene) loci along with their corresponding CEP (9 and 17, respectively) were used in this study. A positive FISH result was defined as the presence of cells with >2 CEP signals or with a loss of the LSI signals relative to their corresponding CEP. p53 locus loss and/or aneusomy of chromosomes 6, 7, 11, and 12 abnormalities could be detected by FISH in routinely processed endoscopic brush cytology specimens from 95% of biopsy-positive cases with a specificity of 100%. Interestingly, all five cases with cytologic changes classified as indefinite for dysplasia from patients with a positive biopsy showed changes by FISH. Loss of the p16 locus was seen commonly in patients both with and without dysplasia/carcinoma. Selected biomarkers from this study merit further investigation to determine their potential to detect genetic changes in patients with Barrett's esophagus prior to the development of high-grade dysplasia.

Detection of chromosomal instability in paired breast surgery and ductal lavage specimens by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization.

PURPOSE: Ductal lavage is a new modality for collecting exfoliated breast cells with the goal of detecting early neoplasia. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the correlation between cancer-associated abnormalities in breast lesions and exfoliated breast cells collected by ductal lavage. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed histopathologic, cytologic, and molecular cytogenetic analyses on 39 paired cases of surgically excised breast lesions and ductal lavage specimens collected immediately before surgery. RESULTS: Abnormal cytology was detected in 7 of 15 (47%) of the evaluable lavages collected from malignant cases, versus 4 of 19 (21%) of the evaluable lavages harvested from benign cases for a sensitivity and specificity of 47 and 79%, respectively. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of all evaluable lavages revealed numeric changes on chromosomes 1, 8, 11, and/or 17 in 10 of 14 (71%) specimens from malignant cases versus 2 of 18 (11%) from benign cases for a sensitivity and specificity of 71 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that cytologic and genetic abnormalities associated with breast cancer progression can be detected in ductal lavage cells collected from women with in situ and invasive breast cancer and suggests that fluorescence in situ hybridization may have superior sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional cytology.

A fluorescence in situ hybridization-based assay for improved detection of lung cancer cells in bronchial washing specimens.

BACKGROUND: Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful tool for detecting chromosome and locus-specific changes in tumor cells. We developed a FISH-based assay to detect genetic changes in bronchial washing specimens of lung carcinoma patients. METHODS: The assay uses a mixture of fluorescently labeled probes to the centromeric region of chromosome 1 and to the 5p15, 8q24 (site of the c-myc gene), and 7p12 (site of the EGFR gene) loci to assess cells in bronchial washing specimens for chromosomal abnormalities indicative of lung carcinoma. The FISH assay was performed on 74 specimens that had been assessed previously for evidence of malignancy by routine cytology with Pap staining. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients had histologically confirmed lung carcinoma and 26 patients had a clinical diagnosis that was negative for lung carcinoma. FISH analysis was performed without knowledge of the patient's clinical information. The finding of six or more epithelial cells with gains of two or more chromosome regions was considered a positive FISH result (i.e., evidence of malignancy). The sensitivity of FISH for the detection of lung carcinoma was 82% in this set of specimens compared with a 54% sensitivity by design for cytology (FISH vs. cytology, P = 0.007). FISH detected 15 of 18 specimens that were falsely negative by cytology. The specificities of FISH and cytology were 82% and 100%, respectively, and were not significantly different (P = 0.993). CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate a potential utility of the FISH assay as an adjunct to bronchial washing cytology in routine clinical practice.